Investigating Taiwan's Integrated Scenarios of Climate Change through Visualization Rhetoric in Science Communication

10.6185/TJIA.V.201807_22(1).0001

Chang-Chieh Lee；Kuo-Hua Chen

Taiwan ； climate change ； scenarios ； science communication ； visualization rhetoric

Tamkang Journal of International Affairs

22卷1期（2018 / 07 / 01）

1 - 38

英文

Visualization rhetoric is used as an analytical framework to examinethe visualized texts 'telling the story' of climate change issues in Taiwan from 2000 to 2017. The categories, characteristics, and visualization techniques from a variety of climate-related visual images andcontexts will be explored from the perspectives of visual persuasiveness, visual performance, and visual value. Devices for understanding the epistemological value and cultural function of data visualization and new ways to link human activity with changing climate issues of climate change are explored. From this analysis, four integrated scenarios were developed: Preferred (green Taiwan), Disowned (expert system), Integrated (a culture of foresight), and Disintegrated (Giddens' paradox).

1. Chen, Ching- Ju,Tsai, Mavis(2009).Investigation of global warming and the Kyoto Protocol: content analysis to analyze of New York Times 2001-2007.Mass Communication Research,100,153-195.
   連結：
2. Chen, Shih-Jung(2007).Exploring knowledge communication in environmental governance: network analysis on Taiwan's climate change Research.Journal of Public Administration,25,1-30.
   連結：
3. Chou, Kuei-Tien(2013).Governance innovation of developmental state under the globalized risk challenges-burgeoning civil knowledge on risk policy supervision in Taiwan.A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs,44,65-148.
   連結：
4. Hsu, Mei-Ling,Shih, Tsung-Jen(2015).Patterns of public support for policies related to climate change.Chinese Journal of Communication Research,28,239-278.
   連結：
5. Hsu, Mei-Ling,Shih, Tsung-Jen(2015).Patterns of public support for policies related to climate change.Chinese Journal of Communication Research,28,239-278.
   連結：
6. Lin, Tze-Luen(2008).Climate change policy in Taiwan: A discourse approach.Journal of Public Administration,28,153-175.
   連結：
7. Yang, Yie-Jing,Hsu, Mei-Ling(2010).Risk society, risk information and web communication: a case of the global warming issue.Chinese Journal of Communication Research,18,151-191.
   連結：
8. Boundas, Constantin V.(ed.)(1993).The Deleuze Reader.New York:Columbia University Press.
9. Burke, Kenneth(1966).Language as Symbolic Action.Berkeley:University of California Press.
10. Carey, James W.(2008).Communication as Culture, Revised Edition: Essays on Media and Society.London:Routledge.
11. Carvalho, Anabela,Peterson, Tarla Rai(2009).Discursive constructions of climate change: practices of encoding and decoding.Environmental Communication,3(2),131-133.
12. Giddens, Anthony(2009).The Politics of Climate Change.Cambridge:Polity.
13. Hsu, Mei-Ling,Yang, Yie-Jing(2011).Risk communication of global warming: lay perceptions and actions in Taiwan.Communication & Culture,15,71-104.
14. Hullman, Jessica,Diakopoulos, Nicholas(2011).Visualization rhetoric: framing effects in narrative visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics,17(12),2231-2240.
15. Inayatullah, Sohail(2008).Six Pillars: Futures Thinking for Transforming.Foresight,10(1),4-21.
16. Inayatullah, Sohail,Na, Lu(2018).Asia 2038: Ten Disruptions That Change Everything.Taipei:Tamkang University Press.
17. Inyatullah, Sohail(ed.),Milojević, Ivana(ed.)(2015).CLA 2.0: Transformative Research on Theory and Practice.Taipei:Tamkang University.
18. Jenks, Chris(1995).Visual Culture.London:Psychology Press.
19. Kirk, Andy(2012).Data Visualization: A Successful Design Process.Birmingham:Packt Publishing Ltd.
20. Lederwasch, Aleta(2012).Scenario Art: A New Futures Method That Uses Art to Support Decision-Making for Sustainable Development.Journal of Futures Studies,17(1),25-40.
21. Li, Shu-Chu Sarrina(2010).Ministry of Science and Technology multiyear research projectMinistry of Science and Technology multiyear research project,未出版
22. Lovelock, James(2007).The Revenge of Gaia: Earth's Climate in Crisis and TheFate of Humanity.New York:Basic Books.
23. Lynch, Michael E.,Woolgar, Steve(1990).Representation in Scientific Practice.MIT press.
24. Matthews, Patricia M.(1996).Kant's sublime: A form of pure aesthetic reflective judgment.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,54(2),165-180.
25. McCormick, Bruce H.(1998).Visualization in scientific computing.ACM SIGBIO Newsletter,10(1),15-21.
26. Nisbet, Matthew C.,Scheufele, Dietram A.(2009).What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.American Journal of Botany,96(10),1767-1778.
27. Pauwels, Luc(2010).Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research.Sociological Methods & Research,38(4),545-581.
28. Pink, Sarah(2006).The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses.New York:Routledge.
29. Shneiderman, Ben(2014).The big picture for big data: Visualization.Science,343(6172),730-730.
30. Smith, Kenneth L.(ed.),Moriarty, Sandra(ed.),Kenney, Keith(ed.),Barbatsis, Gretchen(ed.)(2005).Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media.Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Telea, Alexandru(2014).Data Visualization: Principles and Practice.New York:CRC Press.