從碩士論文口試委員探討臺灣圖書資訊學界社會網路及研究主題多樣性

Representing Social Network and Research Diversity of Library and Information Science in Taiwan Using Thesis Advisory Network

10.6245/JLIS.2014.402/630

董采維(Tsai-Wei Tung)；唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang)

碩士論文 ； 口試委員 ； 圖書資訊學 ； 社會網絡 ； 多樣性指標 ； Thesis Committee ； Social Network ； Research Diversity ； Library and Information Science

圖書館學與資訊科學

40卷2期（2014 / 10 / 01）

47 - 66

繁體中文

圖書資訊學是一個實務發展先於理論的學科，因而與其他領域有頻繁的知識交流，以往關於跨領域學科互動的研究多基於單向引用關係，缺乏實際互動的交流研究，故本研究從圖書資訊學科的碩士論文審查行為切入，試圖探討國內圖書資訊學與其他學科交流的現況。本研究以論文審查委員共現關係建置社會網絡，以論文委員參與的論文主題與合作對象屬性當作多樣性來源，應用三種指標來計算多樣性，並將網絡特性與多樣性結合，期待能以不同方法探究圖資界教師的合作模式與其研究主題、合作對象屬性多樣性的關係。研究結果顯示，近六年碩士論文研究主題以「使用者群服務」與「資訊系統與檢索」兩者最多，論文審查委員之學科專長前三名為圖書資訊（22%）、電算機（17.8%）與教育（16.8%），顯現出與其他學科的高度交流。社會網絡則以交大圖資凝聚力最高，其他七校不相上下；臺大圖資明顯傾向邀請校內教師擔任論文委員，而輔大圖資的合作對象專長多樣性最高，分布也最平均。

Drawing from thesis committee membership data, the study took a social analytical approach to analyze the social and intellectual structure of the field of LIS (Library and Information Science in Taiwan). Specifically, the study attempt to study: firstly, the faculty collaboration network; and secondly, the degree and nature of inter-disciplinary collaboration, as reflected in the composition of the thesis committees. A total 751 Master's theses published by the eight LIS in the periods from 2006 to 2011 were analyzed. Data extracted included the composition of each committee member-ship and research topics covered in these theses. Furthermore, data about the faculty's background were also collected, including gender, seniority, department affiliation, highest degree received, with which the faculty's degree of interdisciplinary collaboration, as reflected in the thesis committee they appeared, could be analyzed. With the theses committee composition data, networks of faculty collaboration were generated where each faulty member were represented by a node, and the strength of their collaboration was represented by the frequency of their co-appeared in these committees. Various network measures, such as centrality, clustering coefficient, E-I index were used to study the cohesion of each department and the LIS filed as a whole. Three diversity measures: Shannon, Simpson, and Gini coefficient, were used to assess the degree of interdisciplinarity of each department and faculty. Regression analyses showed that the number of these advised, seniority, and thesis topic diversity were the significant predictor of a faculty's centrality in the LIS network.

1. 何蕙菩(2008)。台北市=Taipei city，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department and Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
   連結：
2. 袁大鈺、唐牧群(2010)。跨領域學術社群之智識網絡結構初探：以臺灣科技與社會研究為例。圖書資訊學刊，8(2)，125-163。
   連結：
3. 羅思嘉、陳光華、林純如(2001)。圖書資訊學學術文獻主題分類體系之研究。圖書資訊學刊，16，185-207。
   連結：
4. Britannica, Encyclopædia. (2013). Claude shannon.Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/538577/Claude-Shannon
5. Isaac, P. D.,Quinlan, S. V.,Walker, M. M.(1992).Faculty perceptions of the doctoral dissertation.The Journal of Higher Education,63(3),241-268.
6. Liu, Y.,Liang, M.,Zhou, Y.,He, Y.,Hao, Y.,Song, M.,Chunshui Y.,Haihong L.,Zhening L.,Jiang, T.(2008).Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia.Brain,131(4),945-961.
7. Rafols, I.,Meyer, M.(2010).Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience.Scientometrics,82(2),263-287.
8. Stokes, T. D.,Hartley, J. A.(1989).Coauthorship, social-structure and influence within specialties.Social Studies of Science,19(1),101-125.
9. Sugimoto, C. R.,Ni, C.,Russell, T. G.,Bychowski, B.(2011).Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: An examination of dissertation networks in library and information science.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(9),1808-1828.
10. Tang, R.(2004).Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,41(1),54-63.
11. White, H. D.,Wellman, B.,Nazer, N.(2004).Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,55(2),111-126.
12. 王梅玲(2005)。臺灣圖書資訊學系所教師專調查報告。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊，25，27-71。
13. 余詠南(2008)。台北市=Taipei city，世新大學資訊傳播學研究所=Department of Information and Communications, Shih Hsin University。
14. 梁瓊方(2005)。台北市=Taipei city，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department and Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
15. 陳馥蓉(2011)。台北市=Taipei city，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department and Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
16. 楊美華、陳冠穎(2006)。臺灣地區圖書資訊學研究人力與研究成果分析。在數位傳播時代圖書資訊學研究與教育學術研討會，台北市=Taipei city:
17. 歐陽崇榮、羅麗莉、劉昌柏(2011)。從博碩士論文分析探討台灣圖書資訊學之研究。資訊科學與圖書館學進行中論文發表會，新北市=New taipei city:

1. (2023)。我國法實證研究社群的發展現況—知識結構、引用網絡與質性分析。中研院法學期刊，33，1-80。