微觀政治視角下的宗教空間的社會與文化建構－以中國大陸威甯石門檻基督教會為例

Micro-politics and the Socio-cultural Reconstruction of Religious Space-A Case Study of the Christian Church in Shimenkan, Weining, Mainland China

10.6161/jgs.2013.70.03

袁振傑(Zhen-Jie Yuan)；錢俊希(Jun-Xi Qian)；朱竑(Hong Zhu)

空間政治 ； 微觀政治 ； 宗教地理 ； 貴州石門檻 ； 苗文 ； spatial politics ； micro-politics ； the geography of religion ； Shimenkan ； Miao Script

地理學報

70期（2013 / 09 / 01）

47 - 67

繁體中文

伴隨著人文地理學對空間政治的日益關注，國際宗教地理研究體現出對宗教空間政治性的極大興趣。宗教空間在神聖與世俗的碰撞中經歷持續建構的過程，如族群文化與身份認同就在宗教空間中不斷得到再生產。微觀政治立足微觀、關注地方、結合宏觀的特性使其成為宗教政治性研究的有益視角。文章以中國大陸貴州石門檻基督教會為對象，分析教會領導下的「苗文保護運動」過程。發現在中國世俗化的社會背景下，地方少數民族文化與宗教的有機結合，建構了宗教空間之上「我者」的文化空間。「我者」文化空間具有其本質的地理、社會及政治屬性，能夠為少數民族文化提供保護，達到抵抗地方行政權力對民族認同的排斥，進而實現微觀層面上的策略性「政治越界」，有效地保護少數民族文化的傳承與發展。

Alongside the tendency in human geography of shifting to the relationship between space and politics in examining the social and cultural construction of space and spatiality, the research on the geography of religion has shown profound interests on the political potential of religious space. Religious space is always under construction, with the constant dynamic between the scared and the secular. Simultaneously, culture and identity are undergoing drastic reproduction through the participation and appropriation of scared space. Micro-politics, which focuses on micro-level political and cultural processes, but simultaneously reflects and re-shapes macro-level social and cultural fabrics, is a useful lens through which we can examine the intersection of human agency, power relations and cultural identity in local religious space. Through a case study of a ”Miao Script protection movement” staged through Christian Church in Shimenkan, Guizhou, we argued that the religious space holds the potential to become a cultural space of ”us” by combining sacred practices with the renegotiation of minority ethnic identity. This space, albeit non-confrontational and less radical, possesses the political energy to resist the exclusion of minority ethnic identity by the local state, demonstrating the tactical ”transgression” by religious space in a micro-level cultural politics and its potential of powerfully reinforcing local ethnic identity.

1. 李元龍 [Li, Y. L.] 2011。野火燒不盡的老苗文 [Ye huo shao bu jin de lao miao wen; The cannot-destroyed old Miao Script]。http://www.shimenkan.org/info/mw/ (擷取日期 : 2011.09.20)。
2. 王建光 [Wang, J. G.] 1938。苗民的文字 [Miao min de wen zi; The script of Miao]。貴州苗族考 [Gui zhou miao zu kao]，楊萬選、楊漢先、淩純聲主編 [eds. W. X. Yang, H. X. Yang, and C. S. Lin]，253。貴陽 [Guiyang] : 貴州大學出版社 [Guizhou University Press]。
3. Bhabha, H. K.(1990).The location of culture.London:Routledge.
4. Bourdieu, P.(1990).The logic of practice.Cambridge:Polity.
5. Brace, C.,Bailey, A. R.,Harvey, D. C.(2006).Religion, place and space: A framework for investigating historical geographies of religious identities and communities.Progress in Human Geography,30(1),28-43.
6. Buttimer, A.(2006).Afterword: Reflections on geography, religion, and belief systems.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,96(1),197-202.
7. Coddington, K. S.(2011).Spectral geographies: Haunting and everyday state practices in colonial and present-day Alaska.Social and Cultural Geography,12(7),743-56.
8. Collins-Kreiner, N.(2010).The geography of pilgrimage and tourism: Transformations and implications for applied geography.Applied Geography,30(1),153-64.
9. Collins-Kreiner, N.(2008).Religion and politics: New religious sites and spatial transgression in Israel.The Geographical Review,98(2),197-213.
10. Cresswell, T.(1996).In place / out of place: Geography, ideology, and transgression.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
11. Doherty, J.(ed.),Graham, E.(ed.),Mallek, M.(ed.)(1992).Postmodernism and the social sciences.London:Macmillan.
12. Domosh, M.(1998).Those "gorgeous incongruities": Polite politics and public space on the streets of nineteenth-century New York city.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,88(2),209-26.
13. Dunn, K. M.(2001).Representations of Islam in the politics of mosque development in Sydney.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,92(3),291-308.
14. Elden, S.(2001).Mapping the present: Heidegger, Foucault and the project of a spatial history.London:Continuum.
15. Faubion, J. D.(1982).Power.New York:The New Press.
16. Foucault, M.(1976).Discipline and punish: The Birth of the prison.London:Allen Lane.
17. Giddens, A.(1984).The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.Berkeley:University of California Press.
18. Gökarıksel, B.(2009).Beyond the officially sacred: Religion, secularism, and the body in the production of subjectivity.Social and Cultural Geography,10(6),657-74.
19. Hecht, R. D.(1994).The construction and management of sacred time and space: Sabta Nur in the church of the Holy sepulcher.Now here: Space, time and modernity,Berkeley:
20. Hetherington, K.(1997).The badlands of modernity: Heterotopia and social ordering.London:Routledge.
21. Holloway, J.(2006).Enchanted spaces: The séance, affect, and geographies of religion.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,96(1),182-7.
22. Ivakhiv, A.(2006).Toward a geography of "religion": Mapping the distribution of an unstable signifier.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,96(1),169-75.
23. Jamoul, L.,Wills, J.(2008).Faith in politics.Urban Studies,45(10),2035-56.
24. Kong, L.(2001).Mapping "new" geographies of religion: Politics and poetics in modernity.Progress in Human Geography,25(2),211-33.
25. Kong, L.(1993).Negotiating conceptions of "sacred space": A case study of religious buildings in Singapore.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,18(3),342-58.
26. Kong, L.(2005).Religious schools: For spirit, (f)or nation.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,23(4),615-31.
27. Kong, L.(1993).Ideological hegemony and the political symbolism of religious buildings in Singapore.Environment und Planning D: Society and Space,11(1),23-45.
28. Kong, L.(2006).Religion and spaces of technology: Constructing and contesting nation, transnation and place.Environment and Planning A, Special Issue on Geographies and Politics of Transnationalism,38(5),903-18.
29. Kong, L.(2010).Global shifts, theoretical shifts: Changing geographies of religion.Progress in Human Geography,34(6),755-76.
30. Lefebvre, H.(1991).The production of space.Oxford:Blackwell.
31. Mann, P. S.(1994).Micro-politics: Agency in a postfeminist era.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
32. Marston, S. A.(2000).The social construction of scale.Progress in Human Geography,24(2),219-42.
33. Mitchell, D.(2002).Controlling space, controlling scale: Migratory labour, free speech, and regional development in the American West.Journal of Historical Geography,28(1),63-84.
34. Newman, D.,Paasi, A.(1998).Fences and neighbors in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography.Progress in Human Geography,22(2),186-207.
35. Nolan, M. L.,Nolan, S.(1992).Religious sites as tourism attractions in Europe.Annals of Tourism Research,19(1),68-78.
36. Pacione, M.(1999).The relevance of religion for a relevant human geography.Scottish Geographical Journal,115(2),117-31.
37. Percival, G. L.,Johnson, M.,Neiman, M.(2009).Representation and local policy: Relating county-level public opinion to policy outputs.Political Research Quarterly,62(1),164-77.
38. Philo, C.(1992).Foucault's geography.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,10(2),137-62.
39. Rose, G.(1995).The interstitial perspective: A review essay on Homi Bhabha's The Location of Culture.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,13(3),365-73.
40. Valins, O.(2003).Stubborn identities and the construction of socio-spatial boundaries: Ultra-orthodox Jews living in contemporary Britain.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,28(2),158-75.
41. Vukonic, B.(2002).Religion, tourism and economics: A convenient symbiosis.Tourism Recreation Research,27(2),59-64.
42. Whitford, A. B.(2007).Decentralized policy implementation.Political Research Quarterly,60(1),17-30.
43. Yorgason, E.,Della, D. V.(2009).Geography, religion, and emerging paradigms: Problematizing the dialogue.Social and Cultural Geography,10(6),629-37.
44. Zhou, M. L.,Fishma, J. A.(2003).Multilingualism in China: The politics of writing reforms for minority languages 1949-2002.Berlin:Mouto de Gruyter.
45. 石朝江(1998)。苗族古代文字概說。貴州文史叢刊，1998(1)，60-2。
46. 李廷貴、張山、周光大(1996)。苗族歷史與文化。北京=Beijing:中央民族出版社=The Central National Publishing House。
47. 李東旭、吳鐵柱(2011)。福柯的微觀權力的機制研究。世紀橋，2011(1)，34-5。
48. 李德虎、薛景(2007)。清末貴州石門檻苗族信仰基督教原因淺析。貴州民族研究，27(2)，159-62。
49. 沈紅(2006)。結構與主體：激蕩的文化社區石門檻。北京=Beijing:社會科學文獻出版社=Social Sciences Academic Press。
50. 肖虹(2004)。如何看待中國的宗教政策。中國宗教，2004(5)，57-9。
51. 宗文(1987)。基督教循道公會在威甯石門檻興辦的教育事業。貴州民族研究，30(2)，36-41。
52. 東雯編、朱群慧編(1989)。貴州石門坎—開創中國近現代民族教育之先河。北京=Beijing:中國文史出版社=Chinese Literature Press。
53. 阿信(2009)。用生命愛中國—伯格理傳。鄭州=Zhengzhou:河南教育出版社=He Nan Educational Press。
54. 韋啟光(1981)。黔滇川邊區苗族信仰基督教試析。貴州社會科學，7(4)，64-73。
55. 張坦(1992)。「窄門」前的石門檻：基督教文化與川滇黔邊苗族社會。昆明=Kunming:雲南教育出版社=Yunnan Educational Press。
56. 張慧真(2009)。教育與族群認同—貴州石門檻苗族的個案研究（1900-1949）。北京=Beijing:民族出版社=Nationalities Press。
57. 陳金龍(2001)。建國初期中國共產黨的宗教政策略論。民族研究，2001(2)，12。
58. 龍伯亞編(1985)。苗族简史。貴陽=Guiyang:貴州民族出版社=Guizhou Ethnic Publishing。
59. 蘇文清編(2006)。威寧苗族百年實錄。貴陽=Guiyang:貴州民族出版社=Guizhou Ethnic Publishing。
60. 鐘煥然(1957)。西南各少數民族皈依基督教五十年史。