古蹟門票價格的決定－遊客付費意願之評估

The Ticket Price Decision of Cultural Heritage : The Evaluation of Willingness to Pay for Tourists

10.3966/054696002017060101002

林思玲(Szu-Ling Lin)；謝德宗(Der-Tzon Hsieh)；林惠玲(Hui-Lin Lin)

文化資產 ； 觀光 ； 條件評估法 ； 經濟評估 ； 打狗英國領事館官邸 ； Cultural Property ； Tourism ； Contingent Valuation Method ； Economic Evaluation ； Former British Consulate Residence in Takao

應用經濟論叢

101期（2017 / 06 / 01）

31 - 66

繁體中文

「打狗英國領事館官邸」是高雄市市定古蹟，在2007 年臺灣開放大陸遊客觀光後，過度擁擠的遊客引起破壞文化資產價值的危機，高雄市政府從2012 年7 月開始收取門票以降低入園人數。本研究利用條件評估法及雙界二元probit 模型進行分析，並考慮Hsiaoand Sun (1998) 的單邊反應模型，修正受訪者填卷偏誤，希望了解門票價格及經營品質對遊客付費的影響。研究發現經營品質改善後增加票價意願的偏誤為65%，現況下大陸遊客對園區各項服務滿意度均高於臺灣遊客。大陸遊客不論在現況或提升經營品質後，增加票價付費意願與願付價格均高於臺灣遊客。由於大陸遊客付費意願相對臺灣遊客較高，因此在參觀品質提升的前提下提高門票價格不會排擠大陸遊客，又可增加臺灣遊客參訪的意願，而品質的提升則以加強歷史學習功能最為重要。另外淡、旺季差別訂價方式可達控制人數的目的。

The former British consulate residence at Takao is an important cultural heritage site in Kaohsiung City. After tourism in Taiwan opened to Chinese tourists in 2007, overcrowding at this site became a serious problem. To reduce the number of tourists, the Kaohsiung City government started to sell tickets in July 2012. This study evaluates the influence of the entry ticket price and the management quality on the willingness of tourists to pay for the ticket to visit the site. We use the contingent valuation method (CVM) and the probit model to investigate the willingness to pay (WTP) of tourists to visit after the ticket prices increase. We also applied Hsiao and Sun (1998) to investigate the bias of market survey data.The results show that the bias of WIP for improvement heritage approxinmate 65%.The descriptive statistics results show that the satisfaction levels of Chinese tourists with the current services at the former British consulate residence are higher than those of Taiwanese tourists. The regression model results show that Chinese tourists are more willing to pay a higher price for the entry tickets, and that the average of the WTP is also higher than that of Taiwanese tourists in the current situation, as well as those with a high management quality. Therefore, raising the ticket price under high-quality management conditions will not deter Chinese tourists. Taiwanese tourists also have a greater willingness to visit the site. Therefore, enhancing the historical educational functions is a good management policy. Price discrimination in peak and low seasons can efficiently control the number of visitors.

1. 余士迪、王瑜琳(2003)。『台灣地區人力運用調查』中『工作與否』調查偏誤之估計。人文及社會科學集刊，15，475-500。
   連結：
2. 榮芳杰、傅朝卿(2008)。古蹟委外經營制度對文化遺產管理功能之影響：以R.O.T.與O.T.模式為例。建築學報，66，167-188。
   連結：
3. 中華民國交通部觀光局網站，2012，「觀光統計圖表」，取自：http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/public/public.aspx?no=315，檢索日期：2012/08/29。
4. Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman, 1993, “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation”, Federal Register, 58: 4601-4614.
5. 鄭蕙燕，2011，「第十六章生物多樣性之經濟價值與評估」，取自：http://www.medie.com.tw/book/b/b16.htm，檢索日期：2011/05/03。
6. Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, and R. C. Mitchell, 1986, “Determining the Demand for public Goods by Simulating Referendum at Different Tax Prices”, Manuscript, University of California, San Diego..
7. Brookshire, D. S.,Randall, A.,Stoll, J. R.(1980).Valuing Increments and Decrements in Natural Resource Service Flows.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,62,478-488.
8. Davis, R. K.(1963).Harvard University.
9. Greenley, D. A.,Walsh, R. D.,Young, R. A.(1982).Economic Benefits of Improved Water Quality Boulder: Public Perceptions of Option and Preservation Values.Colorado:Westview Press.
10. Hanemann, M.,Loomis, J.,Kanninen, B.(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal Agricultural Economics,73,1255-1263.
11. Hanemann, W. M.(1984).Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66,332-341.
12. Hsiao, C.,Sun, B. H.(1998).Modeling Survey Response Bias - with an Analysis of the Demand for an Advanced Electronic Device.Econometrics,89,15-39.
13. Kling, R. W.,Revier, C. F.,Sable, K.(2000).Estimating the Public Good Value of Preserving a Local Historic Landmark: The Role of Non-substitutability and Information in Contingent Valuation.Proceedings of the Association for Cultural Economics Conference,Minneapolis, Minnesota:
14. Maddison, D.,Mourato, S.(2001).Valuing Different Road Options for Stonehenge.Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites,4,203-212.
15. Mäler, K. G.(ed.),Vincent, J. R.(ed.)(2005).Handbook of Environmental Economics.North Holland:Elsevier Press.
16. Mitchell, R. C.,Carson, R. T.(1989).Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.Washington, D.C.:Resources for the Future Press.
17. Mmopelwa, G.,Kgathi, D. L.,Molefhe, L.(2007).Tourists' Perceptions and Their Willingness to Pay for Park Fees: A Case Study of Self-drive Tourists and Clients for Mobile Tour Operators in Moremi Game Reserve, Botswana.Tourism Management,28,1044-1056.
18. Randall, A.,Ives, B.,Eastman, C.(1974).Bidding Game for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1,132-149.
19. Reynisdottir, M.,Song, H.,Agrusa, J.(2008).Willingness to Pay Entrance Fees to Natural Attractions: An Icelandic Case Study.Tourism Management,29,1076-1083.
20. Salazar, S. D. S.,Marques, J. M.(2005).Valuing Cultural Heritage: The Social Benefits of Restoring and Old Arab Tower.Journal of Cultural Heritage,6,69-77.
21. Throsby, D.(2010).The Economics of Cultural Policy.New York:Cambridge University Press.
22. Venkatachalam, L.(2004).The Contingent Valuation Method: A Review.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,24,89-124.
23. 王嘉齡(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。
24. 林會承(2011)。臺灣文化資產保存史綱。臺北:遠流出版社。
25. 徐慧民、唐梅芳(2010)。建築文化資產整合行銷之探討─以臺中市雙十文化流域為例。設計與環境學報，11，17-32。
26. 陳宗玄、陳淑君、高珮如(2007)。居民對文化資產保存認知與願付價格之研究─以鹿港鎮與台南安平地區為例。朝陽學報，12，271-291。
27. 陳明建編(2003)。自然資源與環境經濟學：理論基礎與本土案例分析。臺北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
28. 陳凱俐、林亞立(2002)。文化資產之價值評估─以臺北市古蹟為例。宜蘭技術學報，9，131-146。

1. 蕭傑諭,王溥琳(2022)。臺鐵旅運者之服務水準選擇與願支付價格研究。運輸計劃季刊，51(3)，169-194。