题名

交通運輸與土地使用連結下的都市模式演變-全球36個主要城市比較分析

并列篇名

Transport and Land Use Relationship Defining Urban Form in Historical Context: A Comparative Analysis of 36 Global Cities

DOI

10.6128/CP.36.1.25

作者

李家儂(Chia-Nung Li);賴宗裕(Tsung-Yu Lai)

关键词

交通運輸與土地使用 ; 都市發展模式 ; 大眾運輸導向發展 ; 全球城市比較 ; Transport and land use ; Urban form ; Transit-oriented development ; A comparative Analysis of global cities

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

36卷1期(2009 / 03 / 01)

页次

25 - 49

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

交通運輸與土地使用相互影響的密切關係,形成了交通運輸與土地使用整合的都市發展模式,透過文獻回顧發現,西元1880至1990年代間,交通運輸與土地使用所架構之都市模式可以區分爲六種,分別爲傳統步行城市、工業化軌道運輸城市、汽車導向蔓延發展城市、汽車導向緊密發展城市、大眾運輸關聯發展城市及大眾運輸導向發展城市(transit-oriented development,簡稱TOD),雖然全球許多城市規劃於1990年代開始,朝向TOD的都市模式邁進,然而各個城市原屬於何種都市模式,缺乏一個有系統的討論與比較分析,推動TOD的過程中無法因地制宜,將降低預期之效益與效率。緣此,本文乃透過全球36個城市的實證分析,發展出都市模式分類的量化與質化標準,並將全球36個城市予以分類,提供運輸與都市整合發展之策略,以作爲各國擬定政策之參考。

英文摘要

Urban forms are shaped by the relationship between transport and land use connection. Urban forms can be divided into six types from 1880 to 1990, namely traditional walking city, industrial transit city, automobile-oriented development city (compact or sprawl), transit-related development city and transit-oriented development city (TOD). Although many global cities have attempted to shape their urban forms as TOD in 1990s, they often did not have definite objectives or strategies to achieve it, or did not know their existing urban forms. Therefore, they could not become TOD cities in effective and feasible ways. Accordingly, based on previous literatures, this study, performs a comparative analysis and empirical study of 36 global cities to develop quantitative and qualitative definitions of urban forms. Moreover, this study classifies the urban form of these 36 global cities, and designs two sets of strategies for shaping a TOD urban form.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. Bell, D.(1991).Office location: City or suburb.Transportation,18,239-259.
  2. Belzer, D.,Aulter, G.(2002).Transit-Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality.Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy and The Great American Station Fundation.
  3. Benfield, F. K.,Raimi, M.,Chen, D. T.(1999).Once There Were Greenfields: How Urban Sprawl is Undermining America's Environment, Economic and Social Fabric.New York:Natural Resources Defense Council.
  4. Breheny, M.,Echenique, M.,Saint, A. (ed.)(2001).Cities for the New Millennium.London:Taylor & Francis.
  5. Carlson, D.(1995).At Road's End: Transportation and Land Use Choices for Communities.Washington, D. C.:Island Press.
  6. Cervero, R.(1998).The Transit Metropolis.Washington, D. C.:Island Press.
  7. Cervero, R.,Landis, J.(1992).Suburbanization of jobs and the journey to work: A submarket analysis of commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area.Journal of Advanced Transportation,23(3),275-297.
  8. Cervero, R.,Murphy, S.,Ferrell, C.,Goguts, N.,Tsai, Y.-H.,Arrington, G. B.,Borski, J.,Smith-Heimer, J.,Golem, R.,Peninger, P.,Nakajima, E.,Chui, E.,Dunphy, R.,Myers, M.,Mckay, S.,Witenstein, N.(2004).Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 102Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 102,Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board.
  9. Daniels, P. W.(1972).Transport changes generated by decentralized offices.Regional Studies,6,273-289.
  10. Davis, J. S.,Seskin, S.(1997).Impacts of urban form on travel behavior.The Urban Lawyer,29(2),215-232.
  11. Davison, G.(1978).The Rise and Fall of Marvellous Melbourne.Melbourne:University of Melbourne Press.
  12. Dittmar, H.,Gloria, O.(2004).The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development.Washington, D. C.:Island Press.
  13. Douglas, B.(1992).Comparison of Commuting Trends Between Downtown, Suburban Centers, and Suburban Campuses in the Washington Metropolitan Area.Washington, DC:Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.
  14. Dunphy, R.(1997).Moving Beyond Gridlock: Traffic and Development.Washington, D.C.:ULI-Urban Land Institute.
  15. Edel, M.,Michael, D.,Allen, J. S. (ed.)(1981).Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society.New York:Methuen.
  16. Fogelson, R.(1967).The Fragmented Metropolis: Los Angeles from 1850 to 1930.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  17. Hart, S.,Spivak, A.(1993).The Elephant in the Bedroom: Automobile Dependence and Denial New Paradigm.Pasadena:New Paradigm Books.
  18. Hilton, G.(1968).Rail transit and the pattern of cities: The California case.Traffic Quarterly,67,37-93.
  19. Katz, P.(1994).The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  20. Kostoff, F.(1991).The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History.London:Thames & Hudson.
  21. Ley, D.(1988).Work-residence relationships for head office employees in an inflating housing market.Urban Studies,22(1),21-38.
  22. Manning, I.(1979).The Journey to Work.NSW:George Allen & Unwin Hornsby.
  23. Meyer, J.,Gomez-Ibanez, J. A.(1981).Autos, Transit, and Cities.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  24. Middleton, W.(1967).The Time of the Trolley.Milwaukee:Kalmbach.
  25. Newman, P.,Kenworthy, J. R.(1999).The land use- transport connection: An overview.Land Use Policy,13(1),1-22.
  26. Newman, P.,Kenworthy, J. R.(1999).Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  27. Newman, P.,Kenworthy, J. R.,Williams, K.,Burton, E.,Jenks, M. (ed.)(2000).Achieving Sustainable Urban Form.New York:E & FN Spon.
  28. O''Connor, K.(1980).The analysis of journey to work patterns in human geography.Human Geography,4(4),477-499.
  29. Porter, D. R.(1997).Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 20Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 20,Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board.
  30. Renne, J. L.,Wells, J. S.,Bloustein, E. J.(2005).National Cooperative Highway Research Project.Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board.
  31. Rice Center for Urban Mobility Research(1987).Houston's Major Activity Centers and Worker Travel Behavior.Houston:Rice Center for Urban Mobility Research.
  32. Shannon, T. R.(1983).Urban Problems in Sociological Perspective.New York:Random Housing.
  33. Smith, W.(1984).Mass transit for high-rise, high-density living.Journal of Transportation Engineering,110(6),521-535.
  34. Spearitt, P.(1978).Sydney Since the 20's.Sydney:Hale & Ironmonger.
  35. Tarr J. A.,Konvitz J. W.,Gillette, H.,Miller Z. L. (ed.)(1987).American Urbanism: A Historiographical Review.New York:Greenwood Press.
  36. TDM Encyclopedia(2006).Transit Oriented Development: Using Public Transit to Create More Accessible and Livable Neighborhoods.Victoria, BC:Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  37. Thomas, R. W.(1981).Information Statistics in Geography.Norwich:Geo Abstracts.
  38. Vance, J. W.(1964).Geography and Urban Evolution in the San Francisco Bay Area.Berkeley:Institute of Governmental Studies.
  39. Warner, S. B.(1962).Streetcar Suburbs.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  40. White W.,Attorney , F.,Leitner, C.(1999).The Zoning and Real Estate Implications of Transit-Oriented Development.Washington: D.C.:Transportation Research Board.
  41. Zuckermann, W.(1992).End of the Road: The World Car Crisis and How to Solve It.Cambridge:The Lutterworth Press.
被引用次数
  1. 李家儂(2008)。健康、運輸與都市設計整合的規劃思潮。土地問題研究季刊,7(4),114-124。
  2. 李家儂(2015)。鄉村地區綠色運輸衡量指標之建構與評估:以宜蘭縣為例。都市與計劃,42(4),455-485。
  3. 劉人華、白仁德(2014)。大眾運輸導向建成環境特性對捷運運量影響之研究-以臺北捷運為實證對象。建築與規劃學報,15(2/3),111-128。
  4. 謝翊楷,李家儂(2023)。大眾運輸導向車站周邊步行友善環境規劃之研究-以板橋車站為例。都市與計劃,50(1),27-56。
  5. (2009)。基於政策支援系統下的大眾運輸導向發展機制。土地經濟年刊,20,35-61。