题名

國中自主學習校訂課程之實踐

并列篇名

The Implementation of School-based Curriculum for Self-regulated Learning in 12-year Basic Education

DOI

10.6249/SE.202009_71(3).0021

作者

林佳慧(Chia-Hui Lin)

关键词

十二年國教 ; 自主學習 ; 專題探究 ; 12-year Basic Education ; problem-based learning ; self-regulated learning

期刊名称

中等教育

卷期/出版年月

71卷3期(2020 / 09 / 01)

页次

67 - 80

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文旨在探究十二年國教國中自主學習校訂課程之實踐,以一所新北市國中為例,闡述該校發展校訂課程的實施歷程。該校以專題探究作為自主學習的取徑,分為「準備、選擇、計畫、行動、歡收」之五個階段,並於106學年度開始,由兩個八年級班級實施小規模試行,引導學生發展自主學習的興趣與能力,逐漸建構系統性與在地性的自主學習課程。本案例對於他校自主學習校訂課程之發展,有三點建議:一、學生自主學習應重視支持資源的運用與整合;二、學校應建立行政領導與教師教學的共力文化;三、學校應善用外部專業協作團隊精進自主學習的課程知能。

英文摘要

This study explored the implementation of a school-based curriculum for self-regulated learning (SRL), and conducted a case study on a secondary school in New Taipei City. The school adopted problem-based learning as an approach to implement the SRL curriculum, which consisted of five facets: preparation, selection, plan, action, and celebration. Starting from 2017 academic year, the school began small-scale trails on the reformed curriculum in two eighth-grade classes and guided the students to develop motivation and abilities of SRL. The SRL curriculum was then gradually and systematically constructed with the features of the school. This study proposes three suggestions for other schools aiming to develop their school-based curriculum for SRL. Firstly, it is suggested to value the execution and integration of supportive resources. Secondly, the school is suggested to establish a collaborative culture shared by the school leaders and teachers. Finally, the school is suggested to take advantage of teams, which consists of outside experts to improve their proficiency in developing the SRL curriculum.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 洪詠善,林佳慧,楊惠娥(2018)。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動,15,20-28。
    連結:
  2. 范信賢,尤淑慧(2017)。專題探究──十二年國教課綱及他山之石。教育脈動,11,50-58。
    連結:
  3. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York, NY: Macmillan Company.
  4. Fadel, C.,Bialik, M.,Trilling, B.(2015).Four-dimensional education: The competencies learners need to succeed.Boston, MA:Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  5. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce,Industry(2017).Leapfrogging to education 4.0: Students at the core.New Delhi, India:Author.
  6. Finnish National Board of Education(2016).National core curriculum for basic education 2014.Helsinki, Finland:Finnish National Agency for Education.
  7. Fisher, D.,Frey, N.(2008).Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  8. H.K. Curriculum Development Council (2017). Secondary education curriculum guide draft booklet 3 effective learning and teaching: Developing lifelong and self-directed learners. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/Guides/SECG%20booklet%203_20170531.pdf
  9. Haworth, L.(1986).Autonomy: An essay in philosophical psychology and ethics.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  10. Housand, A.,Reis, S.(2008).Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings.Journal of Advanced Academies,20(1),108-136.
  11. Neuhouser, F.(2011).Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the origins of autonomy.Inquiry,54,478-493.
  12. New Zealand Ministry of Education(2007).The New Zealand Curriculum.New Zealand:Author.
  13. Rogers, C.(1969).Freedom to learn.Columbus, OH:A Bell & Howell.
  14. Schunk, D. H.,Zimmerman, B. J.(2007).Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation reading and writing through modeling.Reading and Writing Quarterly,23(1),7-25.
  15. Sugarman, S.(1987).Piaget’s construction of the child’s reality.Cambridge University Press.
  16. Zimmerman, B. J.(2002).Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview.Theory Into Practice,41(2),64-70.
  17. Zimmerman, B. J.(2008).Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects.American Educational Research Journal,45,166-183.
  18. 吳清山,王令宜(2018)。教育 4.0 世代的人才培育探析。邁向教育 4.0:智慧學校的想像與建構,臺北:
  19. 李子建,邱德峰(2017)。學生自主學習:教學條件與策略。全球教育展望,46(1),47-57。
  20. 林佳慧(2020)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學課程與教學研究所。
  21. 林俊宏(譯),Harari, Y.N.(2018).21 世紀的 21 堂課.臺北:遠見天下文化.
  22. 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北:教育部。
  23. 梁雲霞(2020)。善教樂學:新課綱脈絡下的自主學習。教育研究月刊,309,4-23。
  24. 龐維國,薛慶國(2001)。中國古代的自主學習思想探析。心理科學,24(1),59-62。
被引用次数
  1. 黃彥文(2023)。遠距教學中自主學習的可能與問題之研究。課程與教學,26(3),31-72。