國民小學校長課程領導與教師領導關係之研究－以桃園市為例

The Relationship between Elementary School Principals' Curriculum Leadership and Teachers' Leadership in Taoyuan City

10.6249/SE.2016.67.4.05

林和春(Ho-Chun Lin)；楊佩禎(Pei-Chen Yang)

國民小學 ； 校長 ； 教師領導 ； 課程領導 ； curriculum leadership ； elementary school ； principal ； teacher leadership

中等教育

67卷4期（2016 / 12 / 01）

57 - 84

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解桃園市國民小學教師知覺校長課程領導與教師領導之現況；其次比較不同背景變項所產生的差異，最後進一步探討校長課程領導與教師領導之相關與預測情形。本研究採問卷調查法，以「桃園市國民小學校長課程領導與教師領導調查問卷」為施測工具。研究採分層配額抽樣方式，抽取桃園市653 名國小教師為研究對象，回收626 份，有效問卷575 份。調查所得資料以描述統計、t 檢定及單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元迴歸分析等方法進行分析。研究結論如下：一、桃園市國民小學教師知覺校長課程領導整體情形良好，以「提供支持環境」和「促進教師專業」層面較佳；而在「實施課程評鑑」表現較低。二、桃園市國民小學教師知覺教師領導整體情形良好，尤以「帶領同儕合作」層面表現較佳；而在「參與學校決策」層面相對較低。三、不同「任教年資」、「擔任職務」及「學校規模」的桃園市國民小學教師知覺校長課程領導有顯著差異。四、不同「擔任職務」及「學校規模」的桃園市國民小學教師知覺教師領導有所差異。五、國民小學校長課程領導與教師領導之間具有顯著正相關。六、校長課程領導對教師領導具有正向預測力，其中以「提供支持環境」的預測力最佳。綜合以上結論，分別對主管教育機關、學校校長、教師及未來研究者提出相關建議。

The study involves two-fold purposes: first, it attempts to understand teachers' perception of the principals' curriculum leadership and teacher leadership of elementary schools in Taoyuan City. Second, it set to investigate the teachers' different perceptions towards principals' curriculum leadership as a function of various different backgrounds of elementary school teachers. The ultimate aim is to explore the relationship of the principals' curriculum leadership and teacher leadership. Questionnaire survey method was applied to collect the research data. The research tool was ＂Scale of the relationship between principals' curriculum leadership and teacher leadership of elementary school teachers＂. A total of 653 questionnaries were distributed, 626 returned, in which 575 valid responses were quantitatively analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis, independent sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple regression analysis. The main findings of this study are as follows: 1. The overall situation of the current principals' curriculum leadership perceived by the elementary school teachers in Taoyuan City is good. In particular, the performance in ＂supporting for the teaching environment＂ was better; the performance of ＂curriculum evaluation＂ was relatively poorer. 2. The overall situation of the current teacher leadership perceived by elementary school teachers in Taoyuan City is good. In particular, the performance in ＂teacher leading peer teaching cooperation＂ was better; the performance of ＂participation in school decision-making＂ was relatively poorer. 3. Elementary school teachers of different background variables, such as years of teaching experience, job position, school size, significantly affect their perceptions toward principals' curriculum leadership. 4. Elementary school teachers of different background variables, such as job position, school size, significantly affect their perceptions toward teacher leadership. 5. Elementary school teachers relationships between principals' curriculum leadership and teacher leadership were found to have medium correlations in the positive direction. 6. The principals' curriculum leadership were found to be able to predict the teacher leadership, especially for the strategy of supporting for the teaching environment. Based on the findings of the study, some suggestions are provided for educational authorities, school principals, school teachers and future researchers.

1. 江嘉杰(2014)。臺灣地區教師領導研究之分析。學校行政雙月刊，90，1-25。
   連結：
2. 陳佩英(2009)。一起學習、一起領導：專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育，60(3)，68-88。
   連結：
3. 葉連祺(2014)。國小校長課程領導之實踐課題。學校行政雙月刊，91，1-32。
   連結：
4. 鄭淵全(2008)。國小校長在校本課程發展的課程領導作為及其相關問題之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，25(1)，1-20。
   連結：
5. Aleccia, V. A.(2007).Newberg, Oregon,George Fox University.
6. Bradley, L. H.(1985).Curriculum leadership and development.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
7. Demir, K.(2015).The Effect of Organizational Trust on the Culture of Teacher Leadership in Primary Schools.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practices,15(3),621-634.
8. Doll, R. C.(1996).Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
9. Glatthorn, A. A.(2000).The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
10. Gross, S. J.(1998).Staying Centered: Curriculum Leadership in a Turbulent Era.Alexandria, VA:Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development=ASCD.
11. Katzenmeyer, M.,Moller, G.(2009).Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
12. York-Barr, J.,Duke, K.(2004).What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship.Review of Educational Research,74(3),255-316.
13. 吳百祿(2009)。教師領導：理念、實施與啟示。國民教育研究學報，23，53-80。
14. 吳清山(2010)。校長課程領導vs.教師教學品質。師友月刊，514，8-13。
15. 吳清山、林天祐(2001)。課程領導。教育資料與研究，38，47-48。
16. 李爭宜(2014)。屏東縣，國立屏東教育大學。
17. 林佳臻(2014)。臺中市，逢甲大學。
18. 孫秀蓉(2009)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學。
19. 徐欣薇(2014)。臺南市，國立臺南大學。
20. 高新建(2002)。學校課程領導者的任務與角色探析。臺北市立師範學院學報，33，113-128。
21. 張德銳(2010)。喚醒沉睡的巨人─論教師領導在我國中小學的發展。臺北市立教育大學學報，41(2)，81-110。
22. 許慧娟(2007)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
23. 郭金和(2013)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學。
24. 黃旭鈞(2002)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
25. 黃旭鈞(2003)。課程領導理論語實務。臺北市:心理。
26. 歐用生(2000)。課程改革。臺北市:師大書苑。
27. 蔡清田(2005)。課程領導與學校本位課程發展。臺北市:五南。
28. 蔡進雄(2011)。教師領導的理論、實踐與省思。中等教育，62(2)，8-19。
29. 蔡進雄(1995)。有效的班級經營：談教師領導方式、班級氣氛與學業成就。教育資料文摘，214，147-159。
30. 賴志峰(2009)。教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展期刊，5(3)，113-144。

1. 陳麗如(2021)。從教師領導研究回顧探討其若干應用與限制。學校行政，133，152-178。
2. 潘慧玲,陳文彥(2019)。校長領導對教師學習領導的影響：檢視信任關係與學業強調的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，119-147。
3. 張文權、范熾文(2018)。國民小學教師績效責任領導量表之發展與運用。課程與教學，21(2)，169-198。
4. (2019)。國民中小學校長推動108課綱的領導取向與具體作為。教育研究月刊，304，80-97。
5. (2019)。新課綱下學校中階雙歧領導任務之挑戰。教育研究月刊，304，46-61。
6. (2024)。校長素養導向課程領導之個案研究。學校行政，153，86-106。