题名

循著中介系統的脈絡來探討特教與幼教老師在自然情境中的合作歷程

并列篇名

Education Teachers and Preschool Teachers from the Mesosystem Perspective

DOI

10.6172/BSE201207.3702001

作者

劉凱(Kae Liu)；曾淑賢(Shu-Hsien Tseng)

关键词

中介系統 ； 合作歷程 ； 自然情境 ； 特教巡迴輔導老師 ； 學前融合教育 ； mesosystem ； collaboration ； natural environment ； itinerant special education teacher ； early inclusion

期刊名称

特殊教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

37卷2期（2012 / 07 / 01）

页次

1 - 27

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究以質性研究取向深入探討特教巡迴輔導老師和幼教老師在融合情境中的合作歷程。硏究者提供自然情境教學支持的特教巡迴輔導，進入11所沒有特教資源的私立托兒所達三年。由於特教老師和特殊幼兒構成一個微觀系統，幼教老師和特殊幼兒也形成一個微觀系統，兩者之間聯繫而成的中介系統為本硏究提供了分析與詮釋的思維脈絡。硏究資料主要來自硏究者參與觀察的個人札記、訪談三位特教巡迴輔導老師和五位幼教老師所得到的資料以及相關記錄文件。整個合作歷程展現出：一、合作關係不會自然發生，必須先了解彼此的需求與期待；二、初入場域，建立以解決問題為取向的關係是關鍵；三、啟動中介系統的趨近過程能夠化解專業衝突，堅持溝通與投入時間是不可或缺的轉化要素；四、專業合作的關係往正向發展時，特教老師和幼教老師也獲得專業成長。除了特教老師和幼教老師合作歷程的主軸故事之外，又浮現另一個值得重視的主題：同儕與督導支持對於新手特教巡迴輔導老師的專業發展與專業合作有相當幫助。
英文摘要

Purpose: In Taiwan, increasingly more children with special needs attend regular preschool classrooms. In response to the trend of early inclusion, the itinerant early childhood special education (ECSE) teacher has become an important support for children with special needs and preschool teachers. We view the child with special needs as a developing individual within nested systems. The child and his ECSE teacher form one microsystem, whereas he and his preschool teacher form another microsystem. The mesosystem consists of the connection between the two microsystems. This study follows the context of the mesosystem to explore the collaborative process between ECSE teachers and preschool teachers. Methods: We trained itinerant teachers to provide services for 3 years, based on the naturalistic approach, to 11 private preschools that have no special education resources. This study adopted the qualitative approach to explore the collaborative process between ECSE teachers and preschool teachers. The data were collected through participation, observations, documents, and interviews with 3 itinerant ECSE teachers and 5 preschool teachers. Results/Findings: The results of this study indicate (1) collaboration did not occur spontaneously and it was necessary for ECSE teachers and preschool teachers to understand each other's needs and expectations. (2) It was important to gain entry based on a problem-solving approach. (3) Activating the proximal processes was crucial for solving professional conflicts and this took time. (4) Teachers' professional development was facilitated once their connection in the mesosystem moved in a positive direction. In the collaboration process between ECSE teachers and preschool teachers, a discovery about novice ECSE teachers emerged; peer coaching and mentoring support are important for their professional growth and collaboration. Conclusions/Implications: Children with special needs learn through ongoing interaction within their natural contexts rather than in isolated sessions. Early inclusion provides various and abundant opportunities for children with special needs, but preschool teachers need support from ECSE teachers to incorporate daily routines into their teaching. Collaboration is important despite the fact that there might be different professional backgrounds and perspectives between ECSE teachers and preschool teachers. Successful collaboration takes time to work out and does not occur accidentally. This study emphasizes that the key to collaboration success is not a simple formula such as two teachers sitting side by side, but arises from two teachers working together toward a common goal, that is, helping the child with special needs. Leadership was not sufficient and sometimes decentralization and equalitarianism yield better results during this process. When itinerant services became a regular and stable support for preschool teachers, some aspects changed such as the teacher role, interaction, and relationships between ECSE teachers and preschool teachers. The child with special needs benefits the most. In addition, a novice ECSE teacher who has support from peers or mentors does better than one who faces a mesosystem alone.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 李翠玲、、鐘梅菁、邱奕君、邱上純(2008)。個別化教育計畫在學前融合班實施之探討：以一個融合班為例。教育學刊，31，121-156。
    連結：
  2. 張小芬(2006)。「特教巡迴輔導教師」之工作現況與工作滿意度調查研究。特殊教育學報，24，57-84。
    連結：
  3. 張翠娥、鈕文英(2007)。跨專業服務融入早期療育課程實施歷程硏究。特殊教育學報，26，111-138。
    連結：
  4. 陳享連、鐘梅菁(2010)。學前特教巡輔教師提供普通班支援服務現況之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，23，25-47。
    連結：
  5. 傅秀媚(2002)。早期療育中跨專業團隊評估模式相關問題硏究。特殊教育學報，16，1-22。
    連結：
  6. 教育部（2011）：歷史統計查詢。特殊教育通報網。2011 年10 月1 日，取自http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/Statis_history.asp。 [Ministry of Education (2011). Statistics Query. Special Education Transmit Net. Retrieved October 1, 2011, from http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/Statis_history.asp]
  7. 特殊教育法施行細則（2003）：中華民國九十二年八月七日教育部台參字第○九二○一一七五八三Ａ號令修正發布。[The Enforcement Rules to the Act of Special Education (2003). Amendment to Artcile 13 promulgated on August 7, 2003.]
  8. Apache, R. R.(2005).Activity-based intervention in motor skill development.Perceptual & Motor Skills,100(3),1011-1020.
  9. Bogdan, R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(2007).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1995).Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective.Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development,Washington, DC:
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1979).The ecology of human development.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  12. Brownell, M. T.,Adams, A.,Sindelar, P.,Waldron, N.,Vanhover, S.(2006).Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities.Council for Exceptional Children,72(2),169-185.
  13. Bruder, M. B.(2001).Inclusion of infants and toddlers: Outcomes and ecology.Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change,Baltimore, MD:
  14. Buysse, V.,Wesley, P. W.(2005).Consultation in early childhood settings.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
  15. Copple, C.(Ed.),Bredekamp, S.(Ed.)(2009).Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8.Washington, DC:National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  16. Cross, A. F.,Traub, E. K.,Hutter-Pishgahi, L.,Shelton, G.(2004).Elements of successful inclusion for children with significant disabilities.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,24(3),169-183.
  17. Damon, W.(Ed.)(1998).Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development.New York:Wiley.
  18. Dettmer, P.,Thurston, L. P.,Dyck, N.(2002).Consultation, collaboration and teamwork for students with special needs.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  19. Dewey, J.、林寶山譯、康春枝譯(2001)。學校與社會、兒童與課程。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
  20. Dinnebeil, L. A.,McInerney, W. F.,Hale, L.(2004).Itinerant ECSE teachers in action.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,15(2),167-175.
  21. Dinnebeil, L. A.,McInerney, W. F.,Hale, L.(2006)."Shadowing" itinerant ECSE teachers: A descriptive study of itinerant teacher activities.Journal of Research in Childhood Education,21(1),41-52.
  22. Dinnebeil, L. A.,McInerney, W. J.(2011).A guide to itinerant early childhood special education services.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
  23. Dinnebeil, L. A.,McInerney, W. J.(2000).Supporting inclusion in early childhood settings: The Tuesday morning teacher.Young Exceptional Children,4,19-27.
  24. Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children=DEC(2005).DEC recommended practices.Longmont, CO:Sopris West.
  25. Dunst, C. J.,Trivette, C. M.,Humphries, T.,Raab, M.,Roper, N.(2001).Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions.Infants and Young Children,14(2),48-63.
  26. Friend, M.,Cook, L.(2007).Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  27. Fullan, M.(1999).Change forces: The sequel.Philadelphia, PA:Falmer Press.
  28. Glickman, C. D.,Gordon, S. P.,Ross-Gordon, J. N.(1995).Supervision of Instruction: A developmental approach.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  29. Gordon, S. P.,Maxey, S.(2000).How to help beginning teachers succeed.
  30. Harris, K. C.,Klein, M. D.(2002).Itinerant consultation in early childhood special education: Issues and challenges.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,13(3),237-247.
  31. Hong, S. J.,Kemp, C.(2007).Teaching sight word recognition to preschoolers with delays using activity-based intervention and didactic instruction: A comparison study.Australasian Journal of Special Education,31(2),89-107.
  32. Hull, K.,Capone, A.,Giangreco, M. F.,Ross-Allen, J.(1996).Through their eyes: Creating functional, child-sensitive individualized education programs.Rethinking pull-out services in early intervention: A professional resource,Baltimore, MD:
  33. Johnson, P.,Wistow, G.,Rockwell, S.,Hardy, B.(2003).Interagency and interprofessional collaboration in community care: The interdependence of structures and values.Journal of Interprofessional Care,17(1),69-83.
  34. Liu, K.,Tseng, S.,Yang, Y.(2007).The results of applying the ecological support teaching model to preschool inclusion setting.18th Asia Conference on Mental Retardation,Taipei, Taiwan:
  35. Losardo, A.,Bricker, D. D.(1994).Activitybased intervention and direct instruction: A comparison study.American Journal on Mental Retardation,98,744-765.
  36. Macy, M. G.,Bricker, D. D.(2007).Embedding individualized social goals into routine activities in inclusive early childhood classrooms.Early Child Development and Care,177(2),107-120.
  37. McWilliam, R. A.,Wolery, M.,Odom, S. L.(2001).Instructional perspectives in inclusive preschool classrooms.Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change,Baltimore, MD:
  38. Mohr, D. J.,Townsend, J. S.(2001).,未出版
  39. Odom, S. L.,Horn, E. M.,Marquart, J.,Hanson, M. J.,Wolfberg, P.,Beckman, P. J.,Lieber, J.,Li, S.,Schwartz, I.,Janko, S.,Sandall, S.(1999).On the forms of inclusion: Organizational context and individualized service delivery models.Journal of Early Intervention,22,185-199.
  40. Pugach, M. C.,Johnson, L. J.(2002).Collaborative practitioners, collaborative schools.Denver, CO:Love Publishing.
  41. Pugach, M. C.,Johnson, L. J.(1995).Unlocking expertise among classroom teachers through structured dialogue: Extending research on peer collaboration.Exceptional Children,62,101-110.
  42. Smialek, M.(2002).Team strategies for success.Lanham, MD:Scarecrow.
  43. Snell, M.(Ed.),Brown, F.(Ed.)(2000).Instruction of students with severe disabilities.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill.
  44. Storm, C.、Todd, T.、洪志美譯、廖婉如譯、許嘉月譯、張書森譯、簡意玲譯、黃宣穎譯(2011)。系統取向督導完全指南。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心靈工坊=PsyGarden Publishing。
  45. Swafford, J.(1998).Teachers supporting teachers through peer coaching.Support for Learning,13(2),54-58.
  46. Thousand, J. S.,Villa, R. A.,Paolucci-Whitcomb, P.,Nevin, A.(1996).A rationale and vision for collaborative consultation..Controversial issues confronting special education,Boston, MA:
  47. Trent, S. C.(1998).False starts and other dilemmas of a secondary general education collaborative teacher: A case study.Journal of Learning Disabilities,31,503-513.
  48. Tseng, S.(2009).Natural environment teaching supports model in early intervention center (EIC), CYCU.Marden Forum on Special Education & Rehabilitation: Seminar on Teaching Supports in Inclusive Education,Hong Kong:
  49. Van Manen, M.(1990).Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy.Albany, NY:State University of New York.
  50. Walsh, M. E.,Brabeck, M. E.,Howard, K. A.(1999).Interprofessional collaboration in children's services: Toward a theoretical framework.Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice,2(4),183-208.
  51. Walther-Thomas, C. S.(1997).Co-teaching experiences: The benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time.Journal of Learning Disabilities,30,395-407.
  52. Wesley, P. W.,Buysse, V.(2004).Consultation as a framework for productive collaboration in early intervention.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,15(2),127-150.
  53. Wolery, M.,Brashers, M. S.,Neitzel, J. C.(2002).Ecological congruence assessment for classroom activities and routines: Identifying goals and intervention practices in childcare.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,22(3),131-142.
  54. 王天苗(2003)。學前融合教育實施的問題和對策－以臺北市國小附幼為例。特殊教育研究學刊，25，1-25。
  55. 王天苗(2001)。運用教學支援建立融合教育的實施模式：以一公立幼稚園的經驗為例。特殊教育研究學刊，21，27-51。
  56. 吳淑美(1992)。發展遲緩幼兒在回歸主流教育安置下社會互動、社會地位及其發展能力之研究。特殊教育學報，7，45-83。
  57. 李翠玲(2006)。學前階段合作模式融合教育之探討－以新竹市融合班為例。特殊教育與復健學報，15，1-19。
  58. 林寶貴、盧台華、賴文鳳、謝蘭芝(1996)。學前合作學習實驗班八十四學年度工作報告。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心=National Taiwan Normal University, Special Education Center。
  59. 柯雅瓊、許維素(2011)。學校輔導教師督導模式初探。輔導季刊，47(1)，30-41。
  60. 洪禎璟、傅秀媚(2007)。從融合教育理念談巡迴輔導意涵之初探。第八屆發展遲緩兒早期療育論文發表大會暨國際交流研討會
  61. 張翠娥、李淑貞(2009)。專業諮詢介入學前融合班級發展個別化教育計畫與實施成效之研究。幼兒保育學刊，7，25-44。
  62. 張翠娥、劉蔚萍、周俊良、馬長齡、李淑真、林月仙、葉玉如、吳玉惠、黃麗蓉(2003)。高雄市實施專業諮詢支援學前融合教育研究。第四屆發展遲緩兒早期療育論文發表大會暨國際交流研討會
  63. 許碧勳(2001)。幼稚園普通班實施融合教育之探討。融合教育學術論文集，臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:
  64. 許維素(1993)。督導關係初探（上）。諮商與輔導，94，5-10。
  65. 陳斐卿、陳曉麗(2001)。實習老師的真實震撼經驗－第一季分析。教育研究資訊，9(2)，107-124。
  66. 鈕文英(2002)。國小階段融合教育實施模式與策略初探。特教園丁，18(2)，1-20。
  67. 劉蔚萍、王銀絲、徐淑珍、卓政翰、紀岑嬌(2003)。學前融合教育專業團隊巡迴輔導：以高縣旗山區早期療育發展中心輔導模式為例。國立臺北師範學院學報，16(2)，307-336。
  68. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  69. 鐘梅菁(2001)。學前教師融合教育專業知能之研究。特殊教育學報，15，309-335。
  70. 鐘梅菁(2002)。學前教師困擾問題之研究－以融合班教師為例。新竹師院學報，15，429-452。
  71. 饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展－理論與實務。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
被引用次数
  1. 翁辰郡,胡中宜(2022)。學校社工師服務國中小自閉症學生角色內涵之初探。輔導與諮商學報，44(2)，33-57。
  2. (2018)。職前幼兒園教師家庭本位正向行為支持專業成長培訓之研究。臺東大學教育學報，29(1)，31-65。
  3. (2018)。中重度障礙幼兒進入幼兒園融合模式之建構。教育研究學報，52(2)，39-63。
print cancel