學生設計遊戲模式之應用與研究展望

Application and research prospects of student-designed games model (SDG)

10.6223/qcpe.202206_36(2).0002

尚憶薇(I-Wei Shang)；徐偉庭(Wei-Ting Hsu)

核心素養 ； 自主學習 ； 遊戲設計 ； 教學策略 ； core competencies ； autonomous learning ； game design ； pedagogical strategy

中華體育季刊

36卷2期（2022 / 06 / 01）

109 - 116

繁體中文

近年來，12年國教核心素養自主學習蔚為風尚。因應時代的變遷，運動教育學熱門議題之一為因應學習者的學習需求，鼓勵自主學習。基於此，本文經由文獻回顧，闡述學生設計遊戲（SDG）模式之理論源起與概念發展，並綜整此模式在體育教學應用的研究成果。透過SDG模式提供學生足夠時間去選擇、體驗、討論、回顧、分享遊戲，在設計遊戲與參與遊戲的過程中激勵學生發揮潛能，提升課堂學習動機，除了可尋求日後體育教學實務的展望性之外，亦可增進學生自主學習歷程的理解。

In recent years, autonomous learning has become an increasing trend for the 12-Year Basic Education core competencies. In response to the changes of the times, the physical education should be getting rid of sports skills-oriented, and then to transform the student-centered non-linear teaching has become a new perspective. Student-Design Games (SDG) model has attracted significant attention because it allows the development of game education through a creative approach. Through literature review, the research of the SDG model applied in physical education. The SDG model provides students with enough time to choose, experience, discuss, review, and share games; it corresponds to inspire students to unleash their full potential and increase their leaning motivation. In addition to seeking practical prospective for the future physical education, it can also enhance students' understanding of their autonomous learning process.

1. 王文宜,陳婷婷(2015)。體育課無動機量表中文化後的信度與效度：以國小和國中學生為對象。臺灣運動心理學報，15(2)，1-17。
   連結：
2. 陳萩慈,掌慶維(2015)。職前體育教師實施理解式教學之探討。中華體育季刊，29(4)，265-272。
   連結：
3. 游添燈,吳秉昇(2018)。Suits 的遊戲理論與《師父》。臺大體育學報，34，39-48。
   連結：
4. 黃承暉,李宏文,潘義祥(2020)。行動反思策略融入運動教育模式（ARSE）對學生學習表現之影響。臺灣運動教育學報，15(2)，23-45。
   連結：
5. André, M. H.,Hastie, P. A.(2020).Gender differences in student-designed games.Physical Educator,77(3),531-552.
6. André, M. H.,Hastie, P. A.(2018).Comparing teaching approaches in two student-designed games units.European Physical Education Review,24(2),225-239.
7. André, M. H.,Rubio, K.(2009).The game inside the school: An overview of 5th grade physical education classes.Motriz,15(2),284-296.
8. Butler, J. I.,Storey, B.,Robson, C.(2014).Emergent learning focused teachers and their ecological complexity worldview.Sport, Education and Society,19(4),451-471.
9. Butler, J.,Hopper, T.(2011).Inventing net/wall games for all students.Active & Healthy,18(3),5-9.
10. Casey, A.,Hastie, P. A.(2011).Students and teacher responses to a unit of student-designed games.Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy,16(3),295-312.
11. Casey, A.,Hastie, P. A.,Rovegno, I.(2011).Student learning during a unit of student-designed games.Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy,16(4),331-350.
12. Chow, J. Y.,Atencio, M.(2012).Complex and nonlinear pedagogy and the implications for physical education.Sport, Education and Society,19,1-21.
13. Ennis, C. D.(2000).Canaries in the coal mine: Responding to disengaged students using theme-based curricula.Quest,52(2),119-130.
14. Fernandez-Rio, J.,Morales-Sallés, P.(2020).Student-designed games in secondary education. Effects and perspectives from students and teachers.The Journal of Educational Research,113(3),204-212.
15. Hastie, P. A.(2010).Student-designed games.Human Kinetics.
16. Hastie, P. A.,André, M.(2012).Game appreciation through student designed games and game equipment.International Journal of Play,1(2),165-183.
17. Hastie, P. A.,Casey, A.(2010).Using jigsaw classroom to facilitate student-designed games.Practice Matters,5(1),15-17.
18. Hastie, P. A.,Casey, A.,Tarter, A. M.(2010).A case study of wikis and student‐designed games in physical education.Technology, Pedagogy and Education,19(1),79-91.
19. Hastie, P. A.,Curtner-Smith, M. D.(2006).Influence of a hybrid Sport Education-Teaching Games for Understanding unit on one teacher and his students.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,11(1),11-27.
20. Hastie, P. A.,Jump, S.(2016).Examining student-designed games through Suits’ theory of games.Sport, Education and Society,21(8),1230-1248.
21. Hellison, D.(2011).Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity.Human Kinetics.
22. Mauldon, E.,Redfern, H. B.(1969).Games teaching: A new approach for the primary school.Macdonald & Evans.
23. Moy, B.,Renshaw, I.,Davids, K.(2016).The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,21,517-538.
24. Oliver, K. L.,Hamzeh, M.,McCaughtry, N.(2009).Girly girls can play games: Co-creating a curriculum of possibilities with fifth-grade girls.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,28(1),90-110.
25. Rovegno, I.(2008).Learning and instruction in social, cultural environments: Promising research agendas.Quest,60(1),84-104.
26. Suits, B(1978).The grasshopper: games, life and utopia.University of Toronto Press.
27. Tinning, R.(2009).Who pushed humpty dumpty? dilemmas in physical education circa 2007?.Historic traditions and future directions on teaching and teacher education in physical education
28. Vidoni, C.,André, M.(2019).Fifth-graders’ social interactions in a student-designed games unit.Early Child Development and Care,189(6),1004-1017.
29. 高翠霞,高慧芬,楊嵐智(2018)。十二年國教議題課程的挑戰─以環境教育為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(10)，68-75。
30. 張蔣耀文,施登堯(2018)。學習者中心與學生中心之內涵解析。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(7)，94-98。
31. 黃琇屏(2018)。高等教育深耕計畫之我思。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(12)，8-12。
32. 謝宗諭,劉有德(2017)。以非線性限制導向理論淺談理解式教學法。政大體育研究，24，41-43。

1. 方進義(2023)。跨域職能提升－應用聊天機器人於運動休閒之營收管理課程之學習效果之影響。體育學報，56(S)，1-19。
2. 潘敏,徐偉庭,林國華,吳伯龍(2023)。體育課三構面教師自主支持量表中文化與信效度檢驗。臺灣體育運動管理學報，23(2)，357-384。
3. 孫佳婷(2023)。全身肢體反應教學法：論其內涵與雙語體育教學中之實踐策略。中華體育季刊，37(4)，343-358。
4. (2023)。非線性教學法對國小體育課學生學習成效之影響。臺灣運動教育學報，18(1)，29-52。
5. (2024)。階段競賽法融入運動教育模式於國中體育課實施之成效。運動表現期刊，11(1)，45-63。