题名

從角色默契消失到敵意湧現的惡化歷程:認定伴侶不貞的男性親密殺人心理探究

并列篇名

The Deterioration Process Resulting from the Loss of Role Understanding to the Emergence of Hostility: Intimate Partner Homicide Caused by Accusations of Infidelity

DOI

10.6251/BEP.201803_49(3).0006

作者

邱獻輝(Hsien-Huei Chiou)

关键词

文化考量 ; 不貞 ; 殺妻 ; 華人關係主義 ; Chinese Relationalism ; Cultural Consideration ; Infidelity ; Intimate Partner Homicide

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

49卷3期(2018 / 03 / 01)

页次

461 - 486

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

不貞是親密殺人的重要前導事件,國外雖已累積不少研究,但多數缺乏文化考量;國內雖已開啟殺害不貞伴侶之心理探究、且融入華人文化的考量,但皆為單一受訪者的敘事探究;故國內外文獻皆有闕漏。為了周延建構台灣此類殺害伴侶者的心理機制,本研究從華人關係主義的角度切入,邀請十位認定伴侶不貞的男性親密殺人者進行深度訪談,並審閱其判決書、社工紀錄、犯罪紀錄,再以共識質性研究法分析文本。研究結果彙整出一個特徵範疇與四個歷程範疇,前者為「思維:關係主義的男性貞節信念」,後者包括「遠因:角色默契消逝的伴侶衝突」、「近因:信任崩解後的敵意湧現」、「爆發:親密暴行質變、憤恨殺害伴侶」、「回首:後悔」。此歷程結果有兩個可能的意涵:其一,從關係主義的觀點來審視,受訪者親密殺人歷程似是一個「從角色默契消失到敵意湧現的惡化歷程」;其二,認定伴侶不貞後出現的信任崩解/敵意湧現,可能是受訪者從相對輕微的親密暴力、惡化變質成殺害伴侶的促發因子之一-但此推測未曾見於先前文獻,後續研究可進一步探討。

英文摘要

Accusing one's partner of infidelity is one of the major causes stated by offenders when intimate partner homicide occurs. Much research has been undertaken concerning this issue among western research literature, but most of them lacked cultural considerations with respect to the psychological process of homicide. In Taiwan, researchers who investigated this topic with Chinese cultural consideration undertook only narrative research based on a single participant, which only presented the specific experience from an individual's perspective and thus generalization is limited. Therefore, there is a gap within the literature on this this topic area. This study is based on Chinese Relationalism perspectives and is designed to comprehensively construct the psychological mechanism behind this type of homicide. Participants of this study consisted of ten male prisoners who accused their partners of infidelity and were convicted of homicide. Consensual qualitative research (CQR) was applied to analyze interview scripts, along with consulting written verdicts, criminal records, and records maintained by social workers. The results revealed one characteristics category and four process categories. The former was "Personal thoughts: Male thinking related to fidelity based on Chinese Relationalism". The later includes (a) Fundamental reasons: couple conflicts along with the loss of role understanding; (b); Proximate reasons: the emergence of hostility after losing trust; (c) Explosion: the worsening of intimate partner violence and accumulated rage leading to intimate homicide. (d) Looking back: regret. There were several implications from these results. Firstly, based on Chinese Relationalism, the interviewees’ homicide process seemed to be "a deterioration process resulting from the loss of role understanding to the emergence of hostility." Secondly, based on the results, it could be hypothesized that "during the process of intimate partner homicide, the loss of trust and the emergence of hostility caused by partner infidelity might be an important reason for the worsening of intimate partner violence." However, no research literature has discussed the role of the trust/hostile related to the intimate partner homicide caused by accusation of infidelity; thus, this would be an important area for future research to explore.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王珮玲(2012)。親密伴侶殺人案件之分析:以男性謀殺女性案件為例。中華心理衛生學刊,25(2),231-266。
    連結:
  2. 邱獻輝、葉光輝(2012)。從傳統華人貞節觀念探討男性殺妻。本土心理學研究,38,43-100。
    連結:
  3. 邱獻輝、葉光輝(2014)。臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵:華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會集刊,26(3),183-523。
    連結:
  4. 楊國樞(2004)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究,22,11-80。
    連結:
  5. 溫毓師(2006)。中國「貞節觀」文化對婦女的影響兼論心理特質探討。華梵人文學報,6,33-76。
    連結:
  6. 葉光輝(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。
    連結:
  7. 葉光輝(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。
    連結:
  8. 葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂(2006)。現代華人的家庭文化特徵:以台灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究,25,141-195。
    連結:
  9. 費孝通(1947):鄉土中國。上海:觀察社。[Fei, X. (1947). Local China. Shanghai, China: Observation Society.]
  10. Abramsky, T.,Watts, C. H.,Garcia-Moreno, C.,Devries, K.,Kiss, L.,Ellsberg, M.,Jansen, H. A. F. M.,Heise, L.(2011).What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence.BMC Public Health,11,109.
  11. Arnocky, S.,Sunderani, S.,Gomes, W.,Vaillancourt, T.(2015).Anticipated partner infidelity and men's intimate partner violence: The mediating role of anxiety.Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences,9(3),186-196.
  12. Avakame, E.(1999).Females' labor force participation and intimate femicide: An empirical assessment of the backlash hypothesis.Violence and Victims,14,277-291.
  13. Block, C. R.,Christakos, A.(1995).Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years.Crime and Delinquency,41,496-526.
  14. Boyce, S.,Zeledón, P.,Tellez, E.,Barrington, C.(2016).Gender-specific jealousy and infidelity norms as sources of sexual health risk and violence among young coupled Nicaraguans.American Journal of Public Health,106(4),625-632.
  15. Buss, D. M.,Duntley, J. D.(2011).The evolution of intimate partner violence.Aggression and Violent Behavior,16,411-419.
  16. Chimbos, P. D.(1998).Spousal homicides in contemporary Greece.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,39(2),213-223.
  17. Corbin, J.,Strauss, A.(2008).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  18. Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(2005).The Sage Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  19. Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  20. Dobash, R. E.,Dobash, R. P.(1979).Violence against wives.New York, NY:Free Press.
  21. Dutton, D. G.(2007).The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
  22. Dutton, D.,Kerry, G.(1999).Modus operandi and personality disorder in incarcerated spousal killers.International Journal of Law & Psychiatry,22(3-4),287-299.
  23. Gottman, J. M.(2015).Principia amoris: The new science of love.New York, NY:Routledge.
  24. Hall, E. T.(1976).Beyond culture.Gardon City, NY:Doubleday and Company.
  25. Hartnett, K.,Blow, A. J.(2005).Infidelity in committed relationships II: A substantive review.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,31,217-233.
  26. Hill, C. E.,Knox, S.,Thompson, B. J.,Williams, E. N.,Hess, S. A.,Ladany, N.(2005).Consensual qualitative research: An update.Journal of Counseling Psychology,52(2),196-205.
  27. Hill, C. E.,Thompson, B. J.,Williams, E. N.(1997).A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research.The Counseling Psychologist,25,517-572.
  28. Ho, D. Y. F.(1995).Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West.Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior,25,115-139.
  29. Ho, D. Y. F.(1998).Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1(1),1-16.
  30. Hwang, K. K.(2012).Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations.New York:Springer.
  31. Jin, X.,Keat, J. E.(2010).The effects of change in spousal power on intimate partner violence among Chinese immigrants.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,25(4),610-625.
  32. Kaighobadi, F.,Starratt, V. G.,Shackelford, T. K.,Popp, D.(2008).Male mate retention mediates the relationship between female sexual infidelity and female-directed violence.Personality and Individual Differences,44,1422-1431.
  33. Kim, H.,Grogan-Kaylor, A.,Han, Y.,Maurizi, L.,Delva, J.(2012).The association of neighborhood characteristics and domestic violence in Santiago, Chile.Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,90(1),41-55.
  34. Kim, U.(Ed.),Berry, J. W.(Ed.)(1993).Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  35. Kunda, Z.(1999).Social cognition: Making sense of people.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  36. Levine, P. A.(2010).In an unspoken voice: Flow the body releases trauma and restores goodness.Berkeley, CA:North Atlantic Books.
  37. Lu, L.,Gilmour, R.(2004).Culture, self and ways to achieve SAW: A cross-cultural analysis.Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,5,51-79.
  38. Marsella, A. J.(Ed.),Devos, G.(Ed.),Hsu, F. L. K.(Ed.)(1985).Culture and Self: Asian and western perspectives.NY:Tavistock.
  39. Nederlof, A. F.,Murdis, P.,Hovens, J. E.(2014).Anger, anxiety, and feelings of delusional threat as predictors of aggressive attitudes: An experimental mood induction study in a non-clinical sample.Personality and Individual Differences,57,25-30.
  40. Pence, E.,Paymar, M.(1993).Education groups for men who batter: the Duluth model.Duluth, Minnesota:Minnesota Program Development.
  41. Sauerheber, J. D.,Disque, J. G.(2016).A trauma-based physiological approach: Helping betrayed partners heal from marital infidelity.The Journal of Individual Psychology,72(3),214-234.
  42. Serran, G.,Firestone, P.(2004).Intimate partner homicide: A review of the male proprietariness and the self-defense theories.Aggression and Violent Behavior,9,1-15.
  43. Shiraev, E. B.,Levy, D. A.(2017).Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications.New York, NY:Routledge.
  44. Starratt, V. G.,Goetz, A. T.,Shackelford, T. K.,McKibbin, W. F.(2008).Men's partner-directed insults and sexual coercion in intimate relationships.Journal of Family Violence,23,315-323.
  45. Sullivom, K. T.(Ed.),Lawrence, E.(Ed.)(2016).The Oxford handbook of relationship science and couple interventions.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
  46. Triands, H. C.(1995).Individualism and collectivism.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  47. Vandello, J. A.,Cohen, D.(2003).Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(5),997-1010.
  48. Varnum, M. E. W.,Grossmann, I.,Kitayama, S.,Nisbett, R. E.(2010).The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis.Current Directions in Psychological Science,10(1),9-13.
  49. Wan, C.,Chiu, C. Y.,Peng, S.,Tam, K P.(2007).Measuring cultures through intersubjective norms: Implications for predicting relative identification with two or more cultures.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,8,213-26.
  50. Weizman, A.(2014).Women's and men's relative status and intimate partner violence in India.Population and Development Review,40(1),55-75.
  51. Wilson, M.,Daly, M.(1994).Spousal homicide.Juristic,14(8),1-14.
  52. Yang, T.,Morris, M. R.,Teevan, J.,Adamic, L. A.,Ackerman, M. S.(2011).Culture matters: A survey study of social Q & A behavior.Processings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.:
  53. 林明傑(2009)。家庭暴力案件危險分級與快速評估之進階實務。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,5(2),305-316。
  54. 侯崇文(1999)。殺人事件中犯罪者與被害者關係研究。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集
  55. 陳顧遠(1992)。中國婚姻史。台北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
  56. 楊士隆(1998)。殺人犯罪:多重面向之殺人犯調查研究。台北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan Book Inc.。
  57. 葉光輝(2002)。「關係主義」:論華人人際互動關係的要素、來源及變化歷程。從現代到本土,台北=Taipei:
被引用次数
  1. (2023)。「反擊型」男性親密暴力者的心理機制:華人關係主義的觀點。教育研究學報,57(1),49-74。