大學生消沉傾向量表之發展研究

The Development of Self-affliction Tendency Scal

10.6251/BEP.20160125

吳珮瑀(Pei-Yu Wu)；林清文(Ching-Wen Lin)；陸洛(Luo Lu)

消沉傾向量表 ； 複核效化 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； Self-affliction Tendency Scale ； cross-validation ； confirmatory factor analysis

教育心理學報

48卷2期（2016 / 12 / 01）

253 - 278

繁體中文

本研究主要依據Church 與Brooks（2009）有關隱微自殺（subtle suicide）概念編製「消沉傾向量表」。消沉傾向量表共有30 題，在信效度考驗上共進行內部一致性信度、再測信度、建構效度、複核效化及效標關聯效度等考驗。以大學生為研究對象，研究樣本來自全台10 所大專校院在學學生，總計包含2,679 位大學生。研究結果發現，消沉傾向量表具有良好信效度，在多次內部一致性信度考驗，全量表信度係數介於 .94- .96，各分量表介於 .76- .96。各分量表組合信度皆達.70以上，平均變異萃取量均在 .30 以上，題項間具有適度的共同變異，SMC（Squared MultipleCorrelations）佳。間隔2 週測量穩定係數為 .89，間隔3 週為 .72。信度考驗結果顯示消沉傾向量表具備良好一致性和穩定性。以結構方程模式統計方法進行驗證性因素分析，結果支持消沉傾向量表評量的因素結構與實徵資料間的適配度佳。複核效化分析結果，顯示建模樣本與效度樣本的指標相似度高，支持消沉傾向量表評量的跨樣本穩定性。在消沉傾向與相關概念間關係，研究結果均支持消沉傾向量表評量具備合理的聚斂效度與區分效度。依據研究結果，本研究提出消沉傾向量表運用與發展之建議。

The purpose of the study was to develop the Self-affliction Tendency Scale (SATS) for college students. Based on phenomenon observed and literature reviewed, the authors proposed a framework for studying the concept of “self-affliction” as a tendency of self-destruction in various aspects ranging from cognitive, emotional, behavioral, to interpersonal relationships. The SATS is comprised of 30 items in 7-point Likert-type scale and can be completed between 5 to 10 minutes. It included four dimensions: existential alienation, dysfunction, poor self-care, and contradictory relationship. The values of reliability and validity on the SATS were calculated from a sample of 2,679, all of which were Taiwanese undergraduate college students from ten universities. Accordingly, the internal consistency reliability (N = 172~1,050), test-retest reliability (N = 66 and 98), construct validity (N = 470), cross-validation (N = 519), and criterion-related validity of the developed scale (N = 172~1,050) were evaluated. Seven tests were conducted to relate the 4-dimension model to various psychological issues in the Taiwanese society. These issues included self-esteem, mental health, internet addiction, loneliness, depression, and happiness. Descriptive statistics, including means, variances, and item-total correlations, were computed for each item. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, one-factor repeated measures analysis of variance, and discriminant analysis were conducted to differentiate the similarity and difference between variables. Internal consistency of the scores on SES and its subscales was estimated by Cronbach’s coefficient alpha (full scale was .94~.96, subscale of existential alienation was .81~.86, subscale of dysfunction was .93~.96, subscale of poor self-care was .76~.84, and subscale of contradictory relationship was .82~.90). Stability coefficient was based on 2 test-retest procedures (an interval of 2 weeks was .89, and an interval of 3 weeks was .72). Validation of the SATS was based on a 4-dimension model, followed by cross-validation on the calibration sample (N = 470) and validation sample (N = 519). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model was well supported by observed data and the stability of the model was confirmed. The result had supported the scale structure. These evidences thus generally supported the 4-dimension self-affliction model. Applications of the SATS and the suggestions of future study were discussed.

1. 李靜如、林邦傑、修慧蘭(2011)。成人依附、社交自我效能、困擾的自我揭露、寂寞與憂鬱之關係：以有戀愛經驗的大學生為例。教育心理學報，43(1)，155-174。
   連結：
2. 陳淑惠、翁儷禎、蘇逸人、吳和懋、楊品鳳(2003)。中文網路成癮量表之編製與心理計量特性研究。中華心理學刊，45(3)，279-294。
   連結：
3. 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質，影響，測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
   連結：
4. 行政院主計處（2011）：100 年人力資源調查提要分析。取自行政院主計處網站：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/232813475071.pdf，2014 年5 月14 日。[Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (2011). The 2011 summary analysis of human resources survey. Retrieved May 14, 2014, from http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/232813475071.pdf ]
5. 行政院主計處（2012）：國情統計通報第179 號。取自行政院主計處網站：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/291716311471.pdf ，2014 年5 月14 日。[Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (2012). The 2012 summary analysis of human resources survey. Retrieved May 14, 2014, from http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/291716311471.pdf]
6. Akiskal, H. S.,Hirschfeld, R. M. A.,Yerevanian, B. I.(1983).The relationship of personality to affective disorders: A critical review.Archives of General Psychiatry,40,801-810.
7. Baumgartner, H.,Homburg, C.(1996).Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review.International Journal of Research in Marketing,13,139-161.
8. Campbell, D.T.,Fiske, D.W.(1959).Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105.
9. Cheng, T. A.,Chien, C. P.(1984).Epidemiology of depression: CES-D survey in Taiwan.The Third Practice Congress of Psychiatry,Seoul, Korea:
10. Chien, C. P.,Cheng, T. A.(1985).Depression in Taiwan: Epidemiology survey untilizing CES-D.Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica,87(5),335-338.
11. Church, M. A.,Brooks, C. I.(2009).Subtle suicide: Our silent epidemic of ambivalence about living.Palo Alto, CA:ABC-CLIO, Praeger.
12. Cooper, D. R.,Emory, C. W.(1995).Business research method.Chicago:IL Irwin.
13. Erikson, E. H.(1963).Childhood and society.New York, NY:Norton.
14. Erikson, E. H.(1968).Identity: Youth and crisis.New York, NY:Norton.
15. Erikson, E. H.(1959).Identity and the life cycle.Psychological Issue,1,1-71.
16. Fornell, C.(Ed.)(1982).A second generation of multivariate analysis, vol. 2, Measurement and evaluation.New York, NY:Praeger.
17. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2010).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson/Prentice Hall.
18. Huprich, S. K.(2003).Evaluating facet-level predictions and construct validity of depressive personality disorder.Journal of Personality Disorders,17,219-232.
19. Huprich, S. K.(2001).The overlap between depressive personality disorder and dysthymia, revisited.Harvard Review of Psychiatry,9,158-168.
20. Huprich, S. K.(2009).What should become of depressive personality disorder in DSM-V?.Harvard Review of Psychiatry,17(1),41-59.
21. Huprich, S. K.(2004).Convergent and discriminant validity of three measures of depressive personality disorder.Journal of Personality Assessment,82,321-328.
22. Huprich, S. K.(1998).Depressive personality disorder: Theoretical issues, clinical findings, and future research questions.Clinical Psychology Review,18,477-500.
23. Huprich, S. K.,Margrett, J.,Barthelemy, K. J.,Fine, M. A.(1996).The depressive personality disorder inventory: An initial examination of its psychometric properties.Journal of Clinical Psychology,2(2),153-159.
24. Klein, D. N.(1990).Depressive personality: reliability, validity, and relation to dysthymia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,99,412-421.
25. Lee, M. B.,Liao, S. C.,Lee, Y. J.,Wu, C. H.,Tseng, M. C.,Gau, S. F.,Rau, C. L.(2003).Development and verification of validity and reliability of a short screening instrument to identify psychiatric morbidity.Journal of Formosa Medical Association,102,687-694.
26. Marsh, H. W.,Hocevar, D.(1985).Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups.Psychological Bulletin,97(3),562-582.
27. Podsakoff, P. M.,Organ, D. W.(1986).Self-Reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects.Journal of Management,12,531-544.
28. Raykov, T.,Marcoulides, G. A.(2000).A first course in structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Rogers, C.(1961).On Becoming a Person.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
30. Rosenberg, M.(1965).Society and the adolescent self-image.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
31. Rosenbluth, M.(ed.),Kennedy, S. H.(ed.),Bagby, R. M.(ed.)(2007).Depression and personality: Conceptual and clinical challenges.Arlington, VA:American Psychiatric Publishing.
32. Ryder, A. G.,Bagby, R. M.(1999).Diagnostic viability of depressive personality disorder.Journal of Personality Disorders,13,99-117.
33. Ryder, A. G.,Bagby, R. M.,Schuller, D. R.(2002).The overlap of depressive personality disorder and dysthymia: A categorical problem with a dimensional solution.Harvard Review of Psychiatry,10(6),337-352.
34. Sawilowsky, S.(2002).A quick distribution-free test for trend that contributes evidence of construct validity.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,35,78-88.
35. Vasconcelos-Raposo, J.,Fernandes, H. M.,Teixeira, C. M.,Bertelli, R.(2012).Factorial validity and invariance of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among Portuguese youngsters.Social Indicators Research,105,483-498.
36. Yang, N.,Chen, C. C.,Choi, J.,Zou, Y.(2000).Sources of work-family conflict: A Sino-US comparison of the effects of work and family demands.Academy of Management Journal,43(1),113-123.
37. 邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式─LISREL?SIMPLIS 原理與應用（二版）。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery。
38. 教育部(2012)。重編國語辭典修訂本。台北=Taipei:行政院=Executive Yuan, R.O.C.。
39. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法統計軟體應用。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan culture enterprise。
40. 陳坤虎(2001)。Taipei，國立臺灣大學大學心理學研究所=National Taiwan University。
41. 陳淑惠(2003)。擬像世界中的真實心理問題？─從心理病理實徵研究談起。學生輔導，86，16-35。
42. 陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，8，115-137。
43. 曾文志(2007)。大學生的樂觀、社會支持與幸福感的關聯：結構方程模式取向之研究。教育與心理研究，30(4)，117-146。
44. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式理論與應用（五版）。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan culture enterprise。

1. 廖珮妏(2020)。體驗教育培養大專生帶得走的品格信念指標之建構。當代教育研究季刊，28(3)，29-33+35。
2. 劉彥君,楊舒涵,陳燕諭(2021)。婚姻適應、伴侶溝通、社會支持與父親產後憂鬱傾向之關係。教育心理學報，52(3)，643-664。
3. 魏玉萍,陳建方,夏秉楓(2023)。問題導向學習（PBL）教學對提升觀光系大學生領隊危機處理能力之成效。觀光旅遊研究學刊，18(2)，47-71。
4. 吳珮瑀(2019)。消沉經驗與自體疾患－Kohut自體心理學之應用。應用心理研究，70，185-226。
5. (2024)。旅遊城市居民與遊客之「知覺環境可步行性」：構面建構及其與步行關聯性分析。運輸學刊，36(1)，71-111。