網路數學討論區使用者之批判思考表現、參與歷程觀感、動機與程度之相關研究

Correlates of Users' Critical Thinking, Participating Perceptions, Motivations, and Involvement Level in a BBS' Math Discussion Board

10.6173/CJSE.2006.1401.04

謝佩宜(Pei-Yi Hsieh)；周倩(Chien Chou)

批判思考技巧 ； 批判思考意向 ； 參與動機 ； 參與程度 ； 參與歷程觀感 ； Critical Thinking Skills ； Critical Thinking Disposition ； Participating Motivation ； Participating Involvement Level ； Participating Perceptions

科學教育學刊

14卷1期（2006 / 02 / 01）

83 - 100

繁體中文

本研究目的主要在探討電子佈告欄(Bulletin Board System, BBS)適用於討論學習的正向可能性。本研究自交通大學應用數學系電子佈告欄，立意選取自發參與數學討論區的研究對象，利用網路自陳問卷與內容分析進行資料收集。研究結果發現，不同個人背景之使用者在批判思考意向、參與歷程觀感、動機與程度之部分層面上具有顯著差異。且使用者之參與歷程觀感與動機可正面影響其參與時的批判思考意向。在批判思考技巧的運用上，多屬於推論與澄清之層面，在奠基與判斷上則較少運用。總而言之，透過數學討論區的學習，個體若能透過討論協商來培養批判思考的態度，且於數學討論中運用批判思考的技巧，將有助於培養其高層次數學思考技巧。因此建議教師可在數學教學中運用電子佈告欄數學討論區時，應首重培養學生高度的參與動機與參與程度。

The main purpose of the study is to survey active-participating users' demographic profiles, participating perceptions, motivations, involvement level, and critical thinking to investigate whether the Bulletin Board System (BBS) helps facilitate users' communication and meaningful learning. The research methods were survey and content analysis. Based on self-selective samples, the researchers collected the quantitative data from 191 respondents. According to the ”Critical Thinking Analyzing Category” developed by the researcher, 3264 postings in two months on the math discussion board were analyzed. The major findings are: Users demographic profiles showed differences in critical thinking, participating perceptions, motivations, and involvement level. Users' participating perceptions and motivations positively affected users' critical thinking disposition. The most used critical thinking skills were ”inference” and ”clarification”, and the least used were ”basis support” and ”judgment.” Findings of this study suggest that math teachers should foster students' participating motivations and involvement level when they want to discuss math topics on the BBS board.

1. 馬秀蘭(2004)。數學乘除問題情境發展之研究－以BBS為管道。科學教育學刊，12(1)，53-81。
   連結：
2. 葉玉珠、葉碧玲、謝佳蓁(2000)。「中小學生批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，47(1)，27-46。
   連結：
3. Bastiaens, T. J.,Krul, Y.(1998).Teleleren in Bedrijven: Een afweging waard.Gids voor de opleidingspraktijk
4. Chan, T. W.,Hue, C. W.,Tzeng, O. J. L.(2001).Four spaces of network learning models.Computers & Education,37,141-161.
5. Chou, C.(2003).Interactivity and interactive functions in Web-based learning systems: A framework for designers.British Journal of Educational Technology,34(3),265-279.
6. Cuoco, A. A.,Goldenberg, E. P.(1996).A role for technology in mathematics education.Journal of Education,178(2),15-32.
7. Douek, N.(1997).Argumentation and conceptualization in context: A case study on sun-shadows in primary school.Educational Studies in Mathematics,39,89-110.
8. Ennis, R. H.(1990).Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research.Educational Researcher,19(4),13-16.
9. Ennis, R. H.(1985).A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills.Educational Leadership,44(2),44-48.
10. Ennis, R. H.,Millman, J.,Tomko, T. N.(1985).Cornell critical thinking tests level X & level Z manual.CA:Midwest Publications.
11. Ernest, P.(1995).The philosophy of mathematics education (3rd).New York:Falmer.
12. Henri, F.,A. R. Kaye (Ed.)(1992).Collaborative learning through computer conferencing.New York:Springer-Verlag.
13. Huffman, K.,Vernoy, M.,Williams, B.,Vernoy, J.(1991).Psychology in action.New York:Wiley.
14. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1987).Research shows the benefits of adult cooperation.Educational Leadership,45(3),27-30.
15. Katz, Y. J.(2002).Attitudes affecting college students` preferences for distance learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18,2-9.
16. Maor, D.(2000).The teacher professional development program on using a constructivist multimedia learning environment.Learning Environments Research,2,307-330.
17. Mayer, R. E.(1996).Thinking, problem solving, cognition.New York:Freeman.
18. Miller, S. M.,Miller, K. L.,B. Abbey (Ed.)(2000).Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education.London:Idea Group Publishing.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
20. Porter, L. A.(1997).Creating the virtual classroom: Distance learning with the Internet.New York:Wiley.
21. Ramaswamy. S.,Harris, H.,Tschirner, U.(2001).Student peer teaching: An innovative approach to instruction in science and engineering education.Journal of Science Education and Technology,10(2),165-171.
22. Rovai, A. P.(2002).Development of an instrument to measure classroom community.Internet and Higher Education,5,197-211.
23. Russell, B.,J. van Heijenoort (Ed.)(1902).From Frege to Gdel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879-1931.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
24. Seale, J. K.,Cann, A. J.(2000).Reflection on-line or off-line: The role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect.Computers and Education,34,309-320.
25. Smith, D. G.(1977).College classroom interaction.London:Methuen.
26. Steele, D. F.(2001).Using sociocultural theory to teach mathematics: A Vygotskian perspective.School Science and Mathematics,101(8),404-415.
27. Taylor, P. C.,Fraser, B. J.,White, L. R.(1994).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.Anaheim, CA:
28. Teo, T. S. H.,Lim, V. K. G.,Lai, R. Y. C.(1999).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage.The International Journal of Management Science,27,25-37.
29. Tsai, C. C.(2001).The interpretation construction design model for teaching science and its applications to Internet-based instruction in Taiwan.International Journal of Education Development,21,401-415.
30. Watson, G.,Glaser, E. M.(1980).Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: Forms A and B manual.Harcourt:Brace & Jouvanovich.
31. Wu, C.-C.,Lee, G. C.(1999).Use BBS to facilitate a teaching practicum course.Computer & Education,32,239-241.
32. 王小惠、王怡茗(2001)。電子佈告欄使用者之動機與使用經驗之研究：以元智大學生為例。教學科技與媒體，55，17-26。
33. 朱茱(1996)。數學發現中的想像。數學傳播，20(2)，77-82。
34. 周倩、方紫薇、方鳳琪(2003)。高中師生對BBS的認知與態度之研究。網際網路技術學刊，5(1)，9-18。
35. 孫治本(2002)。網路學習中的互動式學習－以BBS社群氛圍提昇學習參與度之研究。ELTA 2002網路學習理論與實務學術研討會，新竹市:
36. 郭珍利(1999)。高雄市，國立中山大學。
37. 陳英娥、林福來(1998)。數學臆測的思維模式。科學教育學刊，6(2)，191-218。
38. 黃玉湘(2001)。嘉義市，國立中正大學。
39. 黃宏宇(2003)。新竹市，國立交通大學。
40. 葉玉珠(1998)。職前教師的參訓投入程度、批判思考意向與改善批判思考教學之關係。國立政治大學學報，77，44-71。
41. 葉玉珠(2000)。智能與批判思考。國立中山大學社會科學季刊，2(1)，1-28。
42. 葉玉珠(1998)。有效批判思考教學的基礎之探討。教育研究雙月刊，1(59)，57-67。
43. 蔡珮(1995)。新竹市，國立交通大學。
44. 鄭英耀、王文中、吳靜吉、黃正鵠(1996)。批判思考問卷之編制初步報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，43，213-226。
45. 謝耀宗(2002)。嘉義市，國立中正大學。

1. 廖翊伶(2017)。求職求才媒合系統可使用性設計之研究。中原大學資訊管理學系學位論文。2017。1-101。