题名

整合多尺度自然與行政單元評估南投縣崩塌災害風險

并列篇名

Integration of Multi-scale Natural and Administrative Units for Assessing the Landslide Hazard Risk in Nantou County

DOI

10.6161/jgs.202008_(96).0002

作者

王素芬(Su-Fen Wang);陳毅青(Yi-Chin Chen);宋承恩(Cheng-En Song)

关键词

崩塌潛勢模型 ; 危害暴露 ; 社會脆弱度 ; 災害風險 ; landslide susceptibility model ; hazard exposure ; social vulnerability ; disaster risk

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

96期(2020 / 08 / 01)

页次

27 - 54

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究透過整合跨尺度的崩塌潛勢,社會脆弱性和危害暴露量分析,來建立南投縣崩塌災害風險地圖。首先,崩塌潛勢機率係採用統計方法為研究取徑,透過網格基礎的崩塌潛勢模型進行評估。第二,社會脆弱性使用包含防災訓練次數、消防人力面積比例、避難所的距離、撫養比、淨綜合收入和低收入家庭數量等六個不同尺度的主題圖計算。第三,危害暴露量則是考慮人口與土地利用狀況,採用多層多類別衡量模型,重新分配人口,提高暴露量估算的準確性。在網格層級進行風險指標計算後,整合至坡單元和最小統計區進行災害風險評估。研究結果顯示,透過網格進行整合,能突破現有單元限制並進行跨尺度的評估,但缺點為無法符合現有救災的體制。坡單元能符合崩塌的地形特性;最小統計區是最基礎的統計單元,其劃分亦參考高程與坡度等地形特性和人口分佈狀況及密度,可做為風險評估的基本單元,不僅能夠突顯各村里之間的風險差異,也呈現村里內部風險的空間變異,符合現行防災人員所需之更詳盡且實用的風險空間資料。

英文摘要

This work adopts a multi-scale approach to integrating landslide hazards, social vulnerability and hazard exposure to develop a landslide disasters risk map in Nantou. First, landslide hazards are assessed by using a statistical and grid-based landslide susceptibility model. Second, social vulnerability is calculated by using six multi-scale maps, including frequency of disaster prevention training, ratio of firepower, distance to shelter, dependency ratio, net consolidated income and number of low-income households. Third, hazard exposure is determined based on demographics data and land-use map for considering both non-spatial and spatial factors. A multi-layer, multi-class dasymetric model (MLMCD) is applied to redistribute the human population for improving the spatial accuracy of exposure assessment. The natural and human factors are evaluated based on the slope-unit and minims administrative units, respectively. Analytical results show that use of grid-based units can break through the limitation of administrative districts, but conflicts with the organization of current rescue management. Conversely, the slope unit is relevant to the landslide distribution, and the minims administrative unit was originally developed to meet the distributions of topography and population. This approach presents not only the landslide risk in each village, but also the spatial pattern within a village. Additionally, the landslide risk map provides more precise and detailed information, making it useful for disaster workers.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 李欣輯, H. C.,楊惠萱, H. H.(2012)。坡地災害社會脆弱度指標評估與應用。都市與計劃,39(4),375-406。
    連結:
  2. 李欣輯, H. C.,楊惠萱, H. H.,廖楷民, K. M.,蕭代基, D. G.(2010)。水災社會脆弱性指標之建立。建築與規劃學報,10(3),163-182。
    連結:
  3. 林冠慧, K. H. E.,張長義, C. Y.(2015)。脆弱性研究的演變與當前發展。地理學報,77,49-82。
    連結:
  4. 洪鴻智, H. C.,陳令韡, L. Y.(2012)。颱洪災害之整合性脆弱度評估-大甲溪流域之應用。地理學報,65,79-96。
    連結:
  5. 陳禹銘, Y. M.,蘇昭郎, J. L.,樊國恕, K. S.(2009)。災害風險評估研究之探討。危機管理學刊,6,41-50。
    連結:
  6. 楊惠萱, H. H.,陳怡臻, Y. C.,李欣輯, H. C.(2014)。天然災害社會脆弱度指標之建立及評估:以鄉鎮層級為例。災害防救科技與管理學刊,3(2),71-93。
    連結:
  7. 葉高華, K. H.(2013)。社會脆弱性可解釋九二一地震死亡率分布嗎?。思與言:人文與社會科學雜誌,51(1),135-153。
    連結:
  8. 蕭煥章, H. C.(2008)。Taipei,中國文化大學地學研究所=Department of Geography, Chinese Culture University。
    連結:
  9. Adger, W. N.(2006).Vulnerability.Global Environmental Change,16(3),268-281.
  10. Anderson, M. G.,Howes, S.(1985).Development and application of a combined soil water-slope stability model.Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology,18,225-236.
  11. Birkmann, J.(2006).Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies.Tokyo:United Nations University Press.
  12. Brouwer, R.,Akter, S.,Brander, L.,Haque, E.(2007).Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: A case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh.Risk Analysis,27(2),313-326.
  13. Chambers, R.(2006).Vulnerability, coping and policy.IDS Bulletin,37(4),33-40.
  14. Chang K. T.,Chiang, S. H.,Hsu, M. L.(2007).Modeling typhoon- and earthquake-induced landslides in a mountainous watershed using logistic regression.Geomorphology,89,335-347.
  15. Chen Y. C.,Chang, K. T.,Wang, S. F.,Huang, J. C.,Yu, C. K.,Yu, J. Y.,Chu, H. J.,Liu, C. C.(2019).Controls of preferential orientation of earthquake- and rainfall-triggered landslides in Taiwan's orogenic mountain belt.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,44(9),1661-1674.
  16. Clark, G. E.,Moser, S. C.,Ratick, S. J.,Dow, K.,Meyer, W. B.,Emani, S.(1998).Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: The case of revere, MA., USA.Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,3,59-82.
  17. Cutter, S. L.(1996).Vulnerability to environmental hazards.Progress in Human Geography,20,529-539.
  18. Cutter, S. L.(2003).The Vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,93,1-12.
  19. Cutter, S. L.,Emrich, C. T.(2006).Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,604(1),102-112.
  20. Dietrich, W. E.,Reiss, R.,Hsu, M. L.,Montgomery, D. R.(1995).A Process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data.Hydrological Processes,9(3),383-400.
  21. Dilley, M.,Chen, R. S.,Deichmann, U.,Lerner-Lam, A. L.,Arnold, M.(2005).Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis.Washington, DC:The World Bank.
  22. Dwyer, A.,Zoppou, C.,Nielsen, O.,Day, S.,Roberts, S.(2004).Quantifying social vulnerability: A methodology for identifying those at risk to Natural Hazards.Canberra, Australia:Geoscience Australia.
  23. Erener, A.,Düzgün, H. S. B.(2012).Landslide susceptibility assessment: What are the effects of mapping unit and mapping method?.Environmental Earth Sciences,66(3),859-877.
  24. Füssel, H. M.(2007).Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research.Global Environmental Change,17,155-167.
  25. Gupta, R. P.,Joshi, B. C.(1990).Landslide hazard zonation using the GIS approach - A case study from the Ramganga Catchment Himalayas.Engineering Geology,28(1-2),119-131.
  26. Guzzetti, F.,Carrara, A.,Cardinali, M.,Reichenbach, P.(1999).Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study.Central Italy Geomorphology,31(1),181-216.
  27. Khan, S.(2012).Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand.Natural Hazards,64(2),1587-1607.
  28. McCarthy, J.,Canziani, O. F.,Leary, N. A.,Dokken, D. J.,White, K. S.(2001).Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 2).Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  29. Messner, F.,Meyer, V.(2005).Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception-challenges for flood damage research.Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures
  30. Pellicani, R.,Van Westen, C. J.,Spilotro, G.(2014).Assessing landslide exposure in areas with limited landslide information.Landslides,11(3),463-480.
  31. Rygel, L.,O'Sullivan, D.,Yarnal, B.(2006).A method for constructing a social vulnerability index.Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,11(3),741-764.
  32. Schicker, R.,Moon, V.(2012).Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale.Geomorphology,161(2),40-57.
  33. Smit, B.,Wandel, J.(2006).Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability.Global Environmental Change,16(3),282-392.
  34. Sterlacchini, S.,Ballabio, C.,Blahut, J.,Masetti, M.,Sorichetta, A.(2011).Spatial agreement of predicted patterns in landslide susceptibility maps.Geomorphology,125(1),51-61.
  35. Swets, J. A.(1988).Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic system.Science,92,38-59.
  36. Twigg, J.(2004).Disaster risk reduction: Mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency programming.London:Overseas Development Institute=ODI.
  37. UNDRO(1979).Vulnerability analysis–Report of expert group meeting.Geneva:UN Publications.
  38. UNISDR(2004).Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives.New York:UN Publications.
  39. Wang, S. F.,Chen, Y. C.,Song, C. E.(2017).The Resistance of Land Use to the Landslide under Different Rainfall Intensity.International Symposium on Remote Sensing 2017,Nagoya, Japan:
  40. Wyss, M.(ed.),Peppoloni, S.(ed.)(2014).Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences.Waltham, USA:Elsevier.
  41. Zhou, X. P.,Cheng, H.(2014).Stability analysis of three-dimensional seismic landslides using the rigorous limit equilibrium method.Engineering geology,174,87-102.
  42. 吳杰穎, J. Y.,江宜錦, Y. J(2008)。臺灣天然災害統計指標體系建構與分析。地理學報,51,65-84。
  43. 李欣輯, H. C.,陳怡臻, Y. C.,郭玫君, M. J.(2013)。臺灣颱洪災損評估系統之建置與應用。農業工程學報,59(4),42-55。
  44. 林美君, M. C.(2011)。Taipei,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所=Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University。
  45. 國家災害防救科技中心 [National Science & Technology Center for Disaster Reduction] 2016。氣候變遷坡地災害風險評估 [Qi hou bian qian po di zai hai feng xian ping gu]。https://dra.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/Frontend/Disaster/RiskDetail/BAL0000020 (擷取日期:2019.11.20)。
  46. 國家災害防救科技中心=National Science & Technology Center for Disaster Reduction(2013).IPCC 特別報告:「促進氣候變遷調適之風險管理-針對極端事件及災害」-給決策者摘要.臺北=Taipei:國家災害防救科技中心=National Science & Techndogy Center for Disaster Reduction.
  47. 張倉榮, T. J.,許銘熙, M. H.(2010).脆弱度及風險地圖分析方法之研究.臺北=Taipei:經濟部水利署=Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  48. 謝心怡, H. I.(2007)。Taipei,臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所=Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University。
  49. 蘇明道, M. D.,張齡方, L. F.,糠瑞林, J. L.,林美君, M. J.(2002)。區域洪災損失評估方法之比較研究。臺灣水利,50(2),22-35。