题名

臺灣青少年性格發展之多重指標：從HEXACO六大性格特質切入

并列篇名

Multiple Indicators of Personality Development for Taiwanese Adolescents: The HEXACO Model of Personality as a Framework

DOI

10.6251/BEP.202306_54(4).0008

作者

蔡沂珊(Yi-Shan Tsai)；莊詔鈞(Shao-Chun Chuang)；許功餘(Kung-Yu Hsu)

关键词

青少年性格發展 ； HEXACO性格 ； 性格連續性 ； adolescent personality development ； HEXACO model ； personality continuity

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

54卷4期（2023 / 06 / 01）

页次

945 - 971

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

青少年階段正處於生理與心理上的變化，除了生理的成熟，也經歷社會化的過程，而了解青少年的性格發展型態，有其重要的意涵。本研究目的為了解臺灣青少年的性格向度在個體間與個體內的發展連續性之特性，分別檢驗四種性格連續性：平均水準連續性、排序連續性、個人層次連續性、以及自比連續性。本研究以連續三年收集臺灣地區405位國中生與595位高職生之HEXACO性格向度的分數，並分別檢驗前述四種連續性。不過，在檢驗前述的四種連續性前，先行檢驗結構連續性，以確定所測量的性格量表在國中生與高職生之三個時間點皆有相同的性格結構後，再進行後續其他連續性的檢驗。綜合所有的結果顯示，在平均水準連續性與個人層次連續性上，僅發現誠實／謙遜有明顯下降，而其餘向度變化均不明顯；而在排序連續性與自比連續性上，發現國中生與高職生皆有高的連續性，其中，在排序連續性上，高職生的情緒性、外向性、嚴謹性及開放性之相關係數高於國中生。最後針對研究結果與研究限制進行討論，深入說明不同連續性指標變化的意涵與可能的原因，並對未來研究方向提出相關建議。
英文摘要

The development of personality traits has received considerable attention from scholars in recent 20 years (Caspi et al., 2005). However, few studies in Taiwan have examined the development of personality in teenagers. Therefore, this study, with a longitudinal design, analyzed the patterns of personality trait development in adolescents by using the Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience (HEXACO) personality model. Mean-level continuity, rank-order continuity, ipsative continuity, and individual-level change were employed as indicators of personality development. However, structural continuity was first examined to validate the consistent structure of constructs across time (De Fruyt et al., 2006). Mean-level continuity is a measure of the average difference in the personality traits of the same group of individuals across time or simultaneously between different age groups (Wright et al., 2012). Studies (Ashton & Lee, 2016) have revealed a pattern of increasing agreeableness and a pattern of decreasing honesty-humility during adolescence. However, the development patterns for the remaining dimensions are inconsistent, and they differ between preadolescence and postadolescence. Rank-order continuity indicates the stability of individuals with respect to their relative rankings on certain personality traits within a group or between time points. This measurement is generally calculated using the coefficient of correlation between specific personality traits at two time points (Wright et al., 2012). Roberts and DelVecchio (2000) found that the average correlation coefficient in the age group from 12 to 17.9 years ranged from .46 to .48 (Borghuis et al., 2017; Klimstra et al., 2009). Third, individual-level change is a measure of intraindividual comparison; the differences in a particular personality trait in the same individual across time are evaluated. The reliability change index is primarily employed to compare an observed distribution with the theoretically expected distribution (i.e., normal distribution) and involves calculating standardized scores of the difference scores between two time points. Studies have indicated that the change ratios of adolescents in the United States and Estonia were higher than the theoretically expected distribution (McCrae et al., 2002; Pullmann et al., 2006). Finally, ipsative continuity indicates the continuity of overall personality traits over time and is commonly expressed using the Q correlation coefficient (Wright et al., 2012). there were higher cross-time stabilitiesy in overall personality during postadolescence than during preadolescence (Klimstra et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2020). This data analyzed here was from a study of the "investigation of adolescent personality and social behavior in daily life" (Hsu & Chang, 2015). There were 594 junior high school students (JHSSs) and 991 vocational high school students (VHSSs) in Taiwan over 3 years. Of the participants who completed the 3-year follow-up, 405 were JHSSs (M = 12.96, SD = 0.62; 185 male) and 595 were VHSSs (M = 15.73, SD = 0.59; 346 male). All participants were instructed to complete the Chinese version of the HEXACO-100 Personality Inventory (Hsu & Chang, 2015) each year. The scale comprises six major dimensions of personality (i.e., honesty-humility, emotionality, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness), with 16 items in each dimension; these items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). The Chinese version of each subscale has good reliability, with values of Cronbach's α ranging from .73 to .78. Before the formal analyses, we employed multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) to validate the structural consistency across 3 years in these two groups. We constructed four models to assess invariance in the measurement structure over time in accordance with the recommendations of Meredith (1993): A configural invariance model, a factor loadings invariance model, an intercept invariance model, and a residuals invariance model. The results revealed structural continuity for the two student groups over 3 years; the JHSSs had intercepts invariance and the VHSSs had residuals invariance. Mean-level continuity was evaluated using MGCFA by incorporating a model for mean invariance. This model was used to examine average differences in the levels of the measured constructs across time. The results revealed that the fit for mean-level invariance was not good for neither the JHSSs nor the VHSSs. Four types of patterns may be observed when examining changes in mean-level continuity: A declining pattern, a rising pattern, a V-shaped pattern, and a flat pattern. In the VHSSs, the honesty-humility construct had a declining pattern over the 3 years. In addition, the honesty-humility and conscientiousness constructs for the JHSSs and the agreeableness construct for the VHSSs exhibited significant differences only in the first and third years. For the VHSSs, only the openness construct exhibited a rising pattern, with a significant difference discovered between the first and third years. The openness construct for the JHSSs had a V-shaped pattern, and the emotionality construct for the VHSSs had an inverted V-shaped pattern. Finally, the remaining dimensions in the two samples had flat patterns (i.e., nonsignificant mean-level difference over 3 years). Rank-order continuity was analyzed using correlations between two time points (Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000). The correlation coefficients indicated a high level of effectiveness in capturing rank-order continuity between the same personality dimension in adjacent years for both JHSSs and VHSSs. Furthermore, when analyzing extraversion standardized by Z score, this study found that the correlation coefficient for VHSSs was significantly higher than that for JHSSs for two adjacent years. However, for emotionality, conscientiousness, and openness, the correlation coefficients for VHSSs were significantly higher than those for JHSSs only in the first and second years. Honesty-humility and agreeableness did not differ significantly between the two groups in adjacent years. This study analyzed the change in personality scores of individuals between two time points by comparing the observed difference distribution with the theoretically expected distribution. With respect to JHSSs, the results revealed significant differences between the observed difference distributions of extraversion and agreeableness from the theoretically expected distributions in two adjacent years. In addition, significant differences in honesty-humility and emotionality were discovered between the second and third years and the first and second years, respectively. With respect to VHSSs, the results revealed significant differences between the observed difference distributions of honesty-humility, extraversion, agreeableness, and openness in the first and second year and in the second and third year from the expected difference distributions. Notably, the proportion of individuals with decreasing scores in honesty-humility was greater than those with rising scores. Ipsative continuity, expressed using the Q correlation coefficient, is used to evaluate the continuity of the relative rankings of an individual's overall personality traits over time. A higher coefficient indicates greater similarity in the overall personality profile at the two time points. The average Q correlation coefficient for JHSSs was .65 and .72 in adjacent years. The average Q correlation coefficient for VHSSs was .70 and .74 in adjacent years. In addition, when comparing the Q correlation coefficient calculated from the actual data with that obtained from simulation samples with the same means and standard deviation, the Q correlation coefficient of the actual data was greater. This finding suggests a high level of ipsative continuity in both groups. This study examined personality development in adolescence by evaluating both mean-level and rank-order continuity from the interindividual and intraindividual perspectives. Four indicators-mean-level continuity, rank-order continuity, individual-level change, and ipsative continuity-were analyzed in preadolescent (i.e., JHSS) and postadolescent (i.e., VHSS) samples. The mean-level continuity results revealed no clear changes in the dimensions except for in honesty-humility (decreasing pattern), which agrees with the results of a relevant study (Ashton & Lee, 2016). Adolescents may compete with peers to obtain resources during adolescence, resulting in less frequent cooperative and altruistic behaviors (Ashton & Lee, 2016). The correlation coefficient for rank-order continuity was greater than 0.5 for both 1-year and 2-year intervals. The results indicated a large individual-level change in conscientiousness; small individual-level changes were found in other dimensions, such as honesty-humility, emotionality, extraversion, and agreeableness. The average Q correlation coefficient of ipsative continuity in 2 years of preadolescence was .69, whereas that in 2 years of postadolescence was .72, indicating high ipsative stability in adolescence. The overall results of mean-level continuity and individual-level changes revealed changes within individuals over time but no significant changes in individuals for certain personality traits (e.g. emotionality). The design of this study can be improved in several way. The use of different participants in the preadolescence and postadolescence phases created a disconnect in the development patterns, resulting in potential errors when explaining the development pattern of the adolescent period. In addition, the onset of adolescence varies; therefore, future studies may yield valuable insights by extending the duration over which individuals are tracked to when they graduate from college or enter the workforce.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 張映芬, Y.-F.(2020)。父母心理支持／控制與國中生心理需求、動機涉入關係之分析。當代教育研究季刊，28(4)，61-95。
    連結：
  2. 梁䕒鎂, C.-M.,吳志文, C.-W.,程景琳, C.-L.(2021)。父母心理控制與成年初顯期子女之社交焦慮：自我分化的中介影響。教育心理學報，53，359-382。
    連結：
  3. 許功餘, K.-Y.(2018)。華人青少年性格向度的構念檢核：與北美性格向度之異與同。中華心理學刊，60，1-31。
    連結：
  4. 許功餘, K.-Y.,張玉鈴, Y.-L.(2015)。費力控制與 HEXACO 性格向度對青少年內化與外化問題行為之預測效果。中華心理學刊，57，1-25。
    連結：
  5. 程景琳, C.-L.,陳虹仰, H.-Y.(2015)。父親及母親心理控制行為與子女同儕受害的關聯：社交焦慮的中介影響。教育心理學報，46，357-375。
    連結：
  6. Allemand, M.,Zimprich, D.,Hertzog, C.(2007).Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adulthood and old age.Journal of Personality,75(2),323-358.
  7. Allik, J.,Laidra, K.,Realo, A.,Pullmann, H.(2004).Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits.European Journal of Personality,18(6),445-462.
  8. Ashton, M. C.,Lee, K.(2008).The HEXACO model of personality structure.The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality measurement and testing
  9. Ashton, M. C.,Lee, K.(2005).Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model.Journal of Personality,73(5),1321-1353.
  10. Ashton, M. C.,Lee, K.(2007).Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure.Personality and Social Psychology Review,11(2),150-166.
  11. Ashton, M. C.,Lee, K.(2016).Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports.Journal of Research in Personality,64,102-111.
  12. Bentler, P. M.,Bonett, D. G.(1980).Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin,88(3),588-606.
  13. Bleidorn, W.,Hopwood, C. J.,Lucas, R. E.(2018).Life events and personality trait change.Journal of Personality,86(1),83-96.
  14. Borghuis, J.,Denissen, J. J. A.,Oberski, D.,Sijtsma, K.,Meeus, W. H. J.,Branje, S.,Koot, H. M.,Bleidorn, W.(2017).Big Five personality stability, change, and codevelopment across adolescence and early adulthood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,113(4),641-657.
  15. Browne, M. W.,Cudeck, R.(1992).Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Sociological Methods & Research,21(2),230-258.
  16. Caspi, A.,Roberts, B. W.(2001).Target article: Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity.Psychological Inquiry,12(2),49-66.
  17. Caspi, A.,Roberts, B. W.(1999).Personality continuity and change across the life course.Handbook of personality: Theory and research
  18. Caspi, A.,Roberts, B. W.,Shiner, R. L.(2005).Personality development: Stability and change.Annual Review of Psychology,56,453-484.
  19. Chao, R. K.,Aque, C.(2009).Interpretations of parental control by Asian immigrant and European American youth.Journal of Family Psychology,23(3),342-354.
  20. Chen, F. F.(2007).Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,14(3),464-504.
  21. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),233-255.
  22. Cohen, J.(Ed.)(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  23. Costa, P. T., Jr.,McCrae, R. R.(1994).Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality.Can personality change?
  24. Costa, P. T., Jr.,McCrae, R. R.(2002).Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12.Advances in personality science
  25. Damon, W.(Ed.),Lerner, R. M.(Ed.),Kuch, D.(Ed.),Siegler, R. S.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of child psychology, volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language.John Wiley & Sons.
  26. De Fruyt, F.,Bartels, M.,Van Leeuwen, K. G.,De Clercq, B.,Decuyper, M.,Mervielde, I.(2006).Five types of personality continuity in childhood and adolescence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,91(3),538-552.
  27. Dimitrov, D. M.(2010).Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,43(2),121-149.
  28. Goldberg, L. R.(1990).An alternative ‘‘Description of personality’’: The Big-Five factor structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59(6),1216-1229.
  29. Haan, N.,Millsap, R.,Hartka, E.(1986).As time goes by: Change and stability in personality over fifty years.Psychology and Aging,1(3),220-232.
  30. Hoff, K. A.,Einarsdóttir, S.,Chu, C.,Briley, D. A.,Rounds, J.(2021).Personality changes predict early career outcomes: Discovery and replication in 12-year longitudinal studies.Psychological Science,32(1),64-79.
  31. Hoff, K. A.,Song, Q. C.,Einarsdóttir, S.,Briley, D. A.,Rounds, J.(2020).Developmental structure of personality and interests: A four-wave, 8-year longitudinal study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,118(5),1044-1064.
  32. Hogan, R.(1996).A socioanalytic perspective on the Five-Factor Model.The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives
  33. Hogan, R.,Roberts, B. W.(2004).A socioanalytic model of maturity.Journal of Career Assessment,12(2),207-217.
  34. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1998).Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3(4),424-453.
  35. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55.
  36. Human, L. J.,Biesanz, J. C.,Miller, G. E.,Chen, E.,Lachman, M. E.,Seeman, T. E.(2013).Is change bad? Personality change is associated with poorer psychological health and greater metabolic syndrome in midlife.Journal of Personality,81(3),249-260.
  37. Jacobson, J. S.,Truax, P.(1991).Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59(1),12-19.
  38. Jorgensen, T. D. (2016, May 14). If the effect size you want is Cohen’s D, then you have it easy. If latent variances are fixed to [Comment on the online forum post Effect size of latent mean differences]. Google Groups. https://groups.google.com/g/lavaan/c/Tk9wBUrc0II
  39. Kenny, D. A. (2020, June 5). Measuring model fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
  40. Klimstra, T. A.,Hale, W. W., III,Raaijmakers, Q. A.,Branje, S. J.,Meeus, W. H.(2009).Maturation of personality in adolescence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96(4),898-912.
  41. Klimstra, T. A.,Noftle, E. E.,Luyckx, K.,Goossens, L.,Robins, R. W.(2018).Personality development and adjustment in college: A multifaceted, cross-national view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,115(2),338-361.
  42. Lee, K.,Ashton, M. C.(2004).Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory.Multivariate Behavioral Research,39(2),329-358.
  43. Lee, K.,Ashton, M. C.(2018).Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100.Assessment,25(5),543-556.
  44. Lee, K.,Ashton, M. C.(2006).Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form.Psychological Assessment,18(2),182-191.
  45. Lengua, L. J.(2006).Growth in temperament and parenting as predictors of adjustment during children’s transition to adolescence.Developmental Psychology,42(5),819-832.
  46. Little, T. D.,Cunningham, W. A.,Shahar, G.,Widaman, K. F.(2002).To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,9(2),151-173.
  47. Luan, Z.,Hutteman, R.,Denissen, J. J.,Asendorpf, J. B.,van Aken, M. A.(2017).Do you see my growth? Two longitudinal studies on personality development from childhood to young adulthood from multiple perspectives.Journal of Research in Personality,67,44-60.
  48. Lucas, R. E.,Donnellan, M. B.(2011).Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101(4),847-861.
  49. Magee, C. A.,Heaven, P. C.,Miller, L. M.(2013).Personality change predicts self reported mental and physical health.Journal of Personality,81(3),324-334.
  50. McCrae, R. R.,Costa, P. T., Jr.,Terracciano, A.,Parker, W. D.,Mills, C. J.,De Fruyt, F.,Mervielde, I.(2002).Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(6),1456-1468.
  51. McCrae, R. R.,John, O. P.(1992).An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications.Journal of Personality,60(2),175-215.
  52. Meredith, W.(1993).Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance.Psychometrika,58(4),525-543.
  53. Moshagen, M.,Thielmann, I.,Hilbig, B. E.,Zettler, I.(2019).Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory (-Revised): Reliability generalization, self-observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,227(3),186-194.
  54. Park, H.,Twenge, J. M.,Greenfield, P. M.(2014).The Great Recession: Implications for adolescent values and behavior.Social Psychological and Personality Science,5(3),310-318.
  55. Pullmann, H.,Raudsepp, L.,Allik, J.(2006).Stability and change in adolescents’ personality: A longitudinal study.European Journal of Personality,20(6),447-459.
  56. Roberts, B. W.(2018).A revised sociogenomic model of personality traits.Journal of Personality,86(1),23-35.
  57. Roberts, B. W.,Caspi, A.,Moffitt, T. E.(2001).The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81(4),670-683.
  58. Roberts, B. W.,DelVecchio, W. F.(2000).The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies.Psychological Bulletin,126(1),3-25.
  59. Roberts, B. W.,Mroczek, D.(2008).Personality trait change in adulthood.Current Directions in Psychological Science,17(1),31-35.
  60. Roberts, B. W.,Walton, K. E.,Viechtbauer, W.(2006).Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.Psychological Bulletin,132(1),1-25.
  61. Roberts, B. W.,Yoon, H. J.(2022).Personality psychology.Annual Review of Psychology,73,489-516.
  62. Robins, R. W.,Fraley, R. C.,Roberts, B. W.,Trzesniewski, K. H.(2001).A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood.Journal of Personality,69(4),617-640.
  63. Rosseel, Y.(2012).Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling.Journal of Statistical Software,48(2),1-36.
  64. Rosseel, Y. (2013, February 14). If you must constrain the means to be equal across all groups, you should fix them to zero. The means [Comment on the online forum post Difference in latent variable means in multigroup analysis]. Google Groups. https://groups.google.com/g/lavaan/c/xCgsK6I5vQo?pli=1
  65. Sawyer, S. M.,Azzopardi, P. S.,Wickremarathne, D.,Patton, G. C.(2018).The age of adolescence.The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health,2(3),223-228.
  66. Schaie, K. W.(1965).A general model for the study of developmental problems.Psychological Bulletin,64(2),92-107.
  67. Schwaba, T.,Bleidorn, W.(2019).Personality trait development across the transition to retirement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,116(4),651-665.
  68. Selman, R. L.,Byrne, D. F.(1974).A structural-developmental analysis of levels of role-taking in middle childhood.Child Development,45(3),803-806.
  69. Slobodskaya, H. R.,Akhmetova, O. A.(2010).Personality development and problem behavior in Russian children and adolescents.International Journal of Behavioral Development,34(5),441-451.
  70. Specht, J.,Egloff, B.,Schmukle, S. C.(2011).Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101(4),862-882.
  71. Srivastava, S.,John, O. P.,Gosling, S. D.,Potter, J.(2003).Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(5),1041-1053.
  72. Thielmann, I.,Akrami, N.,Babarovic, T.,Belloch, A.,Bergh, R.,Chirumbolo, A.,Čolovic, P.,De Vries, R. E.,Dostál, D.,Egorova, M.,Gnisci, A.,Heydasch, T.,Hilbig, B. E.,Hsu, K.-Y.,Izdebski, P.,Leone, L.,Marcus, B.,Međedović, J.,Nagy, J.,Lee, K.(2019).The HEXACO-100 across 16 languages: A large-scale test of measurement invariance.Journal of Personality Assessment,102(5),714-726.
  73. Twenge, J. M.(2001).Birth cohort changes in extraversion: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1966–1993.Personality and Individual Differences,30(5),735-748.
  74. Twenge, J. M.(2000).The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79(6),1007-1021.
  75. Van den Akker, A. L.,Deković, M.,Asscher, J.,Prinzie, P.(2014).Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,107(4),736-750.
  76. Van Dijk, M. P. A.,Hale, W. W., III,Hawk, S. T.,Meeus, W.,Branje, S.(2020).Personality development from age 12 to 25 and its links with life transitions.European Journal of Personality,34(3),322-344.
  77. Vandenberg, R. J.,Lance, C. E.(2000).A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,3(1),4-69.
  78. Wright, A. G.,Pincus, A. L.,Lenzenweger, M. F.(2012).Interpersonal development, stability, and change in early adulthood.Journal of Personality,80(5),1339-1372.
print cancel