题名

區域貿易協定對台灣的貿易效果-引力模型的實證分析

并列篇名

Trade Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Taiwan: An Empirical Study Using Gravity Model

DOI

10.29628/AEP.201203.0002

作者

劉宗欣(Zong-Shin Liu);賴美穎(Mei-Ying Lai);陳至還(Chih-Huan Chen)

关键词

區域貿易協定 ; 引力模型 ; 進口轉向效果 ; 出口轉向效果 ; 追蹤資料 ; Regional trade agreement ; Gravity model ; Import diversion effect ; Export diversion effect ; Panel data

期刊名称

經濟論文

卷期/出版年月

40卷1期(2012 / 03 / 01)

页次

35 - 77

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

自1990年代初以來,台灣主要貿易國紛紛簽訂臣域貿易協定(RTA),台灣皆非會員園,此對台灣的貿易效果為何?是否會影響與台灣的貿易關係?先前研究大多只評估RTA的平均貿易效果,無法據以正確評估對台灣的效果。本研究為首次針對台灣與主要貿易國的貿易,建立一精簡的引力模型,並以1980-2008年21國的追蹤資料,實證探討主要貿易國所簽訂的五個RTAs對台灣的貿易效果。結果發現:NAFTA、EU及ANZCER對台灣皆有顯著進口轉向效果,其中NAFTA也有顯著出口轉向效果;AFTA及CEPA皆會增加自台灣進口及對台灣出口。以淨貿易效果而言,AFTA及CEPA會增進與台灣的貿易關係,NAFTA、ED及ANZCER則會減少與台灣的貿易關係。此外也發現,大多數RTAs自生效起即會對台灣產生貿易效果,各RTA不同會員國對台灣的貿易效果也有明顯差異。依實證結果,台灣若能與美國及東協各國簽訂雙邊FTA,應有助於拓展對外貿易。

英文摘要

Since the early 1990s, the major trading partners of Taiwan consecutively signed Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs). Taiwan, however, is not a member of those RTAs. What trade effects do those RTAs have on Taiwan? Do they affect trade relations of Taiwan with its trading partners? Most previous studies merely evaluate the average trade effects of RTAs, which cannot be applied to correctly assess the trade effects on Taiwan. This study is the first to construct a parsimonious gravity model, focusing on the trade between Taiwan and its trading partners, and uses panel data covering 21 countries from 1980 to 2008 to empirically investigate the trade effects on Taiwan of five RTAs signed between its trading partners. The major findings are summarized as follows: NAFTA, EU and ANZCER have significant import diversion effects on Taiwan, where NAFTA also exhibits an export diversion effect. In contrast, both AFTA and CEPA have positive effects on imports from and exports to Taiwan. Regarding the net trade effects, both AFTA and CEPA can enhance trade relations with Taiwan, but NAFTA, EU and ANZCER do the opposite. Moreover, most RTAs are found to have significant trade effects on Taiwan since they went into force, and each member of all RTAs has different trade effects on Taiwan. According to the results, it should be helpful for expanding external trade if Taiwan could sign bilateral FTAs with the U.S.A. and ASEAN countries.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 黃登興、黃幼宜(2006)。兩岸三地貿易流量的變遷─引力模型的驗證。台灣經濟預測與政策,36,47-75。
    連結:
  2. Aitken, N. D.(1973).The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis.American Economic Review,63,881-892.
  3. Anderson, J. E.(1979).A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.American Economic Review,69,106-116.
  4. Anderson, J. E.,van Wincoop, E.(2003).Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.American Economic Review,93,170-192.
  5. Baier, S.,Bergstrand, J. H.(2001).The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs, and Income Similarity.Journal of International Economics,53,1-27.
  6. Baier, S.,Bergstrand, J. H.(2007).Do Free Trade Agreements Actually IncreaseMembers' International Trade?.Journal of International Economics,71,72-95.
  7. Bergstrand, J. H.(1985).The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics,67,474-481.
  8. Bergstrand, J. H.(1989).The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade.Review of Economics and Statistics,71,143-153.
  9. Bond, E. W.,Riezman, R. G.,Syropoulos, C.(2004).A Strategic and Welfare Theoretic Analysis of Free Trade Area.Journal of International Economics,64,1-27.
  10. Brouwer, J.,Paap, R.,Viaene, J.-M.(2008).The Trade and FDI Effects of EUM Enlargement.Journal of International Money and Finance,27,188-208.
  11. Carrére, C.(2006).Revisiting the Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade Flows with Proper Specification of the Gravity Model.European Economic Review,50,223-247.
  12. Cheng, I.-H.,Tsai, Y.-Y.(2008).Estimating the Staged Effects of Regional Economic Integration on Trade Volumes.Applied Economics,40,283-293.
  13. Clarete, R.,Edmonds, C.,Wallack, J. S.(2003).Asian Regionalism and Its Effects on Trade in the 1980s and 1990s.Journal of Asian Economics,14,91-129.
  14. Eaton, J.,Kortum, S.(2002).Technology, Geography, and Trade.Econometrica,70,1741-1779.
  15. Egger, P.(2000).A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation.Economics Letters,66,25-31.
  16. Egger, P.(2002).An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials.The World Economy,25,297-312.
  17. Egger, P.,Pfaffermayr, M.(2003).The Proper Panel Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation: A Three Way Model with Bilateral Interaction Effects.Empirical Economics,28,571-580.
  18. Eichengreen, B.,Irwin, D.(1995).Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs and the Reorientation of World Trade in the 1930.Journal of International Economics,38,1-24.
  19. Ethier, W.(1998).Regionalism in a Multilateral World.Journal of Political Economy,106,1214-1245.
  20. Feenstra, R. C.,Markusen, J. R.,Rose, A. K.(2001).Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among Alternative Theories of Trade.Canadian Journal of Economics,34,430-447.
  21. Frankel, J. A.(1997).Regional Trading Blocs in theWorld Economic System.Washington, DC:Institute for International Economics.
  22. Frankel, J. A.(ed.)(1998).The Regionalization of the World Economy.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  23. Frankel, J.,Stein, E.,Wei, S.-J.(1995).Trading Blocs and the Americas: The Natural, the Unnatural, and the Super-Natural.Journal of Development Economics,47,61-95.
  24. Hejazi,W.,Safarian, A. E.(2005).NAFTA Effects and the Level of Development.Journal of Business Research,58,1741-1749.
  25. Helpman, E.(1987).Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries.Journal of the Japanese and International Economics,1,62-81.
  26. Helpman, E.,Krugman, P.(1985).Market Structure and Foreign Trade.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  27. Helpman, E.,Melitz, M.,Rubinstein, Y.(2008).Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes.Quarterly Journal of Economics,123,441-487.
  28. Ito, T.(ed.) ,Krueger, A. O.(ed.)(1997).Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  29. Jugurnath, B.,Stewart, M.,Brooks, R.(2007).Asia/Pacific Regional Trade Agreements: An Empirical Study.Journal of Asian Economics,18,974-987.
  30. Kandogan, Y.(2007).Sensitivity of International Blocs' Trade Effect to Alternative Specifications of the Gravity Equation.Journal of Applied Economics,10,337-360.
  31. Krishna, P.(1998).Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach.Quarterly Journal of Economics,113,227-252.
  32. Lee, J.W.,Park, I.(2005).Free Trade Areas in East Asia: Discriminatory or Non-Discriminatory?.The World Economy,28,21-48.
  33. Levy, P. I.(1997).A Political-Economic Analysis of Free Trade Agreements.American Economic Review,87,506-519.
  34. Mátyás, L.(1998).The Gravity Model: Some Econometric Considerations.The World Economy,21,397-401.
  35. Mátyás, L.(1997).Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model.The World Economy,20,363-368.
  36. Micco, A.,Stein, E.,Ordonez, G.(2003).The Currency Union Effect on Trade: Early Evidence from EMU.Economic Policy,18,315-356.
  37. Plummer, M. G.(2006).ASEAN-EU Economic Relationship: Integration and Lessons for the ASEAN Economic Community.Journal of Asian Economics,17,427-447.
  38. Pöyhönen, P.(1963).A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries.Weltwir-tschaftliches Archiv,90,93-99.
  39. Pulliainen, K.(1963).A World Trade Study: An Econometric Model of the Pattern of the Commodity Flows of International Trade in 1948-60.Economiska Samfundets, Tidskrift,16,78-91.
  40. Rose, A. K.(2000).One Money, One Market? The Effects of Common Currencies on International Trade.Economic Policy,15,7-46.
  41. Sanso, M.,Cuairan, R.,Sanz, F.(1993).Bilateral Trade Flows, the Gravity Equation, and Functional Form.Review of Economics and Statistics,75,266-275.
  42. Soloaga, I.,Winters, L. A.(2001).Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?.North American Journal of Economics and Finance,12,1-29.
  43. Tang, D.(2005).Effects of the Regional Trading Arrangements on Trade: Evidence from the NAFTA, ANZCER and ASEAN Countries 1989-2000.Journal of International Trade and Economic Development,14,241-265.
  44. Tinbergen, J.(1962).Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy.New York:The Twentieth Century Fund.
  45. Viner, J.(1950).The Customs Union Issue.New York:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  46. Wall, H. J.(2002).Has Japan Been Left Out in the Cold by Regional Integration?.Monetary and Economic Studies,20,117-134.
  47. Winters, L. A.(1997).Regionalism and the Rest of the World: The Irrelevance of the Kemp-Wan Theorem.Oxford Economic Papers,49,228-234.
  48. Wooldridge, J. M.(2010).Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  49. 杜巧霞(2007)。外交部/經濟部國貿局委託研究報告外交部/經濟部國貿局委託研究報告,外交部=Ministry of Foreign Affairs。
  50. 經濟部國貿局(2011)。經濟部國貿局研究報告經濟部國貿局研究報告,未出版
被引用次数
  1. 謝成聰(2016)。國際生鮮蘋果貿易非關稅障礙之估計——隨機邊界引力模型之應用。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2016。1-39。 
  2. 連柏凱(2016)。臺灣服務貿易競爭力之研究-引力模型之應用。國立臺灣大學經濟學系學位論文。2016。1-72。