他的性騷擾?她的性騷擾?：性騷擾的性別化建構

His Sexual Harassment vs. Her Sexual Harassment: Gendered Construction of Sexual Harassment

10.29816/TARQSS.200206.0006

羅燦煐(Tsun-Yin Luo)

性騷擾建構 ； 性別差異 ； 言談分析 ； sexual harassment ； gendered construction ； discourse analysis

台灣社會研究季刊

46期（2002 / 06 / 01）

193 - 249

繁體中文

國內性騷擾研究多依循行為學派的實證量化取向，著重對性騷擾行為及心理層面的量化探討，可能忽略國內對性騷擾的本土性界定及性別化建構。本研究採取言談分析法，檢視十八個焦點團體的訪談資料，探討男女大學生對性騷擾概念的界定，認定，歸因，與創傷論述。言談分析顯示，男女兩性對性騷擾的建構有其共通及差異之處。共通之處在於對性騷擾概念的化約式界定，但對（自身經歷）事實認定的精緻複雜。此外，男女兩性對性騷擾的建構差異相當多元，含括對性騷擾的命名基礎，認定標準，歸因論述，心理創傷，因應處境等。本研究發現，受訪者對性騷擾的性別化建構傾向複製父權意識型態，及深化女性抗拒性騷擾的劣勢處境。基於上述發現，本研究針對國內性騷擾實務處遇，學術研究，及社會教育等面向，提出省思及建議。

This study employed discourse analysis to examine the social construction of sexual harassment among university students and employees in Taiwan. This study conducted 18 focus groups to gather discursive data on the definition, naming/recognition, attribution, and impact of sexual harassment. The analysis reveals that, although men and women share similar definition and recognition of sexual harassment, the discourse for naming, attributing, trauma and coping of sexual harassment is a gendered construction, which tend to reproduce patriarchal ideology and oppress women's agency in responding to sexual harassment. Implications for case counseling, research strategies, and social intervention of sexual harassment in Taiwan are discussed.

1. Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R.(1996).The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data.Psychology of Women Quarterly,20
2. Bingham, S. G.(1997).Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice.Westport, Connecticut:Praeger.
3. Burgess, A. W., Holmstrom, L. L.(1974).Rape trauma syndrome.American Journal of Psychiatry,131
4. Claire, R. P.(1998).Organizing silence: A world of possibilities.NY:State University of New York Press.
5. Ferguson, K. E.(1984).The feminist case against bureaucracy.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
6. Fitzgerald, L. F., Schullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J.(1988).The incident and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace.Journal of Vocational Behavior,32
7. Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M.(1988).Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholarly garb.Psychology of Women Quarterly,12
8. Garlick, R.(1994).Male and female responses to ambiguous instructor behaviors.Sex Roles,30
9. Gruber, J. E.(1992).A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 1990s.Sex Roles,26(11/ 12)
10. Gruber, J. E.(1990).Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research.Population Research and Policy Review,9
11. Gutek, B. A.(1985).Sex and the Workplace.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
12. Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B.(1982).Sex-ratios, sex role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work.Journal of Social Issues,38
13. Kitzingner, C., Thomas, A.(1995).Feminism and Discourse: Psychological Perspectives.London:Sage.
14. Kobrynowicz, D., Branscombe, N. R.(1997).Who considers themselves victims of discrimination?.Psychology of Women Quarterly,21
15. Long, P. J., Muehlenhard, C. L.(1987).Why some men don't say no: A comparison of men who did versus did not resist pressure to have unwanted sexual intercourse.Mid-Continent Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex,Bloomington, IN:
16. Long, P. L., Muehlenhard, C. L.(1988).Men's and Women's experiences of coercive sexual intercourse: How are they pressured and how do they react?.Annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex,San Francisco, CA:
17. MacKinnon, C. A.(1979).Sexual Harassment of Working Women.New Haven:Yale University.
18. Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2)
19. McCann, I. L., Sakheim, D. K., Abrahamson, D. J.(1988).Trauma and Victimization: A model of psychological adaptation.The Counseling Psychologist,16(4)
20. Mckinney, K.(1990).Attitudes toward sexual harassment and perceptions of blames: Views of male and female graduate students.Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology,18(1)
21. Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., Kendall, P. L.(1990).The Focused Interview - A Manual of Problems and Procedures.Free Press.
22. Morgan, D. L.(1988).Focus Group as Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
23. Morris, C.(1994).Bearing witness: Sexual harassment and beyond-Everywoman's story.NY:Little, Brown, and Company.
24. Perry, E. L., Schmidtke, J., Kulik, C. T.(1998).Propensity to Sexually Harass: An Exploration of Gender Differences.Sex Roles,38(5/ 6)
25. Roscoe, B., Strouse, J. S., Goodwin, M. P.(1994).Sexual harassment: Early adolescents' self-reports of experiences and acceptance.Adolescence,29
26. Schneider, B. E.(1982).Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers.Journal of Social Issues,38
27. Shaver, K. G.(1970).Defensive Attribution: Effects of Severity and Relevance on the Attribution of Responsibility for an Accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,14
28. Sherman, F. M., Smith, R. J.(1983).Was she really sexually harassed? The effects of a victim's age and the job status of the initiator.Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,Philadelphia, PA:
29. Siegel, J. M., Golding, J. M., Burman, M. A., Sorenson, S. B.(1990).Reaction to sexual assault: A community study.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,5
30. Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., Hawley, M. E.(1988).Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault.Journal of Sex Research,24
31. Struckman-Johnson, C. J.(1988).Forces sex on dates: It happens to men, too.Journal of Sex Research,24
32. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., Struckman-Johnson, D. L.(1991).Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy.Sex Roles,25
33. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., Struckman-Johnson, D. L.(1994).Men pressured and forced into sexual experiences.Archives of Sexual Behavior,23
34. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., Struckman-Johnson, D. L.(1994).Men's reactions to hypothetical female sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion.Sex Roles,31
35. Tangri, S., Burt, M., Johnson, L.(1982).Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models.Journal of Social Issues,38(4)
36. Till, F.(1980).Sexual Harassment: A report on the Sexual Harassment of Students.Washington, D. C.:National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Program.
37. Valentine-French, A., Radtke, H. L.(1989).Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting.Sex Roles,21(7/ 8)
38. 尤美女(1992)。愛情．法律．新女性。台北:聯經出版社。
39. 王如玄(1997)。婦女人身安全與法律。性別與兩性研討會論文集
40. 王秀紅 Wang, Hsiu-Hung、 謝臥龍 Shieh, Woh-Long、 駱慧文 Lo, Angela(1994)。醫療行為中「性騷擾」的界定與預防－德懷研究。公共衛生 Public Health Quarterly，21(1)
41. 何春蕤 Ho, Josephine(1994)。豪爽女人：女性主義與性解放。台北:皇冠。
42. 呂寶靜 Lu, Pau-Ching(1993)。台灣地區工作場所性騷擾之調查研究。台北:行政院勞工委員會。
43. 林文香 Lin, Wan-Shiang、 夏萍絗 Hsia, Ping-Hui(1998)。女性護理人員面對男病患性騷擾及其看法 Female Nurses' View on Confronting with Sexual Harassment by Patients。公共衛生 Public Health Quarterly，25(3)
44. 洪菁惠(2001)。東海大學社會學研究所。
45. 現代婦女基金會(1991)。台北市高中（職）女生對性騷擾態度之調查研究。台北:現代婦女基金會。
46. 現代婦女基金會(1993)。台北上班族兩性差異對性騷擾與對性騷擾態度影響之研究。台北:現代婦女基金會。
47. 陳若璋 Chen, Roda(1994)。性傷害之影響－以大學生為例之研究。台北:教育部訓育委員會。
48. 焦興鎧 Chiao, Cing-Kae(1997)。美國最高法院惰工作場所性騷擾爭議之最新判決：Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.－一案之解析。美國最高法院重要判決之研究：一九九三－一九九五學術研討會，台北:
49. 楊培珊 Yang, Pei-Shan(2000)。女性居家照顧服務員工作中遭受性騷擾之經驗探討 A Study on the Female Home Attendants' Work-related Experiences of Sexual Harassment。臺大社會工作學刊 NTU Social Work Review，2
50. 臺北市婦女救援基金會(1990)。婦女性暴力調查報告。台北市:婦女救援基金會。
51. 羅燦煐 Luo, Tsun-Yin(1996).Sexual harassment in the Chinese workplace: Attitudes toward and experiences with sexual harassment among workers in Taiwan.Violence Against Women,2(3)
52. 羅燦煐 Luo, Tsun-Yin(2000).Marrying my rapist?!: Cultural trauma among Chinese rape survivors.Gender and Society,14(4)
53. 羅燦煐 Luo, Tsun-Yin(2000)。他的責任，她的過錯？：臺灣青少年對約會強暴責任與譴責歸因之研究 He was responsible but she was to blame?: Attribution of responsibility and blame toward date rape among Taiwanese adolescents。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學 Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences，10(2)
54. 羅燦煐 Luo, Tsun-Yin(1999)。事出有因，情有可原？－臺灣青少年對約會強暴之寬容性研究 Forgivable rape?: Attitudes toward date rape among Chinese adolescents in Taiwan。中華心理衛生學刊 Formosa Journal of Mental Health，12(1)

1. 王鳳蓮(2016)。照顧服務員的職場性騷擾處理之認知、態度及相關滿意度探討。義守大學管理碩博士班學位論文。2016。1-63。