社交計量及同儕知覺受歡迎度與青少年關係攻擊及孤寂感之相關研究

Sociometric and Perceived Popularity in Adolescence: Links to Relational Aggression and Loneliness

10.6251/BEP.20100323.2

程景琳(Ching-Ling Cheng)

同儕知覺受歡迎度 ； 社交計量受歡迎度 ； 青少年 ； 孤寂感 ； 關係攻擊 ； adolescents ； loneliness ； perceived popularity ； relational aggression ； sociometric popularity

教育心理學報

42卷1期（2010 / 09 / 01）

143 - 162

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討「社交計量受歡迎度」與「同儕知覺受歡迎度」對於青少年社會心理適應之預測狀況。研究參與者爲864位來自二所國中共28個班級的八年級學生（男、女生各半，平均年齡爲14.01歲）。本研究以同儕提名問卷的方式測量社交計量受歡迎度、同儕知覺受歡迎度、與關係攻擊行爲，以自陳的量表測量心理孤寂感。結果發現，「社交計量受歡迎度」和「同儕知覺受歡迎度」確爲二種不同的社交地位構念。二種類型的受歡迎度都能負向預測青少年的心理孤寂感，且社交計量受歡迎度與關係攻擊行爲間有負相關，但同儕知覺受歡迎度與關係攻擊行爲則有正相關；反映出二種受歡迎度對於行爲適應問題有不同的預測。對青少女而言，因不受同儕喜愛所引發的關係攻擊傾向，較男生來得強。社交計量受歡迎度與同儕知覺受歡迎度的交互作用，對於關係攻擊與孤寂感的預測都有顯著影響。

The purpose of this study was to explore the extent to which the two types of popularity (i.e. sociometric and peer-perceived) respectively predict psychosocial adjustment outcomes (i.e. relational aggression and loneliness) of Taiwanese adolescents. Participants were 864 eighth-graders (50% boys and 50% girls; the mean age is 14.01) from 28 classes of two public schools. The study used peer nomination questionnaire to measure ”sociometric popularity”, ”peer-perceived popularity”, and ”relational aggression”, and a self-report scale to measure ”loneliness”. The results show that sociometric and peer-perceived popularity are two distinct constructs. Both popularity types negatively correlate with loneliness. Sociometric popularity negatively correlates with relational aggression, while peer-perceived popularity positively correlates with relational aggression. Lower level of sociometric popularity predicts stronger relational aggression for girls than for boys. Interactions between sociometric and peer-perceived popularity were found to be predictive of both relational aggression and loneliness.

1. Cheng, C. L.(2009).No blood means less harm? Relational aggression and peer rejection in adolescence.Bulletin of Educational Psychology,40(3),511-528.
   連結：
2. Cheng, C. L. (2008). Relational aggression questionnaire-peer nomination. Unpublished instrument, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
3. Allen, J. P.,Weissberg, R. P.,Hawkins, J. A.(1989).The relations between values and social competence in early adolescence.Developmental Psychology,25(3),458-464.
4. Asher, S. R.,Wheeler, V. A.(1985).Children's Loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology,53,500-505.
5. Becker, B. E.,Luthar, S. S.(2007).Peer-perceived admiration and social preference: Contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence,17(1),117-144.
6. Bukowski, W. M.,Sippola, L. K.,Newcomb, A. F.(2000).Variations in patterns of attraction of same-and other-sex peers during early adolescence.Developmental Psychology,36(2),147-154.
7. Butcher, J.(1986).Longitudinal analysis of adolescent girls' aspirations at school and perceptions of popularity.Adolescence,21,133-143.
8. Cillessen, A. H. N.,Borch, C.(2006).Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis.Journal of Adolescence,29,935-959.
9. Cillessen, A. H. N.,Mayeux, L.(2004).From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the associations between aggression and social status.Child Development,75(1),147-163.
10. Cillessen, A. H. N.,Rose, A. J.(2005).Understanding popularity in the peer system.Current Directions in Psychological Science,14(2),102-105.
11. Coie, J. D.,Dodge, K. A.,Copottelli, H.(1982).Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Developmental Psychology,18(4),557-570.
12. Crick, N. R.,Grotpeter, J. K.(1995).Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment.Child Development,66,710-722.
13. Damon, W.(ed.),Lerner, R.(ed.)(2006).Handbook of child psychology.New York:Wiley.
14. Damon, W.(Series eds.),Lerner, R. M.(Series eds.),Eisenberg, N.(Vol. Ed.)(2006).Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3 Social, emotional, and personality development.Hoboken, New Jersey:Wiley.
15. Eder, D.(1985).The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents.Sociology of Education,58,154-165.
16. Farmer, T. W.,Estell, D. B.,Bishop, J. L.,O''Neal, K. K.,Cairns, B. D.(2003).Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents.Developmental Psychology,39(6),922-1004.
17. Grusec, J. E.(ed.),Hastings, P. D.(ed.)(2007).Handbook of socialization.New York:Guilford.
18. Hawley, P. H.(2003).Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,49(3),279-309.
19. Hymel, S.,Rubin, K. H.,Rowden, L.,LeMare, L.(1990).Children's peer relationships: Longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood.Child Development,61(6),2004-2021.
20. LaFontana, K. M.,Cillessen, A. H. N.(1999).Children's interpersonal perceptions as a function of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity.Journal of Genetic Psychology,160(2),225-242.
21. LaFontana, K. M.,Cillessen, A. H. N.(2002).Children's stereotypes of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment.Developmental Psychology,38(5),635-647.
22. Lease, A. M.,Kennedy, C. A.,Axelrod, J. L.(2002).Children's social constructions of popularity.Social Development,11(1),87-109.
23. Lerner, R. M.(ed.),Sternberg, L.(ed.)(2009).Handbook of adolescent psychology.Hoboken, New Jersey:Wiley.
24. Mayeux, L.,Sandstorm, M. J.,Cillessen, A. H. N.(2008).Is being popular a risky proposition?.Journal of Research on Adolescence,18(1),49-74.
25. Merten, D. E.(1997).The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls.Sociology of Education,70,175-191.
26. Nangle, D. W.,Erdley, C. A.,Newman, J. E.,Mason, C. A.,Carpenter, E. M.(2003).Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children's loneliness and depression.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,32(4),546-555.
27. Newcomb, A. F.,Bukowski, W. M.,Pattee, L.(1993).Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status.Psychological Bulletin,113,99-128.
28. Parker, J. G.,Asher, S. R.(1993).Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Link with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction.Developmental Psychology,29(4),611-621.
29. Parkhurst, J. T.,Hopmeyer, A.(1998).Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status.Journal of Early Adolescence,18,125-144.
30. Preacher, K. J.,Curran, P. J.,Bauer, D. J.(2006).Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,31,437-448.
31. Prinstein, M. J.,Cillessen, A. H. N.(2003).Forms and function of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,49(3),310-342.
32. Rodkin, P. C.,Farmer, T. W.,Pearl, R.,Van Acker, R.(2000).Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations.Developmental Psychology,36(1),14-24.
33. Rose, A. J.,Swenson, L. P.(2009).Do perceived popular adolescents who aggress against others experience emotional adjustment problems themselves?.Developmental Psychology,45(3),868-872.
34. Rose, A. J.,Swenson, L. P.,Carlson, W.(2004).Friendships of aggressive youth: Considering the influences of being disliked and of being perceived as popular.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,88,25-45.
35. Rose, A. J.,Swenson, L. P.,Waller, E. M.(2004).Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations.Developmental Psychology,40(3),378-387.
36. Salmivalli, C.,Kaukiainen, A.,Lagerspetz, K.(2000).Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter?.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,41(1),17-24.
37. Sandstrom, M. J.,Cillessen, A. H. N.(2006).Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment.International Journal of Behavioral Development,30(4),305-314.
38. Underwood, M. K.,Galen, B. R.,Paquette, J. A.(2001).Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along?.Social Development,10(2),248-266.
39. Weisfeld, G. E.,Bloch, S. A.,Ivers, J. W.(1983).A factor analytic study of peer-perceived dominance in adolescent boys.Adolescence,18,229-243.
40. Weisfeld, G. E.,Bloch, S. A.,Ivers, J. W.(1984).Possible determinants of social dominance among adolescent girls.Journal of Genetic Psychology,144,115-129.
41. Worell, J.(ed.),Goodheart, C. D.(ed.)(2006).Handbook of girls' and women's psychological health.New York:Oxford University Press.
42. Xie, H.,Swift, D. J.,Cairns, R. B.,Cairns, B. D.(2002).Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence.Social Development,11(2),205-224.
43. 戴淑梅(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。

1. 蔡秀蘭,周育如(2019)。學齡前幼兒之社會支配性與影響因素及其資源控制策略之探討。教育心理學報，50(4)，685-705。
2. 程景琳,呂學育(2021)。國中生之同儕受害經驗與負向情緒之關聯：檢視希望感的調節角色。中等教育，72(3)，39-57。
3. 程景琳、張玉姍(2014)。小團體輔導對遭遇關係攻擊之國中女生的輔導成效。中等教育，65(2)，63-85。
4. 鄧文章,陳亦鳳,杜淑芬(2021)。國中輔導教師介入關係霸凌事件的輔導困境與策略。教育心理學報，53(1)，223-249。
5. 許絲茜、吳明燁(2014)。我「受創」故我「消費」：比較家庭與同儕關係對於大學生流行消費之影響。中華心理衛生學刊，27(3)，379-408。
6. 黃俊翰、連廷嘉、林俊德(2013)。應用塔羅技術融入阿德勒取向青少年人際困擾諮商之任務分析。台灣遊戲治療學報，3，67-91。
7. 連彗君(2019)。完形取向運用於高中職學生人際成長團體。諮商與輔導，405，26-30。
8. 廖小雯、程景琳(2012)。國中生關係受害經驗與心理孤寂感之關聯及調節因子之檢驗。健康促進與衛生教育學報，38，1-25。
9. 林烝增,刑志彬(2022)。台灣青少年在COVID-19疫情的孤寂感與情緒困擾現況之調查。台灣公共衛生雜誌，41(4)，467-478。
10. 劉正杰、董旭英(2018)。以同儕關係、從眾行為與認知同理心探討網路霸凌旁觀者之行為傾向。中華心理學刊，60(2)，101-124。
11. 謝曼盈(2020)。簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年評量表的信度與效度研究。教育心理學報，51(4)，505-529。
12. 張芳全、于文灝(2016)。國中生家庭社經地位、關係攻擊、同儕接納與自然科學習動機之縱貫性研究。彰化師大教育學報，28/29，53-80。
13. (2013)。同儕友誼發展與青少年偏差行為問題。社區發展季刊，142，273-282。
14. (2023)。影響兒童社會能力因素之解釋力比較：SOCIAL模型取向。教育心理學報，55(2)，373-400。