重複聆聽、故事難度和識字能力對聽力理解的影響

The Effects of Repetition, Story Difficulty, and Character Recognition on Listening Comprehension

10.6251/BEP.20070107

吳宜貞(Yi-Chen Wu)；戴麗觀(Li-Kuan Dai)

故事難度 ； 重複聆聽 ； 識字能力 ； 聽力理解 ； character recognition ； listening comprehension ； repeated listening ； story difficulty

教育心理學報

38卷3期（2007 / 03 / 01）

251 - 270

繁體中文

本研究以五年級的學生作爲研究對象，計192人，以3（重複次數）×2（故事難度）×3（識字能力）之實驗設計探討重複聆聽在聽力理解上之效果，並進一步針對不同故事難度，探討不同識字能力學童在重複聆聽相同訊息下所呈現之聽力理解能力組型。以變異數分析進行資料分析，所得之重要結果如下：1)不論聆聽次數的多寡，學生在簡單故事上之聽力理解表現皆較困難故事來得高。2)就不同故事難度而言，不同聆聽次數在聽力理解之成長效益並不一致。在簡單故事上，不論聆聽次數的多寡，學生之聽力理解表現並未達.05之顯著差異水準；但是，在困難故事上，學生在聆聽三次上之聽力理解表現皆較僅聽一次或兩次來得高。3)不論識字能力的高低，學生在聆聽兩次之後的聽力理解表現即趨於穩定。從這些發現中建議教師在呈現訊息時，應該要針對教材的難度以及學生的能力來加以決定訊息需要重複出現的次數，以利學生的學習成長。

This study used a 3 (once vs. twice vs. three times) ×2 (easy vs. hard) experimental design to estimate the effects of repetition and story difficulty on fifth graders' listening comprehension. The 192 participants came from 6 classes, which were randomly assigned to each of the 6 experimental conditions. It was found that, despite the number of repetitions and story difficulty, students listening to the easy story had higher comprehension scores than those listening to the hard story. For the easy story, no significant difference was found between any two repetition groups; however, for the hard text, those students listening to the story three times did obtain significantly higher comprehension scores than those listening to the story only once or twice. With regard to repetition, after listening to the story twice, the students' growth of comprehension became stable. These results indicated that repetition had a positive effect on listening comprehension and the difficulty level of a text plays an important role in listening comprehension. It is concluded that, when presenting information, the teachers should base their decision as to the number of repetitions on material difficulty and student ability in order to improve the students' listening comprehension.

1. 吳宜貞(2004)。重複閱讀及文章難度對五年級學生閱讀能力影響之探討。教育心理學報，35(4)，319-336。
   連結：
2. 黃瑋苓(2004)。普通學生與閱讀障礙學生之單位詞、識字、詞彙和閱讀理解能力之比較研究。特殊教育與復健學報，12，31-53。
   連結：
3. Aaron, P. G.,Joshi R. M.(1992).Reading problems: Consultation and remediation.New York:The Guilford Press.
4. Albrecht, J. E.,O`Brien, E. J.(1993).Updating a mental model-maintaining both local and global coherence.Journal of Experimental Psychology,19,1061-1070.
5. Amlund, J. T.,Kardash, C. A. M.,Kuihavy, R. W.(1986).Repetitive reading and recall of expository text.Reading Research Quarterly,21(1),49-58.
6. Catts, H. W.,Hogan, T. P.,Fey, M. E.(2003).Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,36(2),151-164.
7. Ebbinghaus, H.(1964).Memory.New York:Dover.
8. Fries, C.(1963).Linguistics and reading.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Horowitz, R.,Samuels, S. J.(1985).Reading and Listening to Expository Text.Journal of Reading Behavior,17(3),185-198.
10. Linacre, J. M.(2000).Winsteps (Version 3.21). [Computer software].Chicago, IL:MESA Press.
11. Linderholm, T.,Everson, M. G.,van den Broek, P.,Mischinski, M.,Crittenden, A.,Samuels, J.(2000).Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers` comprehension of easy and difficult texts.Cognition and Instruction,18(4),525-556.
12. Mayer, R. E.(1983).Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose.Journal of Educational Psychology,75(1),40-49.
13. Miller, G. A.(1956).The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.The Psychological Review,63,81-97.
14. Miller, S. D.,Smith, D. E. P.(1985).Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently.Journal of Educational Psychology,77(3),341-348.
15. O`Brien, E. J.,F. R. Lorch (Eds.)(1995).Sources of coherence in reading.Hillsdale, New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. O`Brien, E. J.,Myers, J. L.(1987).The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text.Memory & Cognition,15(5),419-427.
17. O`Shea, L. J.,Sindelar, P. T.,O`Shea, D. J.(1985).The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension.Journal of Reading Behavior,17,129-142.
18. O`Shea, L. J.,Sindelar, P. T.,O`Shea, D. J.(1987).The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers.Learning Disabilities Research,2,103-109.
19. Rothkoph, E. Z.(1968).Textual constraint as function of repeated inspection.Journal of Educational Psychology,29(1),20-25.
20. Sindelar, P. T.,Monda, L. E.,O`Shea, L. J.(1990).Effects of repeated readings on instructional-and master-level readers.Journal of Educational Research,83,220-226.
21. Stoddard, K.,Valcante, G.,Sindelar, P.,O`Shea, L.,Algozzine, B.(1993).Increasing reading rate and comprehension: The effects of repeated readings, sentence segmentation, and intonation training.Reading Research and Instruction,32,53-65.
22. Thames, D. G.,Reeves-Kazelskis, C.(1993).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Conference, New Orleans, LA..ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
23. Trabasso, T.,Secco, T.,van den Broek, P.,H. Mandl,N. L. Stein.,T. Trabasso (Eds.)(1984).Learning and comprehension of a text.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Trabasso, T.,van den Broek, P.(1985).Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events.Journal of Memory and Language,24,612-630.
25. Wolman, C.,van den Broek, P.,Lorch, R. E.(1997).Effects of causal structure on immediate and delayed story recall by children with mild mental retardation, children with learning disabilities and children without disabilities.The Journal of Special Education,30(4),439-455.
26. 中央研究院中文詞知識庫小組(1982)。新聞語料字頻統計表。台北:中央研究院。
27. 王文華的童話公園
28. 吳宜貞、黃秀霜(1998)。家庭環境變項、認字、語意區辨及閱讀理解能力之關係分析。教育與心理研究，21(下)，357-380。
29. 周台傑(1992)。國民小學國語文成就測驗。彰化:精華。
30. 林惠芬、林宏熾(2000)。國小學習障礙學生聽覺理解錯誤類型分析研究。特殊教育學報，14，233-256。
31. 張世彗、楊坤堂(2004)。閱讀理解測驗之編製報告。國小特殊教育，37，1-11。
32. 教育部國語推行委員會(2000)。八十七年常用語詞調查報告。台北:教育部。
33. 陳沛嵐(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中正大學教育研究所。
34. 陳美芳(1997)。國小學童聽覺理解與聽覺記憶能力之研究－不同國語文程度學生的比較。特殊教育研究學刊，15，293-305。
35. 陳美芳(1999)。國語文低成就學童口語理解能力的發展。特殊教育研究學刊，17，189-204。
36. 黃秀霜(2001)。中文年級認字量表指導手冊。台北:心理。
37. 黃淑津、鄭麗玉(2004)。電腦化動態評量對國小五年級學生閱讀理解效能之研究。國民教育研究學報，12，167-201。
38. 黃瓊儀(2004)。不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀理解障礙學生教學成效之個案研究。初等教育學刊，18，243-288。
39. 鄭麗玉(1999)。英語聽力策略教學研究。嘉義師院學報，13，57-76。
40. 錢景甯、高儷華(2004)。後設認知策略訓練、聽力理解以及學習態度之間的關係。中原學報，32(2)，241-254。

1. 王家威(2017)。進一步探討以電影片段作為英語聽力訓練教材對學生學習意願和學習成就的影響。中原大學資訊工程學系學位論文。2017。1-82。