超越四向度：六向度目標導向模式之驗證與分析

Beyond 4 Dimensions: The Verification and Analysis of the 6-Dimensional Goal Orientation Model

10.6251/BEP.20140120

林宴瑛(Yen-Ying Lin)；程炳林(Biing-Lin Cherng)

目標導向 ； 考試情緒 ； 課室目標結構 ； 競爭模式 ； classroom goal structure ； competitive model ； goal orientation ； test emotion

教育心理學報

46卷1期（2014 / 09 / 01）

117 - 142

繁體中文

目標導向研究者新近主張以工作／自我／他人參照標準及趨向／逃避焦點建構目標導向理論，將目標導向區分為工作趨向、自我趨向、他人趨向、工作逃避、自我逃避及他人逃避六種目標。本研究目的在於考驗依據前述主張所建構的六向度目標導向模式是否更能解釋實際的觀察資料，並分析六向度目標導向與課室目標結構、考試情緒間的關係。為完成上述研究目的，本研究抽取台灣地區722名國中生，所蒐集資料以結構方程模式、模式比較法進行統計考驗。研究結果顯示六向度目標導向模式具有理想的整體適配度、內在品質、幅合與區別效度，適合用來解釋國中生的觀察資料。六種目標導向與課室目標結構、考試情緒具有不同關係。課室目標結構方面，趨向精熟目標結構最能正向預測工作趨向與自我趨向目標；逃避精熟目標結構最能正向預測工作逃避與自我逃避目標；趨向表現目標結構最能正向預測他人趨向目標；逃避表現目標結構最能正向預測他人逃避目標。考試情緒方面，趨向的目標能正向預測正向考試情緒，負向預測負向考試情緒；逃避的目標則負向預測正向考試情緒，正向預測負向考試情緒。本研究根據研究結果在理論上的涵義進行討論，並提出未來研究之建議。

A 6-dimensional goal orientation model has been recently proposed with three types of references (i.e., task/self/other) and two focuses (i.e., approach/avoidance): task-approach, self-approach, other-approach, task-avoidance, self-avoidance, and other-avoidance. This study was an attempt to test a confirmatory factor analysis model of the 6-dimensional goal orientation theory by using structural equation modeling (SEM) and model comparison approach. Furthermore, the relationships of these goal orientations with classroom goal structures and test emotions were tested. The participants were 722 junior high school students. The theoretical model fitted the observed data well, supporting the 6-dimensional goal orientation theory. The results of this study also showed that the 6 goals were associated with classroom goal structures and test emotions. In terms of classroom goal structures, the approach mastery goal structure most strongly and positively predicted the task-approach goal and self-approach goal; the avoidance mastery goal structure most strongly and positively predicted the task-avoidance goal and self-avoidance goal; the approach performance goal structure most strongly and positively predicted the other-approach goal; and the avoidance performance goal structure most strongly and positively predicted the other-avoidance goal. In terms of test emotions, approach goals positively predicted the positive test emotions and negatively predicted the negative test emotions; conversely, avoidance goals negatively predicted the positive test emotions and positively predicted the negative test emotions. The implications for this theory and future research were discussed.

1. 林宴瑛(2006)。Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=Institute of Education, National Cheng Kung University。
   連結：
2. 林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報，39(2)，173-194。
   連結：
3. 彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報：教育類，50，69-95。
   連結：
4. 程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報：教育類，48(1)，15-40。
   連結：
5. 程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報：教育類，47(1)，36-58。
   連結：
6. Ames, C.(1992).Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
7. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classrom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3),260-267.
8. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structure equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103,411-423.
9. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structure equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
10. Barron, K. E.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2001).Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(5),706-722.
11. Boekaerts, M.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.),Zeidner, M.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
12. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equation modeling with latent variables.New York, NY:John Wiley.
13. Church, M. A.,Elliot, A. J.,Gable, S.(2001).Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(1),43-54.
14. Cohen, J.(1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
15. Cury, F.,Fonseca, D. D.,Elliot, A. J.,Moller, A. C.(2006).The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 ×2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90(4),666-679.
16. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
17. Elliot, A. J.,Murayama, K.(2008).On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application.Journal of Educational Psychology,100,613-628.
18. Elliot, A. J.,Murayama, K.,Pekrun, R.(2011).A 3×2 achievement goal model.Journal of Educational Psychology,103(3),632-648.
19. Elliot, A.,McGregor, H.(2001).A 2×2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76,501-519.
20. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL-8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
21. Kaplan, A.,Midgley, C.(1997).The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference?.Contemporary Educational Psychology,22,415-435.
22. Kleine, M.,Goetz, T.,Pekrun, R.,Hall, N.(2005).The structure of students' emotions experienced during a mathematical achievement test.ZDM,37(3),221-225.
23. Linnenbrink, E. A.(2005).The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(2),197-213.
24. Linnenbrink, E. A.,Pintrich, P. R.(2002).Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model.Educational Psychologist,37(2),69-78.
25. Maehr, M. L.,Midgley, C.(1991).Enhancing student motivation: A school-wide approach.Educational Psychologist,26,399-427.
26. Middleton, M. J.,Midgley, C.(1997).Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory.Journal of Educational Psychology,89(4),710-718.
27. Pekrun, R.(2000).A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions.Motivational psychology of human development,Oxford, UK:
28. Pekrun, R.,Elliot, A.,Maier, M.(2006).Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test.Journal of Education Psychology,98(3),583-597.
29. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Perry, R.,Kramer, K.,Hochstadt, M.,Molfenter, S.(2004).Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ).Anxiety, Stress, and Coping,17(3),287-316.
30. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Titz, W.,Perry, R.(2002).Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research.Educational Psychologist,37(2),91-105.
31. Pintrich, P. R.(2000).Multiple goals , multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(3),544-555.
32. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(2008).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall Merrill.
33. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.(2001).Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality.Structural Equation Modeling,8,613-626.
34. Urden, T.,Midgley, C.(2001).Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn.Educational Psychology Review,13(2),115-138.
35. Wolters, C. A.(2004).Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientation to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(2),236-250.
36. Wolters, C. A.,Yu, S. L.,Pintrich, P. R.(1996).The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning.Learning and Individual Differences,8,211-238.
37. 施怡如(2011)。Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=Institute of Education, National Cheng Kung University。
38. 施淑慎(2005)。教室目標結構與成就目標取向對國小學童自我阻礙行為及考試焦慮之預測作用。台灣心理學會第四十四屆年會，中壢=Zhungli, Taiwan:
39. 彭淑玲(2010)。Taipei, Taiwan，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系研究所=Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University。

1. 程炳林、張映芬(2017)。課室社會目標結構之建構暨其與個人社會目標、求助行為之關係。教育心理學報，48(4)，509-530。
2. 季力康、王柏鈞(2016)。成就目標理論的新觀點：3×2 成就目標之探討。中華體育季刊，30(3)，203-210。
3. 李昭鋆、余民寧(2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊，63(1)，247-271。
4. 林宴瑛(2022)。國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報，53(4)，923-947。
5. 謝欣妤、季力康(2019)。3×2成就目標對主觀幸福感之預測：以基本心理需求為中介變項。文化體育學刊 ，28，9-21。