文章結構教學對增進國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解成效之研究

The Effects of Text-Structure Instruction on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary Students with Hearing Impairments

10.6172/BSE200706.3202004

曾彥翰(Yen-Han Tseng)；蔡昆瀛(Kuen-Ying Tsai)

聽覺障礙 ； 文章結構 ； 說明文 ； 閱讀理解 ； expository writing ； hearing impairment ； text structure ； reading comprehension ； text-structure instruction

特殊教育研究學刊

32卷2期（2007 / 06 / 01）

67 - 91

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討文章結構教學對增進國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解之成效。研究方法採單一受試之逐變標準設計，自變項為文章結構教學，依變項為說明文閱讀理解能力與文章結構分析能力。教學方法以文章結構教學為主，搭配教師引導、同儕討論與放聲思考等策略，對三位高年級之聽覺障礙學生進行二個月之實驗教學。實驗階段分為基線期、教學介入期與維持期。所得之資料以目視分析檢視文章結構分析能力與說明文閱讀理解能力之變化，並以Kendall等級相關來探討二變項間的相關情形。研究發現如下：一、文章結構教學能提昇國小聽覺障礙學生文章結構分析能力，而且三位受試者在頂層結構與鉅觀、微觀命題的分析能力上均有進步。二、文章結構教學對提昇國小聽覺障礙學生文章結構分析能力具有維持效果。三、文章結構教學能提昇國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解能力，而且三位受試者在明示性問題、隱含性問題與涉及個人經驗的問題理解上均有進步。四、文章結構教學對國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解能力的提昇具有維持效果。五、國小聽覺障礙學生之文章結構分析能力與說明文閱讀理解能力具有正相關。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of text-structure instruction on the reading comprehension of three elementary students with hearing impairment. A single-subject changing criterion design was employed; it included a baseline phase, an intervention phase divided into three sub-phases, and a maintenance phase. The independent variable in this study was text-structure instruction, while the knowledge of text structure and expository reading comprehension were the dependent variables. After a visual analysis of graphic data and application of Kendall's coefficient of rank correlation, the results of the study were as follows. Three subjects' knowledge of text structure increased and was maintained throughout the three-week maintenance phase. Furthermore, text-structure instruction improved three subjects' ability to analyze the top-level structures, macropropositions and mircopropositions of expository texts. The improvement in expository reading comprehension of these three subjects was also obvious and maintained throughout the three-week maintenance phase. Besides, text-structure instruction improved the three subjects' textually explicit comprehension, textually implicit comprehension and scriptal comprehension. Finally, the results indicated that there was a significant positive correlation between the knowledge of text structure and expository reading comprehension.

1. 特殊教育法
2. Bagley, C.,Mallick, K.(1995).Negative self-perception and components of stress in Canadian, British and Hong Kong adolescents.Perceptual and Molar skills,81,123-127.
3. Bandalos, D. L.,Finney, S. J.(2001).New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ::Lawrence Enbaum Associates, Publishers.
4. Beer, J.(1991).Depression, general anxiety, test anxiety, and rigidity of gifted junior high and high school children.Psychological Reports,69,1128-1130.
5. Betts, G.(1986).Development of the emotional and social needs of gifted individuals.Journal of Counseling and Development,64,587-589.
6. David, W. C.(2003).Assessing adjustment problems of gifted students in Hong Kong: The development of the student adjustment problems inventory.Gifted Child Quarterly,47(2),107-117.
7. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S. B.(2004).Education of the gifted and talented.
8. Elias, M. J.,Ubriaco, M.,Reese, A. M.,Gara, M.,Rothbaum, P. A.,Haviland, M.(1992).A measure of adaptation to problematic academic and interpersonal tasks of middle school.Journal of School Psychology,30,41-57.
9. Freeman, J.(2005).Counseling the gifted and talented.Gifted Educationa International,19(3),245-252.
10. Geiger, R. D.(1995).Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social talent.Assen, Netherlands:Van Gorcum.
11. Harrison, C.(2004).Giftedness in early childrenhood: The search for complexity and connection.Roeper Review,26(2),78-84.
12. Hess, R. S.,Copeland, E. P.(2001).Students` stress, coping strategies, and school completion: A longitudinal perspective.School Psychology Quarterly,16(4),389-405.
13. Jose, P. E.,Huntsinger, C. S.(2005).Moderation and mediation effect of coping by Chinese American and European American adolescents.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,166(1),16-43.
14. Luthar, S. S.(1991).Vulnerability and resilience: A study of high-risk adolescents.Child Development,62,600-616.
15. Neihart, M.,Reis, S.,Robinson, N.,Moon, S.(2002).The social and Emtional developmemt of gifted children.Waco, Texas:Prufrock Press.
16. Piekarska, A.(2000).School stress, teacher`s abusive behaviors, and children`s coping strategies.Child Abuse & Neglect,24(11),1443-1449.
17. Pincus, B. B.,Friedman, A. G.(2004).Improving children`s coping with everyday stress: Transporting treatment interventions to the school setting.Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review,7(4),223-240.
18. Pope, D. C.,Siman, R.(2005).Help for stressed students.Educational Leadership,62(7),33-37.
19. Preuss, L. J.,Dubow, E. F.(2004).A comparsion between intellectually gifted and typical children in their coping responses to a school and a peer stressor.Roepse Reivew,26(2),105-111.
20. Pufal-Struzik, I.(1999).Self-actualization and other personality dimesions as predictors of mental health of intellectually gifted students.Roeper Review,22(1),44-47.
21. Renzulli, J. S.(1981).Psychology and education of the gifted.New York:Irvington.
22. Romano, J. L.(1997).Stress and coping: A qualitative study of 4th and 5th graders.Elementary School Guidance & Counseling,31(4),273-283.
23. Rotigel, J. V.(2003).Understanding the young gifted child: Guidelines for parents, families, and educators.Early Childhood Education Journal,30(4),209-214.
24. Sears, S. J.,Milburn, J.(1990).Childhood stress.New York:Wiley.
25. Silverman, L.K.(1993).The gifted individual.Counseling the gifted and talented.
26. Sisk, D.(2005).Psychological development of the gifted: Implication for a counseling intervention for the gifted students.Gifted Education Intervational,19(3),213-225.
27. Spencer, M. B.(1999).Social and culture influence on school adjustment: The application of an identity-focused cultural ecological perspective.Educational Psychologist,34,43-57.
28. Tobin, P.J.,Carson J.(1994).Stress and student social worker.Social Work and Social Sciences Review,5(3),246-255.
29. Verma, S.,Sharma, D.,Larson, R. W.(2002).School stress in India: Effects on time and daily emotion.International Journal of Behavioral Development,26(6),500-508.
30. Wenz-Gross, M.,Siperstein, G. N.(1998).Students with learning problems at risk in middle school: Stress, social support, and adjustment.Exceptional Children,65(1),91-100.
31. Work, W. C.,Cowen, E. L.,Parker. G. R.,Wyman, P. A.(1990).Stress resilient children in an urban setting.Journal of Primary Prevention,11(1),3-17.
32. Zeidner, M.,Schleyer, E. J.(1999).Test anxiety in intellectually gifted school students.Anxiety, Stress & Coping,12(2),163-180.
33. 王文伶(2001)。學前資優兒童的特質與教育。台北:心理。
34. 王育敏(2004)。聆聽孩子的壓力與煩惱。北縣教育，48，58-61。
35. 王振宇(2000)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
36. 王蓁蓁(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
37. 王鐘和(2003)。青少年的生活壓力。學生輔導雙月刊，87，112-119。
38. 江承曉(1991)。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所。
39. 吳昆壽(1999)。資賦優異兒童教育。台南:國立台南師範學院特殊教育中心。
40. 吳明隆(1996)。國小學生學習壓力學業成就與其社會心理變因關係之研究。教育資料與研究，8，67-76。
41. 吳新華(1996)。兒童適應問題。台北:五南。
42. 吳新華(1994)。國小學童班級適應、學習方法之效率與學業成就的關係。台南師院學報，27，31-73。
43. 李坤崇(1992)。國小學生學習適應及其相關因素之賡續研究。台南師院學報，25，53-122。
44. 李坤崇(1994)。學習適應量表信度效度與常模之賡緒研究。國立台南師範學院初等教育學報，7，139-170。
45. 李德高(1996)。資賦優異教育。台北:五南。
46. 林續琴(2003)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
47. 徐慕蓮(1987)。國立台灣師範大學家政研究所。
48. 郭靜姿(1986)。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所。
49. 陳佳祺(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
50. 陳英豪、汪榮才、李坤崇(1993)。學習心事尋誰人知？國中國小學生學習適應及其相關因素之比較研究。國教之友，44(3)，5-14。
51. 曾肇文(1996)。國立新竹師範學院初等教育研究所。
52. 黃玉枝(1991)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
53. 黃玉真(1994)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
54. 黃佩儀(2004)。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
55. 黃智淵(1998)。台南市學童學校壓力與因應策略之相關研究。台南師院學生專刊，19，84-116。
56. 詹文宏(2005)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所。
57. 鄒浮安(1997)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
58. 蔡明富、吳武典(2001)。國小資優生學校生活壓力與學校適應之相關研究。資優教育研究，1(1)，41-56。
59. 蔡素美(2003)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
60. 蘇彙珺(1998)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。

1. 黃冠淳(2019)。國小中年級說明文讀寫整合教學之行動研究。臺灣師範大學課程與教學研究所學位論文。2019。1-178。