同儕互動回饋策略在合作學習情境下對木球學習成效與動機之研究

Effects of Peer Interpersonal Feedback Strategies for Achievement and Motivation on Woodball during Cooperative Learning Condition

10.6222/pej.4401.201103.0908

葉秀煌(Shiou-Huang Yeh)

同儕 ； 回饋 ； 小組學習 ； peer ； feedback ； group learning

體育學報

44卷1期（2011 / 03 / 01）

131 - 144

繁體中文

目的：探討同儕互動回饋策略在合作學習情境下對木球學習成效與學習動機之影響。本研究採立意取樣以健體學習領域第二階段六個班120學生爲研究對象。方法：爲實驗研究法，以2×3的隨機因子設計交互分析。本研究以隨機分派方式，將受試者分別接受同儕互動回饋及教師口語回饋二種不同實驗處理。以二因子共變異數分析與雪費的多層考驗比較方法來分析資料。結果：同儕互動回饋在木球學習成效上優於教師口語回饋。在能力因子方面，高能力的學生不因回饋型態相異皆能達到更好的學習成效。另外，對低能力的學生而言，無論同儕互動回饋或教師口語回饋皆能提升有效學習。在學習動機方面，兩種教學策略在合作學習環境下對學生學習動機皆達顯著水準，其後測成績皆優於前測成績。同儕互動回饋的教學情境對學生的學習動機表現顯著優於教師口語回饋。結論：同儕互動回饋配合合作學習策略運用對提升低能力的學生學習成效與學習動機上值得未來加強有效體育教學之參考。

Purpose: To examine the effects of peer interpersonal feedback strategies for achievement and motivation on woodball during cooperative learning condition. The participants of this study were 120 students from four to six-graders of domain of health and physical education. Methods: An experimental method with a 3x2 factorial design study. The participants were random assigned into two treatments (peer interpersonal feedback and teacher oral feedback). The data was analyzed by two-way ANCOVA and a following up test by Scheffe'. Results: The peer interpersonal feedback obviously is higher than that of the teacher oral feedback. In ability factor, Students working group in high ability significantly outscored than that of the other ability conditions. Furthermore, Students working group in heterogeneous (high and low in pairs) was more effective learning while in the peer interpersonal feedback or teacher oral feedback treatment. In the learning motivation aspect, two feedback strategies promote the higher learning motivation in the cooperative learning environment. The results also revealed that the peer interpersonal feedback obviously is higher than that of the teacher oral feedback. Conclusion: The peer interpersonal feedback with cooperative learning strategies to promote low ability students for achievement and learning motivation were an effective model for teaching in physical education.

1. 方正明、卓俊伶(2008)。動作表現與學習的帶寬回饋及年齡效應。臺灣運動心理學報，13，21-38。
   連結：
2. 林尚武、卓俊伶、楊梓楣、陳重佑、葉俊良(2009)。自發錯誤估計促進自我控制回饋的動作學習效益。體育學報，42(2)，15-28。
   連結：
3. 林信宏、黃美瑤、石國棟、周建智(2006)。國小學童動作技能表現、運動技能概念與學習動機之關聯。大專體育學刊，8(1)，47-58。
   連結：
4. 洪新來(2007)。獎勵結構與親和力在合作學習成效之研究。體育學報，40(1)，93-104。
   連結：
5. 鄭麗媛(2008)。合作學習與訊息策略運用對韻律體操動作技能學習成效之影響。體育學報，41(3)，69-80。
   連結：
6. 簡桂彬(2009)。不同回饋方式對法式滾球動作表現品質之影響。海峽兩岸體育研究學報，3(2)，11-30。
   連結：
7. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
8. Darst, P. W.(Ed.),Zakrajsek, D. B.(Ed.),Mancini, V. J.(Ed.)(1989).Analyzing Physical Education and Sport Instruction.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
9. Dempsey, J.(Ed.),Sales, G. C.(Ed.)(1993).Instruction and feedback.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
10. Dyson, B.(2005).Integration cooperative learning and tactical games models: Focus on social unteractions and decision-making.Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practive,Champaign, IL:
11. Hooper, S.,Hannafin, M. J.(1988).Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts.Journal of Educational Computing Research,4(4),413-424.
12. Kulik, C. C.,Kulik J. A.,Bangert-Drowns, R. L.(1990).Effectiveness of feedback programs: A meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research,60,265-99.
13. Lee, A. M.,Keh, N. C.,Magill, R. A.(1993).Instruction effects of teacher feedback in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,12,228-243.
14. Magill, R. A.(2004).Motor learning and control: Concepts and application (7th ed.).New York:McGraw-Hill.
15. Nicase, V.,Cogerino, G.,Fairclough, S.,Bcois, J.,Davis, K.(2007).Teacher feedback and interactions in physical education: Effects of student gender and physical activities.European Physical Education Review,13(3),319-337.
16. Pintrich, P. R.,Groot, E. V.(1990).Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,82,33-40.
17. Pintrich, P. R.,Smith, D. A.,Garcia, T.,Mckeachie, W. J.(1991).The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)..Ann Arbor, MI:NCRIPTAL, The University of Michigan..
18. Schmidt, R. A.,Wrisberg, C. A.(2004).Motor learning and performance.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
19. Schunk, D. H.(1991).Self-efficacy and academic motivation.Educational Psychologist,26(3/4),207-231.
20. Siedentop, D.(1991).Developing teaching skills in physical education (3rd Ed.).Palo Alto,CA:Mayfield.
21. Singer, R. N. (Ed.),Huasenblas, H. A.(Ed.),Janclle, C. M. (Ed.)(2001).Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 205-238).New York:Wiley.
22. Tzetzis, G.,Votsis, E.,Kourtessis, T.(2008).The effect of different corrective feedback methods on the outcome and self-confidence of young athletes.Journal of Sport Science and Medicine,7,371-378.
23. Weiss, M. R.,Ebbeck, V.,Rose, D. J.(1992)."Show and tell" in the gymnasium revisited: Developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal effects on motor skill learning and performance..Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,63,292-301.
24. Wulf, G.,Shea, C. H.(2002).Principles derivcd form the study of simple motor skills do not generalize to complex skill learning.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,9,185-211.
25. 吳靜吉、程炳林(1993)。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報，66，13-39。
26. 李芳素(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
27. 邱穗中(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
28. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。
29. 黃俊清(2003)。木球運動。2002 年國際木球研習會報告書，臺北市:
30. 黃朝嘉(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
31. 趙明毅(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。

1. 黃淑芬(2019)。屏東縣偏鄉國中生家庭社會資本、學習動機與學業成就關係之研究。屏東科技大學技職教育研究所學位論文。2019。1-131。