行動研究於傳播內容設計實務之應用

Action Research in the Design of Media Content

10.30385/JRTS.202007_(40).0001

林玲遠(Fabia Ling-Yuan Lin)；林品婕(Pin-Chieh Lin)

行動研究 ； 創作研究 ； 行動反思 ； action research ； practice-led research ； reflection in/on action

廣播與電視

40期（2020 / 07 / 01）

1 - 37

繁體中文

數位科技帶來巨大的影響，使傳播領域不得不重新審視其資源與工具，以回應快速且具高度不確定性的環境變化。行動研究有一基本立場，是要幫助實務工作者在變動的實務現場釐清問題、尋找解決方案。在這個科技與社會均快速變化，充滿不確定的時代，結合行動研究精神的研究方法可望提供傳播工作者多一種工具，幫助他們以較為系統而又不至喪失整體有機性的方法，投入變動的實務現場之研究。本文檢視既有文獻，並借鏡藝術設計領域之創作研究中結合行動研究精神的作法，從五個方面提出傳播內容設計實務之研究建議，包括：研究起點、循環式過程、研究中反思、資料蒐集與分析、協同合作。期望對現有傳播研究與實務結合的思考與做法有所補充。

The media industry has been greatly impacted by the ever-changing digital technology that not only does it need to respond to the highly uncertain environment, but also it has to become more reflexive in terms of the use of resources and tools at its disposal. To take full advantage of action research and adopt it into the design of media content may shorten the distance between theory and practice. In this way the practice of research would benefit practitioners in the innovation and production of media content. This article examines current use of action research in communication study, draws inspiration from creative production research methodologies in the field of art and design, and comes up with suggestions regarding the combination of action research and the design of media content. The aspects discussed are as follows: the inception of the research, cyclic process, reflections in/on the study, data collection/analysis, and collaboration. It is the aim of this article to contribute to the integration of research and practice in the design of media content.

1. 位明宇(2010)。新聞整合操作：學生媒體行動研究。新聞學研究，105，167-203。
   連結：
2. 高淑清(2001)。在美華人留學生太太的生活世界：詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究，16，225-285。
   連結：
3. 陶蕃瀛(2004)。行動研究：一種增強權能的助人工作方法。應用心理研究，23，33-48。
   連結：
4. 潘世尊(2011)。論行動研究論文審查上的一些問題。當代教育研究，19(4)，41-83。
   連結：
5. Archer, B. (2004). Transcript of DRS lifetime achievement award acceptance. Retrieved from http://nelly.dmu.uk/4dd/DDR4-framez.html/
6. Argyris, C.,Schön, D. A.(1974).Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness.San Francisco, CA:lossey-Bass.
7. Barone, T.(2001).Touching Eternity: The Enduring Outcomes of Teaching.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
8. Barone, T.(2000).Aesthetics, Politics, and Educational Inquiry: Essays and Examples.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
9. Barret, E.(Ed.),Bolt, B.(Ed.)(2007).Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry.London:I. B. Tauris.
10. Barrett, E.(2005).Creative arts practice, Creative Industries: method and process as cultural capital.Speculation and Innovation (SPIN) Conference Proceedings,Brisbane, Australia:
11. Biggs, M. A. R.,Büchler, D.(2008).Architectural practice and academic research.Nordic Journal of Architectural Research,20(1),83-94.
12. Boyatzis, R. E.(1998).Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development.London, UK; New Delhi, India:Sage Publications.
13. Brien, D. L.(Ed.),Williamson, R.(Ed.)(2009).Supervising the creative arts research higher degree: towards best practice.Text, special issue website series,6
14. Burgess, R.G.(Ed.)(1985).Issues in Educational Research: Qualitative Methods.London, UK:The Falmer Press.
15. Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: a guide. Retrieved from http://www.creativeityandcognition.com/resources/RBR%20Guide-1.1-2006.pdf
16. Carr, N.(2010).The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains.New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company.
17. Carr, W.,Kemmis, S.(1986).Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research.London, UK:The Falmer Press.
18. Checkland, P.,Holwell, S.(1998).Information, Systems, and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field.New York, NY:Wiley.
19. Checkland, P.,Scholes, J.(1999).Soft Systems Methodology in Action: A 30-year Retrospective.New York, NY:Wiley.
20. Cockburn, A.(2001).Writing Effective Use Cases.Boston, MA:AddisonWesley.
21. Collier, J. (1945). United States Indian Administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Social Research, 12(3), 265-303.
22. Creswell, J. W.(1998).Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
23. Culhane, S.(1988).Animation: From Script to Screen.New York:St. Martin’s Press.
24. Diamond, C.T. P.(Ed.),Mullen, C. A.(Ed.)(1997).The Postmodern Educator: Arts-based Inquiries and Teacher Development.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
25. Elkins(2009).Artists with PhDs: On the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art.Washington, DC:New Academia Publishing.
26. Elkins J.(Ed.)(2009).Artists with PhDs: on the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art.Washington, DC:New Academia Publishing.
27. Frayling, C.(1993).Research in art and design.Royal College of Art Research Papers,1(1),11-5.
28. Gonsalves, J.,Becker, T.,Braun, A.,Campilan, D.,de Chavez, H.,Fajber, E.,Kapiriri, M.,Rivaca-Caminade, J.,Vernooy, R.(2005).Participatory Research and Development for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management: A Sourcebook, Volume 1: Understanding Participatory Research and Development.Ottawa, Canada:International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
29. Gray, C. & J. Malins (1993). Research procedures/ methodology for artists & designers. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. Retrieved from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/640 Gray, C. (1996). Inquiry through practice: Developing appropriate research strategies. Retrieved from http://carolegray.net/Papers%20PDFs/ngnm.pdf
30. Gray, C.,Malins, J.(2004).Visualizing Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design.Hant, UK:Ashgate Publishing.
31. Hamilton, J. G.,Jaaniste, L.(2009).The effective and the evocative: reflecting on practice-led research approaches in art and design.Interventions in the Public Domain ACUADS Publishing, Queensland College of Art, Griffith University,Brisbane, Queensland:
32. Hearn, G. N.,Tacchi, J. A.,Foth, M.,Lennie, J.(2009).Action Research and New Media: Concepts, Methods and Cases.Creskill, NJ:Hampton.
33. Krech, G.(2014).The Art of Taking Action: Lessons from Japanese Psychology.Monkton, VT:ToDo Institute.
34. Kulak, D.,Guiney, E.(2004).Use Cases: Requirements in Context.Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley.
35. Kwansah-Aidoo, K.(Ed.)(2005).Topical Issues in Communications and Media Research.New York, NY:Nova Science.
36. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-36.
37. Lin, L-Y.(2014).Doubling the Duality: A Theoretical and Practical Investigation into Materiality and Embodiment of Meaning in the Integration of Live Action.Newcastle upon Tyne, UK:Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
38. Lin, L-Y. F.(2019).Using thematic analysis to facilitate meaning-making in practice-led art and design research.The International Journal of Art and Design Education,38(1),153-167.
39. McNiff, S.(2008).Art-based Research.London, UK:Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
40. McNiff, S.(1998).Action Research: Principles and Practice.London, UK:Macmillan.
41. Mohr, T. S. (n.d.). Is an inner argument holding back your productivity? U99. Retrieved from http://99u.com/articles/7200/is-an-inner-argumentholding-back-your-productivity
42. Oudshoorn, N.(Ed.) ,Pinch, T.(Ed.)(2003).How Users Matter: The CoConstruction of Users and Technologies.Cambridge, UK:The MIT Press.
43. Reason, P.(2006).Choice and quality in action research practice.Journal of Management Inquiry,15(2),187-203.
44. Schön, D.(1983).The Reflective Practitioner.New York, NY:Basic Books.
45. Scrivener, S. (2000). Reflection in and on action and practice in creative production doctoral projects in art and design. Working Papers in Art and Design, vol. 1. Retrieved from http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_ research/papers/wpades/vol1/scrivener2.html
46. Scrivener, S. (2002). The art object does not embody a form of knowledge, Working Papers in Art and Design, vol. 2. Retrieved from http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol2/scrivenerfull.html
47. Smith, H.(Ed.),Dean, R.T.(Ed.)(2009).Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts.Scholand, UK:Edinburg University Press.
48. Sullivan, A. M.(2000).Notes from a marine biologist’s daughter: on the art and science of attention.Harvard Educational Review,70(2),211-227.
49. Sullivan, G.(2005).Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Art.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
50. Tacchi, J.,Foth, M.,Hearn, G.(2009).Action research practices and media for development.International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology,5(2),32-48.
51. 王文科(1999).教育研究法.臺北:五南圖書.
52. 石靜文(2016)。政治大學傳播學院在職專班。
53. 成虹飛,中華民國課程與教學學會（編）(2001).行動研究與課程教學革新.臺北:楊志文化.
54. 何文玲(2014)。雲林科技大學設計學研究所。
55. 吳明清(1991).教育研究：基本觀念與方法分析.臺北:五南圖書.
56. 林盈岑(2011)。雲林科技大學設計運算研究所碩士班。
57. 唐台齡(2014)。政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班。
58. 高淑清(2008).質性研究的 18 堂課：首航初探之旅.高雄:麗文文化.
59. 張寶芳(2006)。以「設計思維」角度探討網路時代之新聞教育。2006 年中華傳播年會，台灣，台北:
60. 陳惠邦(1998).教育行動研究.臺北:師大書苑.
61. 陳靜璇,吳宜澄(2011)。藝術領域研究方法之探討：以創作類研究為主之分析。藝術學刊，2(1)，109-136。
62. 黃聿清(2014)。以行動研究初探高等教育之進階媒體識讀教學－以「媒體再現與行動」課程為例。2014 中華傳播年會，台灣，台北:
63. 潘慧玲（編）(2004).教育研究方法論：觀點與方法.臺北:心理.
64. 蔡鶯鶯,徐永年,林永隆(2010)。參與行動研究：921 地震後中嵙社區健康營造研究案例。新聞學研究，77，23-65。