幼兒資優特質與科學創造力之關係：心流經驗之中介效果

The Relationship between the Gifted Traits of Preschool Children and Scientific Creativity: The Mediating Effect of the Flow Experience

10.6172/BSE200907.3402005

侯雅齡(Ya-Ling Hou)

創造力 ； 心流經驗 ； 資優特質 ； 中介效果 ； 結構方程模式 ； creativity ； flow experience ； gifted traits ； mediation effect ； structural equation modeling

特殊教育研究學刊

34卷2期（2009 / 07 / 30）

101 - 118

繁體中文

本研究之目的乃在於探討幼兒的心流經驗在資優特質與科學創造力之間的中介效果。研究對象為高屏地區八所公、私立幼稚園三百零八位大班的兒童。研究工具包含幼兒科學創造力評量表、幼兒心流經驗量表以及幼兒資賦優異特質檢核表。資料分析則採用結構方程模式(structural equation modeling)進行路徑分析。研究結果顯示幼兒心流經驗乃為資優特質對科學創造力的完全中介變數，亦即資優特質是透過心流經驗對科學創造力產生影響。

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among the gifted traits, scientific creativity, and flow experience of preschool children. The participants included 308 children from 8 kindergartens in Kaohsiung and Pingtung. Three instruments were used for this study: the Preschool Children's Science Creativity Scale, the Preschool Children's Science Flow Experience Scale and the Gifted Traits Checklist for Preschool Children. Structural equation modeling was employed for confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis. The results confirm that the children's flow experience has the effect of mediating between their gifted traits and their scientific creativity.

1. 中華民國九十七年十月七日內授童字第○九七○○五四四○二號第三次修正函頒
2. Brady, S. J.,Peters, D. L.,Garnel-McCormick, M.,Venuto, N.(2004).Types and patterns of professional-family talk in home-based early intervention.Journal of Early Intervention,26(2),146-159.
3. Brookes, S. J.,Summers, J. A.,Thornburg, K. R.,Ispa, J. M.,Lane, V. J.(2006).Building successful home visitor-mother relationships and reaching program goals in two early head start programs: A qualitative look at contributing factors.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21(1),25-45.
4. Brorson, K.(2005).The culture of a home visit in early intervention.Journal of early childhood research,3(1),51-76.
5. Bruder, M. B.(2000).Family-centered early intervention: clarifying our values for the new millennium.Topics in early childhood special education,20(2),105-115.
6. Butt, A.,Leers, M.,O''Neil, S.(2001).Home intervention for in utero drug-exposed infants.Public Health Nursing,15(5),307-318.
7. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
8. Dunst, C. J.(2002).Family-centered practices: Birth through high-school.Journal of special education,36(3),139-147.
9. Dunst, C. J.,M. A. Feldman (Ed.)(2004).Early intervention: The essential readings.Maiden, MA:Blackwell.
10. Key aspects and recommendations
11. Feldman, M. A. (Ed.)(2004).Early intervention: The essential readings.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
12. Heinicke, C. M.,Fineman, N. R.,Ponce, V. A.,Guthrie, D.(2001).Relation-based intervention with at-risk mothers: Outcome in the second year of life.Infant Mental Health Journal,22(4),431-462.
13. Kendrick, D.,Elkan, R.,Hewitt, M.,Dewey, M.,Blair, M.,Robinson, J.,Williams, D.,Brummell, K.(2000).Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and mata analysis.Archives of Disease in Childhood,82,443-451.
14. Klass, C. S.(2003).The home visitor's guidebook.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
15. Koch, K.(1999).Frühfördersystem-Überblick, Analyse und perspektivischer Ausblick.Neuwied:Luchterhand.
16. McBride, S. L.,Peterson, C.(1997).Home-based early intervention with families of children with disabilities: Who is doing what?.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,17(2),209-233.
17. Murdick, N. L.,Gartin, B. C.,Crabtree, T.(2007).Special education law.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
18. Odom, S. L. (Eds.),Hanson, M. J. (Eds.),Blackman, J. A. (Eds.),Kaul, S. (Eds.)(2003).Early intervention practices around the world.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
19. Peterson, C. A.,Luze, G. L.,Eshbaugh, E. M.,Hyun-Joo, J.,Kantz, K. R.(2007).Enhancing parent-child Interactions through home visiting: Promising practice or unfulfilled promise?.Journal of Early Intervention,29(2),119-135.
20. Raikes, H.,Green, B.,Atwater, J.,Kisker, E.,Consiantine, J.,Chazan-Cohen, R.(2006).Involvement in early head start home visiting services: Demographic predictors and relations to child and parent outcomes.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21(1),2-24.
21. Rosenberg, S. A.,Robinson, C. C.,Fryer, G. E.(2002).Evaluation of paraprofessional home visiting services for children with special needs and their families.Topics in Early, Childhood Special Education,22(3),158-168.
22. Speck O.,J. Muth (Hrsg.)(1973).Behindertenstatistik, Früherkennung, Frühförderung.Stuttgart:Ernst Klett.
23. Sweet, M. A.,Appelbaum, M. I.(2004).Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children.Child Development,75(5),1435-1456.
24. Wagner, M.,Spiker, D.,Linn, M. I.,Gerlach-Downie, S.,Hemandez, F.(2003).Dimensions of parental engagement in home visiting programs: Exploratory Study.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,23(4),171-187.
25. Wasik, B. H.,Bryant, D. M.(2001).Home Visiting: Procedures for helping families.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
26. Weiß, H.,Neuhäuser, G.,Sohns, A.(2004).Soziale Arbeit in der Frühförderung und Sozialpädiatrie.München:E. Reinhardt.
27. 王文科譯、王智弘譯、J.H. McMillan著、S. Schumacher著(2002)。質的教育研究－概念分析。台北:師大書苑。
28. 王銀絲、許雅惠、劉蔚萍、蘇斾玉、黃婉雯(2005)。發展遲緩孩童到宅服務研究－以高雄市為例。2005年學前特殊教育研討會論文集，高雄:
29. 吳芝儀譯、李奉儒譯、M.Q. Patton著(2008)。質性研究與評鑑。嘉義:濤石。
30. 柯秋雪(2006)。中華民國特殊教育學會九十五年度年刊。台北:中華民國特殊教育學會。
31. 柯秋雪(2008)。美國早期療育到宅服務之發展概述。國小特殊教育，46，44-53。
32. 財團法人雙溪啟智文教基金會(2002)。雙溪早期教育服務總結報告。
33. 陳向明(2006)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
34. 臺北市政府社會局早療中心(2004)。臺北市早期療育到宅療育服務執行情形報告。
35. 臺北縣政府社會局(2006)。臺北縣95年度早期療育委外服務單位業務輔導暨期中檢討會議（未出版）。
36. 劉蔚萍、王銀絲(2007)。早期療育到宅服務員面臨之相關困境。2007年早期療育專業整合暨實務工作研討會論文集，高雄縣:

1. 蔡碩穎、林義涵(2012)。淺談心流經驗及其與過度激動特質、創造力之關係。特教論壇，12，13-34。
2. 賴志超(2017)。「自發性量表」之編製及其信效度分析。測驗學刊，64(1)，51-74。
3. 林碧珍(2020)。學生在臆測任務課堂表現的數學創造力評量。科學教育學刊，28(S)，429-455。
4. 盧台華、王琡棻(2012)。資優行為觀察量表之信效度及測量不變性檢定。測驗統計年刊，20(上)，151-176。
5. 施雅碧(2021)。幸福感－區分性才能發展模式之另一個催化因子。資優教育論壇，19(1)，80-92。
6. 鄒小蘭、張靖卿、張芝萱、吳道愉、吳武典(2016)。國中學生生涯發展組型之探討。教育心理學報，47(3)，417-448。