身心障礙學生功能本位行為介入方案成效之後設分析

The Effects of Function-Based Behavioral Interventions for Students with Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis

10.6172/BSE.201503.4001001

陳佩玉(Pei-Yu Chen)；蔡欣玶(Shin-Ping Tsai)；林沛霖(Pei-Lin Lin)

功能本位行為介入方案 ； 行為功能評量 ； 後設分析 ； 超越中數比率 ； function-based behavioral interventions ； functional behavioral assessment ； meta-analysis ； percentage of data points exceeding the median of baseline

特殊教育研究學刊

40卷1期（2015 / 03 / 31）

1 - 30

繁體中文

本研究分析2001至2012年間，國內39篇身心障礙學生的功能本位行為介入方案之單一受試研究現況，並以超越中數比率（percentage of data points wxceeding the median of baseline, PEM）後設分析行為功能、介入策略種類與策略內容對不同行為問題種類與正向行為之介入成效。研究結果顯示，使用功能本位行為介入方案，對減少身心障礙學生的行為問題及提升正向行為的整體介入成效介於稍有效果到高度有效之間，各研究間的成效差異落差頗大。分析國內研究介入之行為問題種類發現，應用功能本位之行為介入方案能夠改善各類別的行為問題，其中又以改善固著行為與提升可取代固著行為的正向行為介入成果最佳。在行為功能方面，結果顯示，不同功能的行為問題與正向行為的介入為中度到高度有效，且不因行為功能的不同而有顯著差異。在介入策略種類方面，發現不同類別的介入策略對行為問題的介入成果介於中度到高度，而對正向行為的介入介於稍有到高度有效，各組成效落差頗大。就介入策略內容而論，不同於前事策略對行為問題與正向行為的介入皆有中度效果，教導策略與後果策略的介入則介於稍有到高度有效，各種前事策略與後果策略的介入成效並未達顯著差異。

Purpose: Function-based behavioral interventions have become widely used for decreasing challenging behaviors and increasing positive behaviors of students with disabilities. The purpose of this study is to meta-analyze the effects of function-based behavioral interventions on behaviors of students with disabilities in Taiwan. Method: To identify studies, the authors searched electronic databases such as the Index to Taiwan Periodical Literature System and the Chinese Electronic Periodical Services (CEPS), and manually searched the journals listed on the Special Education Transmit Net and the reference lists of the studies obtained from the aforementioned sources. The inclusion criteria used to select studies include: (a) using single-subject designs, (b) providing data in graphs and/or conducting visual analysis, (c) including functional behavior assessment and/or function-based interventions as independent variables, (d) involving students with disabilities. A total of 39 single-subject research studies between 2001 and 2012 were identified, producing 27 to 59 effect sizes according to the dependent variable. The meta-analytic study utilized the percentage of data points exceeding the median of baseline (PEM) approach to calculate the effect sizes of each study. The PEM effect sizes were analyzed across a variety of variables, including types of behavior functions and intervention strategies. H test and U test were then applied to compare the differences of intention effects among the subgroups under each variable. Results/Findings: Results indicated that function-based behavioral interventions overall had moderate to large effects on decreasing challenging behavior and increasing positive behavior of students with disabilities. Function-based behavioral interventions had positive effects on various types of challenging and positive behaviors, among which the effects were greater for stereotypical behaviors and those positive behaviors replacing stereotypical behaviors. Function-based behavioral interventions also showed medium to large effects on various types of behavioral functions; however, no significant difference was shown among the effect sizes on different types of behavioral functions. Regarding different types of intervention strategies, the results of PEM analysis indicated that medium to large effects were yielded for challenging behavior, while mild to large effects were found for positive behavior. Finally, all types of antecedent strategies had medium to large effects on both challenging and positive behaviors while instructional and consequence strategies showed mild to large effects. Differences among effects of different types of antecedent strategies and of consequence strategies were not significant. Conclusions/Implications: While the results showed that function-based behavior interventions had promising effects on both challenging and positive behaviors of students with disabilities, about half of the studies did not report the changes of positive behaviors of their participants. It is suggested that future studies report the changes of both challenging and positive behaviors of the participants and document the effects of intervention across students with various disabilities, different types of intervention strategies, and different functional behavior assessment methods. Future meta-analytic studies can consider to use a different method to calculate the effect sizes and to group the studies under each variable.

1. Chu, S.(2012).A family-centered positive behavior support approach to intervene food refusal behavior for a child with autism.Journal of Special Education,36,37-60.
   連結：
2. Chu, S.,Baker, S.(2011).Effects of "noncontingent reinforcement plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior" and "response interruption and redirection" on a child's vocal stereotypy maintained by automatic reinforcement.Bulletin of Special Education,36(1),109-127.
   連結：
3. Tang, J.-C.(2006).Treating stereotypic behaviors in a student with multiple disabilities by using functional communication training.Journal of National Taichung University Education,20(1),21-38.
   連結：
4. Tang, J.-C.(2006).Treatment of hand-mouthing behavior for one student with mental retardation.Educational Journal of NHCUE,23,1-20.
   連結：
5. Tang, J.-C.(2004).Preference objects as treatment for hand mouthing in a child with mental retardation.Journal of National Hsin Chu Teachers College,19,45-60.
   連結：
6. Tang, J.-C.(2006).Analysis and treatment of body-rocking for one student with mental retardation.Bulletin of Special Education and Rehabilitation,15,127-138.
   連結：
7. 江芳宜、莊妙芬(2005)。正向行為支持方案對改進高職輕度智能障礙學生問題行為之成效。特殊教育與復健學報，14，1-27。
   連結：
8. 李式群、陳怡慧(2011)。圖片兌換溝通系統介入身心障礙學生溝通成效之後設分析研究。國小特殊教育，52，38-49。
   連結：
9. 林月仙、蘇純瑩、吳裕益(2003)。國小高攻擊傾向學生行為問題處理之個案研究。高雄師大學報，16，139-160。
   連結：
10. 林惠芬(2013)。特殊教育學校（班）智能障礙學生問題行為功能之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報，28，1-16。
    連結：
11. 黃美慧、鈕文英(2010)。社會故事對廣泛自閉症者介入成效之分析。特殊教育與復健學報，22，1-23。
    連結：
12. 戴官宇、李永昌(2007)。行為支持計畫對國中視多重障礙學生不專注行為之處理成效。特殊教育學報，25，135-160。
    連結：
13. 特殊教育法施行細則（2013）：中華民國一百零一年十一月二十六日教育部臺參字第1010214785C 號令發佈。[Enforcement Rules of the Special Education Act. (2013).]
14. Alberto, P. A.,Troutman, A. C.(2013).Applied behavior analysis for teachers.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education Inc..
15. Brosnan, J.,Healy, O.(2011).A review of behavioral interventions for the treatment of aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities.Research in Developmental Disabilities,32,437-446.
16. Campbell, J. M.(2003).Efficacy of behavioral interventions for reducing problem behavior in persons with autism: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Research in Developmental Disabilities,24,120-138.
17. Chu, H-C.(2002).Functional analysis and assessment-based interventions for aberrant behavior of children with development disabilities.Journal of National Taipei Teachers College (Education),15,387-432.
18. Cook, B. G.(ed.),Tankersley, M.(ed.),Landrum, T. J.(ed.)(2013).Evidence-based practices.Bingley, UK:Emerald.
19. Cooper, J. O.,Heron, T. E.,Heward, W. L.(2007).Applied behavior analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
20. Gage, N. A.,Lewis, T J.,Stichter, J. P.(2012).Functional behavioral assessment-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders in school: An HLMmeta-analysis.Behavioral Disorders,37(2),55-77.
21. Gast, D. L. (ed.)(2010).Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences.New York, NY:Routledge.
22. Glass, G. V.,McGaw, B.,Smoth, M. L.(1981).Meta-analysis in social research.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
23. Goh, A. E.,Bambara, L. M.(2010).Individualized positive behavior support in school settings: A meta-analysis.Remedial and Special Education,1-16.
24. Hanley, G. P.,Iwata, B. A.,McCord, B. E.(2003).Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,36(2),147-185.
25. Harvey, S. T.,Boer, D.,Meyer, L. H.,Evans, I. M.(2009).Updating a meta-analysis of intervention research with challenging behaviour: Treatment validity and standards of practice.Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability,34(1),67-80.
26. Horner, R. H.,Carr, E. G.,Strain, P. S.,Todd, A. W.,Reed, H. K.(2002).Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,32(5),423-446.
27. Kern, L.,Clemens, N. H.(2007).Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior.Psychology in the Schools,44(1),65-75.
28. Lane, K. L.,Umbreit, J.,Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E.(1999).Functional assessment research on students with or at risk for EBD: 1990 to the present.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,1(2),101-111.
29. Li, S-H.,Tang, J-C.(2008).The effects of assessment-based intervention on body-rocking in one preschool child with moderate mental retardation.Journal of Research on Elementary and Secondary Education,21,115-134.
30. Ma, H-H.(2007).Methodological problems of meta-analysis.Journal for Quantitative Research,1,170-183.
31. Maston, J. L.,Sopes, M.,Horovitz, M.,Worley, J. A.,Shoemaker, M. E.,Kozlowski, A. M.(2011).Behaviors and corresponding functions addresses via functional assessment.Research in Developmental Disabilities,32,625-629.
32. O'Neill, R.,Horner, R.,Albin, R.,Sprague, J.,Storey, K.,Newton, J.(1997).Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole.
33. Pallant, J. F.(2011).SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS.Crows Nest, NSW:Allen & Unwin.
34. Parker, R. L.,Vannest, K. J.,Davis, J. L.(2011).Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques.Behavior Modification,35(4),303-322.
35. Scruggs, T. E.,Mastropieri, M. A.,Cook, S. B.,Escobar, C.(1986).Early interventions for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Behavior Disorders,11,260-271.
36. Snell, M. E.,Voorhees, M. D.,Chen, L.(2005).Team involvement in assessment-based interventions with problem behavior: 1997-2002.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,7(3),140-152.
37. Tang, J.-C.(2006).Functional analysis and treatment of stereotypic hand-smelling in one student with autism.Journal of Education Studies,40(2),43-54.
38. Tang, J.-C.(2006).Functional analysis and treatment of stereotypic saliva-play in one adolescent with autism.Journal of Research on Elementary and Secondary Education,17,213-230.
39. Tang, J.-C.(2008).Assessment and treatment of self-injurious behavior in a student with moderate mental retardation.Journal of Research on Elementary and Secondary Education,20,177-190.
40. Tang, J.-C.(2004).The study of using preference objects to reduce stereotyped finger-sucking in an adolescent with mental retardation.Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education: Education,35,141-154.
41. Tang, J.-C.(2004).Reduction of hand-mouthing in an adolescent with profoundly mental retardation.Journal of National University Tainan Education,38(2),69-80.
42. Thompson, R. H.,Iwata, B. A.(2007).A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,40,333-338.
43. Umbreit, J.,Ferro, J.,Liaupsin, C.,Lane, K.(2007).Functional behavioral assessment and function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach.Columbus, OH:Pearson Prentice Hall.
44. Wong, C.,Odom, S. L.,Hume, K.,Cox, A. W.,Fettig, A.,Kucharczyk, S.,Brock, M. E.,Plavick, J. B.,Fleury, V. P.,Schultz, T. R.(2013).,Chapel Hill, NC:The University of North Carolina.
45. 王雪瑜、凃馨尹、王欣宜(2006)。正增強策略對改善國小普通班疑似選擇性緘默症兒童上課表達行為之研究。特殊教育教學與趨勢
46. 吳怡靜、黃雅蘭、楊雅婷(2011)。正向行為支持計畫對國中資源班自閉症學生尖叫哭鬧行為處理之成效研究。特教園丁，26(4)，1-12。
47. 周怡君、黃雅祺、王淑娟(2009)。社會性故事主導之包裹式策略對國小高年級自閉症兒童離座行為之處理成效研究。特殊教育與輔助科技，4，20-26。
48. 周雅儀(2009)。自閉症兒童問題行為探討之個案研究：以「挑食」為例。南投特教，8，2-6。
49. 林丹雁、吳佳穎(2009)。功能本位介入策略對亞斯伯格症學生口語干擾行為之成效研究。網路社會學通訊，77
50. 林哲永、莊素貞、王欣宜(2008)。正向行為支持計畫對國小資源班學習障礙學生不適當社會行為處理成效之研究。特殊教育與輔助科技，2，12-15。
51. 林桂如、黃琬清(2009)。正向行為支持介入重度自閉症少女干擾行為之研究。兒童及少年福利期刊，16，81-85。
52. 林惠芬(2001)。功能性評量對智能障礙學生問題行為介入處理成效之研究。特殊教育學報，15，85-105。
53. 林翠香(2007)。一位自閉症學生行為問題處理之研究報告。特殊教育文集，9，217-250。
54. 邱于容、蔡珮緹、何淑萍(2008)。行為支持計畫對國小低年級疑似學習障礙學生遲到行為之處理成效。桃竹區特殊教育，11，8-15。
55. 侯雅齡(2002)。教室為本位的教育介入模式對減少ADHD 學生在普通班中不應適行為效果之研究。屏東師院學報，17，367-400。
56. 侯禎塘(2003)。特殊兒童行為問題處理之個案研究：以自閉症兒童的攻擊行為為例。屏東師院學報，18(上=I)，155-192。
57. 唐榮昌、王明泉(2005)。以功能溝通訓練來減低多重障礙學童的含手行為。東台灣特殊教育學報，7，1-18。
58. 唐榮昌、江秋樺(2006)。重度智能障礙學童含手行為的處理。國民教育研究學報，16，225-246。
59. 張正芬(1999)。自閉症兒童行為問題之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，17，253-273。
60. 張正芬(2000)。自閉症兒童問題行為功能之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，18，127-150。
61. 張倉凱(2004)。支持性功能溝通訓練對改善國小自閉症兒童自傷行為之研究。特殊教育暨創造思考研究，1，31-56。
62. 張翠娥(2010)。功能性評量對自閉症幼兒問題行為處理之成效研究。樹德人文社會電子學報，6(2)，19-41。
63. 莊妙芬(2002)。中度智能障礙兒童的異常行為與溝通功能之研究。東台灣特殊教育學報，4，53-76。
64. 許又勻(2001)。國小輕度智能障礙學生嚴重社交行為問題處理個案研究。台東師院學報，12(下=II)，115-144。
65. 陳秋雯(2004)。台北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學教育研究所=Institute for Education, National Chengchi University。
66. 陳郁菁、鈕文英(2004)。行為支持計畫對國中自閉症學生行為問題處理成效之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，27，183-205。
67. 陳香吟、蕭美玲(2005)。行為改變技術及其個案應用實例。花蓮教育大學特教通訊，34，14-20。
68. 鈕文英(2009)。身心障礙者的正向行為支持。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
69. 鈕文英(2010)。特殊教育證據本位實務之建立、鑑識與運用。南屏特殊教育，1，1-24。
70. 鈕文英、王芳琪(2002)。以溝通為基礎的行為處理策略對極重度智能障礙學生口語固著行為之效果研究。東台灣特殊教育學報，4，119-149。
71. 馮士軒(2010)。功能性評量本位介入策略對增進擇選性緘默症兒童口語回應之研究。研究與實務的對話：2010 特殊教育暨早期療育國際論文研討會論文集，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
72. 黃重和(2012)。行為功能評量對提昇融合教育品質之影響。品質月刊，48(7)，26-32。
73. 黃琬清、鈕文英(2011)。正向行為支持對極重度自閉症學生自傷行為之成效。南屏特殊教育，2，1-21。
74. 楊俊威、鈕文英(2006)。功能本位介入策略對注意力缺陷過動症學生口語干擾行為之成效研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，8，21-38。
75. 劉文英、林初穗(2006)。教師實施行為功能評量與正向支持計畫對特殊教育孩童問題行為處理的成效研究。教育研究學報，40(2)，43-54。
76. 蔡明富、林幸台(1999)。認知行為取向介入方案對攻擊傾向學生的輔導效果之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊，17，274-295。
77. 鍾儀潔、鈕文英(2004)。自閉症兒童固著行為的功能分析與介入成效之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，26，177-199。

1. Tsai, Shin-Ping,Hong, Ee Rea,Gong, Li-yuan,Ganz, Jennifer B.,Chen, Pei-Yu(2017).THE QUALITY OF SINGLE-CASE RESEARCH FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS IN JAPAN AND TAIWAN: AN INVESTIGATION OF INTER-RATER RELIABILITY AND TREATMENT FIDELITY.當代教育研究季刊,25(4),207-231.
2. 陳佩玉、吳宜蒨(2018)。國中普通班導師運用介入策略處理情緒行為障礙學生行為問題之探究。特殊教育季刊，149，13-25。
3. 鳳華、郭千瑜、張淑芬、王慧婷(2018)。臺北市國小特殊教育教師實施應用行為分析之現況。特殊教育研究學刊，43(2)，1-29。
4. 張正芬(2018)。身心障礙學生的情緒行為輔導：行為功能介入方案的實施。學生事務與輔導，57(3)，54-59。
5. (2015)。國小普通班自閉症學生行為問題解決之探究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，17，105-128。
6. (2023)。應用課程調整與功能溝通訓練改善安其曼氏症兒童行為問題之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，26，107-136。