家庭調適的質量對話

The Dialogue between Quantitative and Qualitative Research on Family Adjustment

10.6251/BEP.20100120

劉惠琴(Whei-Ching Liu)

家庭系統 ； 家庭調適 ； family adjustment ； family system

教育心理學報

42卷4期（2011 / 06 / 01）

567 - 589

繁體中文

本研究以量性設計及質性設計二種研究程序共同探討本地的青少年與其家人如何在日常生活中面對大環境的挑戰而調適的現象。研究對象主要以晚期青少年家庭為主。本研究樣本分爲三階段蒐集，第一階段爲大樣本的大學生班級團體。第二階段的研究樣本則是以研究者過去在親子個體化研究的樣本群中，徵求青少年家庭參與焦點團體的研究。第三階段則徵求有意願的焦點團體成員及其家人進行家庭訪問資料的蒐集。研究結果則分別(1)以簡單相關分析方法探討家人間對家庭系統知覺的差異與共識。(2)以簡單相關及t檢定法探討大學生受試者對其家庭系統知覺的連續性與變化性。(3)以Q因素分析描繪家庭動力之變化。及(4)以質性敘說分析方法探討相關家人對家庭調適行動的詮釋、理解，與行動意向。從量性研究結果來看，同一家庭內的不同家人間對其家庭系統的知覺是有差異的。研究樣本中的大學生們對家庭系統的知覺與母親及與手足的知覺有較高的關聯，與父親的知覺則無關聯。整體而言，家庭共識與青少年的家庭知覺呈現中度的正關聯，而家庭差異則呈現中度的負相關，研究樣本中的大學生們只有1/3自覺到其家庭系統會因時間而有所變化。從質性研究的結果來看，本文以分別面對不同環境變化的三個家庭爲例，說明家庭如何面對環境變化的調適與轉化過程。最後，作者則提出對於家庭調適之不同探究方式的討論。

This study used qualitative and quantitative methods to examine adjustment of youths and the families as they confront challenges from societal change. Research sample focused on late-adolescent families. Data were collected in three phases: College students completed surveys in the first phase; data from past focus group interviews were used in the second phase; and data from volunteers recruited for family interview in focus groups were used in the third phase. The following results were reported: 1. Consensus and discrepancies of family system perceptions among family members. 2. Continuity and changes of family system perceptions. 3. Changes of family dynamics using Q-factor analysis. 4. Qualitative descriptions of the content, understanding, and intent of the behavioral adjustment among family members. Results indicated that college students' perceptions of their family systems were highly correlated with mothers' and siblings' perceptions but not corelated with fathers' perceptions. Qualitative data from three families were used to illustrate how the family system adjusted and adapted to societal changes. Finally, different approaches to investigate the multi-systems and dynamic family processes were also discussed.

1. 孫頌賢、修慧蘭(2002)。已家庭系統觀進行家庭系統測量之研究－以家庭系統分化為例。中華輔導學報，11，125-166。
   連結：
2. 劉惠琴(2007)。家庭系統測量的評估—以晚期青少年的家庭為例。中華心理衛生期刊，20(3)，261-290。
   連結：
3. Olson, D. H. (1999). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://www.lifeinnovations.com/pdf/circumplex.pdf
4. Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2006). FACE IV and the circumplex model. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://www.facesiv.com/pdf/3.innovations.pdf
5. Bartle-Haring, S.,Kenny, D. A.,Gavazzi, S. M.(1999).Multiple perspectives on family differentiation: Analyses by multitrait multimethod matrix and triadic social relations models.Journal of Marriage and the Family,61(2),491-503.
6. Bosma, H. A.(ed.),Graafsma, T. L. G.(ed.),Grotevant, H. D.(ed.),Levita, D. J.(ed.)(1994).Identity and development.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
7. Brown, S. R.(1993).A primer on Q methodology.Operant Subjectivity,16,91-138.
8. Chirhart, A. S.(2003)."Better for us than it was for her": African American families, communities, and reform in modern Georgia.Journal of Family History,28,578-612.
9. Kazak, A. E.(1992).Stress, change, and families: Theoretical and methodological considerations.Journal of Family Psychology,6(2),120-124.
10. Lee, C.(1988).Theories of family adaptability: Toward a synthesis of Olson's circumplex and the Beaver's systems models.Family Process,27,73-85.
11. Markman, H. J.(1992).Marital and family psychology: Burning issues.Journal of Family Psychology,5(384),264-275.
12. Melito, R.(1985).Adaptation in family system: A developmental perspective.Family Process,24,89-100.
13. Olson, D. H.,McCubbin, H. I.,Barnes, H.,Larsen, A.,Muxen, M.,Wilson, M.(1992).Family Inventories.Minneapolis, MN:Life Innovations.
14. Olson, D. H.,Sprenkle, D. H.,Russell, C. S.(1979).Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.Family Process,18(1),3-28.
15. Pinsof, W. M.(1992).Toward a scientific paradigm for family psychology: The integrative process systems perspective.Journal of Family Psychology,5(4),432-447.
16. Sprenkle, D.,Olson, D.(1978).Circumplex model of marital systems IV: Empirical study of clinic and non-clinic couples.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling,4,59-74.
17. Strauss, A.(1978).Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order.San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass.
18. 高達觀(1978)。中國家族社會之演變。台北:九思。
19. 黃宗堅(1999)。家庭系統的測量與應用。應用心理研究，2，83-110。
20. 楊中芳主編、高尚仁主編(1991)。中國人中國心—人格與社會篇。台北:遠流。
21. 楊國樞主編、黃光國主編(1991)。中國人的心理與行為。台北:桂冠。
22. 劉瓊瑛譯、黃漢耀譯、魯宓譯、馬英譯、Minuchin, S.、Nichols, M. P.(2000)。回家－結構派大師說家庭治療的故事。台北:張老師。

1. 陳慧娟、林漢唐(2016)。家長網路管教、學校投入與青少年危險網路行為之關係：家庭凝聚力之調節效果分析。教育科學研究期刊，61(4)，205-242。
2. 陳婉真、江守峻(2017)。經濟弱勢青少年的教師支持、同儕支持、家庭凝聚力與心理資本之關係：台灣貧窮兒少資料庫分析。當代教育研究季刊，25(4)，11-50。
3. 鄧皓引、張妤玥、利翠珊(2014)。育兒階段夫妻工作家庭壓力調適：系統界限的定位與轉變。中華心理衛生學刊，27(1)，37-72。
4. 管貴貞、沈煜棠(2015)。科技大學學生家庭功能、正向心理資源與生涯調適能力之研究：以臺南市為例。學生事務與輔導，54(1)，18-36。