题名

破冰之旅―虛性和諧友誼中的情緒分享及其影響

并列篇名

A Journey to Icebreaking: Emotion Sharing and Its Effect on Superficial Harmony Friendship

DOI

10.6129/CJP.2012.5402.06

作者

黃筱蘋(Hsiao-Ping Huang);黃囇莉(Li-Li Huang)

关键词

友誼 ; 自我揭露 ; 虛性和諧 ; 情緒分享 ; friendship ; self-disclosure theory ; social sharing of emotion ; superficial harmony

期刊名称

中華心理學刊

卷期/出版年月

54卷2期(2012 / 06 / 01)

页次

219 - 242

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

過去關於友誼的發展多採社會滲透論觀點,認為互動雙方由淺到深的自我揭露讓友誼逐步增進。黃囇莉(2006)揭示了華人人際間的虛性和諧,虛性和諧中的朋友行禮如儀、互稱朋友,溝通與互動停留在表面層次,若以自我揭露理論來看,虛性和諧的友誼凍結在虛性狀態中。本文進行三個研究,探討Rimé、Mesquita、Philippot及Boca(1991)提出的「情緒的社會分享」是否可能使虛性友誼破冰成為實性和諧,且作為和諧化的方式。前導研究探討華人文化下情緒分享的基本現象,研究採問卷施測,以383位大學生為對象。結果顯示情緒分享不論在實/虛性友誼中都會發生,且各種情緒都會分享,也會影響分享後之關係變化。研究二針對分享頻率較低的虛性和諧之情緒分享進行質化研究。結果發現,偶發性的情緒分享能突破虛性友誼,且「印象改變」、「感同身受」及「共享秘密感」是重要的破冰中介因子。研究三,在問卷中進行實驗操弄,以四種情緒如悲傷、快樂、內疚、喜歡之分享為獨變項,檢驗不同情緒之分享與分享前之實/虛性關係對分享後關係變化的影響,以及三因子之中介效果。研究結果再次確認情緒分享能使關係變好,且這樣的效果受到先前關係實/虛性和諧的調節。另外,也確認在虛性和諧中,負向情緒對分享後關係變化的影響是以「共享秘密感」為中介因子,而正向情緒則否。本文最後討論,在解釋友誼間從虛性和諧轉為實性和諧的破冰現象上,情緒的社會分享理論比自我揭露論有較大的優勢。

英文摘要

Previous research on friendship mainly subscribed to the ”Social Penetration Theory” and considered that the interacting friends progressively disclosed themselves through daily interaction and developed intimacy gradually. Huang's theory (2006) suggests researchers should pay more attention to the superficial harmonious side of friendship. Friends who have superficial harmony may conceal their disagreements and not really like each other, even when they claim the other as ”a friend.” They also won't be willing to become close to each other. According to the self-disclosure theory, the superficial friendship seems to remain frozen in this state forever. But is it really true? This article including three studies tried to examine whether the automatic process of ”social sharing of emotion (Rimé, Mesquita, Philippot, & Boca, 1991)” may result in a change or a breakthrough in superficial harmony friendships and move toward genuine harmony.In Study 1, questionnaires were filled out by 383 Taiwanese college students. The results showed that the emotion sharing did happen in both superficial and genuine harmony friendships in Chinese society and different types of harmony displayed the same sharing patterns. All kinds of emotions were shared and affected the friendship quality after sharing. Study 2 focused on the emotion sharing types in superficial harmony friendships that were less frequent in Study 1 and used in-depth interviews as a method for qualitative study. The outcome proposed that emotion sharing in superficial friendships could break up the superficial relationship itself; and ”change in impression,” ”the same feeling” and ”feeling of secret sharing” could be the main influencing factors. In order to further examine the findings in the previous two studies, quasi-experimental methods were used in Study 3. The experimental stories included four manipulated emotions: sadness, happiness, guilt, affection, and one control condition of non-emotion sharing. The results indicated that friendship quality was affected by emotion sharing and the change was moderated by previous harmony type. Furthermore, in superficial friendships, the effect of negative emotion sharing on the friendship quality was mediated by ”feeling of secret sharing,” but positive emotion sharing was not the same. In conclusion, we discuss why the emotion sharing theory is better than the self-disclosure theory for the interpretation of a breakthrough in superficial harmony friendship moving into genuine harmony friendship.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
参考文献
  1. 許詩淇、黃囇莉(2009)。天下無不是的父母?─ 父母角色義務對親子衝突與親子關係之影響。中華心理學刊,51,295-317。
    連結:
  2. 黃囇莉、許詩淇(2006)。虛虛實實之間:婆媳關係的和諧化歷程與轉化機制。本土心理學研究,25,3-45。
    連結:
  3. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel Test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm
  4. Altman, I.,Taylor, D. A.(1973).Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships.New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  5. Anderson, C.,Keltner, D.,John, O. P.(2003).Emotional convergence between people over time.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84,1054-1068.
  6. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173-1182.
  7. Baumeister, R. F.,Bratslavsky, E.,Finkenauer, C.,Vohs, K. D.(2001).Bad is stronger than good.Review of General Psychology,5,323-370.
  8. Bauminger, N.,Finzi-Dottan, R.,Chason, S.,Har-Even, D.(2008).Intimacy in adolescent friendship: The roles of attachment, coherence, and self-disclosure.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,25,409-428.
  9. Berndt, T. J.(1982).The features and effects of friendship an early adolescence.Child Development,53,1447-1460.
  10. Blieszner, R.,Adams, R. G.(1992).Adult friendship.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  11. Bond, M. H.(1993).Emotions and their expression in Chinese culture.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,17,245-262.
  12. Burleson, B. R.(2003).The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication.Personal Relationships,10,1-23.
  13. Chen, G. M.(1995).Differences in self-disclosure patterns among American versus Chinese: A Comparative study.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,26,84-91.
  14. Christophe, V.,Rimé, B.(1997).Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing.European Journal of Social Psychology,27,37-54.
  15. Clark, M. S.,Fitness, J.,Brissette, I.(2001).Understanding people's perceptions of relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives.Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes,Malden, MA:
  16. Collins, N. L.,Miller, L. C.(1994).Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin,116,457-475.
  17. Cozby, P. C.(1973).Self-disclosure: A literature review.Psychological Bulletin,79,73-91.
  18. Curci, A.,Bellelli, G.(2004).Cognitive and social consequences of exposure to emotional narratives: Two studies on secondary social sharing of emotions.Cognition and Emotion,18,881-900.
  19. Derlega, V. D.,Metts, S.,Petronio, S.,Margulis, S. T.(1993).Self-disclosure.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  20. Derlega, V. J.(Ed.),Winstead, B. A.(Ed.)(1986).Friendship and social interaction.New York:Springer-Verlag.
  21. Derlega, V. J.,Margulis, S. T.,Winstead, B. A.(1987).A social-psychological analysis of self-disclosure in psychotherapy.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,5,205-215.
  22. Dolgin, K. G.,Meyer, L.,Schwartz, J.(1991).Effects of gender, target's gender, topic, and self-esteem on disclosure to best and midling friends.Sex Roles,25,311-329.
  23. Duck, S.(1991).Friends, for life: The psychology of personal relationships.New York:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  24. Duck, S.(Ed.),Gilmore, R.(Ed.)(1981).Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships.New York:Academic press.
  25. Ekman, P.(1972).Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion.Nebraska symposium on motivation,Lincoln, NE:
  26. Finkenauer, C.,Rimé, B.(1998).Keeping emotional memories secret: Health and subjective well-being when emotions are not shared.Journal of Health Psychology,3,47-58.
  27. Gable, S. L.,Reis, H. T.,Impett, E. A.,Asher, E. R.(2004).What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87,228-245.
  28. Graham, S. M.,Huang, J. Y.,Clark, M. S.,Helgeson, V. S.(2008).The positives of negative emotions: Willingness to express negative emotions promotes relationships.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34,394-406.
  29. Hatfield, E.,Cacioppo, J. T.,Rapson, R. L.(1994).Emotion contagion.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  30. Hays, R. B.(1989).The day-to-day functioning of close versus casual friendships.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,6,21-37.
  31. Huang, L.-L.,Jone, K. Y.,Peng, T. K.(2007).Conflict resolution patterns and relational context: An exploratory study combining etic and emic theories in Taiwan.Casting the individual in social and cultural contexts: Social and societal psychology for Asia and the pacific,Seoul, South Korea:
  32. Johnson, A. J.,Wittenberg, E.,Villagran, M. M.,Mazur, M.,Villagran, P.(2003).Relational progression as a dialectic: Examining turning points in communication among friends.Communication Monographs,70,230-249.
  33. Kanyangara, P.,Rimé, B.,Philippot, P.,Yzerbyt, V.(2007).Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in "Gacaca" tribunals and assimilation of the Rwandan genocide.Journal of Social Issues,63,387-403.
  34. Laurenceau, J. P.,Barrett, L. F.,Pietromonaco, P. R.(1998).Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74,1238-1251.
  35. Luminet, O.,Bouts, P.,Delie, F.,Manstead, A. S. R.,Rimé, B.(2000).Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation.Cognition and Emotion,14,661-688.
  36. MacKinnon, D. P.,Lockwood, C. M.,Hoffman, J. M.,West, S. G.,Sheets, V.(2002).A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological Methods,7,83-104.
  37. McCall, G. J.(Ed.),Genzin, N. K.(Ed.),Suttles, G. D.(Ed.),Kurth, S.(Ed.)(1970).Social relationships.Chicago, IL:Aldine.
  38. Monsour, M.(1992).Meaning of intimacy in cross- and same-sex friendships.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,9,277-295.
  39. Moore, S.,Boldero, J.(1991).Psychological development and friendship functions in adolescence.Sex Roles,25,521-536.
  40. Omarzu, J.(2000).A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will selfdisclose.Personality and Social Psychology Review,4,174-185.
  41. Peters-Golden, H.(1982).Breast cancer: Varied perceptions of social support in the illness experience.Social Science and Medicine,16,483-491.
  42. Reis, H. T.,Patrick, B. C.(1996).Attachment and intimacy: Component processes.New York:Guilford Press.
  43. Rimé, B.(2007).The social sharing of emotion as an interface between individual and collective processes in the construction of emotional climates.Journal of Social Issues,63,307-322.
  44. Rimé, B.,Finkenauer, C.,Luminet, O.,Zech, E.,Philippot, P.(1998).Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions.European Review of Social Psychology,9(Special issue),145-189.
  45. Rimé, B.,Mesquita, B.,Philippot, P.,Boca, S.(1991).Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion.Cognition and Emotion,5,435-465.
  46. Rimé, B.,Philippot, P.,Boca, S.,Mesquita, B.(1992).Long-lasting cognitive and social consequences of emotion: Social sharing and rumination.European Review of Social Psychology,3(Special issue),225-258.
  47. Sanford, K.,Rowatt, W. C.(2004).When is negative emotion positive for relationships? An investigation of married couples and roommates.Personal Relationships,11,329-354.
  48. Schug, J.,Yuki, M.,Maddux, W.(2010).Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends.Psychological Science,21,1471-1478.
  49. Tam, B. K. Y.,Bond, M. H.(2002).Interpersonal behaviors and friendship in a Chinese culture.Asian Journal of Social Psycholoogy,5,63-74.
  50. Ueno, U.,Adams, R. G.(2006).Adult friendship: A decade review.Close relationships: Function, form, processes,New York:
  51. Zech, E.,Rimé, B.(2005).Is talking about an emotional experience helpful? Effects on emotional recovery and perceived benefits.Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy,12,270-287.
  52. Zech, E.,Rimé, B.,Nils, N.(2004).Social sharing of emotion, emotional recovery, and interpersonal aspects.The regulation of emotion,Mahwah, NJ:
  53. 王世億(2007)。Tainan, Taiwan,國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
  54. 孫俊才、盧家楣(2009)。大學生情緒社會分享的公眾觀。心理科學,32,201-203。
  55. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
  56. 彭泗清、楊中芳(1999)。人際交往關係的影響因素與發展過程。本土心理學研究,12,291-312。
  57. 黃筱蘋(2010)。Taipei, Taiwan,國立台灣大學心理研究所=National Taiwan University。
  58. 黃囇莉(2006)。人際和諧與衝突─本土化的理論與研究。台北=Taipei:揚智=Yang-Chih。
  59. 楊宜憓(1999)。Taipei, Taiwan,國立台灣大學心理研究所=National Taiwan University。
  60. 董定儀(2009)。Yilan, Taiwan,佛光大學心理研究所=Fo Guang University。
被引用次数
  1. 姜定宇,林佳樺(2019)。華人角色關係的情緒表達規則回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,51,169-228。
  2. 藍依萍、吳淑鈴(2017)。教保服務人員主動性人格與組織公民行為關係之研究―情感性友誼的中介效果。學校行政,110,82-104。
  3. 張棋雅(2017)。自我揭露於人際親密互動建立歷程之探討。諮商與輔導,381,26-29。
  4. 周怡蕙(2015)。愛恨交織的關係-談青少年的友誼嫉妒。諮商與輔導,358,42-45+28。