大學生與大學教師在資訊行為考量因素之比較研究

The Comparison Study of Factors Influencing Information Behaviors between Undergraduate Students and Teachers in University

10.6120/JoEMLS.2013.503/0494.RS.CM

徐新逸(Hsin-Yih Shyu)；彭康鈞(Kang-Jiun Pern)

數位原生 ； 數位移民 ； 資訊行為 ； 高等教育 ； 大學生 ； 大學教師 ； Digital natives ； Digital immigrants ； Information behavior ； Higher education

教育資料與圖書館學

50卷3期（2013 / 06 / 01）

393 - 423

繁體中文

資訊行為是由資訊需求所衍生出一連串滿足需求的行為，其包含發現需求、尋求資訊管道、使用資訊、滿足需求。本研究旨在探究影響大學生資訊行為之考量因素及比較大學生與大學教師，其影響資訊行為之考量因素是否有所差異。透過文獻分析及因素分析，歸納出影響因素包含使用資訊的態度、助力與阻力、實體資訊篩選、社會影響、資訊蒐集、網路資訊篩選以及網路互動之七個構面並據此發展問卷。研究結果顯示，大學生與大學教師的資訊行為影響因素在「實體資訊篩選」、「網路資訊篩選」，及「網路互動」產生顯著差異。本文並根據研究結果，提出對於大學教師教學與大學生學習之建議及進行相關議題研討之參考。

The purposes of this study were to explore the consideration factors of influencing undergraduate students' information behavior, and to compare differences in consideration factors information behaviors between undergraduate students and teachers in university. Based on the literature review and principal component analysis, this study generalized 7 consideration factors, including (1) Attitude toward the information, (2) Barriers & Facilitating Conditions, (3) Physical Information Sifting, (4) Social Influences, (5)Information Collecting, (6)Internet Information Sifting, and (7) Interaction with others via internet. The results from t-tests indicated that there were differences in factors of ”Information Collecting”, ”Internet Information Sifting” and ”Interaction with others via internet” between undergraduate students and faculty. Based on the research result, the study provides several suggestions for faculty and undergraduate students in their teaching and learning.

1. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007, January 3). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Retrieved June 16, 2011, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdf
2. Rainie, L. (2006, September 28). New workers, new workplaces: Digital ‘natives' invade the workplace. Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/70/digitalnatives-invade-the-workplace
3. Beloit College Mindset List (2012) The official home of mindset of American history-2012 list. Retrieved April 146, 2013, from http://themindsetlist.com/lists/2012-list/
4. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(2004).Questions raised by a reasoned action approach: Comment on Ogden (2003).Health Psychol,23(4),431-434.
5. Brooks-Young, S.(2005).Integration issues for 21st-century teachers.Today's Catholic Teacher,38,14-17.
6. Brown, J. S.(2000).Growing up: Digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn.Change,32(2),11-20.
7. Buvat, J.,Braunschvig, B.(2007).Digital natives: How is the younger generation reshaping the telecom and media landscape?.Telecom, Media & Entertainment Insights Journal,3,12-19.
8. Callahan, E.(2005).Interface design and culture.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,39(1),255-310.
9. Caruso, J. B.,Kvavik, R. B.(2005).EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research (ECAR), Research ReportEDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research (ECAR), Research Report,Boulder, CO:EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research=ECAR.
10. Downes, T.(2002).Blending play, practice and performance: Children's use of the computer at home.Journal of Educational Enquiry,3(2),21-34.
11. Eagleton, M.,Guinee, K.,Langlais, K.(2003).Teaching Internet literacy strategies: The hero inquiry project.Voices from the Middle,10(3),28-35.
12. Ellis, D.(1989).A behavioural model for information retrieval system design.Journal of Information Science,15(4/5),237-247.
13. Frand, J. L.(2000).The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education.EDUCAUSE Review,35(5),15-24.
14. Hewins, E. T.(1990).Information need and use studies.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,25,145-172.
15. Horne, E. E.(1983).The question generation and formation: An indication of information need.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,34(1),5-15.
16. Lai, J.(2009).Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed?.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education,25(3),87-97.
17. Lee, L.(2005).Young people and the internet: From theory to practice.Nordic Journal of Young Research,13(4),315-326.
18. Lorenzo, G.,Dziuban, C. D.(2006).Educause Learning Initiative Paper2Educause Learning Initiative Paper2,未出版
19. Neef, A.,Schroll, W.,Theis, B.(2009).Digital natives: The revolution of the generation born to the web.Manager-Magazin,2009(May 18)
20. Oblinger, D. G.(ed.)(2006).Learning Spaces.Boulder, CO:Educause.
21. Oblinger, D. G.(ed.),Oblinger, J. L.(ed.)(2005).Educating the net generation.Boulder, CO:Educause.
22. Oblinger, D. G.,van''t Hooft, M.,Greenfield, A.,de Freitas, S.,Tonkin, E.,Haller, M.(2008).Emerging technologies for learning.Coventry:British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
23. Önkal, D.,Bolger, F.(2004).Provider-user differences in perceived usefulness of forecasting formats.Omega: The International Journal of Management Science,32(1),31-39.
24. Prensky, M.(2005).Listen to the natives.Educational Leadership,63(4),8-13.
25. Prensky, M.(2001).Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently?.On the Horizon,9(6),1-6.
26. Rubinstein, J. S.,Meyer, D. E.,Evans, J. E.(2001).Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,27(4),763-797.
27. Salaway, G.,Caruso, J.,Nelson, M.(2008).The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology.Boulder, CO:EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research=ECAR.
28. Smith, J. W.,Clurman, A. S.(1997).Rocking the ages: The yankelovich report on generational marketing.New York, NY:Harper Business.
29. Sutherland-Smith, W.(2002).Weaving the literacy web: Changes in reading from page to screen.The Reading Teacher,55(7),662-669.
30. Sweller, J.(1988).Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.Cognitive Science,12(2),257-285.
31. Tapscott, D.(2009).Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
32. Tapscott, D.(1998).Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
33. Weller, A.(2005).Information-seeking behaviour in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking and learning theory.Journal of Academic Librarianship,31(1),46-63.
34. Wilson, T. D.(1999).Models in information behaviour research.Journal of Document,55(3),249-270.
35. Yang, K. C.(2004).Effects of consumer motives on search behaviors using Internet advertising.CyberPsychology & Behavior,7(4),430-442.
36. 史密斯、克拉曼、姜靜繪譯(1998)。世代流行大調查：從1909年～X世代。台北=Taipei:時報=China Times Publishing Co.。
37. 江昭青(2009)。資訊教育到底該教什麼？。親子天下，8，196-203。
38. 社團法人中華民國資訊學會(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011。台北=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education。
39. 孫賓靜、李宜蓁(2009)。當X世代父母遇上N世代小孩。親子天下，8，132-141。
40. 泰普史考特、陳曉開譯、袁世珮譯(1998)。N世代：主導二十一世紀數位生活的新新族群。台北=Taipei:麥格羅．希爾=McGraw-Hill。
41. 泰普史考特、羅耀宗譯、黃貝玲譯、蔡宏明譯(2009)。N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界。台北=Taipei:麥格羅．希爾=McGraw-Hill。
42. 黃慕萱(2001)。成人讀者之資訊需求行為。臺北市立圖書館館訊，19(2)，9-19。
43. 楊曉雯(1994)。淺析資訊特性及讀者的資訊需求。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館訊，16，25-29。
44. 蘇諼(1995)。讀者研究的趨勢。中國圖書館學會會報，55，51-55。

1. 林昭宇(2014)。「數位原民」與「建構學習」的省思：自主學習性導向之數位藝術創作教學。藝術學報，94，1-28。
2. 劉郁彣、林麗娟(2017)。大學生對個資之資訊需求與尋求分析。圖書資訊學刊，15(2)，101-133。
3. 羅綸新、莊秀卿、張正杰(2014)。多媒體呈現模式與認知風格對國小自然科學學習成效之影響。教育傳播與科技研究，108，31-48。
4. (2013)。大學生使用電子資料庫頻率相關影響因素之研究─以朝陽科技大學為例。朝陽人文社會學刊，11(2)，87-121。
5. (2023)。新北市中等學校資訊科技教師資訊行為之研究。圖資與檔案學刊，103，38-82。