課文本位閱讀策略教學對國小學童閱讀表現與策略使用覺知情形之影響

The effects of Textbook-based Approach to Reading Instruction on elementary graders' reading comprehension and awareness of using reading strategy

10.6251/BEP.201806_49(4).0004

陳明蕾(Minglei Chen)

閱讀策略 ； 閱讀理解 ； 課文本位閱讀策略教學 ； Reading comprehension ； Reading strategy ； Text-based approach to reading instruction

教育心理學報

49卷4期（2018 / 06 / 01）

581 - 609

繁體中文

以教科書做為閱讀教學的主要材料，是提升教師進行閱讀策略教學的有效路徑（Pearson, 2009）。本研究採用課文本位閱讀教學模式，以原有國語課程教學時間，檢視此一教學模式對國小學童閱讀表現、閱讀理解策略覺知情形與情意之影響。本研究以嘉義市2所國小共439位學生為研究對象，採2（實驗組與對照組）×3（三、四、五年級）不等組前後測設計進行兩學期的準實驗教學。結果顯示，本教學模式確能提昇四、五年級學生閱讀測驗表現，但對三年級學生的閱讀測驗表現無顯著效果。在閱讀策略使用覺知的自評表現，發現五年級實驗組學生在摘要、上下文脈絡、理解監控、與自我提問四個構面後測的自評分數高於對照組學生，其餘後測的組別效果則皆無顯著差異。在情意部份，發現三年級實驗組學生在閱讀自信心、學習方法後測的自評分數高於對照組學生，五年級實驗組學生學習方法後測的自評分數低於對照組，其餘後測的組別效果則皆無顯著差異。

The current study designed a multiple reading strategies program for elementary students and examined its effect on the reading comprehension, the awareness of using reading strategie, and attitude. A 2 (treatment: experimental group and control group)x3(grades: 3rd: 4th: 5th) quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was adopted. 439 participants were recruited from 16 classes. The results indicated that (a) 4th and 5th experimental graders' reading comprehension score higher than control group, but there was no difference for 3rd graders; (b) for the awareness of using reading strategies, 5th experimental graders' scores higher than control group on the summary, context, comprehension monitoring, and self-questioning, and no group effects were found for other posttest contrasts; (c) for the attitude, 3rd experimental graders' scores higher than control group on the reading confidence, learning method, and no group effects were found for other posttest contrasts.

1. 吳裕聖、曾玉村(2011)。鷹架式概念構圖教學策略對學童生物文章的閱讀表徵與情意之影響。教育心理學報，43(1)，1-24。
   連結：
2. 陸怡琮(2011)。摘要策略對國小五年級學童摘要能與與閱讀理解的成效。教育科學研究期刊，56(3)，91-118。
   連結：
3. 黃友亭、辜玉旻(2013)。結合自我解釋策略對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。課程與教學季刊，16(2)，135-160。
   連結：
4. Adelman, J. S.(Ed.)(2012).Visual word recognition, volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development.Hove, UK:Psychology.
5. Afflerbach, P.,Pearson, P. D.,Paris, S. G.(2008).Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies.The Reading Teacher,61(5),364-373.
6. Alexandra, K.,Per, B. B.,Rune, H. B. C.(2014).Alexandra, K., Per, B. B., & Rune, H. B. C. (2014). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed effects Models. R package version 2.0-20..
7. Andreassen, R.,Braten, I.(2011).Implementation and effects of explicit reading comprehension instruction in fifth-grade classrooms.Learning & Instruction,21,520-537.
8. Atkins, J. G.(2013).Columbia University.
9. Baayen, R. H.(2008).Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
10. Bates, D.,Maechler, M.,Bolker, B.,Walker, S.(2014).lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4.Journal of statistical software,67(1),1-48.
11. Block, C. C.,Paris, S. R.,Reed, K. L.,Whiteley, C. S.,Cleveland, M. D.(2009).Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,101,262-281.
12. Block, C. C.,Pressley, M.(2002).Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices.New York, NY:Guilford.
13. Brown, R.,Pressley, M.,Van Meter, P.,Schuder, T.(1996).A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers.Journal of Educational Psychology,88,18-37.
14. Cain, K.,Oakhill, J.,Lemmon, K.(2004).Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity.Journal of Educational Psychology,96,671-681.
15. Cantrell, S. C.,Almasi, J. F.,Carter, J. C.,Rintamaa, M.,Madden, A.(2010).The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers.Journal of Educational Psychology,102(2),257-280.
16. Chall, J. S.,Jacobs,V. A.(2003).Poor Children's fourth-grade slump.American Educator,27(1),14-15.
17. Chall. J. S.(1996).Stages of reading development.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace.
18. Cross, D. R.,Paris, S. G.(1988).Developmental and instructioal anslyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension.Journal of Edcuational Psychology,80,131-142.
19. Dole, J. A.,Brown, K. J.,Trathen, W.(1996).The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension of at-risk students.Reading Research Quarterly,31,62-88.
20. Durkin, D.(1978).What classroom observation reveals about reading comprehension instruction.Reading Research Quarterly,14,481-533.
21. Eagleton, M. B.(Ed.),Dobler, E.(Ed.)(2007).Reading the web: Strategies for internet inquiry.New York, NY:Grilford.
22. Guthrie, J. T.,Wigfield,, A.,VonSecker, C.(2000).Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(2),331-341.
23. Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Remove random factors variance and fixed effects from the dependent variable of an LMM analysis. R function version 0.6.10. Retrieved from http://githab.com/hohevsteil/remef/
24. Hoover, W. A.,Gough, P. B.(1990).The simple view of reading.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,2,127-160.
25. Hung, L. Y.,Chen, H. F.(2017).Three-year longitudinal study of Reading Comprehension in one primary school.Promoting textbook base reading comprehension strategy instruction in Taiwan. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Asia Reading and Writing Association,HongKong:
26. Israel, S. E.(Ed.),Duffy, G. G.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of research on reading comprehension.New York, NY:Routledge.
27. Israel, S.(Ed.),Duffy, G.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of research on reading comprehension.New York, NY:Routledge.
28. Israel, S.(Ed.),Duffy, G.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of research on reading comprehension.New York:Routledge.
29. Jegede, O. J.,Ala iyemola, F. F.,Okebukola, P. A.(1990).The effect of concept mapping on students' anxiety and achievement in biology.Journal of research Science leaching,27(10),951-960.
30. Karpicke, J. D.(2009).Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,138(4),469-486.
31. Kendeou, P.,Bohn-Gettler, C.,White, M.,van den Broek, P.(2008).Children's inference generation across different media.Journal of Research in Reading,31,259-272.
32. Ko, H. W.,Yu, T. Y.(2017).Promoting textbook base reading comprehension strategy instruction in Taiwan.Promoting textbook base reading comprehension strategy instruction in Taiwan. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Asia Reading and Writing Association,HongKong:
33. Liang, L. A.,Dole, J. A.(2006).Help with teaching reading comprehension: Comprehension instructional frameworks.The Reading Teacher,59(8),742-753.
34. Lu, I. C.,Yeh, Y. W.,Huang, B. C.,Guo, Y. C.(2017).A School-University Collaboration for the Implementation of The Textbook-based Approach to Reading Instruction (TBRI).Promoting textbook base reading comprehension strategy instruction in Taiwan. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Asia Reading and Writing Association,Hong Kong:
35. McGill-Franzen, A.(Ed.),Allington, R. L.(Ed.)(2011).Handbook of Reading Disability Research.New York, NY:Routledge.
36. McNamara, D. S.(Ed.)(2007).Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions and technologies.New York, NY:Erlbaum.
37. Meyer, B. J. F., Ray, M. N., & Middelmiss, W. (2012). Children's use of comparative text signals: The relationship between age and comprehension ability. Discours, 10. Retrieved from http://discours.revues.org/
38. Mokhtari, K.,Reichard, C. A.(2002).Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reding strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(2),249-259.
39. National Reading Panel(2000).Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research lietrature on reading and its implication for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups.Washington, DC:National Imstitute of Child Health and Development.
40. Ness, M.(2011).Explicit reading comprehension instruction in elementary classrooms: Teacher use of reading comprehension strategies.Journal of Research in Childhood Educaiton,25,98-117.
41. Oakhill, J.,Hartt, J.,Samols, D.(2005).Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,18,657-686.
42. Palinscar, A. S.,Brown, A. L.(1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitioring activities.Cognition and Instruction,2,117-175.
43. Paris, S. G.,Lipson, M. Y.,Wixson, K. K.(1983).Becoming a strategic reader.Contemporary Educational Psychology,8(3),293-316.
44. Phelps, G.(2009).Just knowing how to read isn't enough: Assessing knowledge for teaching reading.Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,21(2),137-154.
45. Pressley, M.,Wharton-McDonal, R.,Hampston, J. M.,Echevarria, M.(1998).The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade4 and -5 classrooms in upstate New York.Scientifice Studies of Reading,2,150-191.
46. Suggate, S. P.(2010).Why what we teach depends on when: grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.Developmental Psychology,46(6),1556-1579.
47. Taylor, B. M.(Ed.),Graves, M. F.(Ed.),van den Broek, P.(Ed.)(2000).Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades.New York, NY:Teachers College.
48. 沈欣怡、蘇宜芬(2011)。推論性問題引導課程對國小四年級學童推論理解與閱讀理解能力之影響。教育心理學報，43(S)，337-356。
49. 柯華葳(2011)。語文課與閱讀能力的培養。教育研究月刊，210，5-14。
50. 柯華葳、丘嘉慧、詹益綾、游婷雅、楊芝瑜(2013)。,未出版
51. 柯華葳、詹益綾(2006)。國民小學（二至六年級）閱讀理解篩選測驗。臺北=Taipei:教育部特殊教育工作小組=Committee of Sepecial Education in Ministry of Educatioin。
52. 洪儷瑜、陳心怡、陳柏熹、陳秀芬(2014)。詞彙成長測驗。台北=Taipei:中國行為科學社=Chinese Behavioral Science Corportation。
53. 教育部（2003）：國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域（國語文）。取自國教署網站：http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php，2017 年4 月13 日。[Minitsry of Education (2003). Mandarin learning areas in Grade1-9 Curricultum Gudieline. Retrived the website of MOE from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php, 2017, Apr, 13.
54. 黃秀霜(1996)。中文年級認字量表。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理出版社=Psychology Press。
55. 蘇宜芬、洪儷瑜、陳心怡、陳柏熹(2015)。閱讀理解成長測驗。台北=Taipei:中國行為科學社=Chinese Behavioral Science Corportation。

1. 陳明蕾(2019)。台灣十年來教師閱讀教學與學生閱讀表現關係之探討：來自PIRLS 2006、2011與2016的證據。教育心理學報，51(1)，51-82。
2. 陸怡琮(2021)。課文本位閱讀策略教學對原住民國小學童閱讀理解與詞彙理解的影響。課程與教學，24(3)，25-53。
3. 謝卓君,閔詩紜(2022)。臺灣閱讀教育治理之城鄉差異探究。教育科學研究期刊，67(4)，73-104。
4. 徐慧珊(2022)。從SmartReading®適性閱讀檢測結果初探國語文教材之適用性－以臺灣某國際學校兩屆七年級母語學習者為例。臺灣華語教學研究，24，49-77。
5. 張國恩,阮品綸,宋曜廷(2022)。中文閱讀動機量表之編製與信效度檢驗。教育心理學報，53(4)，827-852。
6. 張郁雯(2021)。國小二、三年級學童朗讀流暢能力之成長模式探究。教育心理學報，53(2)，463-479。