公部門內部創新執行的制度助力與成效：以臺北市政府民事訴訟案件減止訟為例

Contribution of Institutional Enablers to Internal Innovation Implementation in Public Sector: The Case of Civil Dispute Cases Prevention and Termination in Taipei City Government

10.6683/TPSR.202112_25(2).0003

李俊達(Chun-Ta Lee)

公部門創新 ； 組織創新 ； 創新執行 ； 民事訴訟案件 ； 臺北市政府 ； Public Sector Innovation ； Organizational Innovation ； Innovation Implementation ； Civil Dispute Cases ； Taipei City Government

台灣政治學刊

25卷2期（2021 / 12 / 01）

115 - 167

繁體中文

減止訟為臺北市率全國之先的首創政策，藉由集中管理臺北市政府訴訟案件，由減止訟組專案管制，力求快速定紛止爭。依據臺北市政府法務局的統計，自減止訟創新執行以來，民事訴訟案件新增案減少，積案亦逐年減少。從組織內部創新執行的角度來看，有效的創新執行需要制度助力的支持。同時，制度助力會塑造組織成員對於創新制度的信念與反應，從而影響內部創新的結果。針對公部門的特性以及減止訟的制度源起，本研究以管理支持與資源憑藉，做為減止訟的重要制度助力。本研究向臺北市政府類一條鞭法制人員進行問卷調查，進行統計分析。迴歸分析的結果顯示，法制人員普遍肯定首長立場對於減止訟創新執行的重要性。尤其，市長的鼓勵或表揚會影響機關首長在減止訟的立場。同時，減止訟的作業程序是法制人員的重要資源憑藉，對於創新執行同樣具有顯著的影響效果。本研究並研提實務建議，希冀未來可進一步疏減訟源，建立市府同仁安心執法的環境。

In recent years, the Taipei City Government has been pushing, ahead of other municipalities in Taiwan, for a reduction and rapid settlement of its litigation cases, through the concentrated management of such cases by a dedicated unit. The innovation implementation has borne fruit, having reduced not only the amount of new litigation but also the number of old cases, according to statistics compiled by the city government's Department of Legal Affairs. From the point of view of an organization, the implementation of effective innovation needs the support of institutional enablers, which can forge the conviction of an organization's members in, as well as their reaction to, an innovative system, thereby affecting the outcome of internal innovation. Given the features of the public sector, this study treats management support and resource availability as the institutional enablers for litigation reduction. The study used a questionnaire survey that targeted the city government's legal officials, the results of which were subjected to statistical analysis. Subsequent regression analysis showed that the legal officials confirmed the importance of the standpoints of government-agency chiefs in terms of implementing the innovation for litigation reduction. Moreover, encouragement from or acknowledgement by the mayor also affected the standpoints of the government-agency chiefs in relation to litigation reduction. Meanwhile, the operating procedure for litigation reduction is an important resource available to legal officials and has a significant influence on innovation implementation. In practice, this study suggests that city governments should put in place an environment conducive to law enforcement, thereby facilitating efforts to reduce the amount of litigation.

1. 李仲彬, Chung-pin(2013)。影響地方政府創新產出量的因素。東吳政治學報，31(1)，105-160。
   連結：
2. 涂敏芬, Min-fen(2012)。對抗制度的創新：策略行動者的能動性實踐。臺大管理論叢，22(2)，87-118。
   連結：
3. Borins, Sandford(2001).Encouraging Innovation in the Public Sector.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2(3),310-319.
4. Chatterjee, Debabroto,Grewal, Rajdeep,Sambamurthy, Vallabh(2002).Shaping up for E-commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimilation of Web Technologies.MIS Quarterly,26(2),65-89.
5. Chen, Gilad,Bliese, Paul D.(2002).The Role of Different Levels of Leadership in Predicting Self- and Collective Efficacy: Evidence for Discontinuity.Journal of Applied Psychology,87(3),549-556.
6. Choi, Jin Nam(2004).Individual and Contextual Dynamics of Innovation-Use Behavior in Organizations.Human Performance,17(4),397-414.
7. Choi, Jin Nam,Chang, Jae Y.(2009).Innovation Implementation in the Public Sector: An Integration of Institutional and Collective Dynamics.Journal of Applied Psychology,94(1),245-253.
8. Choi, Jin Nam,Price, Richard H.(2005).The Effects of Person innovation Fit on Individual Responses to Innovation.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,78(1),83-96.
9. Choi, Jin Nam,Price, Richard H.,Vinokur, Amiram D.(2003).Self-efficacy Changes in Groups: Effects of Diversity, Leadership, and Group Climate.Journal of Organizational Behavior,24(4),357-372.
10. Choi, Jin Nam,Sung, Sun Y.,Lee, Kyungmook,Cho, Dong-sung(2011).Balancing Cognition and Emotion: Innovation Implementation as a Function of Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Reactions toward Innovation.Journal of Organizational Behavior,32(1),107-124.
11. Clayton, Peter R.(1997).Implementation of Organizational Innovation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
12. Daglio, Marco,Gerson, Daniel,Kitchen, Hannah(2014).Building Organisational Capacity for Public Sector Innovation.2014 OECD Conference,Paris, FR:
13. De Vries, Hanna,Bekkers, Victor,Tummers, Lars(2016).Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.Public Administration,94(1),146-166.
14. DeVellis, Robert F.(1991).Scale Development: Theory and Applications.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
15. Greenhalgh, Trisha,Robert, Glenn,Bate, Paul,Macfarlane, Fraser,Kyriakidou, Olivia(2005).Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review.Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
16. Halvorsen, Thomas,Hauknes, Johan,Miles, Ian,Røste, Rannveig(2005).,未出版
17. Hartwick, John,Barki, Henri(1994).Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use.Management Science,40(4),440-465.
18. Hawkins, Del I.,Best, Roger J.,Coney, Kenneth A.(1997).Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy.Boston, MA:Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
19. Holahan, Patricia J.,Aronson, Zvi H.,Jurkat, M. Peter,Schoorman, F. David(2004).Implementing Computer Technology: A Multi-organizational Test of Klein and Sorra’s Model.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,21(1-2),31-50.
20. Kattel, Rainer,Cepilovs, Aleksandrs,Drechsler, Wolfgang,Kalvet, Tarmo,Lember, Veiko,Tõnurist, Piret(2014).LIPSE Working PapersLIPSE Working Papers,Rotterdam, NL:Erasmus University Rotterdam.
21. Klein, Katherine J.,Conn, Amy B.,Sorra, Joann S.(2001).Implementing Computerized Technology: An Organizational Analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,86(5),811-824.
22. Kozlowski, Steve W. J.,Hults, Brian M.(1987).An Exploration of Climates for Technical Updating and Performance.Personnel Psychology,40(3),539-563.
23. Kumar, Vinod,Maheshwari, Bharat,Kumar, Uma(2002).ERP Systems Implementation: Best Practices in Canadian Government Organizations.Government Information Quarterly,19(2),147-172.
24. Maguire, Steve,Hardy, Cynthia,Lawrence, Thomas B.(2004).Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada.Academy of Management Journal,47(5),657-679.
25. Majaro, Simon(1988).The Creative Gap: Managing Ideas for Profit.London, UK:Longman.
26. Meyer, John W.,Rowan, Brian(1977).Institutional Organizations: Structure as Myth and Ceremony.American Journal of Sociology,83(2),340-363.
27. Moore, Mark,Hartley, Jean(2008).Innovations in Governance.Public Management Review,10(1),3-20.
28. Moorhead, Gregory,Griffin, Ricky W.(1998).Organizational Behavior.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Co..
29. Mulgan, Geoff,Albury, David(2003).Innovation in the Public Sector.London, UK:Cabinet Office Strategy Unit.
30. Nunnally, Jum C.(1978).Psychometric Theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
31. Orlikowski, Wanda J.,Yates, JoAnne,Okamura, Kazuo,Fujimoto, Masay(1995).Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use.Organization Science,6(4),423-444.
32. Purvis, Russell L.,Sambamurthy, Vallabh,Zmud, Robert W.(2001).The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation.Organization Science,12(2),117-135.
33. Rogers, Everett M.(2003).Diffusion of Innovations.New York, NY:Free Press.
34. Rogers, Everett M.(1962).Diffusion of Innovations.New York, NY:Free Press of Glencoe.
35. Rosenberg, Milton J.(ed.),Hovland, Carl I.(ed.)(1960).Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
36. Russell, Dawn M.,Hoag, Anne M.(2004).People and Information Technology in the Supply Change: Social and Organizational Influences on Adoption.International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,34(2),102-122.
37. Scott, W. Richard(1995).Institutions and Organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
38. Suchman, Mark C.(1995).Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.Academy of Management Review,20(3),571-610.
39. Thomas, David A.(1993).Racial Dynamics of Cross-Race Developmental Relationships.Administrative Science Quarterly,38(2),169-194.
40. Thompson, James D.(1967).Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
41. Van der Aa, Wietze,Elfring, Tom(2002).Realizing Innovation in Services.Scandinavian Journal of Management,18(2),155-171.
42. Walumbwa, Fred O.,Wang, Peng,Lawler, John J.,Shi, Kan(2004).The Role of Collective Efficacy in the Relations between Transformational Leadership and Work Outcomes.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,77(4),515-530.
43. Xie, Yu(1989).Structural Equation Models for Ordinal Variables: An Analysis of Occupational Destination.Sociological Methods and Research,17(4),325-352.
44. Zaltman, Gerald,Duncan, Robert,Holbek, Jonny(1973).Innovations and Organizations.New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
45. Zucker, Lynne G.(ed.)(1988).Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment.Cambridge, MA:Ballinger.
46. 臺北市政府法務局，2021，〈減止訟〉，https://www.legalaffairs.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=615C590310F9885B&sms=5DE250CCBB812828&s=8BB953B92E4E912A，查閱時間：2021/10/02。Department of Leagal Affairs, Taipei City Government. 2021. “Jjian zhi song” [Litigation Reduction]. (Accessed on October 02, 2021).
47. 臺北市政府法務局，2020，〈減止訟：讓人民、公務員、市政府三贏的政策〉，https://www.legalaffairs.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=615C590310F9885B&sms=5DE250CCBB812828&s=8BB953B92E4E912A，查閱時間：2020/12/21。Department of Legal Affairs, Taipei City Government. 2020. “Jian zhi song: Rang ren min, gong wu yuan, shi zheng fu san ying de zheng ce” [Civil Dispute Cases Prevention and Termination: Win-win-win Policy for Citizens Public Employees and City Government]. (Accessed on December 21, 2020).