以變形臉孔典範探討台灣成人本種族知覺登陸優勢與他種族分類偏誤

Exploring the Own-Race Face Encoding Advantage and the Other-Race Face Categorization Bias in Taiwanese Adults: Using a Morphing Face Paradigm

10.6129/CJP.20160329

陳君嫚(Chun-Man Chen)；楊淑斐(Shu-Fei Yang)；簡惠玲(Sarina Hui-Lin Chien)

他種族效應 ； 知覺登錄 ； 種族分類 ； 臉孔知覺 ； 變形臉孔 ； other-race effect ； perceptual encoding ； race categorization ； face perception ； morph face

中華心理學刊

58卷2期（2016 / 06 / 01）

127 - 141

繁體中文

Levin（1996）提出本種族辨認優勢與他種族分類優勢相對論點，目前的證據多以白種人為主，跨文化的研究證據較少。本研究採用Walker與Tanaka（2003）的變形臉孔典範，設計兩個實驗來檢驗台灣成人是否呈現種族優勢相對論。實驗一為臉孔區辨作業，測試成人區辨亞洲人和白種人目標臉孔與混合亞洲人和白種人之變形臉孔的能力。實驗二為種族分類作業，測試成人分類混合亞洲人和白種人臉孔之不同比例亞洲人變形臉孔的種族。實驗一的結果顯示，對亞洲人目標臉孔僅需23%的變形即有一半機率可辨別兩張臉孔間的不同，而對白種人目標臉孔則需32%的變形才有一半機率能辨別出不同，支持本種族的知覺登錄優勢假說。實驗二的結果顯示，參與者對兩個種族的變形臉孔愈接近混合比例各半的情況下分類的反應時間愈長；此外，參與者傾向將50%的亞洲成分臉孔（即亞洲人臉和白種人臉比例各半）分類為白種人，臉孔需達55.71%以上亞洲成分才有一半機率會被分類為亞洲人，顯示出他種族臉孔的分類偏誤。整體而言，本研究以台灣成人參與者之結果支持本種族辨認優勢與他種族分類優勢的相對論點。

1. Chien, S. H.-L.,Hsu, H. Y.(2012).No more top-heavy bias: On early specialization process for face and race in infants.Chinese Journal of Psychology,54,95-114.
   連結：
2. 許馨月、簡惠玲(2011)。台灣嬰兒和成人的他種族效應之探討。中華心理學刊，53，35-57。
   連結：
3. Chen, L. F., & Yen, Y. S. (2007). Taiwanese facial expression image database. Retrieved from http://bml.ym.edu.tw/~download/html
4. Chien, S. H. L., Wang, J. F., & Huang, T. Z. (n.d.). Developing an own-race advantage in Taiwanese 4-, 6-, and 9-month-old infants: A perceptual learning view. Manuscript submitted for publication
5. Benton, C. P.,Skinner, A. L.(2015).Deciding on race: A diffusion model analysis of race-categorisation.Cognition,139,18-27.
6. Caldara, R.,Rossion, B.,Bovet, P.,Hauert, C.-A.(2004).Event-related potentials and time course of the "other-race" face classification advantage.Neuroreport,15,905-910.
7. Chien, S. H.-L.(2011).No more top-heavy bias: Infants and adults prefer upright faces, but not top-heavy geometric or face-like patterns.Journal of Vision,11,13.
8. Diamond, R.,Carey, S.(1986).Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115,107-117.
9. Ge, L.,Zhang, H.,Wang, Z.,Quinn, P. C.,Pascalis, O.,Kelly, D.,Lee, K.(2009).Two faces of the other-race effect: Recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces.Perception,38,1199-1210.
10. Gibson, E. J.(1969).Principles of perceptual learning and development.New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
11. Goren, C. C.,Sarty, M.,Wu, P. Y. K.(1975).Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by new born infants.Pediatrics,56,544-549.
12. Gross, S. R.,Jacoby, K.,Matheson, D. J.,Montgomery, N.,Patil, S.(2005).Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,95,523-560.
13. Hayden, A.,Bhatt, R. S.,Joseph, J. E.,Tanaka, J. W.(2007).The other-race effect in infancy: Evidence using a morphing technique.Infancy,12,95-104.
14. Johnson, M. H.,Dziurawiec, S.,Ellis, H.,Morton, J.(1991).Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline.Cognition,40,1-19.
15. Kelly, D. J.,Liu, S.,Ge, L.,Quinn, P. C.,Slater, A. M.,Lee, K.,Pascalis, O.(2007).Cross-race preferences for same-race faces extend beyond the African versus Caucasian contrast in 3-month-old infants.Infancy,11,87-95.
16. Kelly, D. J.,Quinn, P. C.,Slater, A. M.,Lee, K.,Gibson, A.,Smith, M.,Pascalis, O.(2005).Three-montholds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces.Developmental Science,8,F31-F36.
17. Levin, D. T.(2000).Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129,559-574.
18. Levin, D. T.(1996).Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,22,1364-1382.
19. Lindsay, R.(Ed.),Ross, D.(Ed.),Read, J.(Ed.),Toglia, M.(Ed.)(2007).Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Liu, J.,Wang, Z.,Feng, L.,Li, J.,Tian, J.,Lee, K.(2015).Neural trade-offs between recognizing and categorizing own-and other-race faces.Cerebral Cortex,25,2191-2203.
21. Malpass, R. S.,Kravitz, J.(1969).Recognition for faces of own and other race.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,13,330-334.
22. Meissner, C. A.,Brigham, J. C.(2001).Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,7,3-35.
23. Pascalis, O.,de Schonen, S.,Morton, J.,Deruelle, C.,Fabre-Grenet, M.(1995).Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension.Infant Behavior and Development,18,79-85.
24. Sangrigoli, S.,de Schonen, S.(2004).Recognition of own‐race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45,1219-1227.
25. Scheck, B.,Neufeld, P.,Dwyer, J.(2000).Actual innocence: Five days to execution, and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted.New York, NY:Doubleday.
26. Simion, F.,Macchi Cassia, V.,Turati, C.,Valenza, E.(2001).The origins of face perception: Specific versus non-specific mechanisms.Infant and Child Development,10,59-65.
27. Tanaka, J.,Giles, M.,Kremen, S.,Simon, V.(1998).Mapping attractor fields in face space: The atypicality bias in face recognition.Cognition,68,199-220.
28. Tottenham, N.,Tanaka, J. W.,Leon, A. C.,McCarry, T.,Nurse, M.,Hare, T. A.,Nelson, C.(2009).The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants.Psychiatry Research,168,242-249.
29. Turati, C.(2004).Why faces are not special to newborns: An alternative account of the face preference.Current Directions in Psychological Science,13,5-8.
30. Turati, C.,Simion, F.,Milani, I.,Umiltà, C.(2002).Newborns' preference for faces: What is crucial?.Developmental Psychology,38,875-882.
31. Valentine, T.(1991).A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology,43,161-204.
32. Valentine, T.,Bruce, V.(1986).The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.Acta Psychologica,61,259-273.
33. Valentine, T.,Endo, M.(1992).Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology,44,671-703.
34. Valenza, E.,Simion, F.,Macchi Cassia, V.,Umiltà, C.(1996).Face preference at birth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,22,892-903.
35. Walker, P. M.,Silvert, L.,Hewstone, M.,Nobre, A. C.(2008).Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,3,16-25.
36. Walker, P. M.,Tanaka, J. W.(2003).An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.Perception,32,1117-1125.
37. Young, A. W.,Hellawell, D.,Hay, D. C.(1987).Configurational information in face perception.Perception,16,747-759.

1. 簡惠玲,陳君嫚,郭昱劭(2019)。是亞洲人或白種人？以變形臉孔典範探討台灣學齡期兒童種族分類的發展。中華心理學刊，61(2)，151-172。
2. 簡惠玲,郭昱劭(2021)。學齡期兒童特徵式與組態式臉孔處理的發展與同理心之關聯性初探。中華心理學刊，63(3)，225-247。
3. 簡惠玲,熊恩筠,彭馨蕾,高千惠(2022)。比較自閉症成人與一般成人的臉孔和物體區辨能力：以變形典範探討。中華心理學刊，64(1)，33-55。