職前教師數學教學概念之初探：從研究實作中學習教學

Conceptualizing Mathematics Teaching by Doing Research in the Instructional Setting: A Case Study of a Pre-service Mathematics Teacher

10.6173/CJSE.2001.0901.01

姚如芬(Ru-Fen Yau)；郭重吉(Chorng-Jee Guo)；柳賢(Shian Lieo)

教師即研究者 ； 數學教學研究實作 ； 數學教學概念化 ； 職前數學師資培育 ； teacher as researcher ； doing research in mathematics instructional setting ； conceptualizing mathematics teaching ； pre-service mathematics teacher education

科學教育學刊

9卷1期（2001 / 03 / 01）

1 - 13

繁體中文

本研究從「教師即研究者」的理念出發，將研究的概念引介入職前師資培育的課程中，主要目的在瞭解數學科職前教師透過教學研究實作，其數學教學概念的改變歷程。研究者利用一門大學數學系四年級兩學分的選修課－「數學教學研究」，為數學科職前教師營造一個符合建構主義理念的學習情境，讓職前教師透過數學教學研究的實作歷程，引發其數學的教與學作更深層的思考，進而提昇其解決數學教學問題的能力。本研究以符號互動論與現象學做為分析與詮釋資料的理論視野，並用來解析個案教師的數學教學概念之轉變。經由分析課室觀察、課後晤談所蒐集而得的資料以及相關文件後，研究發現：個案教師的數學教學概念在教學研究實作的歷程中發生了改變；然而，此改變並非全面性的，而是與其教學研究實作的情境有關。易言之，個案教師在其自定的教學研究實作的情境內，從發現特定的數學教學問題到解決問題的過程中，產生一連串與其研究情境有關的數學教學概念上的改變，從「學習乃概念之改變」的論點而言，此即顯示透過教學研究實作確能有益於協助職前教師學習教數學。

A salient feature of this study was to include in the pre-service teacher education program the requirement to do research in the instructional setting. The theoretical perspective of this research was ”teacher as researcher”. The purpose of this case study was to investigate the processes through which a pre-service mathematics teacher learned how to teach by conducting research studies on mathematics teaching and learning. The study was carried out in the context of a two credit hour course called ”Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning”, which was designed for senior mathematics majors. The main purpose of this course was to provide the pre-service teachers a constructivist learning environment allowing them to carry out research studies on the teaching and learning of mathematics. It was expected that this would lead the pre-service teachers to thinking about instruction in mathematics in greater depth, and therefore enhance their abilities in solving problems related to the teaching of mathematics. Theoretical perspectives from symbolic interactionism and phenomenology were adopted by the researcher in an attempt to understand the conception about mathematics teaching and learning of the pre-service teacher. Qualitative research techniques were used to collect and analyze the data. Triangulation of multiple data sources was used to validate the results. The results of this study showed that the conception about mathematics teaching and learning of pre-service teacher changed gradually in the process when he was conducting the research. The resulting change was nevertheless far from being an overall change. The nature and extent of change depended on the research context that the preservice teacher had experienced. In summary, learning to teach can be viewed from the perspective of conceptual change and it can be concluded that, by providing a pre-service teacher opportunities to do research in instructional settings, teacher was found to have learned to teach mathematics.

1. Allan, K. K.,Miller, M. S.(1990).Teacherresearcher collaborative: Collaborative professional development.Theory into Practice,29(3),196-202.
2. Bennett, C. K.(1993).Teacher-researchers: All dressed up and no place to go.Educational Leadership,51(2),69-70.
3. Bishop(1982).Implications of research for math teacher education.Journal of education for teaching,8(2)
4. Blumer, H.(1969).Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
5. Boyer, E.(1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate.Princeton, NJ:Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Brownlie, F.(1990).The door is open. Won’t you come in?.Opening the door to educational research,Newark, DE:
7. Chall, J. S.(1986).The teacher as scholar.Reading Teacher,39(8),792-797.
8. Dicker, M.(1990).Using action research to navigate an unfamiliar teaching assignment.Theory into Practice,29(3),203-208.
9. Douglas, J. D.(Ed.)(1980).Introduction to the sociologies of everyday life.Boston:Allyn and Bacon, Inc..
10. Guba, E. G.,Lincoln, Y. S.(1989).Fourth generation evaluation.Newbury Park:SAGE.
11. Haberman, M.(1992).The role of classroom teacher as a curriculum leader.NASSP Bulletin,76(547),11-19.
12. Hanna, B.(1986).Improving student-teaching effectiveness through action research projects.Action in Teacher Education,8(3),51-56.
13. Meltzer, B. N.,Petras, J. W.,Reynolds, L. T.(1975).Symbolic Interactionism.Boston:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Neilsen, L.(1990).Research comes home.The Reading Teacher,44(3),248-250.
15. Osborne, R. J.,Wittrock, M. C.(1985).The generative learning model and its implications for science education.Studies in Science Education,12,59-87.
16. Santa, C. M.(1990).Teaching as research.Opening the door to The classroom research,Neward, DE:
17. Sardo-Brown, D.(1992).Elementary teachers’ perceptions of action research.Action in Teacher Education,14(2),55-59.
18. Sikula, J.(Ed.),Buttery, T. J.(Ed.),Guyton, E.(Ed.)(1996).Handbook of research on teacher education.
19. SooHoo, S.(1993).Students as partners in research and restructuring schools.The Educational Forum,57(3),386-393.
20. Stansell, J.,Patterson, L.(1988).Teacher researchers find the answers in their classroom.Texas Reading Report,10(6),2-4.
21. Stevens, K. B.,Slanton, D. B.,Bunny, S.(1992).A collaborative research effort between public school and university faculty members.Teacher Education and Special Education,15(1),1-8.
22. Sucher, F.(1990).Involving school administrators in classroom research.Opening the door to classroom research,Newark, DE:
23. 林美玲(1993)。象徵互動論及其在教育上的應用。現代教育，8(2)，20-45。
24. 郭重吉(1992)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊，20(5)，548-570。
25. 陳秉璋(1985).社會學理論.台北:三民書局.
26. 黃瑞琴(1994).質的教育研究方法.台北:心理出版社.

1. 曾國鴻、陳沅(2005)。國小師生對奈米科技之熟悉度、學習需求及其融入課程研究。科學教育學刊，13(1)，101-120。
2. 陳蕙茹、柳賢(2006)。從建模觀點探討數學初任教師教學改變及其影響因子。教育學刊，26，163-189。
3. 陳埩淑(2014)。以實務性數學教學提升職前幼教師專業成長。臺灣數學教育期刊，1(2)，53-81。
4. 謝甫佩、洪振方(2005)。協助實習教師指導學生進行科學探究活動之研究。花蓮教育大學學報：教育類，20，159-182。
5. 徐偉民、王玉品(2009)。一位國小教師面對數學教學改革的抗拒和改變。科學教育學刊，17(3)，233-253。