反思運動教練體罰為介入策略的教學實踐研究：檢視華人領導與動機氣候的改變

Reflection on coaches using corporal punishment as an intervention in teaching practical research: Examining the change of Chinese leadership and motivational climate

10.6222/pej.202109_54(3).0003

高三福(San-Fu Kao)；潘緯澄(Wei-Cheng Pan)；李伯倫(Po-Lun Lee)；葛記豪(Chi-Hao Ke)；Robert J. Schinke；陳忠強(Chung-Chiang Chen)

運動教育 ； 運動心理學 ； 教練教育 ； 社會認知 ； coach education ； sport education ； sport psychology ； social cognition

體育學報

54卷3期（2021 / 09 / 01）

225 - 242

繁體中文

緒論：體罰在運動場域是一個敏感的議題，雖然教練講習會一再地宣導，但運動教練體罰的新聞時有所聞，因此現階段禁止體罰的教育訓練的效果值得釐清。有鑒於此，本研究以Bandura（1986, 2001）的社會認知論為架構，目的是對體育系的學生進行教練權威的知能教育，以反思教練權威的方式，在運動心理學課程進行一學期的教育介入，檢視上課同學的華人領導與動機氣候，以此來了解以禁止體罰為主題的教育介入之效果。方法：本研究是一契合教學實踐精神的實地研究，研究對象是28位北部某體育科系的運動心理學課程修課同學，以三個時間點施測，收集一次質性（心得報告）與三次量化（華人領導、動機氣候）資料。結果：質性資料顯示教練權威與體罰的文章閱讀，能夠刺激同學反思過去所接受的教練領導；量化資料顯示，在14週三次的變項測量，上課同學的華人領導與動機氣候有明顯的不同：華人領導的尚嚴、專權、仁慈、德行呈現上升，動機氣候的工作、表現氣候亦呈現上升。結論：反思個人學習經驗裡所經歷的體罰或高壓的教練權威，會升高同學對正向教練領導的看法，但也同時升高同學對負向教練領導的知覺。教練負向行為的防治，以宣導、強力宣示的方式企圖引發參與課程教練的反思，可能是不夠的；配合正向教練行為的指引與建議，才可能是讓教練的權威與控制，得以往朝向正向發揮而減少負向情況發生的完整教育訓練。

Introduction: Corporal punishment is a sensitive issue in sport. The Ministry of Education has announced a law that forbids using corporal punishment. However, the use of corporal punishment by physical educators has been identified by the press over time. One available approach to prevent corporal punishment is to educate student-athletes so they gain knowledge about corporal punishment and build the right attitude for teaching and training, and then, reduce its continuation when they retire as athletes and transition to coaching. Therefore, based on Bandura's (1986, 2001) social cognitive theory our authors sought to intervene with student-athletes during a semester, through a sport psychology lecture, and asked them to reflect on their experiences with coach authority. The intention was to examine and identify their change in Chinese leadership and motivational climate. Methods: This is a practitioner as researcher inquiry approach to research. Participants were 28 students in a university in North Taiwan. Both qualitative (in the form of an essay) and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. Results: The students' essays revealed that they were stimulated as they reflected on their experiences with their coaches' authority. The measure of Chinese leadership and motivational climate revealed that students changed their perception during the three times they were measured. In Chinese leadership, discipline, autocratic, benevolence, and moral leadership were increased. In motivational climate, both mastery and performance climates were increased. Conclusions: The results revealed that using the reflection in personal experience of coach authority and hierarchy increase both positive and negative coaching leadership. The results suggest refection in coaching authority is not sufficient to prevent coaches' corporal punishment. The guidance toward positivebehaviorisalsoneededtokeepcoaches' authority aligned withpositive athlete holistic development.

1. Farh, J. L.,Cheng, B. S.(2000).A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations.Management and organizations in the Chinese context,London:
   連結：
2. 吳佩伊, P. Y.,林靜萍, C. P.(2019)。運動教練訓練知識來源之探討。中華體育季刊，33(1)，1-8。
   連結：
3. 吳聰義, T. U.,吳治翰, C. H.,粘瑞狄, J. T.,張怡潔, Y. C.,張育愷, Y. K.(2018)。射箭選手之正念傾向，心理技能與心理韌性。臺灣運動心理學報，18(1)，43-57。
   連結：
4. 周婉茹, W. J.,周麗芳, L. F.,鄭伯壎, B. S.,任金剛, C. K.(2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨：再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究，34，223-284。
   連結：
5. 周婉茹, W. J.,鄭伯壎, B. S.,連玉輝, Y. H.(2014)。威權領導：概念源起，現況檢討及未來方向。中華心理學刊，56(2)，165-189。
   連結：
6. 林姿葶, T. T.,連玉輝, Y. H.(2016)。運動情境中的家長式教練領導研究回顧。體育學報，49(2)，125-142。
   連結：
7. 林姿葶, T. T.,鄭伯壎, B. S.(2012)。華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育：仁慈領導之雙構面模式。本土心理學研究，37，253-302。
   連結：
8. 高三福, S. F.,呂政達, C. T.,楊鎮瑭, C. T.(2013)。家長式領導行為與信任教練：團隊價值觀的跨層次調節效果。體育學報，46(4)，393-405。
   連結：
9. 高三福, S. F.,李伯倫, P. L.,謝明輝, M. H.(2016)。教練的領導威權、體罰管教與責備：零體罰的思考。中華體育季刊，30(3)，229-235。
   連結：
10. 高三福, S. F.,張育愷, Y. K.,季力康, L. K.,林靜兒, C. E.(2019)。運動心理學在臺灣三十年的回顧與展望。臺灣運動心理學報，19(1)，1-20。
    連結：
11. 高三福, S. F.,陳鈺芳, Y. F.(2006)。運動教練的教誨領導：高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刊，8(1)，97-111。
    連結：
12. 高三福, S. F.,連玉輝, Y. H.,鄭昱宏, Y. H.,鄭伯壎, B. S.(2020)。轉型領導與家長式領導在運動領導研究的回顧與展望。中華心理學刊，62(2)，267-298。
    連結：
13. 高三褔, S. F.,張俊一, C. Y.(2015)。家長式領導在運動團隊的研究：期刊論文的回顧與分析。臺灣運動心理學報，15(2)，75-106。
    連結：
14. 連玉輝, Y. H.,Huang, J.,鄭伯壎, B. S.(2018)。家長式領導動態歷程分析：以頂尖運動員及其教練為例。本土心理學研究，50，151-201。
    連結：
15. 黃國恩, K. E.,郭建志, C. C.,鄭志富, C. F.(2019)。華人教練威權領導對教練效能知覺之影響：心理集體性中介效果的驗證。體育學報，52(1)，109-125。
    連結：
16. 黃崇儒, C. J.,黃英哲, Y. C.,陳浚良, C. L.,陳錦偉, C. W.(2006)。運動動機氣候量表二版中文化後的信效度分析。體育學報，39(3)，71-82。
    連結：
17. 楊鎮瑭, C. T.,高三福, S. F.(2017)。教練家長式領導八種類型與信任教練、團隊價值觀的關係。臺灣運動心理學報，17(1)，23-37。
    連結：
18. 樊景立, J. L.,鄭伯壎, B. S.(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，126-180。
    連結：
19. 鄭伯壎, B. S.,周麗芳, L. F.,樊景立, J. L.(2000)。家長式領導：三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究，14，3-64。
    連結：
20. 謝宛君, W. J.,高三福, S. F.,呂雲梅, Y. M.(2008)。教練威權領導的比較與省思。中華體育季刊，22(3)，67-72。
    連結：
21. Appleton, P. R.,Ntoumanis, N.,Quested, E.,Viladrich, C.,Duda, J. L.(2016).Initial validation of the coach-created empowering and disempowering motivational climate questionnaire (EDMCQ-C).Psychology of Sport and Exercise,22,53-65.
22. Baker, J.,Young, B.(2014).20 years later: Deliberate practice and the development of expertise in sport.International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology,7,135-157.
23. Bandura, A.(2001).Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.
24. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
25. Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
26. Battaglia, A. V.,Kerr, G.,Stirling, A. E.(2017).Youth athletes' interpretations of punitive coaching practices.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,29,337-352.
27. Benatar, D.(1998).Corporal punishment.Social theory and practice,24(2),237-260.
28. Duda, J. L.(2013).The conceptual and empirical foundations of empowering coaching™: Setting the stage for the PAPA project.International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,11,311-318.
29. Gano-Overway, L.,Van Mullem, P.,Long, M.,Thompson, M.,Benham, B.,Bolger, C.,Schuster, D.(2020).Revising the national standards for sport coaches within the USA.International Sport Coaching Journal,7,89-94.
30. Gibbs、 A. Q.,吳佳綺（譯）, J. C.(Trans.)(2010).質性資料的分析.臺北市:韋伯=Webber.
31. Gil-Arias, A.,Claver, F.,Práxedes, A.,Villar, F. D.,Harvey, S.(2020).Autonomy support, motivational climate, enjoyment and perceived competence in physical education: Impact of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit.European Physical Education Review,26,36-53.
32. Green, J. L.(Ed.),Camilli, G.(Ed.),Elmore, P. B.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of complementary methods in education research.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Harwood, C.(2008).Developmental consulting in a professional football academy: The 5Cs coaching efficacy program.The Sport Psychologist,22,109-133.
34. Harwood, C. G.,Keegan, R. J.,Smith, J. M.,Raine, A. S.(2015).A systematic review of the intrapersonal correlates of motivational climate perceptions in sport and physical activity.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,18,9-25.
35. Hiller, N. J.,Sin, H. P.,Ponnapalli, A. R.,Ozgen, S.(2019).Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies.The Leadership Quarterly,30,165-184.
36. International Council for Coaching Excellence,Association of Summer Olympic International Federations(2012).International sport coaching framework version 1.1.Champaign IL:Human Kinetics.
37. Jowett, S.(Ed.),Lavallee, D.(Ed.)(2007).Social psychology in sport.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
38. Kavanagh, E.,Brown, L.,Jones, I.(2017).Elite athletes' experience of coping with emotional abuse in the coach-athlete relationship.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,29,402-417.
39. Nicholls, J. G.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
40. Owusu-Sekyere, F.,Gervis, M.(2016).In the pursuit of mental toughness: Is creating mentally tough players a disguise for emotional abuse?.International Journal of Coaching Science,10,3-23.
41. Patton、 M. Q.,吳芝儀（譯）, C. Y.(Trans.)(2008).質性研究與評鑑.臺北市:濤石=Waterstone.
42. Roberts, G. C(Ed.)(1992).Motivation in Sport and Exercise.Champaign. IL:Human Kinetics.
43. Savery, J. R.(2006).Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions.The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning,1,9-20.
44. Schein, E. H.(2010).Organizational culture and leadership.San Francisco, CA:Wiley.
45. Schinke, R. J.,Blodgett, A. T.,Ryba, T. V.,Kao, S. F.,Middleton, T. R. F.(2019).Cultural sport psychology as a pathway to advances in identity and settlement research to practice.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,42,58-65.
46. Thomas, J. R.,Nelson, J. K.,Silverman, S. J.(2015).Research methods in physical activity.Human kinetics.
47. United States Olympic Committee(2017).USOC quality coaching frameworks.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
48. Weinberg, R.,Butt, J.,Culp, B.(2011).Coaches' views of mental toughness and how it is built.International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,9,156-172.
49. Westwood, R.(1997).Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for 'paternalistic headship' among the overseas Chinese.Organization Studies,18,445-480.
50. White, S. S.,Locke, E. A.(2000).Problems with the pygmalion effect and some proposed solutions.The Leadership Quarterly,11,389-415.
51. 高三福, S. F.(2001)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
52. 黃崇儒, C. J.(2003)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
53. 鄭伯壎, B. S.(Ed.),姜定宇, D. Y.(Ed.)(2006).華人組織行為：議題,作法及出版.臺北=Taipei:華泰文化=Hwatai.

1. (2023)。教練的威權領導與選手的情緒及行為：選手認知評估因應之觀點。交大體育學刊，19，56-72。
2. (2024)。比較不同文化背景的控制型教練行為。大專體育，167，1-16。
3. (2024)。教練家長式領導與選手安全、焦慮依附之關係：恩威德領導之互涉效果。大專體育學刊，26(1)，41-54。