题名

歐盟自動駕駛車之發展策略與法律規範

并列篇名

EU Development Strategy and Legal Control of Automated Vehicles

DOI

10.7015/JEAS.202006_50(2).0007

作者

洪德欽(Der-Chin Horng)

关键词

自駕車 ； 安全要求 ； 歐盟 ； 移動聯網 ； 智慧交通系統 ； automated vehicle (AV) ； safety requirements ； EU ； connected mobility ； Intelligent Transport System (ITS)

期刊名称

歐美研究

卷期/出版年月

50卷2期（2020 / 06 / 01）

页次

349 - 431

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

人工智慧（AI）結合數位科技之發展，自2010年之後已逐漸應用於自駕車產業。自駕車的發展將帶來創新的功能與機會，也會影響各國的交通結構以及人類的生活方式。自駕車對各國經濟、社會、倫理、生活等方面帶來新的問題與挑戰。自駕車法律建構因此扮演一項重要因素，以規範自駕車的發展秩序、創新研發、安全標準、風險責任、公平競爭與貿易機會等法律關係。汽車乃歐盟一項重要產業，歐盟相當重視自駕車之發展。本文研究歐盟自駕車的發展策略及法律規範，以了解歐盟自駕車發展過程遭遇哪些問題，又採取哪些因應政策？歐盟自駕車安全要求以及智慧交通系統又如何規範及建構？歐盟自駕車建制有哪些特徵、意涵、影響，同時又能提供臺灣哪些參考及啟示。
英文摘要

Automated vehicles (AVs) have been an emerging industry in line with the development of artificial intelligence (AI), digital technology, and connected mobility since 2010. These technologies arrived suddenly on the market, and their future development is expected to accelerate. AVs promise many opportunities and benefits, but also pose many challenges regarding their social impact and the transport system. Regulation plays a key role in the development of AVs in the EU, ensuring AV safety, delineating legal responsibilities, privacy and consumer protection, risk control, fair competition, market access, public confidence, etc. The EU has paid a great deal of attention to AV because the automobile industry is crucially important to the European economy. This paper examines the development strategy and legal framework for AV in the EU, particularly focusing on the following core issues: the concept of AV, development, strategy, safety requirements, opportunities and challenges of the AV, the formation of Intelligent Transport System, the specific features of the EU's AV regulation and policies, the significance and impact of the same, and any implications for Taiwan.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 李寧修, N.-H.(2020)。個人資料合理利用模式之分析：以健康資料之學術研究為例。臺大法學論叢，49(1)，1-50。
    連結：
  2. 施弘文, H.-W.(2017)。淺論我國關鍵基礎設施之資安管理發展—以歐盟網路與資訊系統安全指令為參考。科技法律透析，29(3)，28-34。
    連結：
  3. 洪德欽, D.-C.(2008)。消費者權利在歐盟基改食品標示之規定與實踐。歐美研究，38(4)，509-578。
    連結：
  4. 黃詩淳, S.-C.,邵軒磊, H.-L.(2019)。人工智慧與法律資料分析之方法與應用：以單獨親權酌定裁判的預測模型為例。臺大法學論叢，48(4)，2023-2073。
    連結：
  5. 潘俊良, C.-L.(2018)。自駕車之發展與挑戰—以德國法制為借鏡。科技法律透析，30(12)，48-72。
    連結：
  6. 潘俊良, C.-L.(2017)。歐盟和德國對於自動駕駛及智慧交通系統之個人資料保護發展。科技法律透析，29(9)，52-69。
    連結：
  7. 龍建宇, J.-Y.,莊弘鈺, H.-Y.(2019)。人工智慧於司法實務之可能運用與挑戰。國立中正大學法學集刊，62，43-108。
    連結：
  8. Bagloee, S. A.,Tavana, M.,Asadi, M.,Oliver, T.(2016).Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies.Journal of Modern Transportation,24(4),284-303.
  9. Bradford, A.(2012).The Brussels Effect.Northwestern University Law Review,107(1),1-67.
  10. Brkan, M.(2019).Do algorithms rule in the world? Algorithmic decision-making and data protection in the framework of the GDPR and beyond.International Journal of Law and Information Technology,27(2),91-121.
  11. Brozek, B.,Jakubiec, M.(2017).On the legal responsibility of autonomous machines.Artificial Intelligence and Law,25,293-304.
  12. Burton, S.,Habli, I.,Lawton, T.,McDermid, J.,Morgan, P.,Porter, Z.(2020).Mind the gaps: Assuring the safety of autonomous systems from an engineering, ethical and legal perspective.Artificial Intelligence,279(103201),1-16.
  13. Butcher, L.,Edmonds, T.(2018).Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018.London:House of Common.
  14. CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium. (2015, October 30). European vehicle manufacturers work towards bringing Vehicle-to-X Communication onto European roads. Retrived from https://www.car-2-car.org/press-media/press-releases/press-details/european-vehicle-manufacturers-work-towards-bringing-vehicle-to-x-communication-onto-european-roads-26/
  15. Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. (2019, February). Code of practice: Automated vehicle trialling. Retrieved from https://globalautoregs.com/system/resources/items/000/000/019/original/190205_UK_code-of-practice-automated-vehicle-trialling.pdf?1567592156
  16. Contissa, G.,Lagioia, F.,Sartor, G.(2017).The ethical knob: Ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law.Artificial Intelligence and Law,25(3),365-378.
  17. de Bruin, R.(2016).Autonomous intelligent cars on the European intersection of liability and privacy: Regulatory challenges and the road ahead.European Journal of Risk Regulation,7(3),485-501.
  18. De Bruyne, J.,Werbrock, J.(2018).Merging self-driving cars with the law.Computer Law & Security Review,34(5),1150-1153.
  19. El-Rewin, Z.,Sadatsharan, K.,Selvaraj, D. F.,Plathottam, S. J.,Ranganathan, P.(2020).Cybersecurity challenges in vehicular communications.Vehicular Communications,23,1-28.
  20. Ethics Commission on Automated and Connected Driving. (2017). Automated and connected driving. Retrieved from https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/publications/report-ethics-commission-automated-and-connected-driving.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  21. European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association. (2016, December). Access to vehicle data for third-party services. ACEA Position Paper. Retrieved from https://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/ACEA_Position_Paper_Access_to_vehicle_data_for_third-party_ services.pdf
  22. European Commission(2019).European Commission. (2019e, December 11). Communication on the European Green Deal, COM (2019) 640 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  23. European Commission. (2019b, January). EU Japan adequacy decision. Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/law_and_regulations/documents/adequacy-japan-factsheet_en_2019_1.pdf
  24. European Commission. (2013, February 7). Cybersecurity strategy of the European Union: An open, safe and secure cyberspace, JOIN (2013) 1 final. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-cybersecurity-strategy-european-union-%E2%80%93-open-safe-and-secure-cyberspace
  25. European Commission(2018).European Commission. (2018f, November 28). A clean planet for all. A European strategic long-term version for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, COM (2018) 773 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  26. European Commission. (2018d, June 14). Regulation 2018/858 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulation 715/2007 and 559/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC, OJ 2018, L151/1.Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  27. European Commission(2010).European Commission. (2010, June 2). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on amending Regulation 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies, COM (2010) 289 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  28. European Commission(2017).European Commission. (2017c, October). Ensuring that Europe has the most competitive, innovative and sustainable automotive industry of the 2030s and beyond. The report of the high level group on the competitiveness and sustainable growth of the automotive industry in the European Union (GEAR 2030). Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  29. European Commission. (2004, March 13). Regulation 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency (Text with EEA relevance). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  30. European Commission(2017).European Commission. (2017b, September). GEAR 2030 Strategy 2015-2017-Comparative analysis of the competitive position of the EU automotive industry and the impact of the introduction of autonomous vehicles, final report. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  31. European Commission(2018).European Commission. (2018c, June 6). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the digital Europe programme for the period 2021-2027, COM (2018) 434 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  32. European Commission(2014).European Commission. (2014, October 21). Progress report and review of the ITS action plan, SWD (2014) 320 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  33. European Commission. (2017a, August 30). Europe leading the patent race on autonomous driving-Connected automated driving Europe. Retrieved from https://connectedautomateddriving.eu/mediaroom/europe-leading-patent-race-autonomous-driving/
  34. European Commission. (2019d, September 25). Connected and automated mobility in Europe. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/connected-and-automated-mobility-europe
  35. European Commission. (2019c, March 13). Supplementing Directive 2010/40 with regards to the deployment and operational use of cooperative intelligent transport systems, COM (2019) 1789 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  36. European Commission(2001).European Commission. (2001, June 6). Network and Information Security: Proposal for a European Policy Approach, COM (2001) 298 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  37. European Commission(2020).European Commission. (2020a, February 19). Shaping Europe’s digital future: Commission presents strategies for data and Artificial Intelligence. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  38. European Commission(2018).European Commission. (2018a, May 17). An EU strategy for mobility of the future, COM (2018) 283 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  39. European Commission(2016).European Commission. (2016b, December 12). Saving lives: Boosting car safety in the EU, COM (2016) 787 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  40. European Commission(2019).European Commission. (2019a). ENSEMBLE: Horizon 2020, GA No. 769115. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  41. European Commission(2016).European Commission. (2016a, July 20). A European strategy for low-emission mobility, COM (2016) 501 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  42. European Commission(2018).European Commission. (2018b, May 17). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, as regards their general safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users, amending Regulation 2018/… and repealing Regulations 78/2009, 79/2009 and 661/2009, COM (2018) 286 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  43. European Commission. (2018e, September 5). International data flows: Commission launches the adoption of its adequacy decision on Japan. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_5433
  44. European Commission(2011).European Commission. (2011, March 28). White Paper. Roadmap to a single European transport area-Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, COM (2011) 144 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  45. European Commission(2020).European Commission. (2020b, February 19). White paper: On artificial intelligence-A European approach to excellence and trust, COM (2020) 65 final. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission..
  46. European Commission(2016).European Commission. (2016c, November 30). A European strategy on cooperative intelligent transport systems, a milestone towards cooperative, connected and automated mobility, COM (2016) 766 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  47. European Economic and Social Committee. (2017). Opinion on Artificial Intelligence, OJ 2017, C288/1. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  48. European Parliament. (2019a, January 15). Autonomous driving in European transport. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0005_EN.pdf
  49. European Parliament(2018).European Parliament. (2018). Report on autonomous driving in European transport, PE623.787. Brussels, Belgium: Author..
  50. European Parliament. (2019b, March). Artificial intelligence in transport. Current and future developments, opportunities and challenges. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/635609/EPRS_BRI(2019)635609_EN.pdf
  51. European Union. (2007, October 9). Directive 2007/46 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive), OJ 2007, L263/1. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  52. European Union. (2016a, July 19). Directive 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union, OJ 2016, L194/1. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  53. European Union. (2016b, July 26). Commission Notice on the Blue Guide on implementation of EU products rules 2016, OJ 2016, C272/1. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  54. European Union. (2002, July 31). Directive 2002/58 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), OJ 2002, L 201/37. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  55. Evas, T.(2018).A common EU approach to liability rules and insurance for connected and autonomous vehicles.Brussels, Belgium:EU.
  56. Executive Office of the President of the United States(2020).Executive Office of the President of the United States. (2020). Ensuring American leadership in automated vehicle technologies automated vehicles 4.0. Washington, DC: Author..
  57. Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport(2016).Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Code of practice for testing in Belgium. Belgium, Brussels: FPS Mobility and Transport..
  58. Goldthau, A.,Sitter, N.(2015).Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security.Review of International Political Economy,22(5),941-965.
  59. Hacker, P.(2018).Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law.Common Market Law Review,55,1143-1186.
  60. Hacker, P.,Lianos, I.,Dimitropoulos, G.,Eich, S.(2019).Regulating blockchain: Techno-social and legal challenges.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  61. Hoofnagle, C. J.,van der Sloot, B.,Borgesius, F. Z.(2019).The European Union General Data Protection Regulation: What it is and what it means.Information & Communications Technology Law,28(1),65-98.
  62. Informal Working Group on Automatically Commanded Steering Function. (2020, March 4). Proposal for a new UN Regulation on Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to Automated Lane Keeping Systems. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-06-02r1e.pdf
  63. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (2017, August 28). Deutschland hält Führungsrolle bei Patenten für autonome Autos. Retrieved from https://www.iwkoeln.de/studien/iw-kurzberichte/beitrag/hubertus-bardt-deutschland-haelt-fuehrungsrolle-bei-patenten-fuer-autonome-autos-356331.html
  64. International Organization for Standardization. (2018d, December). ISO 26262-4:2018 Road vehicles-Functional safety-Part 4: Product development at the system level. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/68386.html
  65. International Organization for Standardization. (2018a, December). ISO 26262-1:2018 Road vehicles-Functional safety-Part 1: Vocabulary. Retrieved form https://www.iso.org/standard/68383.html
  66. International Organization for Standardization. (2018b, December). ISO 26262-2:2018 Road vehicles-Functional safety-Part 2: Management of functional safety. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/68384.html
  67. International Organization for Standardization. (2018c, December). ISO 26262-3:2018 Road vehicles-Functional safety-Part 3: Concept phase. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/68385.html
  68. International Organization for Standardization. (2018e, December). ISO 26262-5:2018 Road vehicles-Functional safety-Part 5: Product development at the hardware level. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/68387.html
  69. International Organization for Standardization. (2018f, December). ISO 26262-8:2018 Road vehicles-Functional safety-Part 8: Supporting processes. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/ standard/68390.html
  70. Kalyanpur, N.,Newman, A. L.(2019).The MNC-Coalition paradox: Issue salience, foreign firms and the General Data Protection Regulation.Journal of Common Market Studies,57(3),448-467.
  71. Li, H.,Yu, L.,He, W.(2019).The impact of GDPR on global technology development.Journal of Global Information Technology Management,22(1),1-6.
  72. Long, L.,Hanford, S.,Janrathitikarn, O.,Sinsley, G.,Miller, J.(2007).A review of intelligent systems software for autonomous vehicles.IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in security and defense applications (CISDA 2007),Honolulu, USA:
  73. McDermott, Y.(2017).Conceptualising the right to data protection in an era of big data.Big Data & Society,2017,1-7.
  74. Miglani, A.,Kumar, N.(2019).Deep learning models for traffic flow prediction in autonomous vehicles: A review, solutions, and challenges.Vehicular Communications,20,1-32.
  75. OECD. (2015). Automated and autonomous driving: Regulation under uncertainty (OECD/ITF: 2015). Retrieved from https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/15cpb_autonomousdriving.pdf
  76. Petzinger, J. (2017, October 27). Germany’s automotive giants top the charts for autonomous-driving patents. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1112672/germanys-auto-industry-filed-more-autonomous-driving-patents-than-any-other-country-in-the-past-seven-years/
  77. Prakken, H.(2017).On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law.Artificial Intelligence and Law,25(3),341-363.
  78. Renda, A.(2019).Artificial intelligence: Ethics, governance and policy challenges.Brussels:Centre for European Policy Studies.
  79. Robertson, V. H. S. E.(2020).Excessive data collection: Privacy considerations and abuse of dominance in the era of big data.Common Market Law Review,57,161-189.
  80. SAE International. (2018, June 15). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles J3016. Retrieved from https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/
  81. Schwartz, P. M.(2004).Property, privacy and personal data.Harvard Law Review,117(7),2056-2128.
  82. Tamburri, D. A.(2020).Design principles for the general data protection regulation (GDPR): A formal concept analysis and its evaluation.Information Systems,91,1-14.
  83. Tennant, C.,Stares, S.,Howard, S.(2019).Public discomfort at the prospect of autonomous vehicles: Building on previous surveys to measures attitudes in 11 countries.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,64,98-118.
  84. United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2015, October 22). Report of the Seventy–first session of the Working Party on Road Traffic Safety, ECE/TRANS/WP.1/151. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2015/wp1/ECE-TRANS-WP1-151e.pdf
  85. United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2017, December 22). Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 79 (Steering equipment), ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/10. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2017/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-2017-010e.pdf
  86. United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2014, April 17). Report of the sixty-eighth session of the Working Party on Road Traffic Safety, ECE/TRANS/WP.1/145. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2014/wp1/ECE-TRANS-WP1-145e.pdf
  87. United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2018, October 3). Report of the Global Forum for Road Traffic Safety on its seventyseventh session, ECE/TRANS/WP.1/165. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2018/wp1/ECE-TRANS-WP1-165e.pdf
  88. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/trans/roadsafe/rsabout.html
  89. US Department of Transportation. (2016, September). Federal automated vehicles policy. Retrieved from https://www.transportation. gov/AV/federal-automated-vehicles-policy-september-2016
  90. US Department of Transportation. (2018, October). Preparing for the future of transportation: Automated vehicles 3.0. Retrieved from https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/policy-initiatives/automated-vehicles/320711/preparing-future-transportation-automated-vehicle-30.pdf
  91. Vellinga, N. E.(2017).From the testing to the deployment of self-driving cars: Legal challenges to policymakers on the road ahead.Computer Law & Security Law,33(6),847-863.
  92. von der Leyen, U. (2019). A Union that strives for more. My agenda for Europe Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2019-2024. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/political-guidelines-next-commission_en.pdf
  93. World Economic Forum. (2016, January). Self-driving vehicles in an urban context. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Press%20release.pdf
  94. 吳漢東, H.-D.(2017)。人工智能時代的制度安排與法律規制。法律科學（西北政法大學學報），35(5)，128-136。
  95. 李沛宸, P.-C.(2019)。實施歐盟個人資料保護規章對人工智慧發展之影響。財金法學研究，2(1)，125-165。
  96. 李建良, C.-L.(2018)。New Brave World?—AI 與法學、哲學、社會學的跨界遇合。人文與社會科學簡訊，20(1)，75-80。
  97. 洪德欽, D.-C.(2014)。歐洲聯盟法的法源。華岡法粹，57，1-42。
  98. 陳敬典, J.-D.(2018)。自駕車發展現況與未來趨勢。2018 車輛研測專刊，25-26。
  99. 葉志良, C.-L.(2018)。因應物聯網發展資料保護法律的革新—歐盟法制的發展與啟示。中原財經法學，40，61-127。
  100. 資訊工業策進會科技法律研究所=Science Technology & Law Institute(2018).自駕車的第一本法律書.臺北=Taipei:作者=Author.
  101. 劉靜怡, C. -Y.(2019)。淺談 GDPR 的國際衝擊及其可能因應之道。月旦法學雜誌，286，5-31。
  102. 蔡育岱, Y.-T.(2019)。AI 與國際關係：人工智慧將如何改變我們的世界？。全球政治評論，65，1-5。
  103. 蔡孟彥, M.-Y.(2019)。自駕車之道路交通法規的現在與未來。月旦法學雜誌，288，67-72。
  104. 黎家興, J.-S.(2018)。歐盟通用資料保護規範之新修重點與台灣因應之道。月旦會計實務研究，3，134-142。
被引用次数
  1. 陳俊偉(2021)。論駕駛半自動駕駛車輛肇事之刑事責任。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，27，287-342。
  2. 廖曼庭,莊弘鈺(2022)。自駕車資料法制之比較研究。中正大學法學集刊，74，1-63。
  3. (2021)。自駕車法制之發展（上）。月旦法學雜誌，318，102-123。
  4. (2021)。自駕車法制之發展（下）。月旦法學雜誌，319，68-92。
  5. (2022)。借鑑德日經驗論我國自駕車倫理指引制定之必要性。月旦法學雜誌，330，104-134。
  6. (2023)。智慧醫療器材與醫師之注意義務初探（下）。成大法學，46，185-236。
  7. (2024)。AI開發過程的倫理權衡：自駕車決策案例研究。歐美研究，54(1)，1-67。
print cancel