影響數位閱讀表現的學生與環境因素：PIRLS 2016資料探討

Personal And Environmental Factors Affecting Students' Digital Reading Performance: Exploring Data from the PIRLS 2016

10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0007

張郁雯(Yuwen, Chang)；柯華葳(Hwawei, Ko)

紙本閱讀 ； 家庭學習資源 ； 數位使用 ； 數位閱讀 ； 閱讀自信 ； Digital reading ； Digital use ； Home resources for learning ； Print reading ； Reading confidence

教育心理學報

51卷1期（2019 / 09 / 01）

161 - 181

繁體中文

本研究的目的為探討學生個別因素（紙本閱讀能力、性別、閱讀自信、電腦使用自我效能）以及環境因素（家庭學習資源、家中數位設備與數位使用經驗）對國小學童數位閱讀表現之影響。資料來源為13個國家共69507位國小四年級學童在PIRLS 2016紙本以及數位閱讀表現與相關問卷資料。運用IDB Analyzer第四版進行相關與迴歸分析。結果發現紙本閱讀能力、閱讀自信、電腦使用自我效能、電腦使用經驗、家庭學習資源以及家中數位設備能共同解釋數位閱讀表現49%－73%的變異。其中，紙本閱讀表現大約可以解釋六成數位閱讀表現的變異，顯示兩者涉及共同的歷程，但數位閱讀也需要異於紙本閱讀的技能。雖然大多數國家紙本與數位閱讀表現是女生表現優於男生，當控制了紙本閱讀成績，僅剩四個國家數位閱讀表現的性別差異達顯著水準，顯示多數國家兩性的閱讀落差不因閱讀形式而有所不同。家庭學習資源可以分別解釋數位閱讀表現與紙本閱讀表現變異的14%和16%，家庭學習資源透過對紙本閱讀之影響間接影響數位閱讀表現，但仍有0.6%－2.3%的變異是家庭學習資源直接影響數位閱讀表現。閱讀自信每增加1分，數位閱讀表現平均可以增加16分；而電腦使用自我效能每增1分，數位閱讀表現平均增加4分。閱讀自信的重要性高於電腦使用自我效能。電腦使用經驗與數位閱讀表現的關係，因國家不同而不同。使用電腦和數位閱讀能力的關係也因所從事的活動性質不同而不同，意味著學童如何使用數位工具比數位近用對數位閱讀能力更為重要。

The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of personal factors (print reading performance, gender, and reading confidence, and self-efficacy for computer use) and environmental factors (home resources for learning, digital devices in the home, and digital use) on digital reading performance in primary students. The data of 69507 fourth graders from 13 countries participating in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2016 were examined. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were conducted by the IEA IDB Analyzer software version 4. The results showed that print reading performance, reading confidence, self-efficacy for computer use, home resources for learning, digital devices in the home, and digital use as predictors, the regression line can explain 49%-73% the variation of digital reading performance. Print reading ability can explain 60% variance in digital reading performance, which suggested that processes readers use to comprehend digital text are similar to what is required to comprehend print text. It also suggested that digital reading requires a different set of skills from those required to read the print text. Most countries in the study, girls have outperformed boys in print reading and digital reading. When holding print reading performance constant across genders, gender gaps are no longer statistically significant. This means that digitalization does not exacerbate gender inequality. Home resources for learning can explain 14% and 16% variation respectively in digital and print reading performance. The indirect association (through the effect of home resources for learning on print reading skills) accounts for most of the variation, the direct association accounts for 0.6-2.3% of the variation. Increasing in reading confidence of 1 point could increase in the digital reading of 16 points while increasing in self-efficacy for computer use of 1 point, the increase in digital reading is only 4 points. This suggests the importance to boost students' reading confidence. The relationship between digital use and digital reading skills varies across countries and the activities for which student use computers. What students do with ICT are more important than digital access to them.

1. 劉宜芳, I. F.,柯華葳, H. W.(2017)。線上閱讀研究之回顧與展望。教育科學研究期刊，62(2)，61-87。
   連結：
2. Attewell, P.(2001).Comment: The first and second digital divides.Sociology of Education,74(3),252-259.
3. Azzolini, D.,Schizzerotto, A.(2017).The second digital divide in Europe. A crossnational study on students’ digital reading and navigation skills.Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
4. Borgonovi, F.(2016).Video gaming and gender differences in digital and printed reading performance among 15-year-olds students in 26 countries.Journal of adolescence,48,45-61.
5. Fraillon, J.,Ainley J.,Schulz, W.,Friedman, T.,Gebhardt, E.(2014).Preparing for Life in a Digital Age. The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report.New York, NY:Springer.
6. Hartman, D.K.,Morsink, P.M.,Zheng, J.(2010).From print to pixels: The evolution of cognitive conceptions of reading comprehension.The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice,New York:
7. Hattie (2018). Hattie ranking: 252 influences and effect sizes related to student achievement. Retrieved from https://visible-learning.org/hattie-ranking-influences-effect-sizes-learning-achievement/.
8. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2018). Help Manual for the IEA IDB Analyzer (Version 4.0). Hamburg, Germany. Available from www.iea.nl/data.htm.
9. Kennedy, T.,Wellman, B.,Klement, K.(2003).Gendering the digital divide.IT & Society,1(5),72-96.
10. Lenhard, W.,Schroeders, U.,Lenhard, A.(2017).Equivalence of screen versus print reading comprehension depends on task complexity and proficiency.Discourses Processes
11. Leu, D.J.,Kinzer , C.K.,Coiro, J.,Castek, J.,Henry, L.A.(2013).New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment.Theoretical models and processes of reading,Newark, DE:
12. Martin, M. O.,Mullis, I. V. S.,Hooper, M.(2017).Methods and Procedures in PIRLS 2016,:
13. Martin, M. O.,Mullis, I. V. S.,Hooper, M.,Yin, L.,Foy, P.,Fishbein, B.,Liu, J.(2017).Creating and Interpreting the PIRLS 2016 Context Questionnaire Scales.Methods and Procedures in PIRLS 2016,:
14. Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Foy, P.,Drucker, K. T.(2012).PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2011).PISA 2009 Results: Students on Line: Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume VI).
16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016).PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education.Paris:PISA, OECD Publishing.
17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2014).PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do-Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition).OECD Publishing.
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2015).Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection.PISA, OECD Publishing.
19. Rideout, V.(2017).The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight.San Francisco, CA:Common Sense Media.
20. Singer, L. M.,Alexander, P. A.(2017).Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal.Review of educational research,87(6),1007-1041.
21. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center(2017).PIRLS 2016 achievement scaling methodology.Methods and Procedures in PIRLS 2016,:
22. Van Deursen, A. J.,Van Dijk, J. A.(2014).The digital divide shifts to differences in usage.New Media & Society,16(3),507-526.
23. 柯華葳, H. W.,張郁雯, Y. W.,詹益綾, Y. L.,丘嘉慧, C. H.(2018)。,桃園市=Taoyuan City Taiwan:國立中央大學=National Central University。
24. 柯華葳, H. W.,詹益綾, Y. L.,丘嘉慧, C. H.(2013)。,未出版
25. 柯華葳, H. W.,詹益綾, Y. L.,張建妤, C. Y.,游婷雅, T. Y.(2008)。,未出版
26. 張貴琳, K. L.(2014)。青少年線上閱讀素養表現之關聯變項探討。市北教育學刊，45，29-68。
27. 張鑑如（2017）：幼兒發展調查資料庫建置計畫。取自幼兒發展調查資料庫建置計畫網站：http://pr.ntnu.edu.tw/archive/file/kIT%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E7%B0%A1%E4%BB%8B_20170329%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E6%9C%83%E7%89%88_20170330_%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B%E7%89%88(1).pdf，2018 年 6 月 25 日。[Chang, C. J. (2017). Kids in Taiwan (KIT): National Longitudinal Study of Child Development & Care. Retrieved June 25, 2018, from http://pr.ntnu.edu.tw/archive/file/kIT%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E7%B0%A1%E4%BB%8B_20170329%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E6%9C%83%E7%89%88_20170330_%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B%E7%89%88(1).pdf]

1. Ming-Lei Chen,Chia-Hsing Chen(2023)。Role of Fourth Graders' Vocabulary Ability in Modulating Their Multiple-Text Comprehension: An Eye Tracking Study。教育心理學報，55(1)，181-204。
2. 陳冠銘,袁千雯(2022)。以不同形式電子書為媒介的親子共讀閱讀行為研究。教育資料與圖書館學，59(3)，277-310。
3. 陳佳欣,林素微(2023)。臺灣學生後設認知與閱讀素養的關聯：PISA 2009與PISA 2018資料的比較。測驗學刊，70(3)，193-220。
4. 張芳全(2023)。國小學生的家庭社經地位、學習資源、數位設備、閱讀自信、幸福感受、家長喜歡閱讀和閱讀學習成就之關聯探究。學校行政，147，228-250。
5. (2020)。臺灣 PIRLS 2016 測試模式、題型和文本特徵的性別差異。市北教育學刊，65，1-32。
6. (2023)。青少年品味策略量表編製之研究。臺東大學教育學報，34(1)，29-63。