世代之間的正義與分配：年齡與經濟世代對薪資公平正義認知

Justice and Redistribution among Cohorts: Perceptions of Just Earnings among Age and Economic Cohorts

10.6683/TPSR.201906_23(1).0003

張一彬(Yi-Bin Chang)

年齡 ； 經濟世代 ； 交叉分類隨機效果模型 ； 分配正義 ； 薪資公平正義認知 ； age ； economic cohort ； cross-classified random-effects model ； redistributive justice ； perception of just earnings

台灣政治學刊

23卷1期（2019 / 06 / 01）

103 - 158

繁體中文

本文對於世代的劃分是著眼於在不同的經濟發展階段成年的民眾，運用薪資公平正義認知的經驗性資料來檢視世代之間對分配正義的認知。方法上本文運用交叉分類隨機效果模型（cross-classified random effects model），來緩解因年齡與世代兩者高度共線關係所導致估計值失真的問題。研究發現薪資公平正義認知不但具有世代之間的差異，同時在年齡群組上也呈現出明顯的不同。其次，個人層次解釋變數的效果上，男性、有婚姻關係、高教育年限、自認為是上層社會階級、以及大陸各省市族群對自身薪資公平正義認知較高。這些傳統上屬於社會優勢族群在資源與機會的取得上具有優勢，產生的結果就直接反應在對自身薪資收入的感受。另外，薪資公平正義認知不同年齡層之間呈現出生命週期效果。20－29歲年齡層的民眾是「薪情」最不美麗的一群，30歲以後民眾才漸漸地滿意自己的薪資。相對的，不同經濟世代間的薪資公平認知呈現出兩極的發展。這樣一個世代正義的樣態有可能民眾對經濟全球化下，產業結構轉變造成薪資結構變化的反應。

Previous empirical studies in politics used to regard people as being part of the same political cohort if they grew up in the same political context. This study argues that the concept of a political cohort is inappropriate in explaining differences in the perception of just earnings among cohorts. Given this, the concept of an economic cohort is used in this study and economic cohorts refer to those who grew up in the same economic context. Methodologically, this study utilizes the cross-classified random-effects model to scrutinize perceptions of redistributive justice among economic cohorts because this model is able to correct biased estimators caused by the severe multicollinearity between age groups and cohorts. According to the empirical results, different economic cohorts possess varying perspectives on what just earnings are, while people in different age groups also exhibit significant diversity in their perceptions of just earnings. Secondly, at the individual level, some explanatory variables such as male, marital status, a higher level of education, subjective higher social class, and ethnicity (mainlander) are more likely to regard earnings as over-rewarded. Finally, the perceptions of just earnings reflect the life cycle effect among different age groups. People aged 20 to 29 are those who are most dissatisfied with their earnings, whereas people over the age of 30 gradually become more satisfied with their rewards. In general, senior economic cohorts are more likely to regard their earnings or income as over-rewarded injustice, while junior economic cohorts exhibit a different perspective and regard their income as under-rewarded injustice. The diversity of perceptions of just earnings between senior and junior economic cohorts may be due to changes in income structure caused by economic globalization or industrial change.

1. 王靖興, Ching-hsing,孫天龍, Tien-long(2005)。臺灣民眾民主政治評價影響因素之分析。臺灣民主季刊，2(3)，55-79。
   連結：
2. 吳乃德, Nai-the(2005)。麵包與愛情：初探台灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊，9(2)，5-39。
   連結：
3. 吳親恩, Chinen(2017)。影響台灣民眾公平正義與發展機會評估的因素。臺灣民主季刊，14(3)，1-44。
   連結：
4. 林宗弘, Thung-hong(2015)。再探臺灣的世代政治：交叉分類隨機效應模型的應用，1995-2010。人文及社會科學集刊，27(2)，395-436。
   連結：
5. 崔曉倩, Hsiao-chien,吳重禮, Chung-li(2011)。年齡與選舉參與：2008年總統選舉的實證分析。調查研究─方法與應用，26，7-44。
   連結：
6. 張佑宗, Yu-tzung(2011)。選舉結果、政治學習與民主支持－兩次政黨輪替後台灣公民在民主態度與價值的變遷。臺灣民主季刊，8(2)，99-137。
   連結：
7. 盛杏湲, Shing-yuan(2010)。台灣選民政黨認同的穩定與變遷：定群追蹤資料的應用。選舉研究，17(2)，1-33。
   連結：
8. 許耿銘, Keng-ming,紀駿傑, Chun-chieh,蕭新煌, Michael Hsin-huang(2016)。氣候變遷、世代正義與永續性：概念、指標與政策。臺灣經濟預測與政策，46(2)，259-285。
   連結：
9. 陳光輝, Kuang-hui(2010)。民主經驗與民主價值－兩個世代台灣大學生之比較。臺灣民主季刊，7(4)，1-45。
   連結：
10. 陳陸輝, Luhuei(2003)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望。臺灣政治學刊，7(2)，149-188。
    連結：
11. 陳陸輝, Lu-huei(2000)。台灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究，7(2)，109-141。
    連結：
12. 游清鑫, Ching-hsin,蕭怡靖, Yi-ching(2007)。以新選民的政治態度論台灣民主政治的未來。臺灣民主季刊，4(3)，109-151。
    連結：
13. 黃忠正, Chung-cheng.(2012)。論世代正義。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，50(3)，185-209。
    連結：
14. 黃信豪, Hsin-hao(2011)。民主態度的類型：台灣民眾二次政黨輪替後的分析。選舉研究，18(1)，1-34。
    連結：
15. 黃寄倫, Gillan Chi-lun,冷則剛, Tse-kang,林煥笙, Huan-sheng(2016)。世代正義的政策意涵分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，46(2)，185-207。
    連結：
16. 蕭代基, Dai-gee,顧林, Lin(2016)。跨世代議題的經濟與政策意涵。臺灣經濟預測與政策，46(2)，243-257。
    連結：
17. 戴華, Hua(2016)。我們和未來世代之間的道德關係：跨世代正義如何可能？。臺灣經濟預測與政策，46(2)，159-184。
    連結：
18. 瞿宛文, Wan-wen(2011)。民主化與經濟發展－台灣發展型國家的不成功轉型。台灣社會研究季刊，84，243-288。
    連結：
19. Barry, B.(ed.),Sikora, R. I.(ed.)(1978).Obligations to Future Generations.Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press.
20. Bartels, Larry M.,Jackman, Simon(2014).A generational model of political learning.Electoral Studies,33,7-18.
21. Bengtson, Vern L.(1993).Is the ‘contract across generations’ changing? Effects of population aging on obligations and expectations across age groups.The changing contract across generations,New York, NY:
22. Bhatti, Yosef,Hansen, Kasper M.(2012).The effect of generation and age on turnout to the European Parliament–How turnout will continue to decline in the future.Electoral Studies,31(2),262-272.
23. Binstock, R. H.(ed.),George, L. K.(ed.)(2006).Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences.Burlington, MA:Academic Press.
24. Blais, André,Gidengil, Elisabeth,Nevitte, Neil(2004).Where does turnout decline come from?.European Journal of Political Research,43(2),221-236.
25. Blais, André,Loewen, Peter(2009).Youth electoral engagement in Canada.Ottawa, CA:Elections Canada.
26. Bolanowski, SJ,Gescheider, GA(1991).Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of SS Stevens,Hillsdale, NJ:
27. Braungart, Richard G.,Braungart, Margaret M.(1986).Life-course and generational politics.Annual Review of Sociology,12,205-231.
28. Dalton, R. J.(ed.),Klingemann, H.D.(ed.)(2007).The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
29. Dalton, Russell J.(2013).Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publishing.
30. Esping-Andersen, G.(ed.)(1996).Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publishing.
31. Eyerman, Ron,Turner, Bryan S.(1998).Outline of a theory of generations.European Journal of Social Theory,1(1),91-106.
32. Fröhlich, Norman,Oppenheimer, Joe A.(1990).Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production.American Political Science Review,84(2),461-477.
33. Gergen, K. J.(ed.),Greenberg, M. S.(ed.),Willis, R. H.(ed.)(1980).Social Exchange.New York, NY:Plenum Press.
34. Gibson-Davis, Christina M.,Percheski, Christine(2018).Children and the Elderly: Wealth Inequality Among America's Dependents.Demography,55(3),1009-1032.
35. Güth, Werner,Schmittberger, Rolf,Schwarze, Bernd(1982).An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.Journal of economic behavior & organization,3(4),367-388.
36. Higgs, Paul,Gilleard, Chris(2010).Generational Conflict, Consumption and the Ageing Welfare State in the United Kingdom.Ageing and Society,30(8),1439-1451.
37. Jasso, Guillermina(1999).How Much Injustice is There in the World? Two New Justice Indexes.American sociological review,64(1),133-168.
38. Jasso, Guillermina(2000).Trends in the Experience of Injustice: Justice Indexes About Earnings in Six Societies, 1991-1996.Social Justice Research,13(2),101-121.
39. Jasso, Guillermina(1978).On the Justice of Earnings: A New Specification of the Justice Evaluation Function.American Journal of Sociology,83,1398-1419.
40. Jasso, Guillermina,Wegener, Bernd(1997).Methods for Empirical Justice Analysis: Part 1. Framework, Models, and Quantities.Social Justice Research,10(4),393-430.
41. Johnson, P.(ed.),Conrad, C.(ed.),Thomson, D.(ed.)(1989).Workers versus pensioners: Intergenerational justice in an ageing world.Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press.
42. Kohli, Martin(1987).Retirement and the Moral Economy: An Historical Interpretation of the German Case.Journal of Aging Studies,1(2),20.
43. Lerner, M. J.(ed.),Lerner, S. C.(ed.)(1981).The justice motive in social behavior.New York, NY:Academic Press.
44. Lerner, Melvin J.(1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion.New York, NY:Springer.
45. Mannheim, Karl(1970).The Problem of Generations.Psychoanalytic review,57(3),378.
46. Marks, Lawrence(1978).Sensory processes: The new psychophysics.Amsterdam, NL:Elsevier.
47. Möller, Judith Elisabeth(2013).Growing into Citizenship: The Differential Role of the Media in the Political Socialization of Adolescents.Amsterdam, NL:University of Amsterdam.
48. Montada, L.(ed.),Bierhoff, H. W.(ed.)(1991).Altruism in Social Systems.Toronto, CA:Hogrefe & Huber.
49. Neundorf, Anja,Niemi, Richard G.(2014).Beyond Political Socialization: New Approaches to Age, Period, Cohort Analysis.Electoral Studies,33(1),1-6.
50. Niemi, Richard G.,Klingler, Jonathan D.(2012).The Development of Political Attitudes and Behaviour Among Young Adults.Australian Journal of Political Science,47(1),31-54.
51. Niemi, Richard G.,Stanley, Harold W.,Evans, C. Lawrence(1984).Age and Turnout Among the Newly Enfranchised: Life Cycle versus Experience Effects.European Journal of Political Research,12(4),371-386.
52. Ochs, Jack,Roth, Alvin E.(1989).An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining.The American Economic Review,79(3),338-354.
53. Plutzer, Eric(2002).Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.American Political Science Review,96(1),41-56.
54. Preston, Samuel H.(1984).Children and the Elderly: Divergent Paths for America's Dependents.Demography,21(4),435-457.
55. Raudenbush, Stephen W.,Bryk, Anthony S.(2002).Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publishing.
56. Rawls, John(1971).A Theory of Justice.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
57. Riley, M. W.(ed.),Huber, B. J.(ed.),Hess, B. B.(ed.)(1988).Social structures and human lives.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publishing.
58. Rubenson, Daniel,Blais, André,Fournier, Patrick,Gidengil, Elisabeth,Nevitte, Neil(2004).Accounting for the Age Gap in Turnout.Acta Politica,39(4),407-421.
59. Sapiro, Virginia(2004).Not Your Parents’ Political Socialization: Introduction for a New Generation.Annual Review of Political Science,39,407-421.
60. Schmähl, Winfried(1989).Labour Force Participation and Social Pension Systems.Workers Versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Justice in an Ageing World. Man-chester and New York,Manchester, UK:
61. Smith, Heather J.,Tyler, Tom R.(1996).Justice and Power: When will justice Concerns Encourage the Advantaged to Support Policies Which Redistribute Economic Resources and the Disadvantaged to Willingly Obey the Law?.European Journal of Social Psychology,26(2),171-200.
62. Stevens, Stanley Smith(1986).Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects.New York, NY:Routledge.
63. Thibaut, John W.,Walker, Laurens(1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis.Hillsdale, NJ:L. Erlbaum Associates.
64. Thomas, David(1989).The Welfare State and Generation Conflict: Winners and Losers.Workers Versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Justice in An ageing World,Manchester, UK:
65. Verwiebe, Roland,Wegener, Bernd(2000).Social Inequality and the Perceived Income Justice Gap.Social Justice Research,13(2),123-149.
66. Walster, Elaine Hatfield,Walster, G William,Berscheid, Ellen(1978).Equity: Theory and Research.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
67. Welch, S.(ed.),Miewald, R.(ed.)(1983).Scarce Natural Resources: The Challenge to Public Policy Makers.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publishing.
68. Yang, Yang,Land, Kenneth C.(2006).A Mixed Models Approach to the Age Period Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross Section Surveys, with an Application to Data on Trends in Verbal Test Scores.Sociological methodology,36(1),75-97.
69. Yang, Yang,Land, Kenneth C.(2013).Age-period-cohort Analysis: New Models, Methods, and Empirical Applications.Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press.
70. Yang, Yang,Land, Kenneth C.(2008).Age-period-cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-section Surveys: Fixed or Random Effects?.Sociological methods & research,36(3),297-326.
71. Zannella, Marina(ed.)(2017).The Economic Lifecycle, Gender and Intergenerational Support.New York, NY:Springer.
72. 傅仰止，2016，台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2009第五期第五次：社會不平等組（C00157_1）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00157_1-1。Fu, Yang-chih. 2016. Taiwan shehui bianqian jiben diaocha jihua 2009 di wuqi di wuci: shehui bu pingdeng zu. [2009 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 5, Year 5): Social Inequality (C00157_1)][data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica. doi:10.6141/TWSRDA-C00157_1-1
73. 熊瑞梅, Ray-may,張峰彬, Feng-bin,林亞鋒, Ya-feng(2010)。解嚴後民眾社團參與的變遷：時期與世代的效應與意涵。臺灣社會學刊，44，55-105。
74. 蕭阿勤, A-chin(2010).回歸現實：臺灣一九七○年代的戰後世代與文化政治變遷.台北=Taipei:中央研究院社會學研究所=Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.
75. 瞿宛文, Wan-wen(2007)。台灣戰後經濟發展與民主運動。台灣社會研究季刊，65，183-189。

1. 蔡宗漢,蔡奇霖(2021)。所得變數於政治學民意調查研究中之測量與應用。調查研究-方法與應用，46，55-119。