题名

成人每日靜態行為時間上限之建議

并列篇名

Recommended limit for time spent in daily sedentary behaviors among adults

DOI

10.6288/TJPH.201906_38(3).108009

作者

古博文(Po-Wen Ku);陳上迪(Shang-Ti Chen);鄭聖儒(Rutherford Ru);陳俐蓉(Li-Jung Chen)

关键词

久坐 ; 加速規 ; 客觀測量 ; 切分點 ; prolonged sitting ; accelerometer ; objective measure ; cut-off point

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

38卷3期(2019 / 06 / 21)

页次

228 - 235

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

久坐已逐漸被視為公共衛生的重要課題,並建議所有成人均應設法減少每日靜態行為。本篇綜論在於檢視靜態行為與健康之相關議題,並討論發展每日靜態行為時間上限的可能性。透過回顧每日靜態時間的相關研究證實,本文針對以下與靜態時間及健康有關之議題進行評析與討論:(1)探討各國成年人每日從事靜態行為的現況;(2)彙整與分析世界衛生組織以及各國針對靜態時間所發布的指導原則;(3)透過系統性文獻探討與統合分析的研究證據,探究每日靜態行為時間上限的建議;(4)靜態行為的測量方法可能會調節靜態時間與死亡率間的關係。最後歸結本文的結論與提出未來建議。整體而論,花費過多時間在靜態行為會提高成年人的罹病率及死亡風險。自陳式問卷相較於儀器測量,較容易低估每日靜態時間。儘管近來已有統合分析建議成年人每日超過9小時靜態時間會增加死亡風險。但基於使用客觀測量靜態時間的研究有限,目前仍未足以訂立有關每日靜態時間的建議上限。未來仍需持續累積採用大型樣本且使用客觀儀器測量靜態時間的前瞻性世代以檢驗這些發現。

英文摘要

Prolonged sitting is increasingly being considered a severe concern in public health recommendations, which suggests that all adults should reduce the amount of daily sedentary time. This review examines several crucial aspects of sedentary behaviors and health and discusses the possibilities of developing public health guidelines on daily sedentary time. The following issues were observed and analyzed to review the evidence regarding sedentary time and health: First, the profile of the daily sedentary time of adults across different countries was described. Second, the physical activity guidelines provided by the World Health Organization or government authorities of various countries were reviewed. Third, evidence was obtained on systematic reviews and meta-analyses to explore the recommended limit of daily sedentary time; spending a higher amount of time on sedentary activities than the recommended threshold may damage adult health. Fourth, measurement methods of sedentary behaviors may moderate the associations between sedentary time and mortality across studies. Finally, conclusions and suggestions for future research were proposed. In summary, an increased sedentary time is associated with high morbidity and mortality risks in adults. Self-reported questionnaires typically underestimate the total sedentary time compared with that obtained using device-based measures. Recent meta-analyses revealed that sedentary time of >9 h/day may increase the all-cause mortality risk. However, based on few studies conducted with objectively-assessed sedentary time, the current evidence is insufficient to form guidelines. More large-scale and long-term prospective studies with objective measures of sedentary time are required to validate these findings.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 古博文, PW,孫文榮, WJ,陳俐蓉, LJ.(2016)。老年人靜態行為問卷之發展。大專體育學刊,18,41-55。
    連結:
  2. 古博文, PW,陳俐蓉, LJ,許志宏, ZH(2016)。老年靜態行為與認知老化之文獻回顧。體育學報,49,1-16。
    連結:
  3. Australia Department of Health(2014).Make Your Move - Sit Less: Be Active for Life.Canberry, Australia:Department of Health.
  4. Chastin, SF,Egerton, T,Leask, C,Stamatakis, E(2015).Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health.Obesity,23,1800-1810.
  5. Chau, JY,Grunseit, AC,Chey, T(2013).Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.PLoS One,8,e80000.
  6. Cooper, AR,Biddle, S,Chastin, S(2018).UK Physical Activity Guidelines: Draft Review and Recommendations for Sedentary Behaviour.Bristol, UK:University of Bristol.
  7. Ekelund, U,Steene-Johannessen, J,Brown, WJ(2016).Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.Lancet,388,1302-1310.
  8. Health Canada(2018).A Common Vision for Increasing Physical Activity and Reducing Sedentary Living in Canada.Ottawa, CA:Health Canada.
  9. Japan Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare(2013).Japanese Official Physical Activity Guidelines for Health Promotion.Tokyo, Japan:Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare.
  10. Ku, PW,Steptoe, A,Liao, Y,Hsueh, MC,Chen, LJ(2018).A cut-off of daily sedentary time and all-cause mortality in adults: a meta-regression analysis involving more than 1 million participants.BMC Med,16,74.
  11. Ku, PW,Steptoe, A,Liao, Y,Hsueh, MC,Chen, LJ(2019).A threshold of objectively-assessed daily sedentary time for all-cause mortality in older adults: a meta-regression of prospective cohort studies.J Clin Med,8,E564.
  12. Levine, JA(2014).The chairman's curse: lethal sitting.Mayo Clin Proc,89,1030-1032.
  13. Loyen, A,van der Ploeg, HP,Bauman, A,Brug, J,Lakerveld, J(2016).European sitting championship: prevalence and correlates of self-reported sitting time in the 28 European Union member states.PLoS One,11,e0149320.
  14. Patterson, R,McNamara, E,Tainio, M(2018).Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.Eur J Epidemiol,33,811-829.
  15. Rezende, LFM,Sá, TH,Mielke, GI,Viscondi, JYK,Rey-López, JP,Garcia, LMT(2016).All-cause mortality attributable to sitting time: analysis of 54 countries worldwide.Am J Prev Med,51,253-263.
  16. Singapore Health Promotion Board(2011).National Physical Activity Guidelines: Professional Guide.Singapore:Health Promotion Board.
  17. South Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare(2013).The Physical activity guide for Koreans.Seoul:Ministry of Health and Welfare.
  18. Stamatakis, E,Ekelund, U,Ding, D,Hamer, M,Bauman, AE,Lee, IM(2019).Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings.Br J Sports Med,53,377-382.
  19. Tremblay, MS,Aubert, S,Barnes, JD(2017).Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act,14,75.
  20. UK Department of Health(2011).Start Active, Stay Active: A Report on Physical Activity from the Four Home Countries’ Chief Medical Officers.London, UK:Department of Health.
  21. US Department of Health and Human Services(2018).Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.Washington, DC:US Department of Health and Human Services.
  22. Van Dyck, D,Cerin, E,De Bourdeaudhuij, I(2015).International study of objectively-measured physical activity and sedentary time with body mass index and obesity: IPEN adult study.Int J Obes,39,199-207.
  23. WHO Western Pacific Region(2008).Pacific Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults.Manila, Philippines:WHO Western Pacific Region.
  24. 衛生福利部國民健康署, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan)(2017).全民身體活動指引.台北=Taipei, Taiwan:衛生福利部國民健康署=Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan).
被引用次数
  1. 陳俐蓉,陳上迪,古博文,Brendon Stubbs(2020)。青少年靜態行為與睡眠之系統性文獻回顧。體育學報,53(1),21-44。
  2. 陳俐蓉,孫繼光,古博文(2021)。青少年靜態行為與身心健康之文獻回顧。中華體育季刊,35(4),271-282。
  3. 陳俐蓉,田甜,古博文,王湘(2020)。COVID-19大流行期間的身體活動建議。台灣公共衛生雜誌,39(4),364-372。
  4. 黃曉令,黃雅文,柯麗苓(2022)。師生代謝症候群知識、態度、行為與健康素養之研究-以北台灣為例。學校衛生,76,55-76。
  5. 劉宸碩,楊高騰,楊子瑜,粘瑞狄,張育愷,吳治翰(2021)。以身體活動中斷靜態行為對認知功能之影響:系統性回顧。臺灣運動心理學報,21(3),43-63。
  6. 劉羿德,黃冠宇,陳俐蓉,孫繼光,古博文(2021)。臺灣青少年靜態行為問卷之發展。體育學報,54(1),51-63。
  7. 薛名淳,陳俐蓉,孫繼光,古博文(2021)。輕度身體活動的健康價值被低估了嗎?。台灣公共衛生雜誌,40(1),30-40。