中學輔導教師與專業輔導人員工作內容的時間分析

Time Analysis of Work Activities by Guidance Teachers and Professional Counselors in Secondary Schools

10.6251/BEP.20010611

林家興(Josh Chia Hsin Lin)

時間分析 ； 輔導工作 ； 輔導教師 ； 專業輔導人員 ； Time Analysis ； Guidance Services ； Guidance Teachers,Professional Counselors

教育心理學報

33卷2期（2002 / 04 / 01）

23 - 39

繁體中文

本研究以時間分析法比較專業輔導人員、國中輔導教師與高中輔導教師三組人員，從事直接輔導、間接輔導、教學工作、行政工作、研習進修等工作時間分配的差異。研究對象包括37名專業輔導人員、39名國中輔導教師，以及36名高中輔導教師。主要研究發現：l專業輔導人員顯著地比高中與國中輔導教師花較多的時間從事直接和間接輔導工作，高中輔導教師又比國中輔導教師花較多的時間在直接輔導學生；2國中和高中輔導教師顯著地比專業輔導人員花較多的時間從事教學工作；3國中輔導教師顯著地比專業輔導人員花較多的時間在行政工作；以及4高中輔導教師顯著地比其他兩組人員花較多的上班時間在輔導、教學、行政工作與研習進修以外的活動上。本研究除討論研究結果的意義，也對未來輔導工作與人力提出建議。

Time analysis was conducted on three types of counseling personnel in secondary school to investigate their work activities in terms of direct services, indirect services, teaching, administration, in-service training, as well as the length of time spending on each service category. Research participants included 37 professional counselors, 39 junior high school guidance teachers, and 36 senior high school guidance teachers. Major findings were: 1. Professional counselors were found to spend significantly longer time than the junior and senior high school guidance teachers on direct services and indirect services. Senior high school guidance teachers were found to spend significantly longer time than junior high school guidance teachers on direct services; 2. Junior and senior high school guidance teachers were found to spend significantly longer time than professional counselors on teaching; 3. Junior high school guidance teachers were found to spend significantly longer time than professional counselors on administrative activities; 4. Senior high school guidance teachers were found to spend significantly longer time than the other two groups on other activities. Implications of the results and suggestions for future manpower planning were also presented.

1. 林家興 Lin, Josh Chia-Hsin(2000)。心理衛生專業人員職稱偏好、工作場所與服務時間之比較研究。教育心理學報 Bulletin of Educational Psychology，32(1)，1-14。
   連結：
2. American School Counselor Association(1999).Role statement.Alexandria, VA:American School Counselor Association.
3. Baker, S. B.(1996).School counseling for the twenty-first century.New York:Macmillan.
4. Baldwin, C.(1997).family system and the single client.Family Journal: Counseling & Therapy for Couples & Families,5(3)
5. Balswick, J.(1988).Lexington.
6. Eddy, J.,Richardson, B. K.,Allberg, W. R.(1982).Strategies for maintaining and increasing counselors' use of time for counseling.School Counselor,30,122-126.
7. Fairchild, T. N.(1986).Time analysis: Accountability tool for counselors.School Counselor,34,36-43.
8. Fairchild, T. N.,Seeley, T. J.(1994).Time analysis: Still an important accountability tool.School Counselor,41,276-280.
9. Hutchison, R. L.,Barrick, A. L.,Groves, M.(1986).Functions of secondary school counselors in the public schools: Ideal and actual.School Counselor,34,87-91.
10. Partin, R. C.(1993).School counselors' time: Where does it go?.The School Counselor,40,274-281.
11. Peer, G. G.(1985).The status of secondary school guidance: A national survey.The School Counselor,32,181-189.
12. Wilgus, E.,Shelley, V.(1988).The role of the elementary-school counselor: Teacher perceptions, expectations, and actual functions.The School Counselor,35,259-266.
13. Williams, E.,Bissell, L.,Sullivan, E.(1991).The effects of co-dependence on physicians and nurses.British Journal of Addiction,86(1)
14. 吳松林(1992)。未來十年各級學校專業輔導人力需求推估。教育部。
15. 張植珊(1983)。輔導學的回顧與展望。台北:幼獅。
16. 教育部(1998)。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部。
17. 教育實習手冊編輯小組(1997)。教育實習手冊。台北:國立臺灣師範大學實習輔導處。
18. 陳秉華 Chen, Ping-Hwa、程玲玲 Cherng, Lin-Lin(1992)。學校輔導人員工作綱領之分析研究。教育部訓育委員會。
19. 馮燕 Feng, Joyce Yen、林家興 Lin, Josh Chia-Hsin(2001)。台北市各級學校社會工作試辦方案評估研究。台北:台北市政府教育局。
20. 臺北市教育局(1997)。台北市國民中學試辦專業設置專業輔導人員實施計畫。台北:臺北市教育局。
21. 蕭文 Hsiao, Wen、金樹人 Jin, Shuh-Ren(1996)。「我國學校輔導暨專業諮商人員工作層級與資格檢核標準」之規畫研究。教育部訓育委員會。

1. 許齡方(2019)。國小導師針對轉學生之初級輔導工作探究。中原大學教育研究所學位論文。2019。1-124。 
2. 鄭文婷(2018)。國小專任輔導教師角色知覺、專業承諾與工作滿意度之研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文。2018。1-159。