大眾運輸導向發展之建成環境對捷運運量之影響－臺北捷運系統之實證研究

Built Environment Impacts of Transit-Oriented Development on Metro Ridership: An Empirical Study of Taipei Metro System

10.6402/TPJ.200712.0451

林楨家(Jen-Jia Lin)；施亭伃(Ting-Yu Shin)

大眾運輸導向發展 ； 捷運運量 ； 線性迴歸 ； Transit-oriented development ； Metro ridership ； Linear regression

運輸計劃季刊

36卷4期（2007 / 12 / 30）

451 - 476

繁體中文

本研究目的在探討「大眾運輸導向發展(transit-oriented development, TOD)」建成環境特性與捷運運量及運量時間分散程度間關係，以驗證TOD「增加大眾運具運量」與「提升運量時間分散程度」之效益。研究以民國93年為資料基準時間，臺北市轄區內46個捷運站區為樣本，使用線性迴歸模式校估與t檢定方法分析資料。實證結果發現：捷運全日運量受總樓地板面積的正向影響以及十字路口比例的負向影響，混合使用變數的影響則不顯著；捷運運量的時間分散程度受人行道長度的正向影響以及服務零售業面積比的負向影響，但密度變數之影響不顯著；非尖峰運量與全日運量分別受到相同因素與方向的影響效果；密度變數與都市設計變數對捷運運量之影響在平日與假日間有顯著差異，而混合使用變數在平日及假日均無顯著影響；各項TOD特性對捷運運量時間分散程度之影響效果均會因平日或假日而不同；以及，密度及都市設計變數對捷運非尖峰運量之影響於平日及假日具顯著差異，但混合使用變數均無顯著影響。最後，本文進一步討論實證結果的可能應用，包括適合國內環境背景之TOD發展策略方向以及特定站區的規劃分析，供都市發展規劃與管理單位參考。

This study aimed at confirming the benefits of transit-oriented development (TOD) on increasing transit ridership and dispersing transit ridership time distribution. To explore the influences of the built environment of TOD on the volume, as well as the time distribution, of metro ridership, this study used 46 metro stations in Taipei city as samples and developed cross-section analyses of the year 2004 with regression models and t-tests. The observed results reached the following conclusions: The daily ridership is positively affected by the area of floor space, negatively affected by the ratio of 4-way intersections and insignificantly affected by mixed land-use variables. The ridership time dispersion is positively affected by the sidewalk length, negatively affected by the area of retail and service floor space, and insignificantly influenced by the density variables. The off-peak hour's ridership presents a similar model of daily ridership; the density and design variable influence on daily ridership is significantly different between weekdays and holidays. The effects of all TOD characters on daily ridership entropy are significantly different between weekdays and holidays, and the influence of density and design variables on off-peak hour ridership is significantly different between weekdays and holidays. Finally, two potential applications of the observed findings: TOD strategy directions corresponding to the domestic conditions, and planning analysis for a specific station area, are discussed for the reference of urban planning and management agencies.

1. 李家儂、林楨家(2005)。用於都市地區活動分布之灰色TOD規劃模式。運輸計劃季刊，34(1)，63-91。
   連結：
2. 林楨家、楊恩捷(2006)。都市型態對旅運需求影響之結構化分析。運輸學刊，18(4)，391-416。
   連結：
3. (1989).Development-Related Survey II.Washington, D.C.:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
4. (1987).Development-Related Survey I.Washington, D.C.:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
5. Boarnet, M. G.,Crane R.(2001).Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel Demand.New York:Oxford University Press.
6. Cervero, R.(1995).Mixed Land-uses and Commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey.Transportation Research A,30(5),361-377.
7. Cervero, R.(1994).Rail-oriented Office Development in California: How Successful.Transportation Quarterly,48(1),33-44.
8. Cervero, R.(1993).Report to the California Department of Transportation and the University of California Transportation Center, University of California at Berkeley.Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
9. Cervero, R.(1991).Land-use and Travel at Suburb And Activity center.Transportation Quarterly,45(3),479-491.
10. Cervero, R.,Duncan, M.(2002).Working Paper 604.Berkeley, CA.:University of California at Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center.
11. Cervero, R.,Kockelman, K.(1997).Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.Transportation Research A,2(3),199-219.
12. Cervero, R.,Murphy, S.,Feerell, C.,Goguts, N.,Tsai, Y. H.(2004).Transit Cooperative Research Program 102.Washingtion, D.C.:Transportation Research Board.
13. Holtzclaw, J.,Clear, R.,Dittmar, H.,Goldstein, D.,Haas P.(2002).Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socioeconomic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Usez-Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco.Transportation Planning and Technology,25,1-27.
14. Lund, H. M.,Cervero, R.,Willson, R. W.(2004).Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California, Statewide Planning Studies: Final Report.Oakland, California:Bay Area Rapid Transit District and California Department of Transportation.
15. Messenger, T.,Ewing, R.(1996).Transit-oriented Development in the Sun Belt.Transportation Research Board,1552,145-153.
16. Parker, T.,McKeever, M.,Arrington, G. B.,Smith, H. J.(2002).Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California.Sacramento, CA.:Business Transportation and Housing Agency, California Department of Transportation.
17. Zhang, M.(2004).The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice.Journal of the American Planning Association,70(3),344-360.
18. 中華民國交通統計年鑑
19. 中華民國八十五年工商及服務業普查
20. 中華民國九十年工商及服務業普查
21. 張學孔、錢學陶、杜雲龍(2000)。大眾運輸導向之都市發展策略。捷運技術半年刊，21，1-16。
22. 郭子齊(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。成功大學都市計劃學系。
23. 陳勝智(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。成功大學都市計劃研究所。
24. 臺北捷運公司(2006)。臺北捷運公司2004年年報(2006)。
25. 蕭博正(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北大學都市計劃研究所。

1. 黃隆昇、宋鴻麒(2014)。自行車道結合捷運系統做為高雄城市民眾通勤運具意向之研究。都市與計劃，41(3)，229-258。
2. 解鴻年,邱英浩,吳欣修(2022)。以步行為導向之捷運站TOD都市設計準則建立與實證。都市與計劃，49(2)，149-180。
3. 饒志堅、張景福、林淑敏(2014)。汽車客運路線特性與班次對運量之影響─以分量迴歸分析。運輸計劃季刊，43(4)，343-366。
4. 蘇偉強,賴宗裕,吳可兒(2022)。步行環境對民眾搭乘捷運意願之影響－以臺北市為例。都市與計劃，49(2)，125-148。
5. 吳綱立(2022)。建構綠色大眾運輸導向發展規劃模式來引導永續及緊湊的城市發展－以金門為例。都市與計劃，49(2)，219-262。
6. 謝翊楷、李家儂(2015)。以階層線性模式探討TOD規劃效益對土地開發之影響。臺灣土地研究，19(1)，1-38。
7. (2009)。基於政策支援系統下的大眾運輸導向發展機制。土地經濟年刊，20，35-61。
8. (2024)。空間型構理論視角下臺北市大眾運輸導向發展之可及性分析。建築學報，128，83-100。
9. (2024)。自償性公共建設之探討：以新北市捷運建設計畫為例。中國地方自治，77(7)，3-60。