小組對話的師生共學：精神衛生護理學實習為例

Co-learning in Small Group Dialogue-Clinical Education of Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing

10.30074/FJMH.202103_34(1).0001

蔣欣欣(Hsien-Hsien Chiang)；廖珍娟(Jen-Jiuan Liaw)

師生共學 ； 小組對話 ； 自由談 ； 賞識探詢 ； 體知學習 ； co-learning ； small group dialogue ； free-floating discussion ； appreciative inquiry ； embodied learning

中華心理衛生學刊

34卷1期（2021 / 03 / 01）

3 - 24

繁體中文

研究目的：探究自由談在臨床小組教學的實作內容。研究方法：採反思分析法，以護理學系四年級精神衛生護理學實習的小組教學團體為對象，每週一次，每次兩小時，包括學生團體與教師團體兩階段，共進行9次，每個團體人數為8至14人。本研究收集自由談小組對話團體紀錄，及參與成員心得等資料，進行內容分析。研究結果：臨床小組教學中呈現師生對話共融的共學形式，經由團體的動力，師生共同探究存在與理解真實。對話共融是指師生之間在對話中共同創造與相互調節，觸發學生的自性、教師的覺照；探究存在是透過自由談的話題，關注著他人與自身的存在；理解真實，是對客觀現象的理知與內在主觀體驗的感知。研究結論：此自由談的兩階段臨床小組教學團體，可促進師生共同成長。團體中，以不言之教促進對話共融，以賞識探詢探究存在，以體知學習理解真實，開展出團體對話的深度學習。

Purpose: The aim of this paper was to explore the utility of free-floating discussion in small group learning for a clinical course in psychiatric-mental health nursing. Methods: Groups met once a week for 9 weeks, 2 hours at a time, consisting of 8 to 14 members for each session. Each session has two stages, the first one was for nursing students; the second one was for clinical preceptors. We used the reflective analysis approach and content analysis to examine transcriptions of the group sessions, assignments, and teaching journals. Results: Free-floating discussion promoted co-learning by means of inclusive dialogue between teachers and students. Co-learning enabled exploration and understanding. We found that co-learning resulted from a dialogue supporting mutual inclusion that enabled exploration of the existence of self and other, which promoted understanding through experience. Conclusion: Free-floating discussion in two-stage groups facilitated the co-learning of clinical teachers and nursing students. This small group learning exercise demonstrated the appreciative inquiry that emerges from group dialogue. It also allowed existence experiences to emerge from teaching without talking, and promoted embodied learning that supports creative understanding. Group dialogue facilitated deep learning and the construction of wisdom from practice.

1. 李佩怡(2019)。以《道德經》探討榮格思想的自我與自性（二）。諮商與輔導，408，15-17。
   連結：
2. 李佩怡(2019)。以《道德經》探討榮格思想的自我與自性（二）。諮商與輔導，408，15-17。
   連結：
3. 張靜敏,王增勇(2018)。不同的教學想像：一位教師參與「聽與說故事」課堂的行動敘說。東吳社會工作學報，34，1-28。
   連結：
4. 蔣欣欣(2018)。身體感知：正念團體的反思。中華團體心理治療，24(2)，23-30。
   連結：
5. 蔣欣欣(2015)。自由談的督導團體運作—精神衛生護理人員的經驗。護理雜誌，62(3)，41-48。
   連結：
6. 蔣欣欣(2016)。照護行動的立場—護理倫理課堂之對話。護理雜誌，63(6)，69-76。
   連結：
7. 蔣欣欣,王美惠(2019)。團體的相遇：團體對話的教與學。中華團體心理治療，25(2)，6-16。
   連結：
8. 蔣欣欣,許樹珍,曾雯琦,余玉眉(2011)。透過團體對話進行護理關懷的反思學習。醫學教育，15(1)，10-20。
   連結：
9. 蔣欣欣,廖珍娟(2017)。人性化照護行動的感通。護理雜誌，64(5)，50-58。
   連結：
10. Benner, P.,Sutphen, M.,Leonard, V.,Day, L.(2009).Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
11. Branch, W. T., Jr.,George, M.(2017).Reflection-based learning for professional ethical formation.AMA Journal of Ethics,19(4),349-356.
12. Buber, M.(2002).Between man and man.London:Routledge.
13. Cohn, H. W.(1993).Martix and intersubjectivity: Phenomenological aspects of group analysis.Group Analysis,26(4),481-486.
14. Cooperrider, D. L.,Whitney, D.(2005).Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
15. Doll, W.,Fleener, J.,St. Julien, J.(2005).Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation.New York:P. Lang.
16. Eisner, E. W.,郭禎祥（譯）,陳碧珠（譯）(2008).教育想像力：學校課程、教學的設計與評鑑.臺北:洪葉文化.
17. Embree, L. E.(2006).Reflective analysis.Bucharest, Romania:Zeta Books.
18. Friedman, R.(2014).Group analysis today-Developments in intersubjectivity.Group Analysis,47(3),194-200.
19. Garrison, J.(1997).Dewey and Eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
20. Gergen, K. J.,宋文里（譯）(2016).關係的存有：超越自我．超越社群.臺北:心靈工坊文化.
21. Leigh, J.,Bailey, R.(2013).Reflection, reflective practice and embodied reflective practice.Body Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy,8(3),160-171.
22. Levinas, E.(1981).Otherwise than being or beyond essence.New York:Springer.
23. Morgan, W. J.,Guilherme, A.(2014).Buber and education: Dialogue as conflict resolution.NY:Taylor & Francis.
24. Morgan, W. J.,Guilherme, A.(2014).Buber and education: Dialogue as conflict resolution.Oxford, UK:Routledge.
25. Nias, J.(1996).Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching.Cambridge Journal of Education,26(3),293-306.
26. Pines, M.(1996).The self as a group: The group as a self.Group Analysis,29(2),183-190.
27. Rideout, E.(Ed.)(2001).Transforming nursing education through problem-based learning.Sudbury, MA:Jones and Bartlett Learning.
28. Rogers, C.(2002).Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking.The Teachers College Record,104(4),842-866.
29. Rogers, C. R.,Raider-Roth, M. B.(2006).Presence in teaching.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,12(3),265-287.
30. Seikkula, J.,Arnkil, T. E.,吳菲菲（譯）(2016).開放對話‧期待對話：尊重他者當下的他異性.臺北:心靈工坊文化.
31. Tenenberg, J.(2016).Learing through observing peers in practice.Studies in Higher Education,41(4),756-773.
32. Van Loon, R.(2017).Creating organizational value through dialogical leadership.Switzerland:Springer.
33. Van Manen, M.(1995).On the epistemology of reflective practice.Teachers and Teaching,1(1),33-50.
34. Wang, H.(2016).Unteachable moments and pedagogical relationships.Curriculum Inquiry,46(5),455-472.
35. Wang, M. Q.,Zheng, X. D.(2018).Embodied cognition and curriculum construction.Educational Philosophy and Theory,50(3),217-228.
36. Westberg, J.,Jason, H.(1996).Fostering learning in small groups: A practice guide.New York, NY:Springer.
37. 朱光潛(2008).談美.新北市:新潮社文化.
38. 李崗（編輯）(2017).教育美學：靈性觀點的藝術與教學.臺北:五南.
39. 唐君毅(1991).人生之體驗續編.臺北:臺灣學生.
40. 游淙淇(2019)。文化革新：以發生現象學作為討論線索。近代東西思想交流中的詮釋探問，台北:
41. 湯淺泰雄,黃文宏（譯注）(2018).身體論─東方的心身論與現代.新竹市:國立清華大學.
42. 蔣欣欣(2019).倫理手藝.臺北:五南.
43. 蔣欣欣(2013)。經驗性團體中的話語。中華團體心理治療，19(1)，17-23。

1. 蔡至涵,蔣欣欣,劉盈君(2022)。團體與心體。中華團體心理治療，28(1)，3-16。
2. 蔣欣欣,廖淑貞(2021)。船來了～相遇於自由談團體。榮總護理，38(4)，331-341。