中文多面向健康識能量表（MMHLQ）之發展

Development of Mandarin Multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire (MMHLQ)

10.6288/TJPH201736106061

魏米秀(Mi-Hsiu Wei)；王英偉(Ying-Wei Wang)；張美娟(Mei-Chuan Chang)；謝至鎠(Jyh -Gang Hsieh)

健康識能 ； 測量 ； 多面向 ； 中文 ； 成人 ； health literacy ； measurement ； multi-dimensions ； Mandarin ； adults

台灣公共衛生雜誌

36卷6期（2017 / 12 / 15）

556 - 570

繁體中文

目標：本研究目的在發展一個適用於台灣成人的中文多面向健康識能量表。方法：首先經焦點團體訪談、專家內容效度、語文適讀修正等程序發展檢測題目；接著以566名成人為測定樣本，用以檢測量表心理計量特質及檢定測量模型適配度；最後以2,394名成人為效化樣本，用以檢測量表複核效度。結果：結果顯示二階五因素的測量模型適配度良好。量表包含五個面向：「獲取健康資訊」、「理解健康資訊」、「評估健康資訊」、「應用健康資訊」及「溝通與互動」，共20題自陳式題目。心理計量分析顯示量表的內部一致性信度、再測信度、建構效度、聚斂效度、區辨效度、效標關聯效度及已知群組效度表現良好。複核效度檢定結果，符合跨樣本的量尺不變性。最後，以標準參照方式訂出健康識能程度分級的切分點。結論：MMHLQ為具有良好信、效度的多面向健康識能測量工具，可用以評量群體的健康識能程度，也可做為教育介入的需求評估工具。

Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a tool capable of measuring multidimensional health literacy among adults in Taiwan. Methods: In the first phrase, we adopted focus-group interviews, consultations with experts, and readability check to formulate calibration items. In the second phrase, a calibration sample of 566 adults was recruited to examine the psychometric characteristics of the items and test the fitness of the measurement model. In the last phrase, a validation sample of 2394 adults was used for evaluating cross-validation. Results: CFA demonstrated the high degree of fitness of the proposed second-order five-factor model. The proposed scale covers the following five dimensions: accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying health information, and communication and interaction. The scale includes 20 self-reported items. Psychometric analysis demonstrated that the scale has high internal consistency and test-retest reliability as well as good construct, convergent, discriminant, criterion-related, and known group validity. Cross-validation analysis demonstrated the metric invariance of the scale across the two samples. Cutting scores were selected for criterion-referenced grading. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the Mandarin Multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire (MMHLQ) is a reliable and valid measure of multi-dimensional health literacy. The tool is useful in evaluating the level of health literacy among adult populations as well as in needs assessments geared toward interventions to improve health literacy.

1. 李守義、蔡慈儀、蔡憶文、郭耿南(2012)。「中文健康識能評估量表」簡式量表的發展與效度檢測。台灣衛誌，31，184-94。
   連結：
2. 林純雯(2010)。Newest Vital Sign健康素養量表中文版之信效度檢驗與應用：以幼兒職前教師為例。健康促進與衛生教育學報，34，1-31。
   連結：
3. 蔡慈儀、李守義、蔡憶文、郭耿南(2010)。中文健康識能評估表的發展與測試。醫學教育，14，122-36。
   連結：
4. 魏米秀、洪文綺(2010)。都市與偏遠社區成人的健康資訊尋求經驗：焦點團體訪談結果。健康促進與衛生教育學報，34，93-114。
   連結：
5. HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative report of health literacy in eight EU member states. The European Health Literacy Survey HLS-EU. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/documents/news/Comparative_report_on_health_literacy_in_eight_EU_member_states.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2017.
6. WHO. Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/9gchp/shanghai-declaration.pdf?ua=1. Accessed June 1, 2017.
7. 台灣健康醫院學會：台灣健康促進醫院網路網絡團體會員名單。http://www.hph.org.tw/會員專區/團體會員名單/網絡團體會員。引用2016/05/01。Taiwan Society of Health Promoting Hospitals. List of group members in the Taiwan Network of Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Services. Available at: http://www.hph.org.tw/會員專區/團體會員名單/網絡團體會員. Accessed May 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
8. The Centre for Literacy. The calgary charter on health literacy: rationale and core principles for the development of health literacy curricula. Available at: http://www.centreforliteracy.qc.ca/sites/default/files/CFL_Calgary_Charter_2011.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2017.
9. Altin, SV,Finke, I,Kautz-Freimuth, S,Stock, S(2014).The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review.BMC Public Health,14,1207.
10. Aquilino, WS(1994).Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: a field experiment.Public Opin Q,58,210-40.
11. Berkman, ND,Sheridan, SL,Donahue, KE(2011).Health Literacy Interventions and Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review.Rockville, MD:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
12. Chinn, D(2011).Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.Soc Sci Med,73,60-7.
13. Chinn, D,McCarthy, C(2013).All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS): developing a tool to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy in primary healthcare settings.Patient Educ Couns,90,247-53.
14. DeVellis, R(2017).Scale Development: Theory and Applications.Los Angeles:SAGE.
15. Dowse, R(2016).The limitations of current health literacy measures for use in developing countries.J Commun Healthc,9,4-6.
16. Duong, TV,Aringazina, A,Baisunova, G(2017).Measuring health literacy in Asia: validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asia countries.J Epidemiol,27,80-6.
17. Duong, TV,Chang, PW,Yang, SH(2017).A new comprehensive short-form health literacy survey tool for patients in general.Asian Nurs Res,11,30-5.
18. Hancock, GR(ed.),Mueller, RO(ed.)(2013).Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course.Charlotte:Information Age.
19. Haun, JN,Valerio, MA,McCormack, LA,Sørensen, K,Paasche-Orlow, MK(2014).Health literacy measurement: an inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments.J Health Commun,19,302-33.
20. Hwang, SY,Yen, M,Lee, BO,Huang, MC,Tseng, HF(2010).A critical thinking disposition scale for nurses: short form.J Clin Nurs,19,3171-6.
21. Institute of Medicine(2004).Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
22. Jordan, JE,Osborne, RH,Buchbinder, R(2011).Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses.J Clin Epidemiol,64,366-79.
23. Kline, RB(2016).Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.New York, NY:Guilford.
24. Lee, SYD,Tsai, TI,Tsai, YW(2013).Accuracy in self-reported health literacy screening: a difference between men and women in Taiwan.BMJ Open,3,e002928.
25. Marsh, HW,Hau, KT,Balla, JR,Grayson, D(1998).Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis.Multivariate Behav Res,33,181-220.
26. Morris, NS,MacLean, CD,Chew, LD,Littenberg, B(2006).The single item literacy screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability.BMC Fam Pract,7,21.
27. Nguyen, TH,Park, H,Han, HR(2015).State of the science of health literacy measures: validity implications for minority populations.Patient Educ Couns,98,1492-512.
28. Nutbeam, D(2000).Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century.Health Promot Int,15,259-67.
29. Osborne, RH,Batterham, RW,Elsworth, GR,Hawkins, M,Buchbinder, R(2013).The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).BMC Public Health,13,658.
30. Pleasant, A(2014).Advancing health literacy measurement: a pathway to better health and health system performance.J Health Commun,19,1481-96.
31. Sørensen, K,Van den Broucke, S,Fullam, J(2012).Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.BMC Public Health,12,80.
32. Sørensen, K,Van den Broucke, S,Pelikan, JM(2013).Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q).BMC Public Health,13,948.
33. Wang, J,Wang, X(2012).Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus.West Sussex, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
34. WHO(1998).Health promotion glossary.
35. Wolf, MS,Williams, MV,Parker, RM,Parikh, NS,Nowlan, AW,Baker, DW(2007).Patients' shame and attitudes toward discussing the results of literacy screening.J Health Commun,12,721-32.
36. 邱皓政(2011)。量化研究法。台北=Taipei:雙葉=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery。
37. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北=Taipei:雙葉=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery。
38. 胡幼慧編(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北=Taipei:巨流=Chuliu Publisher。
39. 黃秀雲(2008)。台南=Tainan，成功大學護理學系=Department of Nursing, National Cheng Kung University。
40. 劉孟珊(2004)。雲林=Yunlin，雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所=Graduate School of Technology and Vocational Education, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。

1. 謝菁怡(Ching-Yi Hseh);陳雅玲(Ya-Ling Chen);謝郁瑩(Yu-Ying Hsieh);林采蓉(Tsai Rung Lin)(2023)。提升護理人員執行肝臟移植術後衛教完整率。高雄護理雜誌。40(1)。41-53。 
2. 許雅惠(Ya-Hui Hsu);鍾玉珠(Yu-Chu Chung)(2023)。建立慢性腎臟病病人居家自我照護衛教手冊。彰化護理。30(2)。20-27。