题名

學生為何作弊?以條件化間接效果考驗課室目標結構、個人成就目標、無聊與作弊之關係

并列篇名

Why do students cheat? The conditional indirect effect of perceived classroom goal structures, personal achievement goals, and boredom on cheating

DOI

10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0003

作者

彭淑玲(Shu-Ling Peng);程炳林(Biing-Lin Cherng)

关键词

作弊 ; 個人成就目標 ; 條件間接化效果 ; 無聊 ; 課室目標結構 ; Boredom ; Cheating ; Classroom goal structures ; Conditional indirect effect ; Personal achievement goals

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

51卷3期(2020 / 03 / 01)

页次

387 - 413

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究統整成就目標理論與學業情緒理論,並兼顧成就目標理論之個人與情境層面,解釋課室目標結構(classroom goal structure, CGS)、個人成就目標、無聊如何共同預測作弊。據此,本研究目的為:(1)考驗個人成就目標是否透過無聊對作弊產生中介效果,即無聊是否為個人成就目標與作弊之中介變項。(2)考驗學生知覺的兩種CGS(精熟、表現目標結構)是否調節上述中介效果。本研究以626位七至九年級學生為對象,特定數學領域,並以結構方程模式(structural equational modeling, SEM)進行條件化間接效果分析。結果顯示:(1)精熟與表現目標均會透過無聊對作弊產生負向效果,其中以「精熟目標→無聊→作弊」的負向間接效果較強。(2)學生知覺的CGS會調節「個人成就目標→無聊→作弊」之間接效果。首先,當個人與情境目標一致時,個人成就目標透過無聊對作弊的抑制效果會隨著CGS分數提升而變強(即隨著精熟目標結構分數提升,精熟目標透過無聊而抑制作弊的效果逐漸增強;隨表現目標結構分數提升,表現目標透過無聊降低作弊的效果逐漸增強)。其次,當個人與情境目標不一致時,會隨不同CGS類型與得分程度對中介模式產生不同調節效果。當學生知覺高精熟目標結構時,隨著精熟目標結構分數的增加,會強化表現目標透過無聊而誘發作弊的效果;當學生知覺低表現目標結構時,個人精熟目標透過無聊對作弊的抑制效果才可能存在。本研究依據研究結果提出建議,以作為國中教學輔導與未來研究之參考。

英文摘要

Based on an integration of achievement goal theory and academic emotions theory, the present study explored personal and contextual aspects of the achievement goal theory for disclosing how the perceived classroom goal structures (CGS), personal achievement goals, and boredom jointly have an impact on cheating. Accordingly, the aims of this study were twofold: first, to test whether personal achievement goals have a mediating effect on cheating through boredom (i.e., to validate the mediation role of boredom between personal achievement goals and cheating); second, to test whether the above mediation relationship can be moderated by the two types of perceived classroom goal structures (i.e., mastery and performance goal structures). Methodologically, one large-scale survey in the subject of mathematics was administered to a sample of 626 7th~9th grade Taiwanese students, and the collected data were analyzed using the technique of structural equational modeling (SEM) for validating the conditional indirect effect. The results showed that both the mastery and performance goals have a negative effect on cheating through boredom, but the negative indirect effect of "mastery goals → boredom → cheating" is relatively strong. Also, it was revealed that the perceived classroom goal structures well moderate the indirect effect of "personal achievement goals → boredom → cheating." When the adopted personal goals are consistent with the perceived contextual goals, the negative inhibition effect of the personal achievement goals on cheating through boredom will become stronger as the perceived CGS score increases. That is, as the score of mastery goal structures increases, the effect of the mastery goals on cheating through boredom is gradually enhanced; as the score of performance goal structures increases, the effect of the performance goals on cheating through boredom is gradually enhanced. However, when the adopted personal goals are inconsistent with the perceived contextual goals, different moderating effects will occur as a result of diverse CGS types and the level of CGS scores. That is, when students perceive a high level of mastery goal structure, as the score of mastery goal structure increases, the effect of performance goal on cheating through boredom will be produced. When students perceive a low level of performance goal structure, as the score of mastery goal structures increases, the effect of mastery goal on cheating through boredom is likely to occur. Based on the reported results, several suggestions were proposed to not only inform the instruction and counseling practice of junior high school education, but also shed valuable light for future research.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 宋秋美, C.-M.,程炳林, B.-L.,周啟葶, C.-T.(2010)。課室目標結構對個人目標導向的調節效果。教育心理學報,42,99-122。
    連結:
  2. 林宴瑛, Y.-Y.,彭淑玲, S.-L.(2015)。以多重目標觀點探討課室目標結構對國中生自我調整學習策略的影響:課室教學實驗研究。教育心理學報,47(2),159-178。
    連結:
  3. 林易慧, Y.-H.,程炳林, B.-L.(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之影響。教育心理學報,37,231-255。
    連結:
  4. 彭淑玲, S.-L.(2017)。未來取向之自我調整學習模式暨檢驗課室目標結構的調節效果。教育心理學報,48(3),371-397。
    連結:
  5. 彭淑玲, S.-L.(2019)。知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標、學業自我效能與無聊之關係:中介與條件化間接效果。教育心理學報,51(1),83-108。
    連結:
  6. 彭淑玲, S.-L.,王佩琪, P.-C.,林宏泰, H.-T.(2017)。你求助嗎?個人目標導向與適應/非適應課業求助/避助行為之關係。教育心理學報,49(2),267-293。
    連結:
  7. 彭淑玲, S.-L.,黃博聖, P.-S.,陳學志, H.-C.(2019)。學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係:以學業自我效能為調節變項。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),87-113。
    連結:
  8. 程炳林, B.-L.(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報,48(1),15-40。
    連結:
  9. Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
  10. Anderman, E. M.(ed.),Murdock, T. B.(ed.)(2007).Psychology of academic cheating.Burlington, MA:Elsevier.
  11. Anderman, E. M.,Danner, F.(2008).Achievement goals and academic cheating.Revue International De Psychologie Sociale,21,155-180.
  12. Anderman, E. M.,Griesinger, T.,Westerfield, G.(1998).Motivation and cheating during early adolescence.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(1),84-93.
  13. Anderman, E. M.,Maehr, M. L.,Midgley, C.(1999).Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference.Journal of Research & Development in Education,32(3),131-147.
  14. Anderman, E. M.,Midgley, C.(2004).Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school.Contemporary Educational Psychology,29(4),499-517.
  15. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
  16. Bong, M.(2008).Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivations, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating.The Journal of Experiment Education,76(2),191-217.
  17. Calabrese, R. L.,Cochran, J. T.(1990).The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents.Journal of Research & Development in Education,23(2),65-72.
  18. Chen, F. F.(2007).Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural equation modeling,14(3),464-504.
  19. Cizek, G. J.(1999).Cheating on test: How to do it, detect it and prevent it.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  20. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  21. Corrion, K.,D’Arripe-Longueville, F.,Chalabaev, A.,Schiano-Lomoriello, S.,Roussel, P.,Cury, F.(2010).Effect of implicit theories on judgment of cheating acceptability in physical education: The mediating role of achievement goals.Journal of Sports Sciences,28(8),909-919.
  22. Crown, D. F.,Spiller, M. S.(1998).Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research.Journal of Business Ethics,17(6),683-700.
  23. Ehrlich, E.,Flexner, S. B.,Garruth, G.,Hawkins, J. M.(1980).Oxford American dictionary.New York, NY:Avon Books.
  24. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
  25. Elliot, A. J.,McGregor, H. A.(2001).A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(3),501-519.
  26. Finn, K. V.,Frone, M. R.(2004).Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy.The Journal of Educational Research,97(3),115-121.
  27. Fisher, C. D.(1993).Boredom at work: A neglected concept.Human, Relations,46(3),395-417.
  28. Fu, A. T.,Ko, H. C.,Wu, J. Y. W.,Cherng, B. L.,Cheng, C. P.(2007).Impulsivity and expectancy in risk for alcohol use: Comparing male and female college students in Taiwan.Addictive Behaviors,32(9),1887-1896.
  29. Genereux, R. L.,McLeod, B. A.(1995).Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students.Research in Higher Education,36(6),687-704.
  30. Goetz, T.,Sticca, F.,Pekrun, R.,Murayama, K.,Elliot, A.(2016).Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach.Learning and Instruction,41,115-125.
  31. Hensley, L.(2013).To cheat or not to cheat: A review with implications for practice.The Community College Enterprise,19(2),22-34.
  32. Huang, C. J.(2012).Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1),48-73.
  33. Jarvis, S.,Seifer, T.(2002).Work avoidance as a manifestation of hostility, helplessness, and boredom.The Alberta Journal of Educational Research,48(2),174-187.
  34. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(2001).Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International..
  35. Larson, R. W.,Richards, M. H.(1991).Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students.American Journal of Education,99,418-433.
  36. Lau, S.,Nie, Y.(2008).Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions.Journal of Educational Psychology,100,15-29.
  37. Macklem, G. L.(2015).Boredom in the Classroom Addressing Student Motivation, Self-Regulation, and Engagement in Learning.New York, NY:Springer.
  38. McCabe, D. L.,Trevino, L. K.(1997).Individual and contextual influence on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation.Research in Higher Education,38(3),379-396.
  39. McCabe, D. L.,Trevino, L. K.,Butterfield, K. D.(2001).Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research.Ethics & Behavior,11(3),219-232.
  40. Merriam-Webster(1993).Webster's third new international dictionary.Springfield, MA:Publisher.
  41. Midgley, C.,Maehr, M. L.,Hruda, L. Z.,Anderman, E. M.,Anderman, L.,Freeman, K. E.,Urdan, T.(2000).Manual for the pattern of adaptive learning scale (PALS).Ann Anbor:University of Michigan.
  42. Murayama, K.,Elliot, A. J.(2009).The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes.Journal of Educational Psychology,101,432-447.
  43. Murdock, T. B.,Anderman, E. M.(2006).Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty.Educational Psychologist,41(3),129-145.
  44. Murdock, T. B.,Hale, N. M.,Weber, M. J.(2001).Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26(1),96-115.
  45. Murdock, T. B.,Miller, A. D.,Goetzinger, A.(2007).Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: mediating and moderating process.Social Psychology of Education,10(2),141-169.
  46. Newman, R. S.(1998).Student help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals.Journal of Educational Psychology,90,644-658.
  47. Nicholls, J. G.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  48. Niiya, Y.,Ballantyne, R.,North, M. S.,Crocker, J.(2008).Gender, Contingencies of self-worth, and achievement goals as predictors of academic cheating in a controlled laboratory setting.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,30(1),76-83.
  49. Orosz, G.,Tóth-Király, I.,Böthe, B.,Kusztor, A.,Kovács, Z. Ü.,Jánvári, M.(2015).Teacher enthusiasm: A potential cure of academic cheating.Frontiers in Psychology,6,1-12.
  50. Pavlin-Bernardić, N.,Rovan, D.,Pavlović, J.(2017).Academic cheating in mathematics classes: A motivational perspective.Ethics & Behavior,27(6),486-501.
  51. Pekrun, R.(2006).The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.Educational Psychology Review,18,315-341.
  52. Pekrun, R.,Elliot, A. J.,Maier, M. A.(2006).Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test.Journal of Educational Psychology,98,583-597.
  53. Pekrun, R.,Elliot, A.,Maier, M. A.(2009).Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(1),115-135.
  54. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Daniels, L. M.,Stupnisky, R. H.,Perry, R. P.(2010).Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion.Journal of Educational Psychology,102(3),531-549.
  55. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Titz, W.,Perry, R. P.(2002).Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research.Educational Psychologist,37(2),91-105.
  56. Peng, S. L.,Cherng, B. L.,Lin, Y. Y.,Kuo, C. W.(2018).Four-dimensional classroom goal structure model: Validation and investigation of its effect on students' adoption of personal achievement goals and approach/avoidance behaviors.Learning and Individual Differences,61,228-238.
  57. Preacher, K. J.,Rucker, D. D.,Hayes, A. F.(2007).Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research,42(1),185-227.
  58. Putwain, D. W.,Becker, S.,Symes, W.,Pekrun, R.(2018).Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time.Learning and Instruction,54,73-81.
  59. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.(2001).Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality.Structural Equation Modeling,8(4),613-626.
  60. Shelton, J.,Hill, J. P.(1969).Effects on cheating of achievement anxiety and knowledge of peer performance.Developmental Psychology,1(5),449-455.
  61. Sierra, J. J.,Hyman, M. R.(2006).A dual-process model of cheating intentions.Journal of Marketing Education,28(3),193-204.
  62. Tas. Y.,Tekkaya, C.(2010).Personal and contextual factors associated with students’ cheating in science.The Journal of Experimental Education,78(4),440-463.
  63. Tibbetts, S. G.(1999).Differences between women and men regarding decisions to commit test cheating.Research in Higher Education,40(3),323-342.
  64. Tze, V. M. C.,Klassen, R. M.,Daniels, L. M.(2014).Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement.Contemporary Educational Psychology,39(3),175-187.
  65. Volet, S.(ed.),Järvelä, S.(ed.)(2001).Multiple goals, multiple contexts Motivation in learning context: Theoretical advances and methodological implications.New York, NY:Pergamon.
  66. Watt, J. D.,Vodanovich, S. J.(1999).Boredom proneness and psychosocial development.The Journal of Psychology,133(3),303-314.
  67. Whitley, B. E., Jr.(1998).Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review.Research in Higher Education,39(3),235-274.
  68. Wolters, C. A.,Daugherty, S. G.(2007).Goal structure and teachers' sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level.Journal of Educational Psychology,99,181-193.
  69. Wowra, S. A.(2007).Academic cheating.Ethics & Behavior,17(3),211-214.
  70. Yang, S. C.,Huang, C. L.,Chen, A. S.(2013).An investing of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonesty behavior.Ethics & Behavior,23(6),501-522.
  71. 林清山, C.-S.,程炳林, B.-L.(1997)。國科會專案研究報告國科會專案研究報告,未出版
  72. 張映芬, Y.-F.(2008)。Tainan, Taiwan,國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
  73. 陳正昌, C.-C.,程炳林, B.-L.(2002).SPSS、SAS、BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用.台北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan.
  74. 程炳林, B.-L.(2012)。科技部專案研究報告科技部專案研究報告,未出版
被引用次数
  1. 程炳林,彭淑玲(2022)。國中生逃避策略的改變暨其與知覺課室目標結構及羞愧情緒之關係。教育心理學報,53(3),665-686。
  2. 張同廟(2020)。團隊領導風格、團隊內部互動與團隊服務績效之關係-以大學學生社團服務學習活動營隊為例。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,49,31-58。
  3. (2024)。應用計畫行為理論探究學生作弊行為之縱貫分析。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,17(1),69-99。