题名 |
湖洛論辯之兩種未發論-韓儒巍巖李柬和南塘韓元震對未發論之不同解釋 |
并列篇名 |
Two Interpretations of Weifa (未發) in Korean Confucians' Horak Debates |
DOI |
10.29653/LS.200606.0004 |
作者 |
金起賢(Kee-Hyeon Kim) |
关键词 |
未發 ; 湖洛論辯 ; 朱熹 ; 性理學 ; 巍巖 ; 李柬 ; 南塘 ; 韓元震 ; Weifa ; Horak Debate ; Chu Hsi ; Yi Gan ; Han Won-jin |
期刊名称 |
鵝湖學誌 |
卷期/出版年月 |
36期(2006 / 06 / 01) |
页次 |
89 - 108 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
在韓國朝鮮時代(1392-1910年)的新儒學開展上有過兩大哲學論辯:一是十六世紀的四端七情論辯,二是十八世紀的湖洛論辯。論辯之結果,這兩次論辯產生了兩種不同立場。本文探討湖洛論辯的代表人物李柬和韓元震對「未發」的不同解釋。在朱子思想中,「未發之中」是一切道德行為的大本,故對諸性理學者未發論是極重要的。筆者嘗試湖洛論辯的兩種未發論,來源自在儒家道德思想上的兩種態度:既不是汎道德主義,就是純粹道德主義。 |
英文摘要 |
Chu His's creative theory on weifa (未發) is one of the decisive factors separating Neo-Confucianism from other strands of Confucianism, however, it is possibly imperfect and as yet undecided. It is supported by the fact that Neo-Confucians have raised two interpretations of weifa in Neo-Confucianism. This thesis examines, on moral philosophical grounds, the two interpretations that Woiam Yi Gan and Namdang Han Won-jin suggested and disputed on weifa. Researches on the weifa theories of Yi Gan and Han Won-jin have focused on their assertions and data. This is the time to explain 'how two different weifa theories originated?' or 'what are the philosophical grounds of the two weifa theories?' The author takes the point of view that Yi Gan and Han Won-jin's agreement on weifa theory arises from Pure Moralism, tries to establish a fundamentally pure field of moralism, and Pan-Moralism, admits a basis of 'distinction' or 'difference' on qi (氣) and disapproves of that 'distinction' or 'difference' on li (理). |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 人文學 > 歷史學 人文學 > 中國文學 |
参考文献 |
|
被引用次数 |
|