績效知覺、領導範型契合度與領導效能的關係

Leadership Prototypes and Performance Perceptions

10.6129/CJP.2004.4601.06

徐瑋伶(Wei-Ling Hsu)；鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng)

隱示領導理論 ； 再認歷程 ； 推論歷程 ； 績效知覺 ； 領導範型 ； implicit leadership theory ； recognized-based processes ； inferential processes ； performance perceptions ； leadership prototypes

中華心理學刊

46卷1期（2004 / 03 / 01）

75 - 89

繁體中文

本文立基於隱示領導理論與Lord的領導知覺模式，探討跟隨者對直屬主管與最高主管的領導知覺。研究採取問卷調查法，一共有一百五十位來自台灣本土高科技產業之員工參與調查。結果發現，跟隨者對團體或組織的主觀績效知覺會影響其所知覺之主管與領導範型的差距，亦即，知覺的單位或組織績效愈高，則主管與領導範型間的差距會愈小。研究也發現，跟隨者將單位績效表現歸因於直屬主管身上的程度，會調節團體績效知覺對主管－範型差距的影響效果。此外，研究結果亦顯示，當跟隨者所評定的對象為直屬主管時，績效知覺及主管-領導範型之差距會同時影響其所知覺的領導效能；但當跟隨者所評定者為最高主管時，跟隨者所知覺的組織績效會透過最高主管－領導範型之差距的中介而影響其所知覺的領導效能。最後，本研究討論了研究結果、研究限制、實務應用，及未來的研究方向。

According to implicit leadership theory (ILT), people have personal theories of leadership in their mind and tend to use their own theories to label and judge leaders. Based on ILT and past research, Lord (1985) developed a social information processing model to describe two types of process- the recognized-based processes and the inferential process- to illustrate leadership perceptions. On the basis of implicit leadership theory and Lord's leadership perception model, this study examined followers' perceptions of supervisors and top leaders. A total of 150 employees who were from 8 local high- tech companies participated in the survey. The results indicated that followers' group performance perceptions had a significant effect on supervisory- prototype congruence, and followers' organizational performance perceptions also had a significant effect on top leader- prototype congruence. The results as well revealed that degree of ascription was a moderator in the relationship between group performance perception and supervisor-prototype congruence. Moreover, the results confirmed the predications that perceiving supervisors was different from perceiving top leaders. When perceiving supervisors, subordinates were able to observe and interact with their supervisors frequently, and therefore it was easy to compare the leaders with their preexisting leadership prototypes and use the results of the comparisons as well as the group performance information to judge the leaders; therefore, followers' group performance perceptions and supervisor-prototype congruence impacted leadership effectiveness concurrently. On the other hand, followers rarely interacted with their top leaders; when they evaluated their top leaders, they had to seek outside information such as the performance of the companies to form their image and make the assessments, and the result was that organizational performance perception had an indirect effect on leadership effectiveness by the mediation of topleader-prototype congruence. The theoretical and practical implications of these finding are discussed accordingly.

1. 樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導－一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，127-180。
   連結：
2. Bresnen, M. J.(1995).All things to all people? Perceptions, attributions, and constructions of leadership.Leadership Quarterly,6(4),495-513.
3. Bryman, A.(1989).The generalizability of implicit leadership theory.Journal of Social Psychology,127(2),129-141.
4. Butterfield, D. A.,Powell, G. N.(1981).Effect of group performance, leader sex, and rater sex on rating of leader behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,228,129-141.
5. Cantor, N.,Mischel, W.(1979).Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology.New York:Academic Press.
6. Den Hartog, D. N.,House, R.J.,Hanges, P. J.,Ruiz-Qquintanilla, S. A.,Dofman, P. W.(1999).Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit theories: Are attributes of Charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?.Leadership Quarterly,10(2),219-256.
7. Eden, D.,Leviatan, U.(1975).Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisor behavior scales.Journal of Applied Psychology,60(6),736-741.
8. Edwards, J. R.(1993).Problems with the use of profiles similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research.Personnel Psychology,46,641-665.
9. Edwards, J. R.(1994).The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,58,51-100.
10. Emrich, C. G.(1999).Context effects in leadership perception.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,25(8),911-1006.
11. Engle, E.M.,Lord, R. G.(1997).Implicit theories, self schemas, and leader-member exchange.Academy of Management Journal,40(4),988-1010.
12. Feldman, J. M.(1981).Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal.Journal of Applied Psychology,66,127-148.
13. Fischer, D. G.,Fick, C.(1993).Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desiability scale.Educational and Psychological Measurement,53,417-424.
14. Fiske, S. T.,Taylor, S. E.(1991).Social cognition.New York:Random House.
15. Missing data in quantitative research
16. Helgstrand, K.K.,Stuhlmacher, A. F.(1999).National culture: An influence on leader evaluations?.International Journal of Organizational Analysis,7(2),153-168.
17. Hollander, E. P.(1985).The Handbook of Social Psychology.New York:Random House.
18. James, L. R.,Brett, J. M.(1984).Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation.Journal of Applied Psychology,69(2),307-321.
19. Kelly, H. H.(1973).The process of casual attribution.American Psychologist,28,107-128.
20. Kenny, R. A.,Schwatz-Kenny, B. M.,Blascovich, J.(1996).Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence.Personality and Psychological Bulletin,22(11),1128-1143.
21. Kline, T. J. B.,Sulksy, L. M.,Rever-Moriyama, S. D.(2000).Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection.Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and applied,134(4),401-419.
22. Larson, J. R.,Jr, Lingle, J.H.,Scerbo, M.M.(1984).The impact of performance cues on leader behavior ratings: The role of selective information availability and probabilistic response bias.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,33,323-349.
23. Lord, R. G.(1977).Functional leadership behavior; Measurement and relation to social power and leadership perceptions.Administrative Science Quarterly,,22,114-133.
24. Lord, R. G.(1985).Research in Organizational Behavior.Greenwich, Conn.:JAI Press.
25. Lord, R. G.,Foti, R. J.,Devader, C. L.(1984).A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,34,343-378.
26. Lord, R. G.,Foti, R. J.,Phillips, J. S.(1982).Leadership: Beyond establish views.Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Lord, R. G.,Maher, K. J.(1991).Leadership and information processing.Boston:Routledge.
28. Lord, R. G.,Smith, W.(1999).The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
29. MacKinnon, D. P.,Dwyer, J. H.(1993).Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies.Evaluation Review,17,144-158.
30. MacKinnon, D. P.,Warsi, G.,Dywer, J. H.(1995).A simulation study of mediated effect measures.Mutivariate Behavioral Research,30(1),41-62.
31. Mann, R.D.(1959).A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups.Psychological Bulletin,56,241-270.
32. Meindl, J. R.(1990).On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom.Research in Organizational Behavior,12,159-203.
33. Mitchell, T. R.,Larson, T. R.,Green, S. G.(1977).Leader behavior, situational moderators, and group performance: American owned firms in Britain.Journal of management studies,20,101-211.
34. Nye, J. L.,Simonetta, L. G.(1996).Followers perceptions of group leaders: The impact of recognition-based and inference-based process.What social about social cognition?,124-153.
35. Nye, J.L.,Forsyth, D.R.(1991).The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals.Small Group Research,22(3),360-379.
36. Offerman, L. R.,Kennedy, J. K.,Writz, P. W.(1994).Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability.Leadership Quarterly,5(1),43-58.
37. Phillip, J. S.,Lord, R. G.(1982).Schematic information processing and perceptions of leadership in problem-solving groups.Journal of Applied Psychology,67,486-492.
38. Rosch, E.(1978).Cognition and Categorization.Hillsadle, N. J.:Erlbaum.
39. Rush, M. C.,Phillip, J. S.,Lord, R. G.(1981).Effects of a temporal delay in rating on leader behavior descriptions: A laboratory investigation.Journal of Applied Psychology,66,442-450.
40. Rush, M. C.,Thomas, J. C.,Lord, R. G.(1977).Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,29,93-110.
41. Schiffirn, R. M.,Schneider, W.(1977).Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84,127-190.
42. Schriesheim, C.A.,Stogdill, R. M.(1975).Difference in factor structure across threee versions of Ohio State leadership scale.Personnel Psychology,28,189-206.
43. Shamir, B.,Howell, J. M.(1999).Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership.Leadership Quarterly,10,257-283.
44. Smith, E. R.,DeCoster, J.(1998).Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: simulation with a recurrent connectionist network.Journal of Social and Personality Psychology,74,21-35.
45. Stogdill, R. M.(1948).Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature.Journal of Psychology,25,35-71.
46. Strahan, R.,Gerbasi, K. C.(1972).Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale.Journal of Clinical Psychology,28,191-193.
47. Taylor, J. C.,Bower, D. G.(1970).Survey of organizations.Ann Arbor:University Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
48. Waldman, D. A.,Yammarino, F. J.(1999).CEO charismatic leadership: Level-of-management and level-of analysis effects.Academy of Management Review,24,266-285.
49. Weiss, H. M.,Adler, S.(1981).Cognitive complexity and the structure of implicit leadership theories.Journal of Applied Psychology,66(1),69-78.
50. 任金剛(1996)。。
51. 凌文詮、方俐洛、艾爾卡(1991)。內隱領導理論的中國研究－與美國的研究進行比較。心理學報，3，237-241。
52. 郭建志(1999)。。
53. 陳正昌、程炳林(1998)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計套裝軟體在多變量統計上的應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
54. 鄭伯壎、莊仲仁(1981)。基層軍事幹部有效領導行為之因素分析：領導績效、領導角色與領導行為之關係。中華心理學刊，4，2-41。
55. 鄭伯壎、鄭紀瑩、周麗芳(1999)。效忠主管：概念建構、測量、及相關因素探討。第三屆華人心理學家學術研討會宣讀論文，北京:

1. 蔡啟通(2006)。領導者部屬交換與員工創新行為：組織正義之中介效果及組織特性之干擾效果。管理學報，23(2)，171-193。
2. 簡元瑜,錢宛玲,陳思穎,紀乃文,方沴淳(2023)。精明的籌謀，還是美麗的假象？探討主管不當督導、部屬知覺領導效能及主管導向公民行為之關係：主管政治技巧與外表吸引力的干擾效果。臺大管理論叢，33(3)，165-200。
3. (2024)。華人組織中的人際關係：回顧與展望。中華心理學刊，66(1)，153-193。