大學生知覺其人際依附風格對愛情關係適應之影響

A Qualitative Study of the Attachment Styles and Their Influence on the Adjustment of Love Relationships

10.6251/BEP.20070119

王郁茗(Yu-Ming Wang)；王慶福(Ching-Fu Wang)

人際依附風格 ； 愛情關係 ； 關係適應 ； attachment style ； love relationship ； relationship adjustment

教育心理學報

38卷4期（2007 / 06 / 01）

397 - 415

繁體中文

台灣心理學界對人際依附風格的研究大多直接沿用西方理論採取量化研究，本研究乃以質性研究方法，期能深入瞭解人際依附風格的現象，以及對愛情關係適應的影響。招募18位戀愛中的大學生，以半結構式深度訪談探討下述問題：(1)受訪者對其人際依附風格之知覺。(2)受訪者知覺人際依附風格對雙方交往關係發展的影響。內容分析結果得到內向害羞缺乏自信、被動壓抑人際疏離、主動開放喜歡人際、獨立自由重視自我、隨和尊重順乎緣分、任性恣意不夠成熟等六種人際依附風格。這些人際依附風格在愛情關係中各有不同的表現，對愛情關係的正面影響有溝通良好、照顧與呵護對方、肯定與信任對方、提昇自信、在一起很快樂、良性互動、成長改變、提高自主性、互補不足、擴大社交圈等。負面影響則有負擔累贅、需要互相遷就與顧慮、不安全感、溝通不良、容易摩擦衝突、無法忍受差異、隱瞞、缺少快樂滿足、彼此沈溺而成長停滯、人際圈縮小變差等。本研究進一步討論研究結果在華人社會文化背景中的涵義，嘗試建立一套有助瞭解兩性親密關係適應的人際依附理論與實徵架構。

This study consists of an analysis of answers given to some qualitative questions by 18 unmarried young college students. A semi-structure in-depth interview method was used. The questions included the participants’ perception of (1) their attachment styles and (2) how their attachment styles affect their love relationships. The contents of these in-depth interviews were qualitatively analyzed. Results of the content analysis indicated six types of attachment styles: (1) introversive style, (2) alienated style, (3) open style, (4) autonomous style, (5) natural style and (6) wayward style. The perceived positive influences of these attachment styles included good communication, care for each other, self confidence, happiness, growth and change, autonomy, and good interaction. The perceived negative influences included feeling of burden, feeling of insecurity, misunderstanding, conflict, intolerance of difference, cheating, lack of happiness, indulgence and stagnation, and worsening of social network. Results were discussed in terms of attachment style theory and were compared with the findings from other empirical studies. The implications of these results to the society and culture in Taiwan were further discussed. It is believed that this study may be helpful in developing a theoretical framework for love relationships in Taiwan.

1. 張思嘉、周玉慧(2004)。綠與婚前關係的騷展。本土心理學研究，21，85-123。
   連結：
2. 陳金定、劉焜輝(2003)。青少年依附行為與情緒調適能力之因果模式初探。教育心理學報，35(1)，39-58。
   連結：
3. 歐陽儀、吳麗娟、林世華(2006)。青少年依附關係、知覺父母言語管教、情緒穩定之相關研究。教育心理學報，37(4)，319-344。
   連結：
4. Ainsworth, M. D. S.,Blehar, M.,Waters, B.,Wall, S.(1978).Patterns of attachment
5. Bartholomew, K.(1990).Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
6. Bartholomew, K.,Horowitz, L. M.(1990).Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
7. Bowlby, J.(1969).Attraction and loss: Attachment.
8. Bowlby, J.(1973).Attraction and loss: Seperation: Anxiety and anger.
9. Bowlby, J.(1980).Attraction and loss: Attachment and loss.
10. Brennan, K. A.,Clark, C. L.,Shaver, P. R.,J. A. Simpson,W. S. Rholes(1998).Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview.Attachment theory and close relationships.
11. Chang, H. C.,,Holt, G. R.,S. TingToomey,F. Korzenny(1991).The concept of yuan sad Chinese interpersonal relationship.Gross-culture interpersonal communication.
12. Collins, N. L.,Read, S, J.(1990).Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
13. Hazan, C.,Shaver, P.(1987).Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
14. Keelan, J. P. K,Dion, K. L.,Dion, K. K.(1994).Attachment style and heterosexual relationships among young adults: A short-term panel study.Journal of Social & Personal Relationships.
15. Levy, M. B.,Davis, K. E.(1988).Love styles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
16. Linville, P. W.(1985).Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don`t put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket.Social Cognition,3,94-120.
17. Rothbaum, F.,Weiaz, J.,Polt, M.,Miyake. K.,Morelli, G.(2001).Deeper into attachment and culture.American Psychologist.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.827
18. Rothbaum, F.,Weisz, J.,Pott, M.,Miyake. K.,Morelli, G.(2000).Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan.American Psychologist.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.10.1093
19. Shaver, P. R.,Hazan, C.(1988).A biased overview of the study of love.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
20. Simpson J., A.,Rholes, W. S.(1998).Attachment theory and close relationships.
21. Simpson, J. A.(1990).Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971
22. Strauss, A.、Corbin, J. M.(1998)。Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
23. Yang, K. S.,J. Berman(2002).Beyond Maslow`s culture-bound, linear theory: A preliminary statement of the Double-Y model of basic human needs.Nebraska symposium on motivation, Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self.
24. 王慶福(2000)。當男孩愛上女孩－人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報，8，177-201。
25. 王慶福(1995)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文。
26. 吳芝儀、廖梅花(2001)。質性研究入門一紮根理論研究方法
27. 吳嘉瑜(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
28. 李沛良、楊國樞、文崇一(1993)。臺北，中央研究院民族學研究所。
29. 李美技(1996)。從兩性親密關係的研究闡釋研究者主體陸的位階。中國心理學會通訊，31，12-26。
30. 汪文聖(2001)。現象學方法與理論之反思：一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研究，12，49-76。
31. 胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究一理論方法及本土女隨研究實例。台北:巨流。
32. 孫倩如(2005)。華人本土心理學研究追求卓越延續計畫－子計畫五，國科會補助專題研究計畫。
33. 陸洛(2005)。華人本土心理學研究追求卓越延續計畫－子計畫四，國科會補助專題研究計畫華人本土心理學研究追求卓越延續計畫－子計畫四，國科會補助專題研究計畫,未出版
34. 黃光國(2001)。科學哲學與創造力。台北:立緒文化。
35. 楊國樞(2004)。我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學。本土心理學研究，21，85-123。
36. 葉光輝、胡台麗、許木柱、葉光輝(2002)。父母的後設情緒理念類型及測量。情感、情緒與文化－台灣社會的文化心理研究，267-297。
37. 鄭欣佩、葉光輝(2000)。父母的後設情緒理念在孩童依附戀關係的角色與影響。中央研究院民族學研究所、台灣大學心理學系暨研究所及華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫合辦「家人關係及其心理歷程：第五屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會」宣讀之論文

1. 王綉蘭(2020)。成人參與自我成長培訓方案對親密關係、自我效能的轉化學習歷程之研究—以A、B兩家公司為例。國立暨南國際大學心理健康與諮詢碩士學位學程在職專班學位論文。2020。1-144。