融會在玉米田裡的「非男性」科學－關於「女性科學」的哲學論爭與新發展

A Feeling for Corn Field in Keller's 〞Non-Masculine〞 Science

傅大為(Daiwie Fu)

女性主義科學 ； 男性科學 ； Keller ； Harding ； McClintock ； feminist science ； masculine science ； Keller ； Harding ； McClintock

歐美研究

29卷2期（1999 / 06 / 01）

1 - 40

繁體中文

本文分成幾個部分：一、從生物學史中定位McClintock當年特殊的科學感知，「非男性」科學的特色；二、討論女性主義者如Keller，還有Harding等人對「女性科學」的不同觀點，還有對McClintock科學研究的不同評價。三、四兩節，我對Keller的名著——A Feeling for the Organism作了一個仔細的語言／象徵／論述之分析，發現McClintock與自然的關係大概有四種模型，比Keller有點浪漫的「愛」的模型要複雜很多，並且，McClintock與自然「融會」的科學，也沒有辦法避免傅科所指出的，在「機構中的研究者」如McClintock，與被研究者（玉米）彼此之間的權力宰制關係。畢竟，我們有的只是「部分」的非男性科學，而Harding對玉米田裡非男性科學的評價，值得我們進一步反省。

This is a study of McClintock's science and feminist interpretations of it, viewed through the lens of Keller's famous biographical study, A Feeling for the Organism. In addition to presenting a historically situated understanding of McClintock's 〞non-masculine〞 science, as interpreted by Keller and questioned by Harding, I offer a detailed discursive analysis of Keller's biography itself. What I found can be summerized into four different models of McClintock's relations with nature (or with her research subjects), a picture more complicated than Keller's own 〞eros〞 model. Moreover, my analysis reveals a special dimension of power relationship in the Foucauldian sense, between McClintock's research team as a dominant institutional power, and her research subjects. I argue that McClintock's science is, perhaps, a non-masculine science only in a partial sense. Further, this analysis also concurs with Harding's reservations about the value of McClintock's science as a paradigmatic feminist science.

1. (1991).The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community.New York:Norton.
2. (1989).Feminism and Science.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
3. (1992).The Dynamic Genome: Barbara McClintock's Ideas in the Century of Genetics.Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
4. (1993).The 'Racial' Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
5. (1990).Body/ Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science.New York:Routledge.
6. Di Liddo, R. M.(1994).A short review on Keller's book on 'Secrets'.NWSA Journal: a Publication of the National Women's Studies Association,6(1)
7. Easlea, Brian(1983).Fathering the Unthinkable: Masculinity, Scientists and the Nuclear Arms Race.London:Pluto.
8. Easlea, Brian(1980).Witch Hunting, Magic and the New Philosophy.Brighton:Harvester Press.
9. Galison, Peter(1996).The Disunity of Science.Stanford University Press.
10. Gould, Stephen Jay(1989).An Urchin in the storm.Penguin.
11. Gould, Stephen Jay(1984).Similarities Between the Sexes.New York Times Book Review
12. Gould, Stephen Jay(1978).Women's Brains.New Scientist,80(1127)
13. Hacking, Ian(1988).PSA 1998.
14. Harding, Sandra(1990).Feminism and Theories of Scientific Knowledge.Women: A Cultural Review,1(1)
15. Harding, Sandra(1991).Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
16. Harding, Sandra(1990).Feminism/ Postmodernism.New York:Routledge.
17. Harding, Sandra(1986).The Science Question in Feminism.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
18. Horning, Beth(1993).The Controversial Career of Evelyn Fox Keller.Technology Review,96
19. Houng, Yu-Houng(1993).Philosophy and Conceptual History of Science in Taiwan.Kluwer:
20. Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer(1981).The Woman That Never Evolved.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
21. Keller, Evelyn Fox(1980).Baconian Science: A Hermaphroditic Birth.Philosophical Forum,11(3)
22. Keller, Evelyn Fox(1986).One Woman and Her Theory.New Scientist,111
23. Keller, Evelyn Fox(1985).Reflections on Gender and Science.New Haven:Yale University Press.
24. Keller, Evelyn Fox(1989).Feminism/ Postmodernism.
25. Keller, Evelyn Fox(1992).Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science.New York:Routledge.
26. Keller, Evelyn Fox(1983).A Feeling for the Organism: The Life ＆ Work of Barbara McClintock.San Francisco:Freeman.
27. Martin, Jane Roland(1988).Science in a Different Style.American Philosophical Quarterly,25
28. Meschel, S. V.(1992).Teacher Keng's Heritage: A Survey of Chinese Women Scientists.Journal of Chemical Education,69
29. Rossiter, Margaret W.(1982).Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Rossiter, Margaret W.(1993).The [Mathew] Matilda Effect in Science.Social Studies of Science,23
31. Rossiter, Margaret W.(1980).Women's Work' in Science, 1880-1910.ISIS,71(258)
32. Spanier, Bonnie B.(1995).Im/ Partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
33. 王秀雲 Wang, Hsiu-Yun(1996).A Matter of Training - Sex in Bacteria, 1945-61.History of Science Madison: University of Wisconsin.
34. 傅大為 Fu, Dai-Wie(1996)。玉米田裡的失誤－略談「性別與科學」的譯介。婦女與兩性研究通訊 Bulletin of Women and Gender Studies，37
35. 傅大為 Fu, Dai-Wie(1995).10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.Florence, Italy:
36. 傅大為 Fu, Dai-Wie(1992)。異時空裡的知識追逐－科學史與科學哲學論文集。台北:東大圖書。
37. 傅大為 Fu, Dai-Wie、 王秀雲 Wang, Hsiu-Yun(1996)。台灣女性科學家的九０年代風貌－試析「科學／女性／社會脈絡」諸相關領域。台灣社會研究季刊 Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies，22
38. 凱勒(1995)。玉米田裡的先知。台北:天下文化。

1. 陳瑞麟(2007)。科學哲學在「科技與社會」中的角色與挑戰。臺灣社會研究季刊，68，227-266。
2. 黃心雅(2003)。美洲原住民女性書寫中的族群醫療：鄂翠曲、席爾柯與安莎杜娃作品裡的女性醫學。中外文學，31(10)，149-192。
3. 簡成熙(2002)。重構批判思考：教育分析學者與女性主義學者的論辯。教育科學期刊，2(1)，63-97。
4. 王孝勇(2007)。女性主義立場論的主體與權力問題。政治與社會哲學評論，21，89-146。
5. 吳秀瑾(2005)。女性主義立場論與社會習性。人文及社會科學集刊，17(3)，653-682。
6. 吳秀瑾(2013)。關懷立場論的知識優勢：背負關懷價值的強客觀性。科技、醫療與社會，17，9-58。
7. (2010)。一個務實又微笑的STS：評《科學與技術研究導論》兼論如何使用它。科技、醫療與社會，11，323-340。
8. (2017).A Quarter Century of Encounters with Evelyn Fox Keller.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,11(3),437-440.