從語言中搜尋意識形態：van Dijk的分析策略及其在傳播研究上的定位

Uuncovering the Hidden Ideologies of Everyday Language: van Dijk's Analytical Strategy and its Positioning in Media Studies

10.30386/MCR.201301_(114).0002

倪炎元(Yen-Yuan Ni)

文化研究 ； 批判論述分析 ； 意識形態 ； Critical discourse analysis ； culture studies ； ideology

新聞學研究

114期（2013 / 01 / 01）

41 - 78

繁體中文

本論文主要針對當代批判論述研究的代表學者T. A. van Dijk之分析策略與理論定位進行探討。一方面藉由理論系譜的溯源，還原van Dijk所舖陳的論述／認知／社會的三角互動；另一方面則是透過實例分析的探討，檢視van Dijk如何從日常語言文本中解析出一組意識形態的論述。更重要的是，本研究也嘗試為van Dijk所揭示的分析策略進行理論脈絡的定位。本研究發現，van Dijk的分析架構在當代各種論述理論中之所以能獨樹一幟，在於他的分析架構大幅納入語意學與語用學的觀點，這個語言學立場的選擇，使得van Dijk的分析策略與文化研究的觀點形成明顯的區隔。本研究同時也發現，在意識形態的研究上，van Dijk的分析架構確實可以幫助研究者從日常語言的正式文書中，發掘隱藏在其中的意識形態密碼。這一點對台灣媒體文本的研究，亦有相當的啟發作用。

This paper explores the analytical strategies and positioning of van Dijk-a scholar of contemporary critical discourse analysis. The paper uses the traceability of theoretical lineage to restore van Dijk's layout of the interaction between discourse, cognition, and society. The paper also uses a case study to examine how van Dijk analyzed and identified a group of ideological discourse from daily language texts. This study positions the analytical strategy developed by van Dijk in a theoretical context. The results show that van Dijk's analytical framework is applicable to various contemporary discourse theories because his analytical framework includes semantic and syntax perspectives. This linguistic perspective makes van Dijk's analytical strategies significantly different from cultural studies. In the study of ideology, van Dijk's analytical framework can help researchers uncover hidden ideological passwords from everyday language or formal documents. This finding contributes to the study of Taiwanese media texts and ideology.

1. 張錦華(2011)。從 van Dijk 操控論述觀點分析中國大陸省市採購團的新聞置入及報導框架：以台灣四家報紙為例。中華傳播學刊，20，65-93。
   連結：
2. van Dijk, T. A. (2004). From text grammar to critical discourse analysis: A brief academic autobiography. Retrieved form http://www.discourses.org/Form%20text%20grammar%20to%20critical%20discourse%20analysis.htm.
3. Allan, S.(1999).News culture.Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.
4. Barker, C.,Galasinski, D.(2001).Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dialogue on language and identity.London, UK:Sage.
5. Bell, A.(Ed.),Garrett, P.(Ed.)(1998).Approaches to media discourse.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
6. Cottle, S.(Ed.)(2000).Ethnic minorities and the media.Milton Keynes, UK:Open University Press.
7. Devereux, E.(2007).Media studies.London, UK:Sage.
8. Fowler, R.(1991).Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press.London, UK:Routledge.
9. Hall, S.(1973).Encoding and decoding in the television discourse.Birmingham, UK:University of Birmingham, Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
10. Jensen, K. B.(Ed.),Jankowski, N. W.(Ed.)(1991).A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research.New York, NY:Routledge.
11. M. Freeden (Ed.)(2007).The meaning of ideology: Cross-disciplinary perspectives.London, UK:Routledge.
12. McQuail, D.(2000).McQuail's mass communication theory.London, UK:Sage.
13. McQuail, D.(1994).Mass communication theory.London, UK:Sage.
14. Mills, S.(1997).Discourse: The new critical idiom.London, UK:Routledge.
15. Riggins, S. H.(Ed.)(1997).The language and politics of exclusion: Others in discourse.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Schaffner, C.(Ed.),Kelly-Holmes, H.(Ed.)(1996).Discourse and ideologies.Clevedon, UK:Multilngual Matters Ltd.
17. Schaffner, C.(Ed.),Kelly-Holmes, H.(Ed.)(1996).Discourse and ideologies.Clevedon, UK:Multilngual Matters Ltd..
18. Seliger, M.(1976).Ideology and politics.London, UK:Allen & Unwin.
19. van Dijk, T. A.(1993).Principles of critical discourse analysis.Discourse & Society,4(2),249-283.
20. van Dijk, T. A.(1988).News as discourse.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
21. van Dijk, T. A.(2005).Racism and discourse in Spain and Latin America.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
22. van Dijk, T. A.(2008).Discourse and power.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
23. van Dijk, T. A.(1988).News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
24. van Dijk, T. A.(1993).Elite discourse and racism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
25. van Dijk, T. A.(1987).Communicating racism: Ethic prejudice in thought and talk.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
26. van Dijk, T. A.(1998).Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach.London, UK:Sage.
27. van Dijk, T. A.(1991).Racism and the press.London, UK:Routledge.
28. van Dijk, T. A.(2009).Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk.London, UK:Cambridge University Press.
29. van Dijk, T. A.(1995).Discourse semantics and ideology.Discourse & Society,6(2),243-289.
30. van Dijk, T. A.(Ed.)(1997).Discourse as structure and process.London, UK:Sage.
31. Weiss, G.(Ed.),Wodak, R.(Ed.)(2003).Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Wetherell, M.,Taylor, S.,Yates, S. J.(2001).Discourse theory and practice: A reader.London, UK:Sage.
33. 施盈廷譯、劉忠博譯、張時健譯、Alvesson, M.、Skoldberg, K.(2011)。反身性方法論：質性研究的新視野。台北:韋伯。
34. 翁秀琪(1998)。批判語言學，在地權力觀和新聞文本分析：宋楚瑜辭官事件中宋李會的新聞分析。新聞學研究，57，91-126。
35. 張錦華(1994)。新聞的真實與再現：以李瑞環事件相關報導為例。新聞「學」與「術」的對話，台北:
36. 臧國仁(1999)。新聞媒體與消息來源：媒介框架與真實建構之論述。台北:三民。
37. 鍾蔚文(1992)。從媒介真實到主觀真實。台北:正中。
38. 蘇子喬譯、Heywood, A.(2009)。政治學的關鍵概念。台北:五南。

1. 劉威志(2017)。梁汪和平運動下的賦詩言志 (1938-1948)。清華大學中國文學系學位論文。2017。1-426。