實務與研究的整合：以實證為基礎之圖書資訊學研究初探

Bridging the Gap of Practice and Research: A Preliminary Investigation of Evidence-based Practice for Library and Information Science Research

10.6245/JLIS.2015.412/667

吳寂絹(Chi-Chuan Wu)；卜小蝶(Hsiao-Tieh Pu)

圖書資訊學教育 ； 研究與實務落差 ； 實證圖書館與資訊實務 ； Library and Information Science Education ； Research Practice Gap ； Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice

圖書館學與資訊科學

41卷2期（2015 / 10 / 01）

48 - 76

繁體中文

實務與研究之間的落差，常見於具有專業實踐與學術研究的領域。如何銜接落差，一直是圖書資訊學領域相當關心的議題。本文介紹近年來在歐美地區興起以實證為基礎之圖書資訊學研究內涵與發展，並以其中較具代表性之期刊Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice 為對象，透過內容分析了解其所發表文章之作者群背景、研究方法與主題。研究結果顯示美國與加拿大為主要貢獻國家；70%的第一作者為圖書館從業人員；76%文章為單一機構作者，少見跨國合著，呈現在地研究特性；合著模式以圖書館之間合作為主，圖書館與教學單位間的合作比例並不高；所採用的研究方法超過60%集中於問卷調查、訪談及內容分析等；研究主題幾乎涵蓋所有圖書資訊類別，其中又以「資訊素養與教學」、「資訊需求與資訊行為實徵研究」及「參考資訊服務／數位參考服務」等三類主題較為熱門（分佔15%、10%及8%）；文章所採用的資料來源多為圖書館實際營運所得，且72%文章皆載明研究結果之具體應用方向，相較一般學術期刊論文，更注重研究之具體應用價值。臺灣不乏具備研究能力之圖資專業人員，本文以歐美相關研究為鏡，期盼促發更多館員對從事實證研究之興趣，以進一步提升實務決策品質及建立專業形象。

The gap between practice and research is commonly found in disciplines with both of professional practitioners and academic researchers. How to bridge the gap is also a continuing concern in the field of Library and Information Studies. This article describes the recent development of Evidence‐based Practice for Library and Information Science Research (EBLIP), and provides analysis of the journal EBLIP including its authors’ backgrounds, methods, and topics. The results show that the United States and Canada are the two major nations of contributors; more than 70% of first authors are librarians; 76% of the articles were contributed by one single institute, co‐authorship by cross‐nation institutes were rarely seen, and demonstrates local research interests; type of co‐authored agency is primarily among libraries; 60% methods employed include questionnaires, interviews and content analysis; the coverage of topics is rather broad, and the top three categories of research topics include Information Literacy & Instruction, Information Needs & Seeking Behavior, and Reference Services / Digital Reference Services (15%, 10%, and 8%); many datasets were obtained from real library practice, and 72% of articles provide specific implications for applications which highlight the value of implementation. Many librarians have the research capability, and this article serves as a purpose to introduce the evidence‐based research and encourage more such research done in Taiwan. Hopefully it may benefit and further enhance the quality of library decision‐making and their professional image.

1. 張英陣(2006)。Mind the Gap：研究與實務的整合。社會政策與社會工作學刊，10(2)，87-116。
   連結：
2. 陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(2006)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，147-171。
   連結：
3. 蘇諼(2004)。從實證醫學的發展談醫學圖書館的角色。圖書資訊學刊，2(1)，63-72。
   連結：
4. Special Libraries Association (2001). SLA research statement.
5. Gorman, G.E. (2004). Evidence-based information practice comes of age. Emerald Library Link. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/librarians/Information_Management/info_curves2.jsp.
6. 臺北榮民總醫院教師培育中心（2007）。實證醫學教學證據等級。檢自：http://fdc.vghtpe.gov.tw/web2/index_11.asp【Faculty Development Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital (2007). Level of evidence. Retrieved from http://fdc.vghtpe.gov.tw/web2/index_11.asp】
7. Bayley, L.,McKibbon, A.(2006).Evidence-based librarianship: A personal perspective from the medical/nursing realm.Library Hi Tech,24(3),317-323.
8. Bexon, N.,Booth, A.,Brice, A.(2003).Using research in practice.Health Information and Libraries Journal,20(4),240-243.
9. Blick, A.R.(1984).Information science research versus the practitioner.Representation and exchange of knowledge as a basis for information processes,New York, NY:
10. Booth, A.(2009).A bridge too far? stepping stones for evidence based practice in an academic context.New Review of Academic Librarianship,15(1),3-34.
11. Booth, A.(2009).Is now the time for an international association of EBLIP?.Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,4(3),68-71.
12. Booth, A.(2000).Librarian heal thyself: Evidence based librarianship, useful, practicable, desirable?.the 8th International Congress on Medical Librarianship,London, UK:
13. Booth, A.(2003).Bridging the research-practice gap? The role of evidence based librarianship.New Review of Information and Library Research,9(1),3-23.
14. Booth, A.(2006).Using research in practice.Health Information and Libraries Journal,23,69-72.
15. Booth, A.(Ed.),Brice, A.(Ed.)(2004).Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals.London:Facet Publishing.
16. Carnine, D.(1997).Bridging the research-to-practice gap.Exceptional Children,63(4),513-521.
17. Clyde, L.A.(2006).The basis for evidence-based practice: Evaluating the research evidence.New Library World,107(5/6),180-192.
18. Connor, E.(Ed.)(2007).Evidence-based librarianship: Case studies and active learning exercises.Oxford:Chandos.
19. Crumley, E.,Koufogiannakis, D.(2002).Developing evidence-based librarianship: Practical steps for implementation.Health Libraries Journal,19(2),61-70.
20. Cullen, R.(1998).Does performance measurement improve organisational effectiveness?.Proceedings of the Second Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services
21. Deadrick, D.,Gibson, P.(2007).An examination of the research-practice gap in HR: Comparing topics of interest to HR academics and HR professionals.Human Resource Management Review,17(2),131-139.
22. Edmond, T.,Rochman, E.,Megivern, D.,Howard, M.,Williams, C.(2006).Integrating evidence-based practice and social work field education.Journal of Social Work Education,42(2),377-396.
23. Eldredge, J.(2000).Evidence-based librarianship: An overview.Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,88,289-302.
24. Eldredge, J.(1997).Evidence-based librarianship: A commentary for hypothesis.Hypothesis,11(3),4-7.
25. Eldredge, J.(2006).Evidence-based librarianship: The EBL process.Library Hi Tech,24(3),341-354.
26. Eldredge, J.(2002).Evidence-based librarianship levels of evidence.Hypothesis,16,10-13.
27. Given, L.(2006).Qualitative research in evidence-based practice: A valuable partnership.Library Hi Tech,24(3),376-386.
28. Glynn, L.(2006).A critical appraisal tool for library and information research.Library Hi Tech,24(3),387-399.
29. Gray, J.A.M.(2001).Evidence-Based Healthcare.Churchill:Livingstone.
30. Haddow, G.,Klobas, J.E.(2004).Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap.Library & Information Science Research,26(1),29-43.
31. Hall, H.(2010).Promoting the priorities of practitioner research engagement.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,42(2),83-88.
32. Henderson, J.L.,MacKay, S.,Peterson-Badali, M.(2006).Closing the research-practice gap: Factors affecting adoption and implementation of a children's mental health program.Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology,35(1),2-12.
33. Higgins, J.P.T.,Green, S.(2008).Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Son.
34. Hjörland, B.(2011).Evidence-based practice: An analysis based on the philosophy of science.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(7),1301-1310.
35. Hodgkinson, G.P.,Rousseau, D.M.(2009).Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It's already happening!.Journal of Management Studies,46,534-546.
36. Koufogiannakis, D.(2011).Considering the place of practice-based evidence within Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP).Library and Information Research,35(111),41-57.
37. Koufogiannakis, D.,Crumley, E.(2002).Evidence-based librarianship.Feliciter,48,112-114.
38. Koufogiannakis, D.,Crumley, E.(2006).Research in librarianship: Issues to consider.Library Hi Tech,24(3),324-340.
39. Koufogiannakis, D.,Slater, L.,Crumley, E.(2004).A content analysis of librarianship research.Journal of Information Science,30(3),227-239.
40. Lerdal, S.N.(2006).Evidence-based librarianship: Opportunity for law librarians?.Law Library Journal,98(2),33-60.
41. Lipu, S.(Ed.),Williamson, K.(Ed.),Lloyd, A.(Ed.)(2007).Exploring methods in information literacy research: Topics in Australasian library and information studies.N.S.W.:Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
42. Mancall, J.C.,Fork, D.,McIsaac, M.S.(1982).Avenues of dissemination: Researcher to practitioner.School Library Media Quarterly,10(3),254-262.
43. McClure, C.R.(1989).Increasing the usefulness of research for library managers: Propositions, issues, and strategies.Library Trends,38(2),280-294.
44. McKechnie, (E.F.) L.,Julien, H.,Oliphant, T.(2008).Communicating research findings to library and information science practitioners: A study of ISIC papers from 1996 to 2000.Information Research,13(4),375.
45. McKnight, S.,Booth, A.(2010).Identifying customer expectations is key to evidence based service delivery.Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,5(1),26-31.
46. McNicol, S.(2005).The importance of evaluation and evidence-based skills to improving service delivery.Library & Information Research,29(93),26-34.
47. Mulhall, A.(2001).Bridging the research-practice gap: Breaking new ground in health care.International Journal of Palliative Nursing,7(8),389-394.
48. Partridge, H.,Hallam, G.(2006).Educating the millennial generation for evidence based information practice.Library High Tech,24(3),400-419.
49. Partridge, H.,Thorpe, C.,Edwards, S. L.,Hallam, G.(2007).The practitioner's experience and conception of evidence based library and information practice: An exploratory analysis.the 4th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference,Chapel Hill-Durham, USA.:
50. Powell, R.R.,Baker, L.M.,Mika, J.J.(2002).Library and information science practitioners and research.Library & Information Science Research,24(1),49-72.
51. Riggs, D.E.(1994).Losing the foundation of understanding.American Libraries,25,449.
52. Ryan, P.(2006).EBL and Library Assessment: Two Solitudes?.Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,53(1),18-20.
53. Salvard, D.,Alcock, E.(2007).Research and evidence-based librarianship in the corporate and academic library: Two recent graduates' perspectives.Feliciter,53(1),18-20.
54. Schön, D.(1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.U.S.A:Basic Books.
55. Senn, J.(1998).The challenge of relating IS research to practice.Information Resources Management Journal,11(1),23-28.
56. Sur, R.L.,Dahm, P.(2011).History of evidence-based medicine.Indian Journal of Urology,27(4),487-489.
57. Thomson, M.(1998).Closing the gap between nursing research and practice.Evidenced-Based Nursing,1(1),7-8.
58. Thorpe, C.,Partridge, H.,Edwards, S.L.(2008).Are library and information professionals ready for evidence based practice?.Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) 2008 Biennial Conference,Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia:
59. Todd, R.J.(2006).School libraries and evidence-based practice: An integrated approach to evidence.School Libraries Worldwide,12(2),31-37.
60. Tucker, B.,Parker, L.(2014).In our ivory towers? The research-practice gap in management accounting.Accounting and Business Research,44(2),104-143.
61. Turner, K.J.(2002).Do information professionals use research published in LIS journals?.Proceedings of the 68th IFLA Council and General Conference,Glasgow:
62. Walters, W.H.,Wilder, E.I.(2015).Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012.Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology
63. West, K.(2003).The librarianship conference report: Convincing evidence.Information Outlook,7,12-14.
64. 尤小平(2006)。圖書館界應多些實證性研究：由海峽兩岸圖書資訊學術研討會引發的思考。圖書館學研究，10，2-3。
65. 王崇德(1991)。情報科學原理。臺北市=Taipei City:農業科學資料服務中心=Nongye kexue ziliao fuwu zhongxin。
66. 王敏行(2008)。身心障礙者職業重建體系的新思維。臺灣勞工季刊，16，42-47。
67. 王梅玲(2011)。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士教育回顧與展望。圖書館學與資訊科學，37(2)，20-40。
68. 尼爾．史美舍、陳光中譯、秦文力譯(1996)。社會學。臺北市=Taipei City:桂冠=Guiguan。
69. 邱子恒(2007)。以實證精神規劃圖書館之服務。中國民國圖書館學會會訊，15(3/4)，39-42。
70. 邱五芳(2008)。中國圖書館學應進一步弘揚實證研究。中國圖書館學報，34(1)，16-21。
71. 胡述兆、王梅玲(1994)。英美圖書資訊學碩士教育之比較。圖書館學與資訊科學，20(2)，40-63。
72. 國家圖書館輔導組編輯(2012)。中華民國一○一年圖書館年鑑。臺北市=Taipei City:國家圖書館=National Center Library。
73. 範並思(2004)。20 世紀西方與中國的圖書館學︰基于德爾斐法測評的理論史綱。北京市=Beijing:北京圖書館出版社=Beijing tushuguan chubanshe。
74. 賴鼎銘(2004)。資訊科學的思考。臺北市=Taipei City:文華圖書館管理=Wenhua tushuguan guanli。
75. 謝進昌(2011)。國內後設分析應用研究發展之概況。教育研究月刊，212，77-84。
76. 謝進昌(2010)。國內教育學門系統性文獻評閱策略及後設分析發展現況與建議。國立台南大學教育研究學報，44(2)，133-156。
77. 蘇勳璧、鄧振華、蘇治原(2006)。實證醫學（Evidence Based Medicine, EBM）的認識與應用。臺灣醫檢會報，21(3)，48-56。
78. 黨洪莉(2009)。實證圖書館學的思考。圖書情報工作，53(12)，35-37+77。

1. 石易儒(Yi-Ru Shih);鄭瑋(Wei Jeng)(2023)。臺灣犯罪學開放研究資料及典藏庫實踐：信任、契約與價值的流動。圖書資訊學刊。21(1)。137-168。