臺南市歷史街區對當地房價預期影響之研究

The Expected Effect of Historic Districts on Local Housing Prices in Tainan

曾憲嫻(Cheng Hsien-Hsin)；王湘晴(Hsiang-Ching Wang)

歷史街區 ； 房價 ； 特徵價格模型 ； Historic districts ； Property values ； Hedonic price

規劃學報

37卷1期（2019 / 12 / 01）

45 - 69

繁體中文

台南市歷史街區政策為台灣唯一運用自治條例方式，結合都市規劃概念作廣域都市保存的政策，落實到都市計畫道路檢討等以往保存者較難處理的領域，亦有較完整的獎補助機制。雖然歷史保護被認為具有經濟價值，文化資產指定已成為保護鄰里的重要工具，但歷史街區是否對周邊街區的財產價值產生積極的溢出效應或限制？本研究採用特徵價格法評估歷史街區的經濟價值，以府城歷史街區2013至2017年的當地房價為基礎，探討具有土地使用管制與都市設計準則的鄰近地區，與未具有規範的外圍地區，其房價預期影響之差異，從中檢驗保存政策對不同地區帶來的限制與效益。結果表明，古蹟保存區與保存區的鄰近地區預期付出的成本大於獲益，反映保存政策可能抑制受規範地區的房價，其周圍房地產的獲益來自受規範地區付出的成本；歷史巷道及中正路的分析則顯示不同結果，歷史資源對鄰近地區房價產生了積極的溢出效應。總言之，研究結果證實歷史街區政策產生房價影響，支持了歷史保存具有經濟價值的論點。

The Tainan City Historic District Policy is the only one in Taiwan that uses the autonomous regulations and combines the concept of urban planning for wide-area urban conservation. It is implemented in areas such as urban planning road review, which are difficult for former depositors to handle, and has a more complete award and subsidy mechanism. While historic preservation is thought to have the economic value, and historic designation has become an important tool to preserve neighborhood, efforts have been made to investigate if historic districts have positive spillovers or restriction on property values in surrounding neighborhoods. The purpose of this study is to examine the expected impact of historic district on regulated neighborhood and non-regulated neighborhood. This study employs hedonic price models to estimate local housing prices from 2013 to 2017 in Fucheng historic district. Results suggest that, to properties in the adjacent area of historic resources, that is, regulated area, the expecting costs is not more than benefits in every case. These findings indicate that to each historic resources, preservation could have negative or positive impact on local housing prices. Thus, the results have demonstrated that historic districts have both positive spillovers and restriction on property values in surrounding neighborhoods. In conclusion, the findings support the claim that historic preservation have the economic value.

1. 林思玲,邱龍禹,榮芳杰(2013)。文化資產經濟評估概念與應用。文化創意產業研究學報，3(1)，33-43。
   連結：
2. (2013).Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage.
3. Coulson, N. E.,Leichenko, R. M.(2001).The Internal and External Impact of Historical Designation on Property Values.The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,23(1),113-124.
4. Deodhar, V. (2004). Does the Housing Market Value Heritage? Some Empirical Evidence. Retrieved from Macquarie University.
5. Haughey, P.,Basolo, V.(2000).The Effect of Dual Local and National Register Historic District Designations on Single-Family Housing Prices in New Orleans.The Appraisal Journal,68(3),283-289.
6. Heintzelman, M. D.,Altieri, J. A.(2013).Historic Preservation: Preserving value?.The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,46(3),543-563.
7. Ijla, A.,Ryberg, S.,Rosentraub, M. S.,Bowen, W.(2011).Historic Designation and the Rebuilding of Neighborhoods: New Evidence of the Value of An Old Policy Tool.Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability,4(3),263-284.
8. Kovacs, J. F.,Galvin, K. J.,Shipley, R.(2015).Assessing the Success of Heritage Conservation Districts: Insights from Ontario, Canada.Cities,45,123-132.
9. Leichenko, R. M.,Coulson, N. E.,Listokin, D.(2001).Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: An Analysis of Texas Cities.Urban Studies,38(11),1973-1987.
10. Mason, R.(2005).Economics and historic preservation.Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institution.
11. Noonan, D. S.(2007).Finding An Impact of Preservation Policies: Price Effects of Historic Landmarks on Attached Homes in Chicago, 1990-1999.Economic Development Quarterly,21(1),17-33.
12. Phillips, R.,Stein, J.(2016).Heritage and Community Regeneration in Northern Ireland: Finding Points of Coalescence in the Development Planning Process.Journal of Community Practice,24(1),4-17.
13. Sharpe, C. A.(2006).House Prices in a Heritage Area: The Case of St. John's, Newfoundland.Canadian Journal of Urban Research,15(2),175-201.
14. Shipley, R.(2000).Heritage Designation and Property Values：Is There An Effect?.International Journal of Heritage Studies,6(1),83-100.
15. Shipley, R.,Jonas, K.,Kovacs, J. F.(2011).Heritage Conservation Districts Work：Evidence from the Province of Ontario, Canada.Urban Affairs Review,47(5),611-641.
16. Shipley, R.,Reeve, A.(2010).Evaluating the THI: Measuring the Effectiveness of the Townscape Heritage Initiatives in the United Kingdom.URBAN DESIGN International,15(4),221-237.
17. Shipley, R.,Reeve, A.,Walker, S.,Grover, P.,Goodey , B.(2004).Townscape Heritage Initiatives Evaluation: Methodology for Assessing The Effectiveness of Heritage Lottery Fund Projects in the United Kingdom.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,22(4),523-542.
18. Shipley, R.,Snyder, M.(2013).The Role of Heritage Conservation Districts in Achieving Community Economic Development Goals.International Journal of Heritage Studies,19(3),304-321.
19. Throsby, D.(2001).Economics and culture.Cambridge, England:Cambridge university press.
20. van Duijn, M.,Rouwendal, J.,Boersema, R.(2016).Redevelopment of Industrial Heritage: Insights into External Effects on House Prices.Regional Science and Urban Economics,57,91-107.
21. 吳憶如(2008)。臺北大學。
22. 李元拓(2009)。國立成功大學。
23. 林建亨(2008)。國立成功大學。
24. 張景棠(2017)。國立成功大學。
25. 鄔廸嘉(2015)。臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
26. 廖杏瑜(2010)。國立成功大學。
27. 臺南市地政局(2017)。臺南市地政局 (2017)，臺南市地政局房地產實際交易價格資料。
28. 臺南市都市發展局(2018)。臺南市都市發展局 (2018)，變更臺南市中西區細部計畫（第二次通盤檢討）案。
29. 賴聲(2013)。國立成功大學。

1. (2022)。審計新村老屋再造計劃對各類房價影響之研究－Google 地圖之應用。臺灣銀行季刊，73(1)，95-117。