题名

自由貿易港區背後腹地開發成功評量要因之分析-以模糊多準則決策法之應用

并列篇名

Key Successful Assessment Criteria for Hinterland Development on Free Port Zone: Based on the Fuzzy AHP Approach

DOI

10.6402/TPJ.200906.0121

作者

楊鈺池(Yi-Chih Yang)

关键词

自由貿易港區 ; 港埠 ; 背後腹地 ; 模糊多準則決策 ; Free trade zone ; Port ; Hinterland ; Fuzzy AHP

期刊名称

運輸計劃季刊

卷期/出版年月

38卷2期(2009 / 06 / 30)

页次

121 - 149

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

臺灣國際商港開發計畫長期單純偏重於貨物裝卸、搬運、儲存以及提領功能之作業區域,所以一旦設立自由貿易區後,進行國際物流與倉儲業務便會發生腹地不足問題。本文擬藉由在歐美、日韓等海運先進國家近期所關心港埠背後腹地開發議題,探討港埠背後腹地之功能和其開發成功要件,作為本文研究重點。研究方法採取重要性分析法與模糊多準則決策法,來確認自由貿易區港埠背後腹地之重要成功評量要因。 經實證結果發現:(1)港埠背後腹地擔任船舶與貨物處理區域和當地港埠城市區域之間的互補區域之重要角色;(2)自由貿易區功能,應依照群聚理論,將現行物流功能擴及到多功能園區,包括國際貿易與商展區、科技研發區與創投事業區、組裝與加工區以及親水娛樂等區域;(3)自由貿易港背後腹地開發之成功評量要因,依排序為通關與港埠物流資訊系統整合、港埠作業效率、區內貨物免徵關稅與附加價值稅、政治穩定性、市場經濟規模、健全投資制度與獎勵措施、對投資企業的法人稅、附加價值稅、地方稅等之減免、兩岸三通、通關便捷化、勞工成本、運輸與配銷成本、複合運輸交通網之效率化、土地成本、港埠物流設施之完備性、航次密集與航線多元化以及背後物流用地規模充分性。

英文摘要

The act for the establishment and management of free ports was enforced to attract multi-national enterprises or logistics service providers to operate value added logistics service in the area. The primary functions of the Free Trade Zone are to encourage private enterprises with a series of duties and tax incentives to re-export or transshipment cargo with value added processing in and out international sea or air port, and to boost national economic growth and foreign trade surplus. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the function of port hinterland and explore the key successful criteria of port hinterland development on the Free Trade Zone based on Key factor analysis and Fuzzy AHP approaches. The finding can be illustrated as: (1) port hinterland holds a critical role of complementing the area between the ship-cargo handling area and the local port city area; (2) current logistics functions of FTZ need to extend to multi-function parks containing international trade and exhibition areas, technological R&D development park, venture business park, assembling and processing park, and a waterfront leisure park based on cluster perspective; (3) the key successful factors of FTZ's port hinterland in Taiwan are integration of customs and port logistic information, efficiency of port operation, exemption and deduction of customs duty and value-added tax for cargo, political stability, economic market scale, soundness of the investment system and incentive measures, exemption or deduction of corporate tax and local taxes, direct-shipping across the Taiwan Strait, convenience of the custom clearance process and a one-stop administrative service window, labor cost, transportation and distribution cost, efficiency of an intermodal transport network, land cost, sufficiency of port hinterland for logistics functions, frequency of sailing route and adequacy of port logistics facilities.

主题分类 工程學 > 交通運輸工程
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Chen, S. H.,Hsieh, C. H.(2000).Representation, Ranking, Distance, and Similarity of L-R Type Fuzzy Number and Application.Australian Journal of Intelligent Processing Systems,6(4),217-229.
  2. Cohen, M. A.,Lee, H. L.(1989).Resource Deployment Analysis of Global Manufacturing and Distribution Networks.Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management,2,81-104.
  3. Ding, J. F.(2006).Using Fuzzy AHP to Investigate Key Factor Influencing the Quality of Service Delivery System for Port of Kaohsiung.Advances in Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1(1),63-81.
  4. Freidman, J.,Gerlowski, D. A.,Silberman, J.(1992).What Attracts Foreign Multinational Corporation? Evidence from Branch Plant Location in the United States.National Tax Journal,32,475-487.
  5. Kidami, Y.(1993)。港灣產業辭典。東京:成山堂書店。
  6. Langen, P. W. De(2002).Clustering and Performance: The Case of Maritime Clustering in the Netherlands.Maritime policy and Management,29(3),209-221.
  7. Min, H.,Melachrinoudis, E.(1996).Dynamic Location and Entry Model Selection of Multinational Manufacturing Facilities under Uncertainty: A Chance-Constrained Goal Programming Approach.International Transactions in Operational Research,3(1),65-76.
  8. Notteboom, T. E.,Jean-Paul, Rodrigue(2005).Port Regionalization: Toward a New Phase in Port Development.Maritime policy and Management,32(3),297-313.
  9. Porter, M. E.(1999).Michael Porter on Competition.Antitrust Bulletin,4(4),841-876.
  10. Robinson, R.(2002).Ports as Elements in Value-Driven Chain Systems: The New Paradigm.Maritime Policy and Management,29(3),241-255.
  11. Robinson, S. P.(1980).Management.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  12. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York:McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..
  13. Schmenner, R. W.(1982).Making Business Location Decisions.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall.
  14. Schniederjans, M. J.,Hoffman, J.(1992).Multinational Acquisition Analysis: A Zero-One Goal Programming Model.European Journal of Operational Research,62,175-185.
  15. Ulgado, F. M.(1997).Location Decision-Making Characteristics of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.International Business Review,6(3),271-293.
  16. Yehuda, H.(1987).Intermodality: Concept and Practice.London:Lloyd's of London Press Ltd.
  17. Yurimoto, S.,Masui, T.(1995).Design of a Decision Support System for Overseas Plant Location in the EC.International Journal of Production Economics,41,411-418.
  18. 丁吉峰、梁金樹(2005)。應用重要性分析與矩陣分析確認高雄港之關鍵能力。航運季刊,14(3),21-36。
  19. 白種實(2001)。關稅自由區吸引全球物流企業之強化方案研究。韓國海洋水產開發院。
  20. 自由貿易港區統計
  21. 吳萬益、林清河(2000)。企業研究方法。臺北:華泰事業文化公司。
  22. 李性雨(2001)。日本港埠背後腹地開發案例研究。海洋水產月刊,206,72-92。
  23. 李性雨(2002)。日本港埠背後腹地活性化動向。海洋水產月刊,217,49-57。
  24. 周文賢(2004)。多變量統計分析SAS/SAT使用方法。臺北:智勝文化。
  25. 金學紹、李性雨(2007)。海洋產業現況分析。韓國海洋水產開發院。
  26. 徐村和(1998)。模糊德菲層級程序法。模糊系統學刊,4(1),59-72。
  27. 高勇基(2004)。第三屆光洋港國際論壇暨韓國貿易協會創立30週年紀念學術大會。韓國貿易學會。
  28. 張有恆(1998)。運輸計畫評估與決策-模糊理論之探討與應用。臺北:華泰文化事業公司。
  29. 楊清喬(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學交通管理學研究所。
  30. 韓國海洋水產研究院(2003)。21世紀東北亞經濟圈內平澤港之發展方向與展望。
  31. 韓國海洋水產部(2003)。港埠背後腹地開發綜合計畫。
  32. 韓國海洋水產開發院(2000)。韓國港口區內設置關稅自由區之研究韓國港口區內設置關稅自由區之研究,未出版
  33. 韓國海洋水產開發院與中央大學(2000)。光陽港關稅自由區指定與營運之研究光陽港關稅自由區指定與營運之研究,未出版
被引用次数
  1. 陳和憲、王士嘉(2018)。由台灣擔任疏運華東地區時效貨流的解決方案。航空安全及管理季刊,5(4),318-330。
  2. 彭銘淵(2019)。論上海自由貿易試驗區與臺灣自由貿易港區之規劃與合作。臺北海洋科技大學學報,10(1),56-101。