原住民食物的滋味政治：商品化下的紅藜味道（再）發現

Taste Politics of Indigenous Food: Commodifying and Rediscovering the Taste of Red Quinoa in Recent Years

黃舒楣(Shu-Mei Huang)；張宇忻(Yu-Hsin Chang)

原住民 ； 紅藜 ； 滋味政治 ； 原味 ； 真實性 ； Indigenous people ； red quinoa ； politics of taste ； indigeneity ； authenticity

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

60卷2期（2022 / 06 / 01）

204 - 248

繁體中文

「天然美味」、「純淨生產」、「超級食物」，過去十年來逐漸浮現於生機飲食門市的紅藜集結了這些想像，成為麵包店架上或連鎖餐廳菜單中美麗原真色彩的來源。對照更早興起於國際飲食市場的南美洲藜麥，臺灣（紅）藜（Chenopodium Formosanum）晚近才華麗轉身從配角變主角，百年前原住民常用之於輔助發酵釀酒，今日它成為營養學研究凸顯為神奇的超級（準）穀物，富含膳食纖維和鐵、鈣質等等，儼然催生了一門紅藜好生意。聚焦食物的滋味政治和實踐，這篇論文檢視臺灣紅藜重新被發現、商品化的過程如何於原住民鄉展開，指出紅藜物性挑戰了構成原鄉美味之原味、真實性論述，紅藜逐漸變成主角卻處境尷尬，去殼不去殼之間不易協調，保留「原味」卻未必有利於市場行銷，由科學和市場口味來定義的「原味」之間有了矛盾，在在具現於紅藜「成為食物」之不易。結論指出作物之特定物性是理解食物滋味政治不可忽視，物性是否能支持「原味」和「真實性」論述之功將影響到作物商品化、進入食品治理及食物實作體系相關過程中，原住民能否克服邊緣處境而積極參與食物滋味政治。

＂Natural taste,＂ ＂purely clean production,＂ ＂superfood,＂ phrases as such reflect the increasing presence of red quinoa in organic food stores in the past decade. Red quinoa seems to embody these imaginaries all at once, becoming source of beautiful authentic colors at bakeries or the menus of chain restaurant in Taiwan. Compared to the much earlier recognition of quinoa grown in and imported from South America, Taiwanese quinoa (officially named Chenopodium Formosanum) has just transformed from a supporting actor to a leading one. Rather than just a supplant material used for millet wine making, red quinoa has become a magic superfood, which is seen as containing rich fibers, iron and calcium, etc., and therefore has contributed to a growing business. Focusing on the taste of red quinoa as food, this paper examines the process of commodifying and rediscovering of taste of red quinoa in recent years and identifies the actors and their practices. Red quinoa has increasingly become a recognized, leading actor and yet ended up within an ambiguous situation. It has become a challenge in considering whether or not it should be husked as the appreciation of its ＂authentic/indigenous taste＂ differs in food science and in marketplace. This research illustrates the process in which commodification of red quinoa unfolds and identifies how its materiality challenges the discourses of authenticity and indigeneity, which makes it difficult for the crop to ＂become food.＂ It concluded that materiality matters in understanding the taste politics of food, which contributes to the commodification of and governance over food, and the participation of Indigenous communities in politics of taste.

1. 日宏煜,羅恩加(2018)。從「酵素」到「醬」：當代泰雅族飲食流變的文化地景。中國飲食文化，14(2)，175-214。
   連結：
2. 李宜澤(2018)。「組裝」醬料的當代風土論述：以臺中地區發酵釀造工坊的生產網絡為例。中國飲食文化，14(2)，71-126。
   連結：
3. 黃舒楣、張宇忻,胡哲豪, Valagas(2021)。紅藜新興經濟中的「小農」製造。台灣社會研究季刊，119，1-65。
   連結：
4. 葉秀燕(2020)。原食力：原住民飲食文化做為食農教育的社會實踐。思與言，58(3)，187-232。
   連結：
5. (2008).紅藜推廣手冊.
6. Ang, Ien,Brand, Jeffrey E.,Noble, Greg,Wilding, Derek(2002).Living Diversity Australia's Multicultural Future.Artarmon, Australia:Special Broadcasting Service.
7. Bannerman, Colin(2006).Indigenous Food and Cookery Books: Redefining Aboriginal Cuisine.Journal of Australian Studies,30,19-36.
8. Bellut, Konstantin,Michel, Maximilian,Zarnkow, Martin,Hutzler, Mathias,Jacob, Fritz,Lynch, Kieran M.,Arendt, Elke K.(2019).On the Suitability of Alternative Cereals, Pseudocereals and Pulses in the Production of Alcohol-reduced Beers by Non-conventional Yeasts.European Food Research and Technology,245(11),2549-2564.
9. Cheung, Sidney,Tan, Chee-Beng(2007).Food and Foodways in Asia: Resource, Tradition and Cooking.London, UK:Routledge.
10. Coté, Charlotte(2016)."Indigenizing" Food Sovereignty. Revitalizing Indigenous Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States.Humanities,5(3),57.
11. Dei, George J. Sefa(Ed.)(2010).Explorations of Educational Purpose Vol. 9, Teaching Africa: Towards a Transgressive Pedagogy.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer.
12. Douglas, Mary(1984).Food in the Social Order: Studies of Food and Festivities in Three American Communities.New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Douglas, Mary(Ed.)(1987).Constructive Drinking: Perspectives on Drink from Anthropology.London, UK:Routledge.
14. Gregg, Benjamin(2019).Indigeneity as Social Construct and Political Tool.Human Rights Quarterly,41(4),823-848.
15. Guthman, Julie(2004).Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
16. Handler, Richard(1986).Authenticity.Anthropology Today,2(1),2-4.
17. Harris, Michele,Nakata, Martin,Carlson, Bronwyn(2013).The Politics of Identity: Emerging Indigeneity.UTS ePRESS.
18. Hsu, Boyang,Lin, S. W.,Inbaraj, B. Stephen,Chen, Bing-Huei(2017).Simultaneous Determination of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids in Chenopodium Formosanum Koidz. (Djulis) by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS.Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis,132,109-116.
19. Huang、 Shu-Mei,Hu, Che-Hao, Valagas,Chang, Yu-Hsin(2021).The Paradox of Cultivating Community Resiliency: Re-agrarianisation and De-peasantisation of Indigenous Farmers in Taiwan.Journal of Rural Studies,83,96-105.
20. Kerssen, Tanya M.(2015).Food Sovereignty and the Quinoa Boom: Challenges to Sustainable Re-peasantisation in the Southern Altiplano of Bolivia.Third World Quarterly,36,489-507.
21. Kimura, Aya Hirata(2013).Hidden Hunger: Gender and the Politics of Smarter Foods.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
22. Lee, Chih-Wei,Chen, Hong-Jhang,Xie, Gui-Ru,Shih, Chun-Kuang(2019).Djulis (Chenopodium Formosanum) Prevents Colon Carcinogenesis via Regulating Antioxidative and Apoptotic Pathways in Rats.Nutrients,11(9),2168.
23. Lévi-Strauss, Claude(1966).The Raw and the Cooked.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
24. Li, Tania Murray(2010).Indigeneity, Capitalism, and the Management of Dispossession.Current Anthropology,51(3),385-414.
25. Li, Tania Murray(2015).Can There Be Food Sovereignty Here?.Journal of Peasant Studies,42(1),205-211.
26. Lindholm, Charles(2008).Culture and Authenticity.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
27. Lu, Wen-Chien,Chan, Yung-Jia,Tseng, Fang-Yu,Chiang, Po-Yuan,Li, Po-Hsien(2019).Production and Physicochemical Properties of Starch Isolated from Djulis (Chenopodium Formosanum).Foods,8(11),551.
28. MacCannell, Dean(1973).Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings.American Journal of Sociology,79,589-603.
29. MacKay, Kathryn(2020).Authenticity and Normative Authority: Addressing the Agency Dilemma with Values of One’s Own.Journal of Social Philosophy,51(3),349-370.
30. McDonell, Emma(2015).Miracle Foods: Quinoa, Curative Metaphors, and the Depoliticization of Global Hunger Politics.Gastronomica,15(4),70-85.
31. Moginon, Debbie Ferdinand,Toh, Poh See,Saad, Mazni(2012).Indigenous Food and Destination Marketing.Current Issues in Hospitality and Tourism: Research and Innovations,London, UK:
32. Noble, Greg(2011)."Bumping into Alterity": Transacting Cultural Complexities.Continuum,25(6),827-840.
33. Ochs, Elinor,Pontecorvo, Clotilde,Fasulo, Alessandra(1996).Socializing Taste.Ethnos,61(1-2),7-46.
34. Parkin, Robert(2000).Proving "Indigenity," Exploiting Modernity: Modalities of Identity Construction in Middle India.Anthropos,95(1),49-63.
35. Romero, Simon and Sara Shahriari (2011). Quinoa’s Global Success Creates Quandary at Home. The New York Times, 2011.3.19.
36. Sulryape Gadhu （2016.2.26）。〈二月盛產紅藜葉魯凱族人傳統食材〉。原視 youtube， 網址：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGhqS5q4Hq0。點閱日期：2020 年 10 月 27 日。
37. Theodossopoulos, Dimitrios(2013).Introduction: Laying Claim to Authenticity: Five Anthropological Dilemmas.Anthropological Quarterly,86(2),337-360.
38. Trilling, Lionel(1972).Sincerity and Authenticity.London, UK:Oxford University Press.
39. World Food Program USA (2016). Cooking Ancestral Quinoa in Colombia. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from World Food Program USA, Website: https://www.wfpusa.org/articles/cooking-ancestral-quinoa-in-colombia/
40. 山田金治（1922）。〈パイワン蕃族の造酒法並に之に用ふる植物〉，《臺灣博物學會會報》，12: 8-10。
41. 王清玲(2010)。作物蟲害非農藥防治資材。農試所特刊，142，61-63。
42. 王瑄茹(2014)。為什麼紅藜進入高級麵包與大明星的餐盤？。康健雜誌，183
43. 行政院農業委員會臺東區農業改良場。〈臺灣藜臺東一號——特色雜糧生力軍〉。行政院農業委員會臺東區農業改良場，網址：https://www.ttdares.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=news&id=8228。點閱日期：2021 年 11 月 30 日。
44. 更生日報（2017.6.30）。〈摩斯漢堡進駐臺東，開發紅藜與洛神特色商品〉。臺東網路農場（臺東縣政府農情資訊），網址：https://efarmer.taitung.gov.tw/zh-tw/Event/News/583/。點閱日期：2021 年 2 月 27 日。
45. 信豐農場。〈百年營養主食臺灣紅藜〉。信豐農場，網址：http://www.sinfongfarm.com/index.php/quinoa?m=1。點閱日期：2020 年 10 月 25 日。
46. 施政豪(2019)。臺北，國立師範大學地理學研究所。
47. 胡家瑜(2004)。賽夏儀式食物與 Tatinii（先靈）記憶─從文化意象和感官經驗的關連談起。物與物質文化，臺北:
48. 原視（2013.5.9）。〈早期祖先紅藜傳統煮法以及生活應用〉。原視 youtube 頻道，網址：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CY_EQAoBnXA。點閱日期：2020.10.27。
49. 徐炳文（2019.1.18）。〈高雄全台首賣現場示範紅藜入年菜辦桌〉。風傳媒，網址：https://www.storm.mg/localarticle/842984。點閱日期：2020 年 10 月 27 日。
50. 張瑋琦(2012)。原住民成為有機專業農歷程的省思：知識、食物主權與身體規訓。台灣原住民研究論叢，12，245-289。
51. 陳美惠,李來錫,童毓欣(2017)。屏東北排灣及西魯凱原住民之植物知識結構─以常見食用作物為例。中華林學季刊，50(3)，195-213。
52. 曾奕慈、何佳陽（2018.2.19）。〈科技改良紅藜種植方式創造循環經濟〉。TVBS NEWS， 網址：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrVEwFPtNC8。點閱日期：2020 年 10 月 27 日。
53. 黃至君,蔡碧仁(2012)。,科技部。
54. 楊遠波(2008)。,行政院農委會林務局。
55. 葉秀燕(2009)。從原「汁」原「味」到原「知」原「衛」：反思原住民風味餐廳的文化社會意涵。台灣人文生態研究，11(1)，29-60。
56. 廖靜蕙（2014）。〈不再流浪：拉勞蘭小米產業族人愛種戀著土地〉。環境資訊中心，網址：https://e-info.org.tw/node/100064。點閱日期：2020 年 10 月 27 日。
57. 蔡碧仁(2010)。穀類紅寶石─台灣藜之保健價值及開發。屏科大研發專刊，5，3-4。
58. 鄭伊娟(2010)。臺灣藜之開發應用成果介紹。農政與農情，217
59. 賴韋廷,黃宥蓁(2018).走一條藜家不遠的路：荒田變農金凋零小村翻身黃金部落的臺東紅藜創生記.臺北:商業週刊.

1. (2023)。農耕實踐與人地關係跨域連結：臺灣原住民族社群與香港青年。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，61(3)，209-259。